Revision of DRGs regarding Multiple significant trauma (484, 485, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

revision of drgs regarding multiple significant trauma
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Revision of DRGs regarding Multiple significant trauma (484, 485, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Revision of DRGs regarding Multiple significant trauma (484, 485, 486, 486O and 487) MDC 21 Nils Oddvar Skaga, MD PhD Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry Oslo University Hospital, Ullevl Oslo - Norway Objectives Oslo University


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Revision of DRGs regarding Multiple significant trauma

(484, 485, 486, 486O and 487) – MDC 21 Nils Oddvar Skaga, MD PhD Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål Oslo - Norway

slide-2
SLIDE 2

nosk_2015 2

Objectives

  • Oslo University Hospital (OUH) trauma

service – brief introduction

  • The trauma registry at OUH (TR-OUH)
  • Scoring of anatomic injury in trauma
  • What is the DRG-problem in trauma?
  • Our suggestions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

nosk_2015 3

OUH Trauma Service

  • Major trauma centre, Oslo (600,000)
  • Trauma referral centre, health regions East

and South of Norway (2.7 million)

  • 1,800 trauma admissions each year
  • Severe injury (ISS >15)

600 patients/yr (40%)

ISS = Injury Severity Score

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Trauma service activity

nosk_2015 4

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Trauma team activations 2000 - 2014 OUH-TR, Ullevål

slide-5
SLIDE 5

nosk_2015 5

Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry

  • Operative since August 2000
  • Nearly 17.000 patients included
  • Document trauma service activity and quality
  • Research
  • DRG revision – potential financial gain for the

hospital

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What is the DRG-problem in trauma?

nosk_2015 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Formal request MDC21

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Formal request for MDC21

  • principal diagnosis from the group Fresh trauma
  • r fresh trauma related diagnosis (principal

diagnosis property 00P21) (1011 diagnoses)

  • two or more diagnoses indicating significant

trauma in more than one body region (24X10 – 24X81) OR

  • a diagnosis indicating injuries in multiple areas of

the body (diagnosis property 24X90)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Present DRG

  • a good description of the field
  • necessary to do a revision of the diagnosis

properties – in order to make the system more consistent and more logical

  • “Significant injury”
  • “Not significant injury”

nosk_2015 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

International classification of traumatic injury

1350 codes Severity score 1 to 6:

  • AIS code 1 Minor
  • AIS code 2 Moderate
  • AIS code 3 Serious
  • AIS code 4 Severe
  • AIS code 5 Critical
  • AIS code 6 Maximum

nosk_2015 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Suggestion

Focus on 5 categories 1) Columna injuries 2) Large blood vessels 3) Open wounds 4) Nerve damage in arms and legs 5) Other diagnosis

nosk_2015 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Suggestions

  • Marked “IN” – should be reclassified as

significant

  • Marked “OUT” – should be reclassified as

not significant

nosk_2015 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Columna

nosk_2015 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Inconsistency?

  • Diagnosis included (significant) today:
  • Must be included:

nosk_2015 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Injuries on large blood vessels

nosk_2015 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Open wounds

nosk_2015 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Nerve damage in arms and legs

nosk_2015 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Other injuries

nosk_2015 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Other injuries, continued

nosk_2015 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Severe Injury TR-OUS 2009 – 2013 DRG-groups

Injury Severity Score > 15

  • 483

476 patients (17,0%)

  • 484

116 patients (4.1%)

  • 485

13 patients (0.5%)

  • 486

454 patients (16.2%)

  • 487

279 patients (10.0%)

Number of patients with ISS > 15: 2803 Number of patients in actual DRG groups: 1338 (47,7%)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Severe injury – international convention

  • Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15

– Range 1 (small) to 75 (lethal)

  • ISS = AIS2 + AIS2 + AIS2
  • ISS = 42 + 32 + 32 = 34

nosk_2015 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

nosk_2015 22

Conclusion

  • A trauma rigistry is a unique tool for quality

assurance

  • The present DRG groups give a good

description of the field

  • demanding to do a revision of the diagnosis

properties – to make the system more consistent and more logical