Observational signatures of fragmenting protostellar disk Olga - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

observational signatures of fragmenting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Observational signatures of fragmenting protostellar disk Olga - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Observational signatures of fragmenting protostellar disk Olga Zakhozhay Main Astronomical Observatory National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine zkholga@mail.ru in collaboration with Eduard Vorobyov 1 and Michael Dunham 2 1 Institute of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Observational signatures of fragmenting protostellar disk

Olga Zakhozhay

Main Astronomical Observatory National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine zkholga@mail.ru

in collaboration with Eduard Vorobyov1 and Michael Dunham2

1Institute of Astrophysics, University Vienna, Austria 2Department of Astronomy , Yale University, USA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disk formation and evolution, and planet formation, are integral parts of the star formation process

Pre-stellar phase Class 0 and I phases T Tauri phase

  • 1+1D models (Hueso & Guillot 2005; Visser et al. 2009; Rice at al. 2010),
  • 2D models (Yorke & Bodenheimer 1999; Boss & Hartmann 2001;

Vorobyov & Basu 2006, 2010, Zhu et al. 2009),

  • 3D models (Krumholz et al. 2007; Kratter et al. 2010; Machida et al. 2009, 2010).

Global models that self-consistently follow Cloud => Disk transition

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Gas surface density and temperature maps for the model with initial core mass M = 1.23 Msun

Gas surface density (g cm-2) Temperature (K)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Number of fragments vs. time

Characteristic time of mass infall onto the disc

Md – disk mass

– mass infall rate onto the disk

Md = 0.2 – 0.25 Msun

= (2 – 3) 10-6 Msun yr-1

tinfall = 0.07 – 0.12 Myr

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Properties of fragments

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Zoomed-in surface density images for four proto-BDs (characterized by midplane temperature >103 K)

Hill radius

Mf – mass of the fragment (proto-BD)

rf – radial distance from the protostar to the fragment

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Calculation algorithm for the SEDs

* disk

F F F = +

disk d sc

F F F = +

Protostar

Disk

d – distance to YSO, 250 pc κν – opacity (Ossenkopf & Henning 1994, thin ice mantles (OH5 dust))

Disk Sink cell

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Test of the code

where, T* = 4000 K R* = 2.5 Rsun rout = 200 AU (270 AU) Chiang & Goldreich 1997

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Surface density maps and SEDs for the fragmenting disk

M = 55 MJup Tmp = 1660 K M = 64 MJup Tmp = 1375 K M = 52 MJup Tmp = 1190 K M = 32 MJup Tmp = 1180 K

proto-BD proto-BD proto-BD proto-BD

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Surface density maps and SEDs for the fragmenting disk

Star+disk are embedded within a core

M = 55 MJup Tmp = 1660 K M = 64 MJup Tmp = 1375 K M = 52 MJup Tmp = 1190 K M = 32 MJup Tmp = 1180 K

proto-BD proto-BD proto-BD proto-BD

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Surface density maps and SEDs for the non-fragmenting disk

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Simulated ALMA images (log (mJy beam-1), 1 hour, 0.1″)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Simulated ALMA images, (mJy beam-1, 1 hour, 0.1″)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Simulated ALMA images, (log (mJy beam-1), 1 hour, 0.5″)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions

  • Disk experiences multiple episodes of fragmentation in the embedded phase :
  • mass distribution function: maxima around 5 MJ and 60-70 MJ,
  • mass spectrum: from about Jupiter mass to very-low-mass stars.
  • Majority of fragments surface temperatures Tsurf<100K due to high optical

depths.

  • Some fragments: interior temperatures sufficient to evaporate dust grains.

These fragments have much higher surface densities and create a peak at ≈ 5μm in the SEDs.

  • Fragments can be detected with ALMA (1 hour, 0.1").
  • detection limit: 1.5 MJ (at 250 pc).
  • use a log scaling to resolve the spiral structure and fragments at ≤ 100 AU.
  • use oversaturated linear scaling to detect distant and low-mass fragments.
  • with resolution of 0.5" fragments may be detected at distances ≤ 150 pc.
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Model caveats

Uncertainties in dust opacity • Non-zero inclination

Dust sublimation temperature (1500K) Td.s. = 1000K, Fmax 18%, at λ = 1.2 μm Td.s. = 2000K, Fmax 46%, at λ = 1.75 μm