San Joaquin County Employees’ Retirement Association
C tl d P t Ltd Courtland Partners, Ltd.
Institutional Real Asset Advisor
San Joaquin County Employees Retirement Association C Courtland - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
San Joaquin County Employees Retirement Association C Courtland Partners, Ltd. tl d P t Ltd Institutional Real Asset Advisor Real Estate Strategy and Proposed Implementation Plan June 2017 Table of Contents 1- Real Estate
Institutional Real Asset Advisor
1 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
2 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
Total SJCERA Plan Assets $2.5 billion
Total SJCERA Plan Assets $2.5 billion Real Estate Equity MV, 12/31/16 (mil) % of SJCERA
Private - Core, Value and Opportunistic 255.8 $ 10.2% Public - Domestic and International 57.5 $ 2.3%
Total 313.3 $ 12.5%
Real Estate Debt MV, 12/31/16 (mil) % of SJCERA
Doubleline (Mortgage Backed Securities) 71.6 $ 2.9% PRIMA (Commercial Mortgages) 96.7 $ 3.9% Mesa West Funds (Leveraged Com. Mortgages) 27.3 $ 1.1% Total 195.6 $ 7.9%
Estimated Unfunded Commitments = $58 mil.
Distrib tions are e pected to increase Interest income is being distributed as earned New $50 million commitment to Mesa West IV Distributions are expected to increase:
will increase exposure
3 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
E i tin Cl d End M n r P t nti l f r In tm nt in N t F nd Existing Closed-End Managers - Potential for Investment in Next Fund Manager New Fund in the Market? Attractive Opportunity?
Almanac Later in 2017 Yes Angelo Gordon 2018 Yes Colony Probably within next 18 months Maybe SteelWave No N/A 4 | Courtland Partners, Ltd. Sarofim No N/A Greenfield No N/A Miller Global Yes Unlikely Walton Street No N/A
5 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
Risk/Return Nominal Net Return Actual Exposure 12/31/16 Projected Exposure Per Model** Target Tactical Allocation Policy Range Core 6.0%-8.0% 48% 61% 40% 10-70% Value 9.0%-11.0% 28% 22% 40% 10-60% Opportunistic 13.0%+ 24% 17% 20% 10-40% REITs* 18% 23% 0-30% 0-30%
* Domestic REITs included as Core; International REITs included as Value. ** Projected exposure includes $30 million commitment to GAP VIII and does not include any new 2017/2018 allocations.
6 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
E t d it l di t ib ti
7 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
80
$
50 60 70
$ Millions
10 20 30 40
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Source: Courtland Partners
8 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
70% 2016 2020 2020 w. New 48% 28% 61% 47% 33% 40% 50% 60% 70% 28% 24% 22% 17% 20% 0% 10% 20% 30%
Note: Core includes U.S. REITs; Value includes Non-U.S. REITs; Excludes Mortgages
Model assumes $60 million in allocations to Value and $30 million in allocations to Opportunistic in 2017 and 2018 No future year allocations are assumed at this time
Core Value Opportunistic
Opportunistic in 2017 and 2018. No future year allocations are assumed at this time. If all $90 million is allocated to Value, the exposures would be 47% Core, 40% Value, and 13% Opportunistic. Current real estate exposure is 12.5%. Assuming proposed 2017-2018 allocations are made the exposure is projected to be 11% (2017) 11% (2018) 12% (2019) and
9 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
are made the exposure is projected to be 11% (2017), 11% (2018), 12% (2019), and 12% (2020).
Long Term Potential New Long-Term Target 2017 and 2018 Objectives Potential New Allocations Managers Core 40%
Continue to monitor domestic REITs. None None
Value 40%
Consider opportunities with a strong current income component and long-term return potential. Up to $90 million Up to three managers
Opportunistic 20%
Consider unique opportunities Up to $30 million Up to one manager
Opportunistic 20%
q pp that expect to capitalize
market opportunity. p p g
REITs 0%-30%
Standard monitoring
allocation for potential modifications. $0 N/A
International 0%-20%
Consider funds with international exposure. Consider moving some of the domestic REIT position into international REIT. Part of value and
T t l
Up to $90 million
Total
Up to $90 million
considering new opportunities
10 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
managers
*Includes mixed-use, self-storage, operating companies, senior housing, CMBS, private debt, land, timber, and healthcare. ** Impact of potential increased allocations is not material on expected exposure due to the generic funds included in the model. 11 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
*Impact of potential increased allocations is not material on expected exposure due to the generic funds included in the model. 12 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
13 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
Strategies and Themes Strategies and Themes
valued core properties.
Consider debt oriented strategies that are protected by 25% 35% borrower equity in a first loss position.
institutions in need of recapitalized balance sheets.
Retail Industrial Office Multifamily Debt Other
y based retail as defensive strategy.
pricing has increased due to favorable urban j coastal markets has rebounded in pricing; be selective given current valuations.
pp y coming to market in select cities.
steep discounts by focusing on properties with g p class A assets has been pushed to record highs.
and development constrained markets. portions of capital structure which do not provide adequate control or protection provisions. g continues to remain a fragmented asset type with many inefficiencies.
housing/medical favorable urban lifestyle demographics; be selective due to current pricing.
class-A malls given Fundamentals continue to be strong as companies build out supply chain management systems.
properties with significant capital needs (e.g., leasing costs or physical improvements) that cannot be met under the existing capital constrained markets.
if yield to cost reasonably exceeds current market cap rates.
in capital markets by providing debt on transitional assets.
in capital markets by housing/medical
advantage of demographics (aging population, need for assisted living facilities). class A malls given current values; historically have provided a consistent income return resilient to market downturns. Focus on infill locations, be selective in NY/NJ and Southern California due to pricing.
structure.
gateway markets; Class A assets in
that are not likely to be negatively affected by new supply.
in capital markets by providing liquidity to distressed capital structures.
leverage by debt managers
new products provide better amenities demanded by incoming students. 14 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
and new supply. and new supply. managers.
15 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
16 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
17 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
18 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
19 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
20 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
21 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
22 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
23 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
24 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
25 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
26 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
27 | Courtland Partners, Ltd. Note: REIS reports for the Industrial sector on an annual basis.
28 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
29 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
30 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.
31 | Courtland Partners, Ltd.