Presented by : Liza Fahmida Examination Committee: Dr. Sundar - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presented by liza fahmida examination committee dr sundar
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Presented by : Liza Fahmida Examination Committee: Dr. Sundar - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presented by : Liza Fahmida Examination Committee: Dr. Sundar Venkatesh (Chairperson) Dr. Juthathip Jongwanich (Co-Chair) Dr. Yuosre Badir (Member) 3/6/2012 1 Outline Objectives of the Study Exchange Rate Regimes in Bangladesh : An


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presented by : Liza Fahmida Examination Committee:

  • Dr. Sundar Venkatesh (Chairperson)
  • Dr. Juthathip Jongwanich (Co-Chair)
  • Dr. Yuosre Badir (Member)

3/6/2012 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

Objectives of the Study Exchange Rate Regimes in Bangladesh : An

Overview

Impact on Macro Economic Fundamentals Summery of Empirical Evidence Present Currency Situation Recommendations Conclusion

3/6/2012 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objectives

Evaluation of Exchange Rate Regimes in

Bangladesh: Fixed to Float Bangladesh: Fixed to Float

Analyze It’s Impact on Macro Economy: Export,

Workers Remittance and Foreign Reserve.

Exploring the Reasons of Present Currency Situation

3/6/2012 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Exchange Rate Regimes In Bangladesh :An Overview

3/6/2012 4

Fixed (1972) to Float (2003)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Exchange Rate Regimes In Bangladesh : An Overview cont.

Bangladesh had a fixed exchange rate system from

January,1972 to May 2003.

After more than 31 years, Bangladesh Bank changed it

into a floating exchange rate system in June 2003. into a floating exchange rate system in June 2003.

The reasons behind adopting new system was: Government’s commitment to the liberalization of the

country’s economy

IMF's ' ‘Conditionality’

Source: BB Financial Sector Review (2006)’ 3/6/2012 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Exchange Rate Regimes In Bangladesh : An Overview cont.

1972: Taka used to float with US$ via British Pound Sterling/GBP. 1975: Government adopted an expansionary monetary policy resulted high inflation and trade deficit. 1983: Facing serious macroeconomic problems, the government, for the first time accepted "do gooder's" i.e. World Bank-IMF's structural adjustment credit under ‘conditionality’ that involves deflationary macroeconomic policies and elimination of various subsidy programs. 1991:During this period, Government took some major reform in the exchange rate arrangements like : arrangements like :

  • I. Unified the exchange rate regime in January 1992 by abolishing the secondary

exchange market.

  • II. Removed some exchange controls in current account transactions.
  • III. In April 1994 government accepted the Article VIII obligation of the IMF.
  • IV. The removal of exchange controls induced inflows of WR through the official channels.

2003 : To meet up the economic demand and to fulfill the aid conditionality, on 29 May Bangladesh Bank issued a circular stating- effective from 31st May, 2003, Bangladesh Bank floated its exchange rate and followed a fully market based exchange rate for Taka. Under this arrangement, exchange rate is determined on the basis of demand and supply of the respective currencies. Source: Hossain, Aktar.2002.Exchange Rate, Capital Flows and International Trade

3/6/2012 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Exchange Rate Regimes In Bangladesh : An Overview cont.

Exchange Rate Movment

58.35 58.4 58.45 58.5 58.55 58.6 58.65 58.7 h a n g e R a te T K /$

Figure: Exchange Rate Movement immediately after inception of Floating

58.2 58.25 58.3 58.35 Ju n '-0 1 Ju n '-0 4 Ju n '-0 8 Ju n '-1 1 Ju n '-1 5 Ju n '-1 8 Ju n '-2 2 Ju n '-2 5 Ju n '-2 9 Ju ly'-0 3 Ju ly'-0 7 Ju ly'-1 Ju ly'-1 4 Ju ly'-1 7 Ju ly'-2 1 Ju ly'-2 4 Ju ly'-2 8 Ju ly'-3 1 Banking days E xch a n

After the introduction of free floating exchange rate system, there was no unusual raise of exchange rate till mid 2004.

3/6/2012 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Growth rate of GDP (% per year), Current Account Balance as Percentages of GDP, Inflation : Comparison with some neighboring countries Source: ADB Outlook’2011

  • Growth rate of GDP (% per year)

GDP

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Banglade sh

5.3 4.4 5.3 5.7 6.0 6.6 6.4 6.2 5.7 5.8 6.3

India

5.8 4.0 8.2 7.4 7.6 9.7 9.2 6.7 8.0 8.6 8.2

Sri Lanka

  • 1.5

4.0 5.9 5.0 5.5 7.7 6.8 6.0 3.5 7.6 8.0 C/A

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Banglade sh

  • 2.3

0.4 0.5 0.0

  • 1.5

1.3 1.4 0.9 2.7 3.7 0.2

India

0.2 0.8 0.7 0.3 0.3

  • 1.2
  • 1.4
  • 2.4
  • 2.8
  • 3.0
  • 3.5

Sri Lanka

  • 1.5
  • 1.8
  • 2.2
  • 3.0
  • 3.5
  • 5.3
  • 4.3
  • 9.5
  • 0.5
  • 3.8
  • 4.0

Inflation

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Banglade sh

1.6 2.8 4.4 4.7 5.2 7.2 7.2 9.9 6.7 7.3 8.0

India

4.7 3.4 5.3 5.0 5.0 5.2 5.0 8.7 2.1 9.2 7.8

Sri Lanka

11.0 10.2 2.6

  • 10.0

15.8 22.6 3.4 5.9 8.0

3/6/2012 Source: ADB Outlook: 2004-2011 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Impact on Macro Economic Fundamentals Export, Remittance, Reserve (FY 02-FY11)

15000 20000 25000 Export in mil US$ 5000 10000 Export in mil US$ Workers Remittance in mil US$ Reserve in mil US$

in million US$

FX Rate

3/6/2012 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

FOREIGN RESERVE

Period Reserves ($) 2002-2003 2469.6 2003-2004 2705 2004-2005 2930

6000 8000 10000 12000

Reserves($)

2005-2006 3483.8 2006-2007 5077.2 2007-2008 6148.8 2008-2009 7470.9 2009-2010 10749.7 2010-2011 10911.6

2000 4000 Reserves($)

  • reserve position increased over the years from 2003-2011

3/6/2012 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Impact on Macro Economic Fundamentals : The Growth Rate of GDP

3/6/2012 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Impact on Macro Economic Fundamentals: Relationship FX rate and Remittance

Correlation Matrix:

Correlation Export Remittance Reserve Exchange Rate 0.928315219 0.859373146 0.825444493 Regression Analysis: Regression Model Y=66.15+.010385 remittance The value of R square is .37 which means that the regression model explains 37% variation in exchange rate. The coefficient is very low which is and P value is quite high that is 3.74. So, the remittance does not show any significant impact on foreign exchange rate.

3/6/2012 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summery of Empirical Evidence

1.

There is strong evidence that exchange rate regimes have a clear, significantly negative impact on growth. William Miles, 2006

2.

Regime change has no statistically significant impact on the value

  • f Bangladesh currency once foreign exchange reserve is

incorporated in the regression model. Asad Karim Khan, June 2009 2009

  • 3. High seasonal demand for foreign currency because of increased

import bills, systematic withdrawal of excess liquidity by Bangladesh Bank, relatively faster expansion of credit and higher interest rates on various national savings instruments are the reasons behind the interest rate hike in the money market and depreciation of the nominal exchange rate. Rahman and Barua (2006)

3/6/2012 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Present Currency Situation

In the recent Taka depreciates against US$ drastically: Over the period, July 2010-January 2012, from Tk 70 to Tk 86 -- a depressing 23% fall down.

70 80 90 10 20 30 40 50 60 1/1/2003 4/1/2003 7/1/2003 10/1/2003 1/1/2004 4/1/2004 7/1/2004 10/1/2004 1/1/2005 4/1/2005 7/1/2005 10/1/2005 1/1/2006 4/1/2006 7/1/2006 10/1/2006 1/1/2007 4/1/2007 7/1/2007 10/1/2007 1/1/2008 4/1/2008 7/1/2008 10/1/2008 1/1/2009 4/1/2009 7/1/2009 10/1/2009 1/1/2010 4/1/2010 7/1/2010 10/1/2010 1/1/2011 4/1/2011 7/1/2011 10/1/2011 1/1/2012 USD/BDT

3/6/2012 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Present Currency Situation cont

The current account balance recorded a deficit of

372 million U. S. dollars in the July-October period in the current financial year 2011-2012.

Taka depreciates against US$ drastically: Over the Taka depreciates against US$ drastically: Over the

period, July 2010-January 2012, from Tk 70 to Tk 86

  • - a depressing 23% fall down.

3/6/2012 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Reasons for Currency Depreciation

High Inflation:

10 12 14 2 4 6 8 10 point to point 12 months average

3/6/2012 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Trade Deficit

30000.0 40000.0 50000.0 60000.0 0.0 10000.0 20000.0 Import Export

Figures: In million US$

IMPORT >EXPORT:CREATES DEMAND FOR FOREIGN CURRENCY

3/6/2012 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Low Foreign Direct Investment:

300.00% 350.00% 400.00%

growth rate

3/6/2012 18

  • 150.00%
  • 100.00%
  • 50.00%

0.00% 50.00% 100.00% 150.00% 200.00% 250.00% Jul/96-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun July-Dec. growth rate

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Recommendations

  • 1. Control Inflation
  • 2. Reduce Trade Deficit
  • 3. Enhancing Foreign Direct Investment
  • 4. Short Term Foreign Borrowings
  • 4. Short Term Foreign Borrowings
  • 5. Effective Capital Market
  • 6. Derivatives Market
  • 8. Autonomy of the Central Bank

3/6/2012 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Conclusion

  • Government and Regulator (BB) should formulate

Macro Economic (Fiscal and Monetary) Policy Objectives with the consistency of FX regime.

  • The development of macro economic fundamentals
  • The development of macro economic fundamentals

does not primarily depends on FX regime.

3/6/2012 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Thank You Thank You Thank You Thank You Thank You Thank You Thank You Thank You

3/6/2012 21