Quality Data Categories Administered by: Funded by: Target - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quality data categories
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quality Data Categories Administered by: Funded by: Target - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MultilingualWebLT MultilingualWeb-LT: Quality Data Categories Administered by: Funded by: Target audience MultilingualWebLT Localization Service Providers doing Quality Assessment tasks Content creators doing quality veri fi cation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MultilingualWebLT

Administered by: Funded by:

MultilingualWeb-LT:

Quality Data Categories

slide-2
SLIDE 2

MultilingualWebLT

Administered by: Funded by:

Target audience

  • Localization Service Providers doing Quality

Assessment tasks

  • Content creators doing quality verification
  • Authors marking up authoring errors
  • Posteditors providing information on

efficiency/MT quality

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MultilingualWebLT

Administered by: Funded by:

Motivations

  • Streamline linguistic review process

– Reduce multiple reviews of similar content – Use provenance of segments to reinforce assessment

  • Build real-time workflow rules based on past

translator performance.

  • Build content profile from translation agent, MT

confidence, domain, purpose, etc.

  • Use Linked Data to capture cross-silo process

profile of content.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

MultilingualWebLT

Administered by: Funded by:

Description

  • Two (complex) data categories:

– Errors themselves – Overall error profiles

  • Provides flexible way to use different error

models in a consistent, standardized way.

  • Implement standard marking regardless of

metric used.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MultilingualWebLT

Administered by: Funded by:

qualityerror purpose

  • Mark quality issues against a specified

framework

  • Provide an audit trail for quality resolution
  • Flexible framework for various tasks
slide-6
SLIDE 6

MultilingualWebLT

Administered by: Funded by:

qualityerror description

  • type?
  • ruleset?
  • severity?
  • note?
  • agent?

The <span its-qa-type="syntactic error” its-qa-ruleset="SAE J2450” its-qa-severity="major” its-qa-note="bad grammar” its-qa-agent="ABCReview">verbs agrees</span> with the subject.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

MultilingualWebLT

Administered by: Funded by:

qualityprofile purpose

  • Defines the overall profile(s) used.
  • Allows for flexibility in picking an appropriate

profile/metric

  • Does not require local tagging: can be

summary only (e.g., the traditional LISA QA Model software or SAE J2450 were used with no in-line tagging)

  • Defaults to LISA QA Model
slide-8
SLIDE 8

MultilingualWebLT

Administered by: Funded by:

qualityprofile description

  • name?
  • uri?
  • pass?
  • score?
  • agent?

<meta name="qualityProfile” content="name:LISA QA Model; uri:http://www.example.com; pass:no;score:85%; agent:ABCReview” />

We ¡know ¡this ¡would ¡not ¡ work ¡exactly ¡as ¡is, ¡but ¡it ¡ shows ¡the ¡concept. ¡

slide-9
SLIDE 9

MultilingualWebLT

Administered by: Funded by:

Issues and Notes

  • Verboseness
  • Would these be used in general? (More

sophisticated than most current processes)

  • Implementation commitments and

timeframe

  • Represents perspective of upcoming QT

Launchpad project (which aims to standardize/unify error metrics).