perspectives on concurrency and biological sciences
play

Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences Luca Bortolussi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences Luca Bortolussi 1 1 Department of Mathematics and Informatics University of Udine, Italy. SISSA, Trieste, 12 th


  1. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences Luca Bortolussi 1 1 Department of Mathematics and Informatics University of Udine, Italy. SISSA, Trieste, 12 th December 2005 Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  2. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Outline Concurrency and System Biology 1 Concurrency and Computations π -calculus Modeling Biological Systems Simulation and Semantics Increasing Expressiveness 2 Concurrent Constraint Programming Encoding Protein Folding A Glance on Concurrent Optimization Again on Modeling Biological Systems Beyond Simulations 3 Behaviours, Syntax and Dynamical Systems Checking the Models Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  3. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Outline Concurrency and System Biology 1 Concurrency and Computations π -calculus Modeling Biological Systems Simulation and Semantics Increasing Expressiveness 2 Concurrent Constraint Programming Encoding Protein Folding A Glance on Concurrent Optimization Again on Modeling Biological Systems Beyond Simulations 3 Behaviours, Syntax and Dynamical Systems Checking the Models Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  4. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Concurrency and Computations Old and New Computation R. Milner: Turing, Computing and Communication , In recollection of Alan Turing , 1997. Old Computing New Computing (formal) analysis of the (formal) evolution of the (informal) notion of (informal) notion of computability information passing Sequential Concurrent Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  5. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Concurrency and Computations Computation vs. Interaction Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  6. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations π -calculus Computing by Exchanging Information π -calculus There are two basic entities: agents and names Agents interacts by exchanging names through communication channels (message-based computation). Computation resides in the evolution of the status of the agents, by means of message passing (behavioral computation). That’s all! R. Milner, J. Parrow, D. Walker: A Calculus of Mobile Processes, I & II , Inf. Comput. , vol. 100, 1992 Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  7. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations π -calculus π -calculus: Graphical Syntax A. Phillips, L. Cardelli: A Graphical Representation for the Stochastic π -calculus , BioCONCUR05 , 2005. Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  8. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Modeling Biological Systems Stochastic π -calculus (C. Priami) Can we use π -calculus for (biological) simulation? Molecule Process Interaction capability Channel Interaction Communication Modification State change (of cellular components) (state transition systems) A. Regev and E. Shapiro Cellular Abstractions: Cells as Computation. Nature , vol. 429 (2002) Quantitative aspects must enter the picture: interaction “ rates ” assigned to channels. C.Priami. The stochastic pi-calculus. The Computer Journal 38: 578-589, 1995. Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  9. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Modeling Biological Systems Example: H + Cl A. Phillips - Feb. 2005 Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  10. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Modeling Biological Systems Example: H + Cl Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  11. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Modeling Biological Systems Another Example: Repressilator Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  12. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Modeling Biological Systems Another Example: Repressilator L. Cardelli - Sept. 2005 Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  13. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Simulation and Semantics How does it work? The Execution Model A state is the collection of all agents present at a given point in the simulation. In every state consider all pairs of agents ready to communicate on channels. These are the active transitions. Channel’s rates are associated to an exponential probability distribution over non-negative reals (time). A graph can be build (state-transition graph), where the vertices are the states and each enabled transition is an edge, labeled by the corresponding rate. Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  14. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Simulation and Semantics How does it work? The Simulation In every state, one transition is chosen among the active ones by running a race condition: the quickest communication wins and it is executed. The execution of a program corresponds to the execution of a Continuous Time Markov Chain. It’s a linear time evolution in the state space. SPiM is an Abstract Machine that implements this mechanism to perform simulations. A. Phillips and L. Cardelli: A Correct Abstract Machine for the Stochastic π -calculus , BioCONCUR04, 2004. Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  15. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Simulation and Semantics Pro and Cons Pro The modeling technique is modular and compositional. The same model (of a protein, of a gene) can be used in different contexts. It’s based on a well developed theory, and on an attractive metaphor. Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  16. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Simulation and Semantics Pro and Cons Cons The behaviour of the system depends on the rates, and it is not so clear how to assign them. There is the possibility of modeling only the interaction among biological entities. It is not natural to introduce a form of memory or some (algorithmical) computational mechanism. Modeling complex interactions can be very difficult. Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  17. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Outline Concurrency and System Biology 1 Concurrency and Computations π -calculus Modeling Biological Systems Simulation and Semantics Increasing Expressiveness 2 Concurrent Constraint Programming Encoding Protein Folding A Glance on Concurrent Optimization Again on Modeling Biological Systems Beyond Simulations 3 Behaviours, Syntax and Dynamical Systems Checking the Models Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  18. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations How to Increase Expressiveness Add algorithmical features to π -calculus. Add a form of local storage. Keep separated the description of interactions and the description of memory and computations. Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  19. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Concurrent Constraint Programming Computing with Constraints Constraint Programming is a declarative programming methodology where problems are encoded by sets of constraints (e.g., X ≤ Y , | X − Y | ≥ 10 , { X + Y } ⊆ A ∪ B ). Optimization problems are naturally encoded and in this case computations are traversing of search trees pruned by unsatisfiability of constraints. In general, variables do not have necessarily a unique value but a set of values that makes the constraints satisfiable. Computations are, in a sense, manipulations of sets of values . Classical computations can be reobtained by using (list of) sets containing just one point. Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

  20. Concurrency and System Biology Increasing Expressiveness Beyond Simulations Concurrent Constraint Programming Concurrent Constraint Programming Concurrent Constraint Programming combines together a calculus of interactions and the algorithmical power of constraints. Agents interact by telling constraints in a store (constraint store), and by asking if certain relation are verified (entailed) by the current set of constraints. Communication proceeds via the store, and it is asynchronous. The store is a form of memory, and it has algorithmical capabilities. V. A. Saraswat: Concurrent Constraint Programming , 1993. Luca Bortolussi Perspectives on Concurrency and Biological Sciences

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend