reduction and approximation of multidimensional
play

Reduction and Approximation of Multidimensional Persistent Homology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reduction and Approximation of Multidimensional Persistent Homology Massimo Ferri 1 , 2 1 Dip. di Matematica, Univ. di Bologna, Italia 2 ARCES - Vision Mathematics Group, Univ. di Bologna, Italia ferri@dm.unibo.it GETCO 2010 Geometric and


  1. Reduction and Approximation of Multidimensional Persistent Homology Massimo Ferri 1 , 2 1 Dip. di Matematica, Univ. di Bologna, Italia 2 ARCES - Vision Mathematics Group, Univ. di Bologna, Italia ferri@dm.unibo.it GETCO 2010 Geometric and Topological Methods in Computer Science Aalborg University, January 11-15, 2010 Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 1 / 50

  2. Outline Shape 1 Persistent topology 2 Distances 3 Multidimensional persistent homology 4 One-dimensional reduction 5 Ball coverings 6 Combinatorial representation 7 Conclusions 8 Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 2 / 50

  3. Shape Shape 1 Persistent topology 2 Distances 3 Multidimensional persistent homology 4 One-dimensional reduction 5 Ball coverings 6 Combinatorial representation 7 Conclusions 8 Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 3 / 50

  4. Shape Which object has the same shape as the circle? Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 4 / 50

  5. Shape Shape = Geometry? Homoteties surely preserve shape Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 5 / 50

  6. Shape Shape = Geometry? Homoteties surely preserve shape . . . but not only they do. Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 5 / 50

  7. Shape Shape = Topology? Sometimes homeomorphisms are deceptive. Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 6 / 50

  8. Shape Shape = Psychology? Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 7 / 50

  9. Shape Size pairs A possible setting: persistent topology of a size pair ( X , − → ϕ ) Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 8 / 50

  10. Shape Size pairs A possible setting: persistent topology of a size pair ( X , − → ϕ ) X is a topological space, ϕ : X → R n a continuous map, called measuring (filtering) function. Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 8 / 50

  11. Shape Size pairs A possible setting: persistent topology of a size pair ( X , − → ϕ ) X is a topological space, ϕ : X → R n a continuous map, called measuring (filtering) function. − → ϕ provides the geometrical aspects; Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 8 / 50

  12. Shape Size pairs A possible setting: persistent topology of a size pair ( X , − → ϕ ) X is a topological space, ϕ : X → R n a continuous map, called measuring (filtering) function. − → ϕ provides the geometrical aspects; the core idea is to study the evolution and persistence of topological features of the sublevel sets of − → ϕ ; Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 8 / 50

  13. Shape Size pairs A possible setting: persistent topology of a size pair ( X , − → ϕ ) X is a topological space, ϕ : X → R n a continuous map, called measuring (filtering) function. − → ϕ provides the geometrical aspects; the core idea is to study the evolution and persistence of topological features of the sublevel sets of − → ϕ ; the choice of − → ϕ conveys the subjective viewpoint of the observer. Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 8 / 50

  14. Shape Size pairs A possible setting: persistent topology of a size pair ( X , − → ϕ ) X is a topological space, ϕ : X → R n a continuous map, called measuring (filtering) function. − → ϕ provides the geometrical aspects; the core idea is to study the evolution and persistence of topological features of the sublevel sets of − → ϕ ; the choice of − → ϕ conveys the subjective viewpoint of the observer. Examples of measuring functions 1-dimensional: distance from center of mass, ordinate, curvature, . . . Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 8 / 50

  15. Shape Size pairs A possible setting: persistent topology of a size pair ( X , − → ϕ ) X is a topological space, ϕ : X → R n a continuous map, called measuring (filtering) function. − → ϕ provides the geometrical aspects; the core idea is to study the evolution and persistence of topological features of the sublevel sets of − → ϕ ; the choice of − → ϕ conveys the subjective viewpoint of the observer. Examples of measuring functions 1-dimensional: distance from center of mass, ordinate, curvature, . . . multidimensional: color, coordinates, curvature and torsion, . . . Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 8 / 50

  16. Shape Size pairs A possible setting: persistent topology of a size pair ( X , − → ϕ ) X is a topological space, ϕ : X → R n a continuous map, called measuring (filtering) function. − → ϕ provides the geometrical aspects; the core idea is to study the evolution and persistence of topological features of the sublevel sets of − → ϕ ; the choice of − → ϕ conveys the subjective viewpoint of the observer. Examples of measuring functions 1-dimensional: distance from center of mass, ordinate, curvature, . . . multidimensional: color, coordinates, curvature and torsion, . . . (Claudia Landi and Patrizio Frosini will further elaborate on that. In fact, what I am presenting is largely the product of team work at our Vision Mathematics group in Bologna.) Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 8 / 50

  17. Shape Persistence A different approach to the same idea [Edelsbrunner et al. 2000]: Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 9 / 50

  18. Shape Persistence A different approach to the same idea [Edelsbrunner et al. 2000]: Persistent topological features are the ones which persist under resolution change Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 9 / 50

  19. Shape Persistence A different approach to the same idea [Edelsbrunner et al. 2000]: Persistent topological features are the ones which persist under resolution change Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 9 / 50

  20. Shape Persistence A different approach to the same idea [Edelsbrunner et al. 2000]: Persistent topological features are the ones which persist under resolution change Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 9 / 50

  21. Shape Natural pseudodistance More than by a size pair, the concept of shape is well represented by the comparison of shapes, i.e. a measure of dissimilarity. Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 10 / 50

  22. Shape Natural pseudodistance More than by a size pair, the concept of shape is well represented by the comparison of shapes, i.e. a measure of dissimilarity. Such a measure is the natural pseudodistance d between pairs ϕ ) , ( Y , − → ( X , − → ψ ) , where X and Y are homeomorphic compact spaces. d is defined as ϕ ) , ( Y , − → ϕ ( P ) − − → � ( X , − → � P ∈ X �− → d ψ ( f ( P )) � ∞ ψ ) = inf max f where f varies among all homeomorphisms from X to Y [Frosini et al. 1999]. Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 10 / 50

  23. Persistent topology Shape 1 Persistent topology 2 Distances 3 Multidimensional persistent homology 4 One-dimensional reduction 5 Ball coverings 6 Combinatorial representation 7 Conclusions 8 Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 11 / 50

  24. Persistent topology Rank invariant [Carlsson et al. 2007] We define the following relation � ( ≺ ) in R n : if � u = ( u 1 , . . . , u n ) v = ( v 1 , . . . , v n ) , we write � u � � v ( � u ≺ � v ) if and only if u j ≤ v j and � ( u j < v j ) for j = 1 , . . . , n . Let also ∆ + be the set v ) ∈ R n × R n | � u ,� u ≺ � v } . { ( � Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 12 / 50

  25. Persistent topology Rank invariant [Carlsson et al. 2007] We define the following relation � ( ≺ ) in R n : if � u = ( u 1 , . . . , u n ) v = ( v 1 , . . . , v n ) , we write � u � � v ( � u ≺ � v ) if and only if u j ≤ v j and � ( u j < v j ) for j = 1 , . . . , n . Let also ∆ + be the set v ) ∈ R n × R n | � u ,� u ≺ � v } . { ( � u � the lower level set { p ∈ X | − → f ( p ) � − → We denote by X � � f � � u } . Massimo Ferri (DM-ARCES, U. Bologna) Reduction and Approximation GETCO 2010 12 / 50

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend