segal type models of higher categories
play

Segal-type models of higher categories Simona Paoli Department of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Segal-type models of higher categories Simona Paoli Department of Mathematics University of Leicester Higher Structures Lisbon 2017 Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 1 / 34 Two motivating examples Two prototype examples in


  1. Segal-type models of higher categories Simona Paoli Department of Mathematics University of Leicester Higher Structures Lisbon 2017 Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 1 / 34

  2. Two motivating examples Two prototype examples in dimension 2: a) The 2-dimensional structure with Objects = categories 1-morphisms = functors 2-morphisms = natural transformations. b) The 2-dimensional structure with Objects = points of a space X 1-morphisms = paths in X 2-morphisms = 2-tracks (equivalence classes of homotopies between paths). Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 2 / 34

  3. � � � � � � � � � � � Two motivating examples, cont. Objects are also called 0-cells and k -morphisms are called k -cells. In both examples, we can use the pictorial representation Objects • � • 1-morphisms • • � • 2-morphisms ⇓ Vertical and horizontal compositions ⇓ � • • • • ⇓ ⇓ • � • � • • • ⇓ ⇓ ⇓ Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 3 / 34

  4. � Two motivating examples, cont. Main difference between examples a) and b): a) All compositions are associative and unital. This is a strict 2-category. b) Composition of paths is associative and unital only up to homotopy; given paths g f h � • � • � • • a c b d there is a homotopy ( h ◦ g ) ◦ f a • � • d ≀≀ h ◦ ( g ◦ f ) The structure we obtain is a weak 2-category. Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 4 / 34

  5. Strict n -categories Idea of strict n -category: in a strict n -category there are cells in dimension 0 , . . . , n , identity cells and compositions which are associative and unital. Each k -cell has source and target which are ( k − 1 ) -cells, 1 ≤ k ≤ n . Strict n -categories are defined by iterated enrichment: 1- Cat = Cat , n - Cat = (( n − 1 ) - Cat ) - Cat When all cells have inverses, we obtain a strict n -groupoid Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 5 / 34

  6. Strict n -groupoids and n -types An n -type is a topological space whose homotopy groups vanish in dimension higher than n . n -types are the building blocks of spaces via the Postnikov decomposition. Fact: Strict n -groupoids do not model n -types when n > 2. This was one of the motivations for the development of weak n -categories: in the weak n -groupoid case it gives an algebraic model of n -types (homotopy hypothesis). Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 6 / 34

  7. Weak n -categories Idea of weak n -category: in a weak n -category there are cells in dimension 0 , . . . , n , identity cells and compositions which are associative and unital up to an invertible cell in the next dimension, in a coherent way. In dimensions n = 2 , 3 it is possible to give an explicit definition of the axioms with the notions of bicategory and tricategory. For general n there are several different models of weak n -categories and weak n -groupoids. Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 7 / 34

  8. � � Internal categories and internal groupoids Definition An internal category in a category C with pullbacks consists of a diagram in C d 0 c d 1 � C 1 � C 0 C 1 × C 0 C 1 s where these maps satisfies the axiom of a category. An internal groupoid in C is an internal category with all morphisms invertible. Denote by Cat C the category of internal categories and internal functors. Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 8 / 34

  9. n -Fold categories. Definition n -fold categories are defined inductively as Cat 1 = Cat Cat n = Cat ( Cat n − 1 ) Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 9 / 34

  10. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Example: double categories Let X ∈ Cat ( Cat ) X 0 ∈ Cat has • objects • morphisms • X 1 ∈ Cat has • • • � • objects morphisms ⇓ • � • Thus squares can be composed horizontally and vertically • • � • • • • • ⇓ ⇓ ⇓ ⇓ • • � • � • � • • � • • • ⇓ � ⇓ • � • • � • All compositions are associative and unital. Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 10 / 34

  11. � � � � � Strict 2-categories versus double categories Strict 2-category Double category • • • • � • ⇓ ⇓ • � • • • � • • • � • • Note: the picture on the right becomes the one on the left when all vertical morphisms are identities. Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 11 / 34

  12. Strict n -categories versus n -fold categories There is an embedding → Cat n . n -Cat ֒ A strict n -category X ∈ n -Cat is a n -fold category in which certain substructures are discrete (that is just sets). This discreteness condition is called the globularity condition. The sets underlying these discrete substructures are the sets of cells in the strict n -category. Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 12 / 34

  13. A motivating question The category n -Cat is too small to model weak n -category while Cat n is too large. Is there an intermediate category → Cat n n -Cat ֒ → ? ֒ which is a model of weak n -categories? The answer is provided by the category Cat n wg of weakly globular n -fold categories. Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 13 / 34

  14. Some historical development A pioneering work on the use of n -fold structures in connection with homotopy theory is Loday’s Cat n -groups as a model of path-connected ( n + 1 ) -types. This was also investigated by Bullejos-Cegarra-Duskin with a different approach, and led Brown to a proof a higher order Van-Kampen theorem with interesting computational applications. A combinatorially different model was also given by Porter and by Ellis-Steiner in terms of crossed n -cubes. The notion of weak globularity first arose in a special case in relating Loday’s model to the Tamsamani-Simpson model in the path-connected case ([P ., Adv. Math. 2009]). Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 14 / 34

  15. Simplicial combinatorics. Let ∆ be the simplicial category. Its objects are finite ordered sets [ n ] = { 0 < 1 < · · · < n } for integers n ≥ 0 and its morphisms are non decreasing monotone functions. op , C ] is the category of simplicial objects The functor category [∆ and simplicial maps in C . Let ∆ n op = ∆ op × n op . · · · × ∆ Multi-simplicial objects in C are functors [∆ n op , C ] . Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 15 / 34

  16. � � � � � � �� �� � � � �� � � � � �� � � �� � �� �� � � � �� � �� Example: Bisimplicial object . . . . . . . . . · · · X 22 X 12 X 02 � � � � � � · · · X 21 X 11 X 01 � � � � · · · X 20 X 10 X 00 Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 16 / 34

  17. �� �� � Nerves and multinerves There is a fully faithful nerve functor op , C ] N : Cat C → [∆ X ∈ Cat C ��� X 1 NX · · · X 1 × X 0 X 1 × X 0 X 1 ���� X 1 × X 0 X 1 X 0 By iterating the nerve construction, we obtain fully faithful multinerve functors N ( n ) : Cat n → [∆ n op , Set ] J n : Cat n → [∆ n − 1 op , Cat ] Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 17 / 34

  18. Example: the double nerve of a double category ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 18 / 34

  19. Higher categories via multi-simplicial objects. Multi-simplicial objects are a good environment for the definition of higher categorical structures because there are natural candidates for the compositions given by the Segal maps. Our structures are based on [∆ n − 1 op , Cat ] . These can be used to model higher categories by imposing additional conditions to encode: i) The sets of cells in dimension 0 up to n . ii) The behavior of the compositions. iii) The higher categorical equivalences. Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 19 / 34

  20. � � � � � � � Segal maps. op , C ] be a simplicial object in a category C with pullbacks. Let X ∈ [∆ Denote X [ k ] = X k . For each k ≥ 2, let ν i : X k → X 1 , ν j = X ( r j ) , r j ( 0 ) = j − 1, r j ( 1 ) = j X k ν 1 ν k ν 2 · · · X 1 X 1 X 1 ∂ 1 � ∂ 1 � ∂ 0 ∂ 0 ∂ 0 ∂ 1 · · · X 0 X 0 X 0 X 0 X 0 There is a unique map, called Segal map k η k : X k → X 1 × X 0 · · ·× X 0 X 1 . Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 20 / 34

  21. �� �� � Segal maps and internal categories Recall the nerve functor op , C ] N : Cat C → [∆ X ∈ Cat C ��� X 1 · · · X 1 × X 0 X 1 × X 0 X 1 ���� X 1 × X 0 X 1 NX X 0 op , C ] is the nerve of an internal category in C if and only if Fact: X ∈ [∆ k all the Segal maps X k → X 1 × X 0 · · ·× X 0 X 1 are isomorphisms. Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 21 / 34

  22. Segal maps and multi-simplicial objects. For each X ∈ [∆ n op , C ] we have Segal maps in each of the n simplicial directions. Using these Segal maps one can characterize the image of the multinerve J n : Cat n → [∆ n op , Cat ] and J n : n -Cat → [∆ n op , Cat ] Simona Paoli (University of Leicester) July 2017 22 / 34

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend