recursive descent parsing
play

Recursive-Descent Parsing 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 1 BL Compiler - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Recursive-Descent Parsing 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 1 BL Compiler Structure Code Tokenizer Parser Generator string of string of abstract string of characters tokens program integers (source code) (words) (object code) Note that


  1. Recursive-Descent Parsing 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 1

  2. BL Compiler Structure Code Tokenizer Parser Generator string of string of abstract string of characters tokens program integers (source code) (“words”) (object code) Note that the parser starts with a string of tokens . 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 2

  3. Plan for the BL Parser • Design a context-free grammar (CFG) to specify syntactically valid BL programs • Use the grammar to implement a recursive-descent parser (i.e., an algorithm to parse a BL program and construct the corresponding Program object) 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 3

  4. Parsing • A CFG can be used to generate strings in its language – “Given the CFG, construct a string that is in the language” • A CFG can also be used to recognize strings in its language – “Given a string, decide whether it is in the language” – And, if it is, construct a derivation tree (or AST) 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 4

  5. Parsing Parsing generally refers to this last • A CFG can be used to generate strings in step, i.e., going from a string (in the its language language) to its derivation tree or— for a programming language— – “Given the CFG, construct a string that is in perhaps to an AST for the program. the language” • A CFG can also be used to recognize strings in its language – “Given a string, decide whether it is in the language” – And, if it is, construct a derivation tree (or AST) 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 5

  6. A Recursive-Descent Parser • One parse method per non-terminal symbol • A non-terminal symbol on the right-hand side of a rewrite rule leads to a call to the parse method for that non-terminal • A terminal symbol on the right-hand side of a rewrite rule leads to “consuming” that token from the input token string • | in the CFG leads to “if-else” in the parser 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 6

  7. Example: Arithmetic Expressions → expr add-op term | term expr → term mult-op factor | factor term → ( expr ) | digit-seq factor → + | - add-op → * | DIV | REM mult-op → digit digit-seq | digit digit-seq → 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 digit 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 7

  8. A Problem → expr add-op term | term expr → term mult-op factor | factor term → ( expr ) | digit-seq factor → + | - add-op Do you see a → * | DIV | REM mult-op problem with a recursive descent → digit digit-seq | digit digit-seq parser for this → 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 digit CFG? (Hint!) 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 8

  9. A Solution → term { add-op term } expr → factor { mult-op factor } term → ( expr ) | digit-seq factor → + | - add-op → * | DIV | REM mult-op → digit digit-seq | digit digit-seq → 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 digit 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 9

  10. A Solution → term { add-op term } expr → factor { mult-op factor } term → ( expr ) | digit-seq factor → + | - add-op The special CFG symbols { and } → * | DIV | REM mult-op mean that the enclosed sequence of → digit digit-seq | digit digit-seq symbols occurs zero or more times ; → 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 digit this helps change a left-recursive CFG into an equivalent CFG that can be parsed by recursive descent. 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 10

  11. A Solution The special CFG symbols { and } also simplify a non-terminal for a number → term { add-op term } expr that has no leading zeroes. → factor { mult-op factor } term → ( expr ) | number factor → + | - add-op → * | DIV | REM mult-op → 0 | nz-digit { 0 | nz-digit } number → 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 nz-digit 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 11

  12. A Recursive-Descent Parser • One parse method per non-terminal symbol • A non-terminal symbol on the right-hand side of a rewrite rule leads to a call to the parse method for that non-terminal • A terminal symbol on the right-hand side of a rewrite rule leads to “consuming” that token from the input token string • | in the CFG leads to “if-else” in the parser • {...} in the CFG leads to “while” in the parser 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 12

  13. More Improvements If we treat every number as a token, → term { add-op term } expr then things get simpler for the → factor { mult-op factor } term parser: now there are only 5 non- → ( expr ) | number terminals to worry about. factor → + | - add-op → * | DIV | REM mult-op → 0 | nz-digit { 0 | nz-digit } number → 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 nz-digit 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 13

  14. More Improvements If we treat every add-op and mult-op → term { add-op term } expr as a token, then it’s even simpler: → factor { mult-op factor } term there are only 3 non-terminals. → ( expr ) | number factor → + | - add-op → * | DIV | REM mult-op → 0 | nz-digit { 0 | nz-digit } number → 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 nz-digit 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 14

  15. Improvements Can you write the tokenizer for this language, so every number , add-op , and mult-op is a token? → term { add-op term } expr → factor { mult-op factor } term → ( expr ) | number factor → + | - add-op → * | DIV | REM mult-op → 0 | nz-digit { 0 | nz-digit } number → 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 nz-digit 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 15

  16. Evaluating Arithmetic Expressions • For this problem, parsing an arithmetic expression means evaluating it • The parser goes from a string of tokens in the language of the CFG on the previous slide, to the value of that expression as an int 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 16

  17. Structure of Solution "4 + 29 DIV 3" <"4", "+", "29", "DIV", "3", "EOI"> 13 Tokenizer Parser string of string of value of characters tokens arithmetic (arithmetic expression expression) 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 17

  18. Structure of Solution We will use a Queue<String> to hold a mathematical value like this. "4 + 29 DIV 3" <"4", "+", "29", "DIV", "3", "EOI"> 13 Tokenizer Parser string of string of value of characters tokens arithmetic (arithmetic expression expression) 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 18

  19. Structure of Solution We will also assume the tokenizer adds an “end-of-input” token at the end. "4 + 29 DIV 3" <"4", "+", "29", "DIV", "3", "EOI"> 13 Tokenizer Parser string of string of value of characters tokens arithmetic (arithmetic expression expression) 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 19

  20. Parsing an expr • We want to parse an expr , which must start with a term and must be followed by zero or more (pairs of) add-op s and term s: → term { add-op term } expr • An expr has an int value, which is what we want returned by the method to parse an expr 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 20

  21. Contract for Parser for expr /** * Evaluates an expression and returns its value. * ... * @updates ts * @requires * [an expr string is a proper prefix of ts] * @ensures * valueOfExpr = [value of longest expr string at * start of #ts] and * #ts = [longest expr string at start of #ts] * ts */ private static int valueOfExpr(Queue<String> ts) {...} 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 21

  22. Parsing a term • We want to parse a term , which must start with a factor and must be followed by zero or more (pairs of) mult-op s and factor s: → factor { mult-op factor } term • A term has an int value, which is what we want returned by the method to parse a term 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 22

  23. Contract for Parser for term /** * Evaluates a term and returns its value. * ... * @updates ts * @requires * [a term string is a proper prefix of ts] * @ensures * valueOfTerm = [value of longest term string at * start of #ts] and * #ts = [longest term string at start of #ts] * ts */ private static int valueOfTerm(Queue<String> ts) {...} 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 23

  24. Parsing a factor • We want to parse a factor , which must start with the token "(" followed by an expr followed by the token ")" ; or it must be a number token: → ( expr ) | number factor • A factor has an int value, which is what we want returned by the method to parse a factor 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 24

  25. Contract for Parser for factor /** * Evaluates a factor and returns its value. * ... * @updates ts * @requires * [a factor string is a proper prefix of ts] * @ensures * valueOfFactor = [value of longest factor string at * start of #ts] and * #ts = [longest factor string at start of #ts] * ts */ private static int valueOfFactor(Queue<String> ts){ ... } 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 25

  26. Code for Parser for expr private static int valueOfExpr(Queue<String> ts) { int value = valueOfTerm(ts); while (ts.front().equals("+") || ts.front().equals("-")) { String op = ts.dequeue(); int nextTerm = valueOfTerm(ts); if (op.equals("+")) { value = value + nextTerm; } else /* "-" */ { value = value - nextTerm; } } return value; } 22 March 2019 OSU CSE 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend