Pula ski Co unty JDAI Pro g re ss June 11, 2018 By: Cha stity Sc - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Pula ski Co unty JDAI Pro g re ss June 11, 2018 By: Cha stity Sc ifre s a nd Ja so n Sza nyi Da ta E sta b lish a g re e me nt a b o ut c o mmo n da ta e le me nts to re vie w a nd tra c k a s a g ro up Arre sts Re fe rra ls a
June 11, 2018
By: Cha stity Sc ifre s a nd Ja so n Sza nyi
E
sta b lish a g re e me nt a b o ut c o mmo n da ta e le me nts to re vie w a nd tra c k a s a g ro up
Arre sts Re fe rra ls a nd dive rsio ns De te ntio n a dmissio ns Pro g ra m o utc o me s a nd pub lic sa fe ty indic a to rs (e .g ., re c idivism;
suc c e ssful c o mple tio n)
2037 2315 2257 2070 1839 1643 1416 1323 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Numb e r o f Cita tio ns a nd Co mp la ints a s re po rte d b y I nta ke
Circ uit Cle rk’ s Offic e re po rts a to ta l o f 1,164 De linq ue nc y a nd 282 F INS T rua nc y c a se s file d in 2017
517 607 507 472 370 382 378 317
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Numbe r of De te ntions Ye a r
* I nta ke numb e rs do no t re fle c t the to ta l numb e r o f juve nile s de ta ine d. T
numb e rs inc lude pic k-up o rde rs a nd wa rra nts.
45 65 47 55 54 51 39 65 75 60 66 79 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
701 T
32 50 53 56 47 36 42 44 53 51 51 53 10 20 30 40 50 60
568 T
186 150 123 88 56 47 44 40 38 33 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
1,018 T
Arre sts
T
34% o f a ll a rre sts
L a rg e c a te g o ry fo r “All Othe r Offe nse s”
11% o f a rre sts (117)
F a ir; 8% (79)
Mc Cle lla n
885 89 35 742 276 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Bla c k White Hisp a nic Ma le F e ma le
46 22 18 16 15 10 8 7 7 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 T he ft o f Pro pe rty F le e ing Po sse ssio n o f a Co ntro lle d Sub sta nc e Diso rde rly Co nduc t T he ft b y Re c e iving Burg la ry Po sse ssio n o f a Ha nd g un o n Sc ho o l Pro pe rty Do me stic Ba tte ry 3rd T e rro ristic T hre a te ning
210 T
Arre sts
182 28 169 41 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Bla c k White Ma le F e ma le
62 13 12 9 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
129 T
Arre sts L a rg e numb e r
Offe nse s” Ca te g o ry
96 31 3 96 33 20 40 60 80 100 120 Bla c k White Hisp a nic Ma le F e ma le
31 18 9 9 7 5 4 4 3 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
110 T
Arre sts
66 42 2 83 27 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Bla c k White Hisp a nic Ma le F e ma le
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Ja nua ry F e b rua ry Ma rc h April Ma y June July Aug ust Se pte mb e r Oc to b e r No ve mb e r De c e mb e r Ma le F e ma le
103 to ta l juve nile s c ha rg e d a s a dults
15 4 8 6 8 12 6 8 4 15 6 6 1 1 3 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Ja nua ry F e b rua ry Ma rc h April Ma y June July Aug ust Se pte mb e r Oc to b e r No ve mb e r De c e mb e r Ma le F e ma le
103 to ta l juve nile s c ha rg e d a s a dults. 17% (18) we re la te r tra nsfe rre d to juve nile c o urt
Wha t do we know?
Ad missio ns to d e te ntio n fe ll 35% fro m 2012 to
2016 (re fe rra ls fe ll 41% o ve r tha t time pe rio d )
In 2017:
1/ 3 (34%) o f yo uth we re re le a se d in 3 da ys o r
fe we r a nd 55% we re re le a se d within a we e k
38% o f a dmissio ns we re fo r pro b a tio n vio la tio ns
(25% o f whic h we re fo r yo uth re le a se d in 3 da ys
In 2016, 60% o f yo uth ha d a t le a st o ne pre vio us
a d missio n to d e te ntio n)
Que stions
Wha t d e te ntio n a lte rna tive s c o uld we intro d uc e
with the 2015 c ha ng e s to § 9-27-322(a ), pa rtic ula rly fo r yo uth with sho rt sta ys in d e te ntio n (e .g ., 3 d a ys o r fe we r)
Wha t c a n we d o to id e ntify a lte rna tive
sa nc tio ns fo r yo uth with pro b a tio n vio la tio ns, pa rtic ula rly fo r tho se re le a se d within 3 d a ys o r 1 we e k?
34% 21% 24% 21%
2017 JDC Admissio ns - L OS
3 da ys o r fe we r 4-7 d a ys 8-21 da ys Mo re tha n 21 da ys
T
he 2015 c ha ng e s to Ark Co de Ann § 9-27-322(a ) a llo ws inta ke o ffic e rs to use disc re tio n to se nd the a rre ste e ho me o n a n e le c tro nic mo nito r o r pla c e juve nile in she lte r c a re if una b le to lo c a te the juve nile ’ s pa re nt/ g ua rdia n.
Ho w is e le c tro nic mo nito r funde d a nd who a tta c he s mo nito r a nd e xpla ins
c o nditio ns o f mo nito r re le a se ? I nta ke a nd Judg e s will ha ve to de te rmine pa ra me te rs a nd imple me nta tio n.
Wha t she lte rs a re a va ila b le ?
I
nta ke o ffic e rs ha ve a utho rity to a llo w a rre ste e to re turn ho me upo n writte n c o nditio ns a nd re turn to c o urt within a sho rt pe rio d fo r a n e xpe dite d he a ring .
I
nta ke a nd Judg e s will ha ve to de te rmine pa ra me te rs a nd imple me nta tio n me tho d o f writte n c o nditio ns.
Wo uld a llo w fo r re duc tio n in sho rt sta ys in de te ntio n whe re we kno w yo uth a re
like ly to b e re le a se d a t de te ntio n he a ring a nd c o uld he lp e xpe dite first a ppe a ra nc e s o f yo uth a nd c o nne c tio n to se rvic e s
What do we know?
I
n 2017, 38% o f a ll JDC a dmissio ns we re fo r vio la tio ns o f pro b a tio n/ c o urt
Of yo uth a dmitte d to de te ntio n o n VOPs, 25% we re re le a se d within 3
da ys o r fe we r a nd 40% we re re le a se d within a we e k
Wha t a lte rna tive re spo nse s c o uld b e use d to ho ld yo uth
a c c o unta b le in a c o nstruc tive wa y?
Ho w c o uld a fo rma l syste m o f g ra dua te d re spo nse s (sa nc tio ns a nd
e a rne d o ppo rtunitie s) he lp re duc e pro mo te c o mplia nc e , ho ld yo uth a c c o unta b le with skill-b uilding o ppo rtunitie s, a nd re duc e VOPs?
“T
he use o f inc e ntive s is e q ua lly impo rta nt (a nd o fte n no t suffic ie ntly c o nside re d) in pro b a tio n a nd pa ro le supe rvisio n”
“[S]a nc tio ns a nd inc e ntive s sho uld b e
use d in c o njunc tio n with o ne a no the r to pro mo te c o mplia nc e a nd po sitive b e ha vio r”
E ffe c tive Re spo nse to Offe nde r Be ha vio r: L e sso ns L e a rne d fo r Pro b a tio n a nd Pa ro le Supe rvisio n, AM. PROB. &
PAROL E ASS’ N (2012), availab le at http:/ / www.a ppa -ne t.o rg / e We b / do c s/ APPA/ pub s/ E
ROBL L PPS-Re po rt.pdf.
Wo rk with L RPD to de te rmine is a L a w E nfo rc e me nt Dive rsio n thro ug h L RPD’ s Ok Pro g ra m is po ssib le
E duc a te justic e syste m o n a va ila b le / po te ntia l sc ho o l pro g ra ms a nd pro vide vo lunte e r a ssista nc e / suppo rt to sc ho o ls:
a ir Hig h Sc ho o l’ s Be tte r Cho ic e s Inte rve ntio n a nd Me nto ring with the Arka nsa s Co mmunity Dispute Re so lutio n Ce nte r (c o lla b o ra tive pa rtne rs inc lude the City o f L R’ s Stre e t Inte rve ntio n T e a m, the Big Ho mie Pro g ra m, De pt o f Co rre c tio ns U.N.I.T .Y. Pro g ra m) to e ng a g e ma le stude nts in po sitive me nto ring , c o lla b o ra tive pro b le m-so lving a nd me dia tio n, so c ia l a nd e mo tio na l le a rning a nd re duc e inc ide nts/ sc ho o l-b a se d c rimina l a c tivity
a ir Hig h Sc ho o l’ s use o f the Re c la im Pro g ra m thro ug h T e nda ji Co mmunity De ve lo pme nt Co rpo ra tio n fo r juve nile s with o ut-o f-sc ho o l suspe nsio ns
Mc Cle lla n Hig h Sc ho o l’ s po ssib le future Re sto ra tive Justic e T e e n Co urt Pro g ra m
Inc re a se the numb e r o f re fe rra ls to NL R T e e n Co urt a nd NL R Middle Sc ho o l Co urt
Mo nito r ne wly insta lle d De te ntio n Sc re e ning Instrume nt to de te rmine whe the r PC ne e ds a da y o r e ve ning re po rting c e nte r, she lte r
De fine re c idivism
Be g in c o lle c ting o utc o me da ta o n c urre nt inta ke dive rsio n pro g ra m
Be g in c o lle c ting o utc o me da ta fo r pro b a tio n a nd pro b a tio n re la te d se rvic e s
Cre a te a nd insta ll a writte n pro b a tio n po lic y inc luding a g ra dua tio n re spo nse g rid
Use da ta to de te rmine if da y o r e ve ning re po rting c e nte r o r she lte r is ne e de d/ justifie d
L
Sa nta Cruz’ s Azte c a s So c c e r pro g ra m a nd vic tim/ o ffe nde r dia lo g ue pro g ra m
12% (20 o f 168)o f yo uth sc o re d in the hig h ra ng e (14+ po ints)
26% (43) yo uth we re de ta ine d
Ha d a n o ve ra ll de te ntio n o ve rride ra te o f 13% (19 o f 148)(c a lc ula te d a s the % o f yo uth who sc o re d a s lo w o r mo de ra te who we re de ta ine d).
20 o f the 28 o ve rride s we re e lig ib le fo r re le a se o r a lte rna tive , b ut pla c e d in a mo re re stric tive de te ntio n se tting (6 we re due to a ma nda to ry sta tuto ry ho ld); 8 we re o ve rride s do wn a nd re le a se d with a c ita tio n.
On the disc re tio na ry o ve rride s, do me stic inc ide nts whe re yo uth we re una b le to re turn ho me fo r sa fe ty re a so ns wa s the mo st c o mmo n re a so n, whic h indic a te s a she lte r wo uld b e wo rth c o nside ring .
38% (63) re fe rra ls c a me fro m sc ho o l-b a se d inc ide nts in this o rde r: Ja c kso nville Hig h, Mc Cle lla n Hig h, Ha ll Hig h, NL R Hig h, J. A. F a ir
F urthe r b re a kdo wn:
104 Ma le , 64 F e ma le 143 Bla c k, 22 White , 3 unkno wn Ag e ra ng e o f 11-18; ma jo rity we re 16 & 17 ye a rs o ld Ha d 17 nig ht c urfe w vio la tio ns a nd 9 da y c urfe w vio la tio ns Mo st c o mmo n c ha rg e s whe re Ba tte ry 3rd a nd Diso rde rly Co nduc t
L E ma ke c o nta c t with juve nile L E pre -a rre st dive rsio n:
R’ s OK pro g ra m
R T e e n Co urt & Middle Sc ho o l Co urt
Sc ho o l T e e n Co urt
L E a rre st juve nile & c o nta c t pa re nts & I nta ke I nta ke ma ke s de c isio n to re le a se o r de ta in:
1) Dive rt
R T e e n Co urt/ Middle Sc ho o l Co urt
nta ke Dive rsio n
se rvic e
2) Re le a se d with c ita tio n 3) Re le a se with writte n c o nditio ns b y inta ke 4) Ho me c o nfine me nt with e le c tro nic mo nito ring 5) E le c tro nic mo nito ring 6) Re le a se to she lte r 7) Re le a se to pa re nt/ g ua rdia n 8) De ta in in Juve nile De te ntio n Ce nte r
*Juve nile c a n b e re fe rre d to Unite d F a mily Se rvic e s(UF S) fo r re c e ipt o f vo lunta ry se rvic e s
No t dive rte d
wa s unsuc c e ssful Cha rg e s se nt to Pro se c uto r’ s Offic e fo r file de c isio n No c ha rg e s file d- E xit justic e syste m I nta ke me e ts with juve nile a nd pa re nts/ Pe titio n is file d Co urt da te is se t a nd Pe titio n is se rve d o n juve nile a nd pa re nts
T ria l, within 2 we e ks if in c usto dy, lo ng e r is no t in c usto dy No t a djudic a te d g uilty- E xit justic e syste m Adjudic a te d g uilty-
1) Pro b a tio n
(o b e y la ws, a tte nd sc ho o l, fo llo w c urfe w, no g a ng a c tivity, no drug s/ a lc o ho l, no we a po ns, re po rt to pro b a tio n o ffic e r)
a sse ssme nt, drug / a lc o ho l a sse ssme nt
a mily Se rvic e s (UF S)
use pro g ra m
ife Skills
le c tro nic mo nito ring
le c tro nic mo nito ring
nte r CT SP Pro g ra m
ve ning Re po rting Ce nte r
nte nsive yo uth b a ske tb a ll a c a de my
2) Se nte nc e d to c usto dy o f DYS
Suc c e ssfully c o mple te pro b a tio n- E xit justic e syste m Vio la tio n o f pro b a tio n-
1) Gra dua te d re spo nse in a c c o rda nc e with the re spo nse g rid 2) Co urt issue s a pic k up
Re pe a t: c a n b e se nte nc e d to a ny o f the
a djudic a tio n po ssib ilitie s