Outline 1. Introduction to PMFs 2. Reheating of the CMB photon 3. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

outline
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Outline 1. Introduction to PMFs 2. Reheating of the CMB photon 3. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

New constraints on small-scale primordial magnetic fields from Magnetic Reheating Shohei Saga (YITP, Kyoto University) Based on S.S, H.Tashiro, and S.Yokoyama [MNRAS 475 L 52(2018)] S.S, A.Ota, H.Tashiro, and S.Yokoyama in prep. Outline 1.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

New constraints on small-scale primordial magnetic fields from Magnetic Reheating

Shohei Saga (YITP, Kyoto University)

Based on S.S, H.Tashiro, and S.Yokoyama [MNRAS 475 L52(2018)] S.S, A.Ota, H.Tashiro, and S.Yokoyama in prep.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • 1. Introduction to PMFs
  • 2. Reheating of the CMB photon
  • 3. Magnetic Reheating
  • 4. Summary
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline

  • 1. Introduction to PMFs
  • 2. Reheating of the CMB photon
  • 3. Magnetic Reheating
  • 4. Summary

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1. Introduction to PMFs

Primordial Magnetic Fields(PMFs) generated by cosmological phenomena in the early universe Why we consider PMFs? Observed (large-scale) magnetic fields

  • Galaxy(~ kpc)

~ 10-5 - 10-6 Gauss

  • Cluster(~ Mpc)

~ 10-6 Gauss

  • Intergalactic(void)

> 10-16 - 10-21 Gauss Setting seed fields in the early universe and amplifying Cosmological constraint on PMFs

  • CMB anisotropy
  • CMB distortion
  • Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN)

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

1.1 Example(1) CMB anisotropy

PMFs generate CMB temperature and polarization anisotropies.

101 102 103

` 10−6 10−3 10−1 101 103 106 `(` + 1)C`/2⇡ ⇥ µK2⇤

TT TT TT TT TT TT

Primary Scalar magnetic Vector magnetic Passive tensor magnetic

nB = -2.9 B1Mpc = 4.5 nGauss Planck 2015 [1502.01549]

5

  • A. Lewis [astro-ph/0406096]

PB(k) ∝ knB ~ O(nGauss)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1.2 Example(2) CMB distortion

z

~ 2.0 × 106 ~ 4.0 × 104 Double Compton scattering Compton scattering # of CMB photon fix Bose-Einstein distribution Non-equilibrium state μ era y era Double Compton era

Decaying of PMFs generates μ and y distortion è From the observation of COBE, B < O(nG).

Chemical potential y-parameter

6

e− + γ ← → e− + γ + γ

  • J. Ganc and M. S. Sloth [1404.5957]
  • K. K. Kunze and E. Komatsu [1309.7994]
slide-7
SLIDE 7

1.3 Constraint on PMFs

In the cosmological observations,

PMFs on much smaller scales ?

n Gauss PMFs on Large Scale (≳ Mpc)

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Outline

  • 1. Introduction to PMFs
  • 2. Reheating of the CMB photon
  • 3. Magnetic Reheating
  • 4. Summary

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2. Reheating of the CMB photon

Before μ era, i.e., 2.0 × 106 ≲ 1 + z, Double Compton scattering is efficient.

  • Thermal equilibrium
  • Planck distribution

An energy injection increases # of CMB photons while # of baryons does not change. The baryon-photon number ratio η decreases. η = nb

z

9

~ 2.0 × 106 ~ 4.0 × 104 Compton scattering Double Compton scattering Planck distribution Compton scattering # of CMB photon fix Bose-Einstein distribution Non-equilibrium state μ era y era Double Compton era

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2.1 Baryon-photon ratio η

Baryon-photon ratio is independently constrained by BBN and CMB. Constrained value by BBN ηBBN = (6.19 ± 0.21) × 10−10

K.M.Nollet and G.Steigman [1312.5725]

η determines è photon dissociation rate, reaction rate, and so on. è abundance of light element generated in BBN era

R.H.Cyburt, B.D.Fields, and K.A.Olive [astro-ph/0503065]

10

η = nb nγ

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2.2 Baryon-photon ratio η

Baryon-photon ratio is determined independently by BBN and CMB. Constrained value by CMB (after the onset of the μ-era) ηCMB = (6.11 ± 0.08) × 10−10

Planck 2013 [1303.5076]

From CMB observations,

  • Temperature of CMB photons: TCMB
  • Density of baryons: Ωb0

We can directly determine η

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2.3 Baryon-photon ratio η

ηBBN = (6.19 ± 0.21) × 10−10 ηCMB = (6.11 ± 0.08) × 10−10

@BBN @CMB

η Standard model

z

12

Energy injection

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Outline

  • 1. Introduction to PMFs
  • 2. Reheating of the CMB photon
  • 3. Magnetic Reheating
  • 4. Summary

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

3 Magnetic Reheating

14

kD(z) ≈ 7.44 × 10−6(1 + z)3/2 Mpc−1 ∼ kSilk(z)

k

kD kD MHD mode analysis Example: Fast-magnetosonic mode

Large scale ← → Small scale

Spectrum of PMFs: Reheating photons Energy injection source = Diffusion of PMFs à increasing nγ (i.e., reheating)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

3.1 Delta-function type

101 102 103 104

102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109

Bdelta [nG]

kp [Mpc-1]

Magnetic reheating BBN CMB distortion

PB(k) = B2

deltaδD(ln (k/kp))

15

M.Kawasaki and M.Kusakabe [1204.6164] K.Jedamzik et al. [astro-ph/9911100]

slide-16
SLIDE 16

3.2 Power‐law type (Upper bound)

10-30 10-25 10-20 10-15 10-10 10-5 100 105

  • 3.0
  • 2.0
  • 1.0

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0

B [nG]

nB

Fast mode Alfven mode Planck constraint

k0 = 1 Mpc−1

16

PB(k) = B2 ✓ k k0 ◆nB+3

Scale-invariant

Planck 2015 [1502.01549]

slide-17
SLIDE 17

3.3 Anisotropic reheating(Preliminary)

k0 = 1 Mpc−1

17

PB(k) = B2 ✓ k k0 ◆nB+3

Scale-invariant

10-25 10-20 10-15 10-10 10-5 100 105

  • 3.0
  • 2.0
  • 1.0

0.0 1.0 2.0

B [nG]

nB

Anisotropic reheating zini = 1014 Uniform reheating (Fast) Uniform reheating (Alfven) Planck constraint

Preliminary

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Outline

  • 1. Introduction to PMFs
  • 2. Reheating of the CMB photon
  • 3. Magnetic Reheating
  • 4. Summary

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

4. Summary Magnetic Reheating is the novel mechanism to explore small-scale PMFs. for example, B ≲ 10−17 nG for nB = 1.0 10−23 nG for nB = 2.0 ó Planck ~ O(1.0 nG) !!!

19

In the case of power-law type spectrum, bluer tilt is strongly constrained: + Magnetic anisotropic reheating?