Pula ski Co unty JDAI Pro g re ss June 11, 2018 By: Cha stity Sc - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pula ski Co unty JDAI Pro g re ss June 11, 2018 By: Cha stity Sc ifre s a nd Ja so n Sza nyi

Da ta  E sta b lish a g re e me nt a b o ut c o mmo n da ta e le me nts to re vie w a nd tra c k a s a g ro up  Arre sts  Re fe rra ls a nd dive rsio ns  De te ntio n a dmissio ns  Pro g ra m o utc o me s a nd pub lic sa fe ty indic a to rs (e .g ., re c idivism; suc c e ssful c o mple tio n)

Re fe rra ls Ove r Pa st Se ve n Ye a rs 2500 2315 2257 2070 2037 2000 1839 1643 1416 1500 1323 Circ uit Cle rk’ s Offic e re po rts a to ta l o f 1,164 De linq ue nc y a nd 282 F INS T rua nc y c a se s file d in 2017 1000 500 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Numb e r o f Cita tio ns a nd Co mp la ints a s re po rte d b y I nta ke

De te ntio ns b y I nta ke Offic e rs 700 607 600 517 507 500 472 382 378 Numbe r of De te ntions 400 370 317 300 200 100 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Ye a r * I nta ke numb e rs do no t re fle c t the to ta l numb e r o f juve nile s de ta ine d. T o ta l numb e rs inc lude pic k-up o rde rs a nd wa rra nts.

Pula ski Co unty Juve nile De te ntio n Ce nte r Admissio ns in 2016 90 79 80 701 T o ta l 75 70 66 65 65 60 60 55 54 51 50 47 45 39 40 30 20 10 0

Pula ski Co unty Juve nile De te ntio n Ce nte r Admissio ns in 2017 60 56 568 T o ta l 53 53 53 51 51 50 50 47 44 42 40 36 32 30 20 10 0

L RPD Yo uth Arre sts 2017: T o p 10 Cha rg e s 11% o f a rre sts (117) T o p 2 o ffe nse s = o c c urre d a t J.A. 34% o f a ll a rre sts F a ir; 8% (79) L a rg e c a te g o ry fo r 186 200 “All Othe r Offe nse s” o c c urre d a t 180 150 1,018 T o ta l 160 Mc Cle lla n Arre sts 140 123 120 88 100 80 56 47 60 44 40 38 33 40 20 0

L RPD Arre sts b y Ra c e a nd Ge nde r 1000 885 900 800 742 700 600 500 400 276 300 200 89 100 35 0 Bla c k White Hisp a nic Ma le F e ma le

NL RPD Yo uth Arre sts 2017: T o p Cha rg e s 50 46 45 210 T o ta l 40 Arre sts 35 30 25 22 20 18 16 15 15 10 10 8 7 7 5 0 T he ft o f F le e ing Po sse ssio n o f a Diso rde rly T he ft b y Burg la ry Po sse ssio n o f a Do me stic T e rro ristic Pro pe rty Co ntro lle d Co nduc t Re c e iving Ha nd g un o n Ba tte ry 3rd T hre a te ning Sub sta nc e Sc ho o l Pro pe rty

NL RPD Arre sts b y Ra c e a nd Ge nde r 200 182 180 169 160 140 120 100 80 60 41 40 28 20 0 Bla c k White Ma le F e ma le

PCSO Yo uth Arre sts 2017: T o p Cha rg e s 70 62 60 L a rg e numb e r 50 o f “All Othe r 129 T o ta l Offe nse s” 40 Arre sts Ca te g o ry 30 20 13 12 9 10 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 0

PCSO Arre sts b y Ra c e a nd Ge nde r 120 100 96 96 80 60 40 33 31 20 3 0 Bla c k White Hisp a nic Ma le F e ma le

MPD Yo uth Arre st 2017: T o p 10 Cha rg e s 35 31 30 110 T o ta l 25 Arre sts 20 18 15 9 9 10 7 5 4 4 5 3 0

MPD Arre sts b y Ra c e a nd Ge nde r 90 83 80 70 66 60 50 42 40 27 30 20 10 2 0 Bla c k White Hisp a nic Ma le F e ma le

2016 Juve nile s Cha rg e d a s Adults 14 12 103 to ta l juve nile s c ha rg e d 10 a s a dults 8 6 4 2 0 Ja nua ry F e b rua ry Ma rc h April Ma y June July Aug ust Se pte mb e r Oc to b e r No ve mb e r De c e mb e r Ma le F e ma le

2017 Juve nile s Cha rg e d a s Adults 16 15 15 103 to ta l juve nile s c ha rg e d a s a dults. 17% (18) we re la te r 14 tra nsfe rre d to juve nile c o urt 12 12 10 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ja nua ry F e b rua ry Ma rc h April Ma y June July Aug ust Se pte mb e r Oc to b e r No ve mb e r De c e mb e r Ma le F e ma le

De te ntio n 2017 JDC Admissio ns -  Wha t do we know? L OS  Ad missio ns to d e te ntio n fe ll 35% fro m 2012 to 2016 (re fe rra ls fe ll 41% o ve r tha t time pe rio d ) 3 da ys o r fe we r 4-7 d a ys  In 2017 : 8-21 da ys Mo re tha n 21 da ys  1/ 3 (34%) o f yo uth we re re le a se d in 3 da ys o r fe we r a nd 55% we re re le a se d within a we e k  38% o f a dmissio ns we re fo r pro b a tio n vio la tio ns 34% (25% o f whic h we re fo r yo uth re le a se d in 3 da ys 21% o r fe we r; 40% we re re le a se d within a we e k)  In 2016, 60% o f yo uth ha d a t le a st o ne pre vio us a d missio n to d e te ntio n)  Que stions  Wha t d e te ntio n a lte rna tive s c o uld we intro d uc e with the 2015 c ha ng e s to § 9-27-322(a ), 24% pa rtic ula rly fo r yo uth with sho rt sta ys in d e te ntio n (e .g ., 3 d a ys o r fe we r)  Wha t c a n we d o to id e ntify a lte rna tive sa nc tio ns fo r yo uth with pro b a tio n vio la tio ns, 21% pa rtic ula rly fo r tho se re le a se d within 3 d a ys o r 1 we e k?

Alte rna tive s to De te ntio n  T he 2015 c ha ng e s to Ark Co de Ann § 9-27-322(a ) a llo ws inta ke o ffic e rs to use disc re tio n to se nd the a rre ste e ho me o n a n e le c tro nic mo nito r o r pla c e juve nile in she lte r c a re if una b le to lo c a te the juve nile ’ s pa re nt/ g ua rdia n.  Ho w is e le c tro nic mo nito r funde d a nd who a tta c he s mo nito r a nd e xpla ins c o nditio ns o f mo nito r re le a se ? I nta ke a nd Judg e s will ha ve to de te rmine pa ra me te rs a nd imple me nta tio n.  Wha t she lte rs a re a va ila b le ?  I nta ke o ffic e rs ha ve a utho rity to a llo w a rre ste e to re turn ho me upo n writte n c o nditio ns a nd re turn to c o urt within a sho rt pe rio d fo r a n e xpe dite d he a ring .  I nta ke a nd Judg e s will ha ve to de te rmine pa ra me te rs a nd imple me nta tio n me tho d o f writte n c o nditio ns.  Wo uld a llo w fo r re duc tio n in sho rt sta ys in de te ntio n whe re we kno w yo uth a re like ly to b e re le a se d a t de te ntio n he a ring a nd c o uld he lp e xpe dite first a ppe a ra nc e s o f yo uth a nd c o nne c tio n to se rvic e s

Pro b a tio n  What do we know?  I n 2017, 38% o f a ll JDC a dmissio ns we re fo r vio la tio ns o f pro b a tio n/ c o urt o rde rs  Of yo uth a dmitte d to de te ntio n o n VOPs, 25% we re re le a se d within 3 da ys o r fe we r a nd 40% we re re le a se d within a we e k  Wha t a lte rna tive re spo nse s c o uld b e use d to ho ld yo uth a c c o unta b le in a c o nstruc tive wa y?  Ho w c o uld a fo rma l syste m o f g ra dua te d re spo nse s (sa nc tio ns a nd e a rne d o ppo rtunitie s) he lp re duc e pro mo te c o mplia nc e , ho ld yo uth a c c o unta b le with skill-b uilding o ppo rtunitie s, a nd re duc e VOPs?

Wha t did the re se a rc he rs find?  “T he use o f inc e ntive s is e q ua lly impo rta nt (a nd o fte n no t suffic ie ntly c o nside re d) in pro b a tio n a nd pa ro le supe rvisio n”  “[S]a nc tio ns a nd inc e ntive s sho uld b e use d in c o njunc tio n with o ne a no the r to pro mo te c o mplia nc e a nd po sitive b e ha vio r” E ffe c tive Re spo nse to Offe nde r Be ha vio r: L e sso ns L e a rne d fo r Pro b a tio n a nd Pa ro le Supe rvisio n, A M . PROB . & E ASS ’ N (2012), availab le at http:/ / www.a ppa -ne t.o rg / e We b / do c s/ APPA/ pub s/ E ROBL L PPS-Re po rt.pdf. PAROL