Problems with Quality and Late Shuck Opening in Southeastern Shuck - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Problems with Quality and Late Shuck Opening in Southeastern Shuck - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Problems with Quality and Late Shuck Opening in Southeastern Shuck Opening in Southeastern Pecans in 2010 Lenny Wells UGA Horticulture UGA Horticulture Early 2010 Pecan Crop Predictions for Georgia f G i Littlepage Littlepage Pape Pape
Early 2010 Pecan Crop Predictions f G i for Georgia
Littlepage Pape Alabama NPSA Littlepage Pape Alabama NPSA 78 million 85 million 75 million 90 million
2010 Crop Maturity and D l I Development Issues
- Cool Spring Temperatures
Cool Spring Temperatures
“The temperature effect on date of nut maturity is
indirect in that springtime temperatures influence the starting date of fruit development.” Darrell Sparks UGA Horticulture
“Cool early season temperatures result in a pronounced
dela in pollen shed b t a minor dela in recepti it so UGA Horticulture delay in pollen shed, but a minor delay in receptivity, so chosen pollen shed –receptivity patterns may not match any more in a year with cool early season temperatures.” Tommy Thompson USDA pecan breeder,
Average Maximum Temperature h March
80 70 80 F) 50 60 erature ( 2010 2009 30 40
- x. Tempe
2009 2008 2007 10 20 Max 2007
Ft Valley Cordele Albany Tifton Vidalia
Green immature catkins with no evidence of anther dehiscence suggest that Stuart is a few days from pollen shed.
- Because many female
flowers on adjacent flowers on adjacent Desirable trees are already receptive, they cannot be pollinated by Stuart, b th ill l Rough, glistening fully developed stigma indicating receptivity of because they will no longer be receptive when Stuart pollen is shed. indicating receptivity of ‘Desirable’ flower is near peak. Bill Goff
Pollination Pollination
No Pollination Self-Pollination Sparks
Effect of Self‐Pollination d ‐‐‐Marquard, 1988
Self Cross Self Pollination Cross Pollination Weight 5 4g 6 5g** Weight 5.4g 6.5g Volume 7.4 ml 8.3ml** % Pops 11.7% 3.6%NS
Self Pollination results in: 17% l t t 17% less nut wt 11% smaller volume
Cool Spring Cool Spring
- Cool spring temperatures indirectly delayed
- Cool spring temperatures indirectly delayed
crop maturity as a result of the delay in budbreak budbreak
- Cool spring temperatures reduced pollination
- f ‘Desirable’ by ‘Stuart’ in some locations
- f Desirable by Stuart in some locations
(and potentially other cultivars), leading to more fruit abortion and lower quality more fruit abortion and lower quality
- Use more than one pollinator!
2010 Crop Maturity Issues 2010 Crop Maturity Issues
- Cool Spring Temperatures
- Cool Spring Temperatures
- Extreme Prolonged Heat
Average Maximum Temperature b June 1‐September 15
96 92 94 96 88 90 2010 2009 82 84 86 2009 2008 2007 78 80 82 2007 76 8
Ft Valley Cordele Albany Tifton Vidalia
Pecans, Heat, and Water Pecans, Heat, and Water
- Pecans have a very efficient water transport
Pecans have a very efficient water transport system
- Developed ability to avoid stomatal closure
Developed ability to avoid stomatal closure under high temps with adequate water
- Can tolerate temperatures of 106.5 with good
Can tolerate temperatures of 106.5 with good soil moisture
- Pecans are very inefficient users of water
Pecans are very inefficient users of water
- Require large amounts of water to support
- ptimal growth and fruit production
- ptimal growth and fruit production
- High daytime temperatures are not a serious
- High daytime temperatures are not a serious
limiting factor to pecan production UNLESS soil moisture is inadequate soil moisture is inadequate
- SE irrigation systems are designed to be
supplemental to rainfall supplemental to rainfall
- Under prolonged heat and inadequate soil
i ill ff moisture, pecans will suffer
2010 Crop Maturity Issues 2010 Crop Maturity Issues
- Cool Spring Temperatures
- Cool Spring Temperatures
- Extreme Prolonged Heat
S h
- Late Season Drought
Water Deficit b June 1‐September 15
1 3 5 ) ‐3 ‐1 1 ficit (in) 2010 2009 ‐7 ‐5 3 ater Def 2009 2008 2007 ‐11 ‐9 Wa 2007 ‐13
Ft Valley Cordele Albany Tifton Vidalia
Evapotranspiration b June 1‐September 15
24 23 24 22 in) 2010 2009 20 21 ET (i 2009 2008 2007 19 2007 18
Ft Valley Cordele Albany Tifton Vidalia
Tree Water Status 2010
120 (psi) 80 100
- tential (
20 40 60 Water Po 20
/ 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 1
Stem W
6 / 4 / 2 6 / 1 1 / 2 6 / 1 8 / 2 6 / 2 5 / 2 7 / 2 / 2 7 / 9 / 2 7 / 1 6 / 2 7 / 2 3 / 2 7 / 3 / 2 8 / 6 / 2 8 / 1 3 / 2 8 / 2 / 2 8 / 2 7 / 2 9 / 3 / 2
Date Evap Pan Tensiometer Dry
Nut Drought Induced Yield Nut Retention (%) Drought Induced Nut Drop (# nuts beneath canopy) Yield (lbs/tree) (July 20) (Aug. 13) Evap Pan 61a 22.6a 59a p Tensiometer 65a 27.8a 48ab Dry 60a 122.8b 30b
Summary Summary
- Cool spring temperatures indirectly delayed
nut maturity and directly affected pollination
- f certain cultivar combinations, which led to
fruit abortion
- Prolonged heat combined with inadequate