Property Rights in Financial Markets Larry Harris USC Marshall - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

property rights in financial markets
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Property Rights in Financial Markets Larry Harris USC Marshall - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Property Rights in Financial Markets Larry Harris USC Marshall School of Business Columbia Program on the Law and Economics of Financial Markets May 20, 2008 Introduction The identification of important issues is a key object of the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Property Rights in Financial Markets

Larry Harris USC Marshall School of Business Columbia Program on the Law and Economics of Financial Markets May 20, 2008

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Introduction

  • The identification of important issues is a

key object of the Program on the Law and Economics of Capital Markets.

  • I will provide a quick survey of property

right issues in the financial markets.

  • These issues all have substantial public

policy implications.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Properties in Financial Markets

  • Most properties contested in financial

markets are intellectual properties.

  • Network externalities free rider problems

substantially complicate ownership issues for many financial products.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Common Economic Issues

  • Our main focus today

– Network externalities

  • Other common economic issues

associated with intellectual property

– Free rider problems – Incentives to innovate and copy – Monopoly costs

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Today’s Topic Agenda

  • Big network externality problems

– Ownership of futures contracts – Market data

  • Other topics

– Publication of fund portfolio positions – Security research and ratings – Innovative financial products and processes

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Futures Contracts

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Contract Monopolies

  • Enforced by exchange clearinghouses
  • Backed by federal laws preventing off-

board trading

  • The order flow externality provides

extraordinary protection to incumbents.

  • Contrast to the Options Clearing Corp
  • CME-CBOT and CME-NYMEX mergers
  • Competition from OTC derivatives
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Intellectual Property Issues

  • Contract design can be expensive but

monopoly can be too.

  • Contrast to patent law

– 20 years of protection, not forever

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Patents

  • Provide incentive to invest.
  • Create incentives to share inventions to

promote further inventions.

– Not necessary when keeping trade secrets is difficult

  • One-size-fits-all and litigation problems
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

A Related Design Issue

  • Who should own the right to write

contracts on well-known indices?

– S&P, Dow, Russell, MSCI, … – Presently the index manager

  • Should index managers be able to extract

the benefits of the network externality?

  • Did you see Titanic?
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Market Data

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Exchanges Sell Market Data

  • The order flow externality makes the data

from the largest exchanges valuable.

  • The data facilitate crossing, internalization,

and preferencing.

  • Exchanges and traders both argue that

they should own the data because they produce them.

  • Securities and futures market differences
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

The Reg NMS Solution

  • The order flow externality arises because

an offer to trade is an option.

  • Price the externality!
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Position Reports

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Mutual Funds

  • Mutual funds must publish their full

schedule of portfolio positions within 60 days of the end of each quarter.

– Forms N-Q and N-CSR

  • Allows interested investors to monitor

whether a fund is complying with its stated investment objective

  • Reveals proprietary fund strategy and

front-running opportunities

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Other Position Reporting Regs

  • Institutional investment advisors must

report aggregate positions within 45 days

  • f the end of each quarter (Form 13F)
  • Actively managed ETFs must report daily

– In effect, giving up all proprietary research in favor of a market-based distribution system – Other actively managed ETF proposals have been stalled at the SEC for at least five years.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Research

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

The Research Problem

  • Information is easily shared, making it

hard to control its distribution.

  • People pay for a first look but not

everyone can get a first look.

  • Issuers pay if the consumers will not.

– Research can lower cost of capital. – All sorts of related agency problems

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

An Additional Twist

  • By writing regulations that depend on

private credit ratings, the SEC

– Uses rating agency properties – Creates markets for the ratings

  • Since the SEC does not own the ratings, it

has limited control over them.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Innovative Financial Products

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Patents versus Trade Secrets

  • Trade secrets are hard to control with a

mobile labor force and little physical capital.

  • Poorly issued patents lead to extortion.
  • Without patents, the regulatory approval

process allows slow competitors to catch up to innovators.

– Examples: Index participations, ETFs, …

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conclusion

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Property Rights Are Difficult

  • Many disparate governors

– Patent law – Superseding agency jurisdictions – Network externalities and free rider problems

  • Many disparate and conflicting interests

– Among private rent-seekers – Among public policy values

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Some Proposed Principles

  • Results should not depend on network

externalities and free rider problems.

  • Externalities should be priced, if possible.
  • Regulators should not undercut incentives

to innovate

  • A balance between the benefits of

innovation and the costs of market power should govern market structure

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Free and Competitive

  • We seek free and competitive markets.
  • Too often people associate the former with

the latter.

  • Externalities and free rider problems often

make free markets uncompetitive.

– Free marketers often ignore these problems. – Simple is not necessarily good.

  • Benefits and dangers of regulation