Outline of the Presentation 1. Introduction 2. Literature Review - - PDF document

outline of the presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Outline of the Presentation 1. Introduction 2. Literature Review - - PDF document

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Final Presentation 5 August 2009


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 1

1

  • Achfas ZACOEB

!!

Final Presentation

5 August 2009

"#$%"%&'"(""$()%"#%"*&+&() ($#,#%"*&&+&'""#"(""$( #(#,-"$%)

2

Outline of the Presentation

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Literature Review
  • a. Concrete Strength Assessment
  • b. Concrete Damage Detection
  • 3. Point Load Test
  • a. Basic Theory
  • b. Experimental Outline
  • c. Results and Discussion
  • 4. Stick Scanner
  • a. Imaging of Concrete
  • b. Outline and Specification
  • c. Performance and Verification
  • 5. Outlook of Field Application
  • 6. Concluding Remarks
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 2

3

Introduction

  • !

" ! ! ! # $#% & ''() '(( * % + !

4

Objectives

' ! , - ,- . ! ! ! ,- + / ! 0 % % %% 1 ! %% 2 !

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 3

5

.#

The direct determination of the strength of concrete implies that concrete specimens must be loaded to failure and requires special specimens to be taken, shipped, and tested at laboratories. This procedure may result in the actual strength of concrete, but may cause trouble and delay in evaluating existing structures. Because of that, special techniques have been developed in which attempts were made to measure some concrete properties other than strength, and then relate them to strength, durability, or any other property. Testing the core specimen extracted from a structure is the most reliable method for determining the concrete strength, including that at different distances from the surface. Cores usually have no standard dimensions, especially in height-to-diameter ratio which impairs the reliability of the result.

6

.#(cont.)

A more direct assessment on strength can be made by core sampling and testing. Cores are usually cut by means of a rotary cutting tool with diamond bits. In this manner, a cylindrical specimen is obtained, usually with it ends being uneven, parallel and square and sometimes with embedded pieces of reinforcement. The cores are visually described and can be used for the following test such as strength and density determination, depth of carbonation, chemical analysis, water/gas permeability, petrographic analysis, and chloride permeability. Although the method consists of expensive and time consuming

  • perations, cores give reliable and useful results since they are

mechanically tested to destruction (Neville, 1981).

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 4

7

.# (cont.)

The method of core testing is very popular. In the USA the diameter

  • f the cores is usually 10 - 28cm, cores with a diameter of 10 -

15cm are used in Sweden and Norway. In Japan cores are used when the maximum size of coarse aggregate is up to 50mm, but when the maximum size is 150mm or more, the coring method becomes inapplicable on a large scale, since the diameter of the cores would have to be greatly increased. Typically cores will be 100mm in diameter, and should ideally be at least three times the maximum aggregate size of Gmax in diameter.

8

.

  • 3 !

! " ! ! 4

  • 4 !

! "

5 5 5 65

%5!55! 7!"55"5'882

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 5

9

,

  • !

#

  • "
  • !

!

955555: !55

%"5'88'

. (cont.)

10

! +

  • "

"

  • # +

$%9" .((1

5555555 55555$%9"5.((1 #5# ;5# ,5# 5# 9 !5 !55#

. (cont.)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 6

11

Basic Theory

By taking the circular area of the core into account, an argument can be made that Equation should be written as:

2

d P IS =

where, IS : Point load index (MPa) P : Load (N) d : Core diameter (mm)

This figure can be used as conceptual model for derivation

  • n Equation:

2

4 d P IS π =

Point Load Test

7 < *" '8).

12

Point Load Test

Basic Theory (cont.)

& " .(('" " /(= * * ! ! + > ? De.

Wd P D P I

e S

π 4

2 =

=

" IS @5,55 5, P @5-5 De @59555 W @53555 d @5555 "55"55.(('

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 7

13

Point Load Test

Basic Theory (cont.)

S S

FI I =

) 50 (

Considering of IS variations with specimen size and shape lead to introduce a reference index IS(50) which corresponds to the IS of a diametrically loaded rock core of 50mm diameter. A new correction function which accounts for both size and shape effects by utilizing the concept of “equivalent core diameter” (De). This function (known as geometric correction factor) is given by:

45 .

50      

e

D

" @5555 A #%;"5'8B1

14

Point Load Test

Experimental Outline

% !

  • '(( .((

! C D% & ! * " ! E5555

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 8

15

Point Load Test

Experimental Outline (cont.)

* ! '.1" '((" 1( /1 ! ! "

  • 06
  • 16

Point Load Test

Experimental Outline (cont.)

7 ! ! " " h/d '( ! ! %" " h/d '1 .( ,-

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 9

17

Point Load Test

! F&%G%F !+ ,H " ν ('B " Ec .0, ! h/d = 1.5 h/d = 2.0

Experimental Outline (cont.)

18

Point Load Test

Experimental Outline (cont.)

' '.1 / '(( ! D% " '. 1( 'B /1 ,-

,%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 10

19

Point Loading Test

575% 59 5%5 %55,- ,-5% DATA ANALYSIS

5d 5/1

1.1 )( )1 '((

h/d A5'1 h/d A5.( 5d 1( h/d A5'1 h/d A5.(

Experimental Outline (cont.)

20

Point Load Test

$

%

. /#001 .2

  • 32
  • $

.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 11

21

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

4IS

CV A B 'B= h/d A .( d A 1( d/Gmax A '.1 CV B '0=

  • !
  • '( '1=

h/d A '1 d A /1 d/Gmax A ')1 CV B /.="

  • h/d A .(

d A 1( d/Gmax A '.1

22

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

$4 .

! ##"

  • 1 = C

! @

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 12

23

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

  • "

Gmax 0(

d = 35mm d = 50mm

24

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

4.5d 678

2. +.

$#% &1/(B ! ! 'B 01, * %" # + +4

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 13

25

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

4.5d 68

2. +.

+4

26

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

Influence of maximum coarse aggregate size of Gmax

I555"5IS(35) I555"5IS(50) * IS(35) Gmax 0(" h/d " Gmax .( ! . .1= " " d /1 # ,- d/Gmax (B)1 '.1 55555 5

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 14

27

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

. " X ! # d /1 Gmax .( ! CV " X (1/ (8B. *!" 1( >? !@ ∴555/1

28

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

Experimental and estimation values of IS(50) The results were satisfied enough by showing a value of absolute relative error less than 5%. The coefficient of correlation between them also high (R2 = 0.982) in case of core specimen diameter, d of 35mm and maximum coarse aggregate size, Gmax of 20mm is applied in concrete structures.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 15

29

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

Re-calculation procedure is conducted by using a new geometric factor for correcting point load index of core drilled specimen diameter of 35mm and performing linear regression analysis to propose an estimation formula for each group. The coefficient of correlation, R2 also shows an improvement in strong relationship between point load index and compressive strength of concrete core.

30

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

Minimum of sample size

7 $#%" " A / % + ! ! I" ! JJ'" + ! @

  • 8'/=

'1')=

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 16

31

Point Load Test

$(cont.)

, + 1 ! (B)2 (BB0 CV A5'(5 'B=5555!55 7555"55CV 5Gmax ! 5'(="5555555555555555 ''/'"55555+"5n A5'825 5''/'5A508'25≈ 8 & CV Gmax '1')= "

  • ()1"

'///" +" n A '82 '/// A 2B.8 ≈ 1

32

Stick Scanner

Imaging of Concrete

Visual examination is the most effective qualitative method of evaluation of structure soundness and identifying the typical distress symptoms together with the associated problems. Simple tools and instrument like camera with flash, magnifying glass, binoculars and gauge for crack width measurement, chisel and hammer are usually

  • needed. Occasionally, a light platform/scaffold tower

can be used for access to advantage. The periodic inspection covered the visual information data such as cracking, scaling, color change or stain, spalling, exposure, corrosion and rupture of steel reinforcement inside concrete Experienced engineers Tools and Instrument

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 17

33

Stick Scanner

Imaging of Concrete (cont.)

In-depth inspections are close-up, hands-on inspections, generally of a limited portion of a bridge, completed to identify deficiencies not readily detectable during routine inspections. An in-depth inspection frequently relies

  • n

special access equipment that provides the inspector better access to the structure than is available for a periodic inspection. Another method for assisting the inspection like core drilled will gather an existing concrete condition, and investigate the inside defects, such as carbonation depth, chloride ion diffusion, cracking, void, and corrosion. This inspection technology is developed by using a scanner (Stick Scanner) to capture internal concrete image from small diameter inspection borehole, whereas the measurement and analysis is confirmed by manipulating captured image in photograph stage.

34

Stick Scanner

Outline

  • ld model: SS-1

new model: SS-2

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 18

35

Stick Scanner

Detail of Parts

36

Stick Scanner

Performance

. 9

  • !
  • ! '

.01

  • " !
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 19

37

Stick Scanner

Performance (cont.)

The acquisition of scanning image Image size measurement error !

  • "

! K 1= ((B05555/((5 ((0.55552((5 04

38

Stick Scanner

Performance (cont.)

  • 2:

4 ! ! &! ! ! * ! !+ ((1" ('" (." (0" (1" (2" (B" '(" '1" .(" /(" 0(" 1( ! ! ! (0. ' A (0.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 20

39

Stick Scanner

Performance (cont.)

.2/= 1=

#:-"4

40

Stick Scanner

Performance (cont.)

. . # ! + ((1 !

  • &!

! ! + ! !

;.

  • .
  • . "4
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 21

41

Stick Scanner

Performance (cont.)

%

# $2 *

d 07 (:

  • "2
  • 42

Stick Scanner

Performance (cont.)

'.

.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 22

43

Stick Scanner

Performance (cont.)

  • 44

Stick Scanner

Performance (cont.)

%% '((( !

%5555@5%%'5 %5555@5%%.5

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 23

45

Outlook of Field Application

Project Illustration

%;.*<5. <+%

=."

46

Outlook of Field Application

Project Illustration (cont.)

%"$295'::

< !

%"$2>5.

<

=#

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 24

47

Outlook of Field Application

Project Illustration (cont.)

=..

%;.>5'::

48

Outlook of Field Application

In-Situ Strength Estimation

* ! 1( h/d .( %5+@ D5555A5.' 755A5.' 55555 @ D555A5'20, 755A5.08, 75% A5.(),

= 24.1MPa

  • !

Gmax 6

;+%4

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 25

49

Outlook of Field Application

Inside deterioration assessment

#5 ;55

  • 5

I5 #55 #5

%555!55

50

Outlook of Field Application

Interfacial debonding monitoring

Setup of four point bending test Location of inspection borehole and point load

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 26

51

Outlook of Field Application

Interfacial debonding monitoring (cont.)

Reference image of initial stage #5 5

  • 52

Concluding Remarks

Results obtained can be summarized according to the objectives of the study as follows: ' ,- ! 1(" hd '1 .( Gmaxd '.1 & ,- 'B 01, . # 1( ,- CV B 'B= # CV 81=" 1 ) Gmax .( 0(" ! / ! IS f’cc F" ! " 1(

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Midterm Seminar 11/22/2016 Student Number: 06642002 27

53

Concluding Remarks (cont.)

%% '((( ! !+ , ! &! ! ! .2/= " ' ((B0 ((0. /(( 2((" ! 1 7! .01" ! # ! " " " " ! 2 ! ,- ! %% 7 " # "

54

Suggested further study

During the investigation that had been undertaken in this study, many

  • ther alternatives and ideas have emerged. But, unfortunately within the

constraints of the study, not all of these could be examined. Suggestions for further study in the field of concrete structure soundness assessment are applying the developed method and device in existing concrete structures inspection program in the different environment condition. From these differences, more data and images will collected to improve our knowledge about concrete structure degradation in order to extent the remaining service life of structure in optimum ways.