Regulating uranium Edit Master text styles Second level The EPA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

regulating uranium
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Regulating uranium Edit Master text styles Second level The EPA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

South Australias Environment Protection Authority Click to edit Master title style Regulating uranium Edit Master text styles Second level The EPA and the community Third level Fourth level Fifth level Presentation to the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 1

South Australia’s Environment Protection Authority

Regulating uranium

The EPA and the community

Presentation to the

NSW Legislative Council State Development Committee

August 2019

Keith Baldry

Director Science and Information keith.baldry@sa.gov.au www.epa.sa.gov.au

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 2

About me

Amongst other things…

  • Windscale Pile reactor decommissioning (where the British weapons

grade plutonium was made)

  • Maralinga nuclear weapons test site remediation
  • Regulation of the legacy sites at Radium Hill and Maralinga
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 3

Who regulates radiation?

Environment Health

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 4

It’s not the numbers

20 millisieverts all good 0.01 millisieverts hmm not sure

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 5

Why the public doesn’t trust us

Other countries Enduring Other sectors Catastrophes Local issues

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 6

The trust gap is quickly filled

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 7

Leadership Expert Involve the community

What are the features of a regulator that might build trust?

Represent the community World’s highest standards

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 8

Independence

Where regulatory independence has been criticised: Fukushima, BP Gulf of Mexico EPA Board EPA Chief Executive Minister for Environment and Water Radiation Protection Committee EPA Chief Executive Environment Radiation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 9

Legislation that is in the public interest

The objectives of a regulatory framework and the regulator should have the interests of the public as its principle focus

South Australian Radiation Protection and Control Act 1982 The Minister … must, in exercising and discharging powers, functions and duties under this Act … endeavour to ensure that exposure of persons to ionising radiation is kept as low as reasonably achievable …

When the interests of the public was not put first: Maralinga nuclear weapons testing

South Australian Environment Protection Act 1993 that the use, development and protection of the environment should be managed in a way, and at a rate, that will enable people and communities to provide for their economic, social and physical well-being and for their health and safety that proper weight should be given to both long and short term economic, environmental, social and equity considerations that all reasonable and practicable measures are taken to protect, restore and enhance the quality of the environment

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 10

Legislation that is in the public interest

…is also in the operator’s interest The public demands and deserves:

  • Approvals and hold points
  • Industry best practice benchmarking
  • Strong enforcement options with significant penalties
  • Transparent reporting – routine and incidents
  • Financial assurances or bonds

Social ial licen cence ce Global bal reputat tatio ion Keepin ing corn rner-cu cutters tters out t of the market et

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 11

Expertise

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 12

Standards

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) IAEA Safety Fundamentals SF-1 IAEA Safety Standards GSR Part 3 Commonwealth – ARPANSA Fundamentals for Protection Against Ionising Radiation F-1 Codes for Radiation Protection State – EPA Radiation Protection and Control Act 1982 Authorisations with conditions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 13

Standards (governance)

COAG Health Council

ARPANSA

Health Ministers Advisory Council (AHMAC) Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC) Environmental Health Standing Committee (enHealth)

Radiation Health Committee (RHC) National Directory for Radiation Protection (NDRP) Codes for Radiation Protection South Australian legislation State te repres resen enta tatio tion

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 14

Accountability

  • The operator has the prime responsibility for safety
  • Regulators must be visible and accessible
  • Decisions and documents must be available for scrutiny
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 15

Transparency

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 16

Community engagement

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 17

Time

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 18

Competent response capability

  • ‘There’s only one in a million chance of an accident’ is no longer

acceptable

  • Government needs to tell the community what could go wrong, no

matter how unlikely, and what the response will be

  • If it does happen, we get only one go
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 19

Transport (the most important issue?)

What our regulatory framework seeks to achieve

  • World’s best standards for uranium transport
  • Operators meet state regulatory requirements (safety, environment)
  • Commonwealth requirements are met (security, exports)
  • Clarity of responsibilities
  • Framework can accommodate new entrants and interstate operators
  • An incident can be managed
  • Public has access to information
  • Regulation is commensurate with risk (+10%)
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 20

Transport

No. TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT PLAN 3 Documentation (work procedures, plans, training modules, registers) 4 Key Contacts 6 Regulatory obligations, permits and approvals 7 Stakeholders (within company, Government, key third parties) 8 Company functions and responsible roles 9 Information on the materials transported 10 Risk assessment 11 Transport information 11.1 Shipment notification procedures 11.2 Pre-departure procedures 11.3 Vehicles 11.4 Loading of vehicles 11.5 Transport drivers 11.6 Unscheduled stops 11.7 Communication with owner 11.8 Delays to departure 11.9 Transport route 11.10 Alternative routes 11.11 End of transit procedures 12 Incident response – managing incidents and spills 13 Incident reporting 14 Security 15 Post shipment reporting requirement 16 Education and training 17 Public education and information / engagement A ASNO approved transport routes B Responding to a UOC incident C Equipment for incident response

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 21

Transport review

Uranium Transport Steering Committee and working group

  • EPA
  • Department for Energy and Mining
  • Premier and Cabinet
  • Country Fire Service
  • Metropolitan Fire Service
  • SA Police
  • ASNO
  • Operators (BHP, Heathgate, Cameco)
  • WA
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 22

Leadership

Department for Energy and Mining Program for environment protection and rehabilitation (PEPR) Environment Protection Authority (EPA) EPA licence Optimal safety, environmental and business outcomes

Making this relationship work

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Click to edit Master title style

  • Edit Master text styles
  • Second level
  • Third level
  • Fourth level
  • Fifth level

16/08/2019 23

Thank you