www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Searching and trapping for Mulgara in the Pilbara Graham Thompson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Searching and trapping for Mulgara in the Pilbara Graham Thompson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Searching and trapping for Mulgara in the Pilbara Graham Thompson Scott Thompson www.terrestrialecosystems.com Dasycercus sp. www.terrestrialecosystems.com Motivation for this research Failure to identify Mulgara habitat The above statement
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Dasycercus sp.
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Motivation for this research
The above statement was taken from an EPBC referral in 2012 for a site within 1km of the area that has the highest recorded density of Mulgara in the Pilbara and where the habitat was almost identical!
Failure to identify Mulgara habitat
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Motivation for this research
This area probably supported Mulgara, and was not referred under the EPBC Act
Failure to identify Mulgara habitat
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Motivation for this research
Failure to detect burrows
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Motivation for this research
Mis-identification of burrows
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Mulgara burrows
- How many people doing field work in the Pilbara have actually dug Mulgara from a
burrow or followed a Mulgara to a burrow and know what Mulgara burrows look like?
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Insufficient trapping effort
Motivation for this research
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Mulgara burrows in the Pilbara
- ‘D’ shaped entrance
- Underground tunnels are generally 60-70mm wide, narrowest at about 40mm
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Simple Mulgara burrow
Elevation not to scale
Thompson and Thompson JRSWA 2007, 90:195-202
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Complex Mulgara burrow
Elevation not to scale
Thompson and Thompson JRSWA, 2007, 90: 195-202
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Complex Mulgara burrow
Elevation not to scale
Thompson and Thompson JRSWA, 2007, 90:195-202
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Spinifex Hopping Mouse borrow
Thompson and Thompson JRSWA 2007, 90: 111-113
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Mulgara burrows in the Pilbara
- Varying number of entrances
- Entrances can be in the open or hidden under spinifex and
shrubs
- Burrows have interconnecting tunnels
- Each Mulgara probably has multiple burrows
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Four case studies all are from the Pilbara, where:
– the terrain is generally flat; – hard, sandy surface, often with surface stones; – low shrubs or hard spinifex of varying densities and heights; and – the landscape is often burnt.
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Case study 1
Thompson and Thompson , JRSWA , 2007, 90: 195-202
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Case study 1
Methods
- Searched in June 2006 (22 person hrs –
44ha)
- Trapped (750 trap-nights) and all burrows
were dug out in Jan 2007
Results
- Only 9 burrows found in the 2006 search
- 65 burrows dug out after fire in Jan 2007
- 4 Mulgara trapped, 5 more dug out
- Mulgara trapped on nights 1, 2, 3 and 4
- 190 trap-nights per Mulgara caught
Conclusions
- A lot of new burrow dug between June and
December or burrows were not found during searches in June 2006
- Mulgara are difficult to trap in a resource
limited environment
- Digging out all burrows ensures you catch
all Mulgara
- Burrows easier to find after it was burnt
Thompson and Thompson , JRSWA , 2007, 90: 195-202
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Case study 2
Thompson and Thompson, Australian Mammalogy, 2008, 30: 65-70
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Case study 2
Methods
- 9,900 trap-nights (Jan-Feb 2007, Jun
2007) in 210ha
Results
- Very few Mulgara burrows seen
- 50 Mulgara trapped
- 220 trap-nights per Mulgara
- 395 D. rosamondae, 1 N. alexis,
27 P. desertor, 179 M. musculus, and 1,212 P. hermannsburgensis trapped
Conclusions
- Mulgara passed multiple baited traps
- n multiple nights before they were
caught
- Mulgara are difficult to trap, even in
areas of high density
- May not be living in ‘typical’ burrows
- r burrows
Thompson and Thompson, Australian Mammalogy, 2008, 30: 65-70
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Case study 3
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Case study 3
Methods
- Traps set at 25m centres for 5 or 8
nights (May 2013)
- Traps set at 25m centres
- 3,367 trap-nights
Results
- 2 Mulgara caught on nights 3 and 5
- 3 burrows recorded that could have
been N. alexis or D. blythi
- 23 P. desertor, 24 M. musculus,
30 D. rosamondae, 26 N. alexis, and 46 P. hermannsburgensis caught Conclusions
- Mulgara passed multiple baited traps
- n multiple nights before they were
caught
- Burrows are difficult to locate in
dense vegetation
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Case study 4
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Case study 4
Methods
- 1,881 baited traps, 9,740 trap-nights
- Traps set at 25m centres
Results
- 2 Mulgara caught on nights 6
and 7
- 19 D. rosamondae, 430 N. alexis,
25 M. musculus, 17 P. desertor, 196 P. hermannsburgensis caught
- 3 N. alexis burrows found
Conclusions
- Mulgara passed multiple baited traps
- n multiple nights before they were
caught
- Burrows are difficult to locate in
dense vegetation
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Case study conclusions
- searching in mature, high or dense spinifex and low shrubs resulted in
many burrows not being detected;
- it was relatively easy to misidentify burrows used by Mulgara;
- Mulgara passed multiple baited traps on multiple nights before they were
caught;
- in a high density population a minimum of 200 trap-nights / individual was
necessary to capture most Mulgara; and
- five nights of trapping was not sufficient to catch all Mulgara in an area
when traps were placed at 25m centres (16 traps per ha).
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Recommendations
- Assuming that Mulgara are living in burrows, searches to record the
presence of Mulgaras in an area should only occur when: – the height of spinifex or shrubs is less than 50cm; – the vegetation cover is less than 40%; and – the search effort is greater than two persons/hr/ha.
- In areas where the height of spinifex and shrubs is greater than 50cm and
the vegetation cover greater than 40%, then the area should be trapped instead of grid searching;
www.terrestrialecosystems.com
Recommendations
- The minimum trapping effort to detect or remove all Mulgaras from an area
should be 16 traps per ha (25m centres) with traps set for a minimum of seven nights; and
- When the purpose of the trapping program is to catch and/or record all
Mulgara in an area, trapping should cease when no Mulgara have been caught within 400m of the trap for three consecutive nights.