resource constrained workflow nets
play

Resource-Constrained Workflow nets Kees van Hee Natalia Sidorova - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Resource-Constrained Workflow nets Kees van Hee Natalia Sidorova Marc Voorhoeve Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Technische Universiteit Eindhoven The Netherlands Workflow nets A Petri net N is a Workflow net (WF-net) iff: N has


  1. Resource-Constrained Workflow nets Kees van Hee Natalia Sidorova Marc Voorhoeve Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Technische Universiteit Eindhoven The Netherlands

  2. Workflow nets A Petri net N is a Workflow net (WF-net) iff: N has two special places (or transitions): an initial place (transition) i : • i = ∅ , and a final place (transition) f : f • = ∅ . For any node n ∈ ( P ∪ T ) there exists a path from i to n and a path from n to f . Applications: business process modelling, software engineering, . . . . – p.

  3. Resource-Constrained WF-nets A Petri net = � P p ∪ P r , T, F + p ∪ F + r , F − p ∪ F − r � is a Resource-Constrained Workflow net (RCWF-net) iff: P r � = ∅ and P p ∩ P r = ∅ , F + p and F − p are mappings ( P p × T ) → N , F + r and F − r are mappings ( P r × T ) → N , and N p = � P p , T, F + p , F − p � is a WF-net, which we call a production net of N . – p.

  4. Non-redundancy and non-persistency N� N� 1� 2� p� p� a� b� a� b� i� f� i� f� d� d� c� c� s� s� Non-redundancy: every transition can potentially fire and every production place can potentially obtain tokens, provided that there are enough tokens on the initial place and resource tokens. Non-persistency: it should be possible for every production place (except for f ) to become unmarked again. – p.

  5. Redundancy and persistency N� N� 2� 1� p� p� a� b� a� b� i� f� i� f� d� d� c� c� s� s� Redundancy: no resource place can ever obtain tokens, if it was not marked initially. Persistency: every resource place should become marked again when the net terminates. – p.

  6. Formally: Let N = � P, T, F � be a WF-net. A place p ∈ P is non-redundant iff ∃ k ∈ N , m ∈ N P : k [ i ] ∗ − → m ∧ p ∈ m . A place p ∈ P is non-persistent iff ∃ k ∈ N , m ∈ N P : p ∈ m ∧ m ∗ − → k [ f ] . A transition t is non-redundant iff ∃ k ∈ N , m ∈ N P : k [ i ] t ∗ − → m − → . All production places should be non-redundant and non-persistent; all resource places should be redundant and persistent. – p.

  7. Siphons A set R of places is a siphon if • R ⊆ R • . A siphon is a proper siphon if it is not empty. ▽ – p.

  8. Siphons A set R of places is a siphon if • R ⊆ R • . A siphon is a proper siphon if it is not empty. ▽ – p.

  9. Siphons A set R of places is a siphon if • R ⊆ R • . A siphon is a proper siphon if it is not empty. ▽ – p.

  10. Siphons A set R of places is a siphon if • R ⊆ R • . A siphon is a proper siphon if it is not empty. ▽ – p.

  11. Siphons A set R of places is a siphon if • R ⊆ R • . A siphon is a proper siphon if it is not empty. Unmarked siphons remain unmarked – p.

  12. Non-redundancy criterion A WF-net has no redundant places iff P \ { i } contains no proper siphon. A WF-net has no redundant places iff it has no redundant transitions. N� N� 1� 2� p� p� a� b� a� b� i� f� i� f� d� d� c� c� s� s� – p.

  13. Traps A set R of places is a trap if R • ⊆ • R . A trap is a proper trap if it is not empty. ▽ – p.

  14. Traps A set R of places is a trap if R • ⊆ • R . A trap is a proper trap if it is not empty. ▽ – p.

  15. Traps A set R of places is a trap if R • ⊆ • R . A trap is a proper trap if it is not empty. ▽ – p.

  16. Traps A set R of places is a trap if R • ⊆ • R . A trap is a proper trap if it is not empty. ▽ – p.

  17. Traps A set R of places is a trap if R • ⊆ • R . A trap is a proper trap if it is not empty. Marked traps remain marked. – p.

  18. Non-persistency criterion A WF-net has no persistent places iff P \ { f } contains no proper trap. N� N� 1� 2� p� p� a� b� a� b� i� f� i� f� d� d� c� c� s� s� – p.

  19. A check for structural correctness Check that the production net has no redundant places and no persistent places; Check that all resource places are redundant and persistent; Check whether resources are independent of each other, if necessary: resource r is independent of other resources iff place r is redundant and persistent in the net with all other resource places removed. ▽ – p.1

  20. A check for structural correctness Check that the production net has no redundant places and no persistent places; Check that all resource places are redundant and persistent; Check whether resources are independent of each other, if necessary: resource r is independent of other resources iff place r is redundant and persistent in the net with all other resource places removed. r� 1� b� a� d� i� f� c� r� 2� ▽ – p.1

  21. A check for structural correctness Check that the production net has no redundant places and no persistent places; Check that all resource places are redundant and persistent; Check whether resources are independent of each other, if necessary: resource r is independent of other resources iff place r is redundant and persistent in the net with all other resource places removed. r� 1� b� a� d� i� f� c� r� 2� ▽ – p.1

  22. A check for structural correctness Check that the production net has no redundant places and no persistent places; Check that all resource places are redundant and persistent; Check whether resources are independent of each other, if necessary: resource r is independent of other resources iff place r is redundant and persistent in the net with all other resource places removed. r� 1� b� a� d� i� f� c� r� 2� ▽ – p.1

  23. A check for structural correctness Check that the production net has no redundant places and no persistent places; Check that all resource places are redundant and persistent; Check whether resources are independent of each other, if necessary: resource r is independent of other resources iff place r is redundant and persistent in the net with all other resource places removed. r� 1� b� a� d� i� f� c� r� 2� ▽ – p.1

  24. A check for structural correctness Check that the production net has no redundant places and no persistent places; Check that all resource places are redundant and persistent; Check whether resources are independent of each other, if necessary: resource r is independent of other resources iff place r is redundant and persistent in the net with all other resource places removed. r� 1� b� a� d� i� f� c� r� 2� ▽ – p.1

  25. A check for structural correctness Check that the production net has no redundant places and no persistent places; Check that all resource places are redundant and persistent; Check whether resources are independent of each other, if necessary: resource r is independent of other resources iff place r is redundant and persistent in the net with all other resource places removed. r� 1� b� a� d� i� f� c� r� 2� ▽ – p.1

  26. A check for structural correctness Check that the production net has no redundant places and no persistent places; Check that all resource places are redundant and persistent; Check whether resources are independent of each other, if necessary: resource r is independent of other resources iff place r is redundant and persistent in the net with all other resource places removed. r� 1� b� a� d� i� f� c� r� 2� ▽ – p.1

  27. A check for structural correctness Check that the production net has no redundant places and no persistent places; Check that all resource places are redundant and persistent; Check whether resources are independent of each other, if necessary: resource r is independent of other resources iff place r is redundant and persistent in the net with all other resource places removed. r� 1� b� a� d� i� f� c� r� 2� ▽ – p.1

  28. A check for structural correctness Check that the production net has no redundant places and no persistent places; Check that all resource places are redundant and persistent; Check whether resources are independent of each other, if necessary: resource r is independent of other resources iff place r is redundant and persistent in the net with all other resource places removed. r� 1� b� a� d� i� f� c� r� 2� – p.1

  29. Soundness Desired property: proper completion Soundness for WF-nets: A WF-net N with initial and final places i and f resp. is k - sound for k ∈ N iff [ f k ] is reachable from all markings m from M ( N, [ i k ]) . A WF-net is (generalised) sound iff it is k -sound for every natural k . Generalised soundness is decidable [ van Hee, Sidorova, Voorhoeve 2004 ] – p.1

  30. Soundness of RCWF-nets N is ( k, m r ) -sound for some k ∈ N , m r ∈ N P r iff for all ∗ m ∈ R ( k [ i ] + m r ) , m − → ( k [ f ] + m r ) . N is k -sound iff there exists m r ∈ N P r such that it is ( k, m ′ ) -sound for all m ′ ≥ m r . N is sound iff there exists m r ∈ N P r such that it is ( k, m ′ ) -sound for all k ∈ N , m ′ ≥ m r . ▽ – p.1

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend