quality data categories
play

Quality Data Categories Administered by: Funded by: Target - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MultilingualWebLT MultilingualWeb-LT: Quality Data Categories Administered by: Funded by: Target audience MultilingualWebLT Localization Service Providers doing Quality Assessment tasks Content creators doing quality veri fi cation


  1. MultilingualWebLT MultilingualWeb-LT: Quality Data Categories Administered by: Funded by:

  2. Target audience MultilingualWebLT • Localization Service Providers doing Quality Assessment tasks • Content creators doing quality veri fi cation • Authors marking up authoring errors • Posteditors providing information on e ffi ciency/MT quality Administered by: Funded by:

  3. Motivations MultilingualWebLT • Streamline linguistic review process – Reduce multiple reviews of similar content – Use provenance of segments to reinforce assessment • Build real-time work fl ow rules based on past translator performance. • Build content pro fi le from translation agent, MT con fi dence, domain, purpose, etc. • Use Linked Data to capture cross-silo process pro fi le of content. Administered by: Funded by:

  4. Description MultilingualWebLT • Two (complex) data categories: – Errors themselves – Overall error pro fi les • Provides fl exible way to use di ff erent error models in a consistent, standardized way. • Implement standard marking regardless of metric used. Administered by: Funded by:

  5. qualityerror purpose MultilingualWebLT • Mark quality issues against a speci fi ed framework • Provide an audit trail for quality resolution • Flexible framework for various tasks Administered by: Funded by:

  6. qualityerror description MultilingualWebLT • type? • ruleset? • severity? • note? • agent? The <span � � its-qa-type="syntactic error” � � its-qa-ruleset="SAE J2450” � � its-qa-severity="major” � � its-qa-note="bad grammar” � � its-qa-agent="ABCReview">verbs agrees</span> with the subject. � Administered by: Funded by:

  7. qualitypro fi le purpose MultilingualWebLT • De fi nes the overall pro fi le(s) used. • Allows for fl exibility in picking an appropriate pro fi le/metric • Does not require local tagging: can be summary only (e.g., the traditional LISA QA Model software or SAE J2450 were used with no in-line tagging) • Defaults to LISA QA Model Administered by: Funded by:

  8. qualitypro fi le description MultilingualWebLT • name? • uri? • pass? • score? • agent? <meta � � name="qualityProfile” � We ¡know ¡this ¡would ¡not ¡ � content="name:LISA QA Model; � work ¡exactly ¡as ¡is, ¡but ¡it ¡ � uri:http://www.example.com; � shows ¡the ¡concept. ¡ � pass:no;score:85%; � � agent:ABCReview” � /> � Administered by: Funded by:

  9. Issues and Notes MultilingualWebLT • Verboseness • Would these be used in general? (More sophisticated than most current processes) • Implementation commitments and timeframe • Represents perspective of upcoming QT Launchpad project (which aims to standardize/unify error metrics). Administered by: Funded by:

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend