Peptide modeling in isolation and in interaction : steps towards - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

peptide modeling in isolation and in interaction steps
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Peptide modeling in isolation and in interaction : steps towards - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Peptide modeling in isolation and in interaction : steps towards rational peptide design Pierre Tuffry GT MASIM Paris, 17 novembre 2017 Equipe 1 : "Structure-based peptide design" (Dr P. Tuffery) Equipe 2 : "Computational


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Peptide modeling in isolation and in interaction : steps towards rational peptide design

Pierre Tufféry GT MASIM Paris, 17 novembre 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Equipe 1 : "Structure-based peptide design" (Dr P. Tuffery) Equipe 2 : "Computational approaches applied to pharmacological profiling" (Pr A-C. Camproux, Pr O. Taboureau) Equipe 3 : "Virtual screening and rational design of protein-protein interaction modulators with balanced ADME-Tox properties" (Dr M. Miteva)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Mobyle

Virtualization Service publication, workflows All-in-one ! cloud

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Therapeutic peptides: why ?

Griesenauer et al., Drug. Discov. Today, 2017

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Last production update (15/10/2015) :

l Prokaryotes genomes : l ~ 100 orders l ~ 200 families l ~ 700 genera l ~ 1,500 species l ~ 2,700 strains l Total : ~ 2,000,000 peptides l ~ 70 % of newcomers l ~ 200,000 (~ 20 %) of new intergenic SCSs are conserved to some extent : consistent

with genes found in RefSeq

Rey et al., Database, 2014

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Towards rational peptide design

Folding Binding Specificity

slide-10
SLIDE 10

De novo peptide structure modeling

Probabilistic model

  • f

polypeptidic chain Scoring Conformational Sampling

slide-11
SLIDE 11

HMM derived Structural alphabet

  • A. C. Camproux et al., Prot. Eng, 1999, J Mol Biol 339, 591–605 (2004)
slide-12
SLIDE 12

HMM derived Structural alphabet

R hidden states {S1,...,SR} emitting the vectors of descriptors of each fragment ~ R multi- gaussian densities fxi(y,qi ) with qi = (µi, si

2)

N states of a protein (X1,..,XL) ~ R states Markov chain (order 1) Transition Matrix (R*R) : Pjl = P(Xi=Sj | Xi-1=Sl ), 1<j,l<R Initial law of the chain (R) : uj = P(X1=Sj ), 1<j<R Generation of L vectors using a Gaussian distribution Observations describing the fragments of 4 alpha-C

X 1X 2 X 3 .... X L V1 v2 v3 .... vL

Succession of L unknown states following a Markovian process

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SA letters Phi/Psi

HMM-SA letter “O”

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Generating models

Conformer heap Rigid assembly Grow by one residue (or MC move)

Tuffery et al., J Comput Chem., 2005 Tuffery and Derreumaux, Proteins., 2005 Maupetit et al., J Comput Chem., 2010 Maupetit et al.,, Nucleic acids Res., 2009

  • 1. Grow peptide
  • 2. Monte-Carlo (~30 000 steps)
slide-15
SLIDE 15

De novo peptide structure modeling

Probabilistic model

  • f

polypeptidic chain Scoring Conformational Sampling

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Maupetit et al., Proteins, 2007 Maupetit et al., J. Comput Chem., 2009

Generating models

slide-17
SLIDE 17

De novo peptide structure modeling

Probabilistic model

  • f

polypeptidic chain Scoring Conformational Sampling

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Camproux et al., J. Mol. Biol., 2004

Amino acid sequence PSSM Local structure profile

Peptide structure de novo modelling (PEP-FOLD)

P(SA|Obs)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Peptide structure de novo modelling (PEP-FOLD1-2)

Maupetit et al. J. Comput Chem., 2009; Shen et al. J. Chem. Theor. Comput., 2014

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Lamiable et al., J. Comput Chem, 2016 ; Nucleic Acids Res., 2016

Peptide structure de novo modelling (PEP-FOLD3)

DSLLNLYKKKUODSKTKLHVZWAAVWESLGGSNKR 0 DSLKNLXPXKUOBQNTLHBBZEWAAAZNTPPQXKK 1 DSXKNMNPQYUSUSXTLNHBZWAAAAVQPSPSKKK 2 DSLKXKKPQKUSGSTXMHBBEBQMNMNNPZDSLLU 3 JPIKXKYPSPZFDSNTLHBBBAABVWVZZCDSKPG 4 DSLKNMXPQYUSUSNKLNPBZVWAAAVZZCDSKKG 5 DSKHQLXPIFUSGSTTPIHBVWAAVWEGZCDSLKN 6 DSKLNMNPQKUSUSLTKPQPVWAAVZIPQGDSKLG 7 DSLLNLXPIYUSUSLPPIHVZWAAAAVZZCDFQFZ 8 USKKLLLGIKUSUSNTMNHZWAAAVSKGZZDSKLN 9 DSXKKNXKNYUEGITMXLHBBVWAAAVZZCDSLKK 10 DSKKXLNPQYUSUSNTMLHBBVWAAABZZCDQKLK 11

P(Obs|SA) = P(SA|Obs) * P(Obs) / P(SA)

Complexity ~4.8 Complexity 1

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Lamiable et al., J. Comput Chem, 2016 ; Nucleic Acids Res., 2016

Peptide structure de novo modelling (PEP-FOLD3)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Shen et al., J. Chem. Theor. Comput., 2014 PEP-FOLD1 (cyan) and PEP-FOLD2 (magenta) compared to the experimental conformation (green) of 2jnh (top) and 1i6c (bottom)

Peptide structure de novo modelling (PEP-FOLD)

80 % native models in the top 5 models

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Shen et al., J. Chem. Theor. Comput., 2014 PEP-FOLD1 (cyan) and PEP-FOLD2 (magenta) compared to the experimental conformation (green) of 2jnh (top) and 1i6c (bottom)

Peptide structure de novo modelling (PEP-FOLD)

80 % native models in the top 5 models

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Peptide structure de novo modelling (PEP-FOLD)

1bhi (zinc finger like) Green : model rank2 Wheat : NMR RMSd : 6.3A RC-RMSd : 1.4A

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Peptide structure de novo modelling (PEP-FOLD)

1uao (10 aas) rank 1 RC-RMSd : 0.9A Green : model Wheat : NMR model 1aqg(11 aas) rank 1 RC-RMSd : 0.9A 2oru(20 aas) rank 2 RC-RMSd : 2.8A

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Peptide structure de novo modelling (PEP-FOLD)

2bn6 (P-element somatic inhibitor) Green : model rank 1 Cyan : NMR model RC-RMSd : 4.3A

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Peptide structure de novo modelling (PEP-FOLD)

1bjb (Amyloid beta [e16], res.1-28) Green : model rank 1 Cyan : NMR model

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Towards rational peptide design

Folding Binding specificity

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Peptide-protein interactions : an increasing panel of on- line tools

Blind docking Local docking

Peptide-protein complex

Blind Binding site identification User knowledge

Peptide- Protein complex DB

Homology modeling Blind docking pepATTRACT CABSDock AnchorDock ACCLUSTER PeptiMap PEPSite PEP-SiteFinder GalaxyPepDock HADDOCK PEP-FOLD3 Rosetta flexPEP-Dock

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Accessing peptide conformation in complexes ?

Can suboptimal conformations of peptides in isolation approximate conformation of peptides in interactionwith proteins ?

Peptidb collection (London & al., Structure, 2010) (100 peptides)

Lamiable et al., Methods Mol. Biol.,2017.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

PEP-SiteFinder : a protocol for binding site identification

Saladin et al., Nucleic Acids Res.,2014.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Peptide sub-optimal conformations to search for interaction sites ?

http://bioserv.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/PEP-SiteFinder/ CAPRI29 T66

PriA Helicase Bound to SSB C-terminal Tail Peptide (PDB code: 4NL8)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

M Y S E Q

PepATTRACT : blind rigid docking step

deVries et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 2017

http://bioserv.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/services/pepATTRACT/ Docking performance (50 best models) iRMSd < 2 : 34 % Binding site identification performance

  • Sens. Spec.

r_pepATTRACT 37.2 37.2 PEP-SiteFinder 27.3 27.3 PepSite 13.4 26.6

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Direct blind search for peptide-protein complex conformation ?

Combining PEP-FOLD and pepATTRACT

M Y S E Q

+ PEP-FOLD 10 most populated cluster centtroids

Peptide-protein complex is better sampled

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Direct blind search for peptide-protein complex conformation ? PEP-FOLD-ATTRACT for failed pepATTRACT

The first correct (iRMSD < 2) structure is at rank #6, with iRMSD = 1.1 A

KELCH-LIKE ECH-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 1 / 9-mer NRF2 PDB : 1X2J (unbound) 1X2R (bound)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Local docking by folding peptide at protein vicinity ?

Lamiable et al., Nucleic Acids Res.,2016.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Dashed: mean Plain: median

PeptiDB 41 complexes, APO protein conformation

Best ranked

Local docking by folding peptide at protein vicinity ?

slide-38
SLIDE 38

PEP-FOLD3: protein-peptide interactions

Generation ~ OK Improve scoring At the coarse grained level Sampling issue ? http://bioserv.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/PEP-FOLD3/

slide-39
SLIDE 39

CYPA + 20 * GP computed density crystal structure MD simulation ~300 ns

Hot spots of interaction

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Towards rational peptide design

Folding Binding Specificity

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Example of CASPASE9-PP2A interaction

PP2A PDB : 2IAE (ABC) CASPASE9 PDB : 1JXQ (AB) Interfering peptides identified using pepSCAN

(thanks to A. Rebollo)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Example of CASPASE9-PP2A interaction PEP-FOLD-ATTRACT in agreement with pepSCAN ?

PEP-FOLD-ATTRACT Q1 : CASPASE9 peptide to bind identified patch of PP2A ? PP2A chain C

Bruzzoni et al., Drug Discov. Today.,2017.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Example of CASPASE9-PP2A interaction PEP-FOLD-ATTRACT in agreement with pepSCAN ?

Q2 : CASPASE9 peptide specifically binds identified patch of PP2A ? PP2A chain C

Cumulated results over 18 non-overlapping peptides of 12 amino acids

Bruzzoni et al., Drug Discov. Today.,2017.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

bioserv.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/services/BCSearch

Mining protein structures to get information about candidate peptides.

Guyon et al., Bioinformatics 2014, Guyon et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 2015.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Rasolohery I. Moroy G. and Guyon F.

  • J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2017

PatchSearch: A Fast Computational Method for Off-Target Detection.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Construction of a correspondence graph. Correspondence

  • r

matching between atoms C1C1ʹ is linked to correspondence C2C2ʹ as distance between C1 and C2 is equivalent to distance between C1ʹ and C2ʹ. Method: Similarities searches based

  • n

conservation of internal distances between atoms a binding site. 1) Stringent clique searching in correspondence graph à rigid core of binding sites 2) Enlargement of the cliques to construct quasi-cliques in correspondence graph à flexible parts of binding sites.

PatchSearch: A Fast Computational Method for Off-Target Detection.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

PatchSearch: A Fast Computational Method for Off-Target Detection.

Comparaison with other approaches (AUC): Rasolohery I. Moroy G. and Guyon F.

  • J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2017
slide-48
SLIDE 48

« Some » directions

Clustering vs partitioning Force field optimization vs optimality Quick binding affinity estimates

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Thanks to

From http://shoichetlab.compbio.ucsf.edu/

MTi INSERM UMR-S 973

  • J. Maupetit
  • Y. Shen
  • J. Rey
  • F. Guyon
  • A. Saladin
  • G. Moroy
  • P. Thévenet
  • A. Lamiable
  • M. Vavrusa
  • S. deVries

IBPC CNRS UPR 9080

  • Ph. Derreumaux
  • U. Montreal, Canada
  • N. Mousseau
  • S. Coté

TUM Munchen, Germany

  • M. Zacharias
  • U. Montreal, Canada
  • N. Mousseau
  • S. Coté

http://bioserv.rpbs.univ-paris- diderot.fr