Nosocomial Infections Khachornsakdi Silpapojakul MD Prince of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nosocomial infections
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nosocomial Infections Khachornsakdi Silpapojakul MD Prince of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nosocomial Infections Khachornsakdi Silpapojakul MD Prince of Songkla University Hat yai, Thailand What? Nosocomial comes from the Greek word nosokomeion meaning hospital ( nosos = disease, komeo = to take care of ). From Wikipedia, the free


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nosocomial Infections

Khachornsakdi Silpapojakul MD Prince of Songkla University Hat yai, Thailand

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Nosocomial comes from the Greek word nosokomeion meaning hospital (nosos = disease, komeo = to take care of ).

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why epidemiologists should pay an attention to nosocomial infections?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Nosocomial Infections: How much?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88 (Suppl 10): S1-9

42 hospitals Point prevalence survey March 2001 18,456 patients. Patients on antibiotics = 48.5%

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Nosocomial Infection Rate 1985-1986, Thailand Hospital beds Rate (%) >700 15.2 400 – 700 4.1 <400 2.8

Ref.: Pinyowiwat W et al. Dept. of Epidemiology Ministry of Public Health

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Nosocomial Infections

Mortality-How much?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88 (Suppl 10): S1-9

42 hospitals Point prevalence survey March 2001 18,456 patients. Patients on antibiotics = 48.5%

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Nosocomial Infections

Morbidity-How much?

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Why epidemiologists should pay an attention to nosocomial infections?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88 (Suppl 10): S1-9

42 hospitals Point prevalence survey March 2001 18,456 patients. Patients on antibiotics = 48.5%

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

The number of admissions in Thailand is ~6.2

  • million. With a prevalence rate of 6.4%, the

estimated number of nosocomial cases was 396,800 cases with 26,586 deaths attributable to these infections in Year 2001.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Top ten morbidity rate of diseases under surveillance Thailand, 2001 (2544)

Morbidity Rate Rank Diseases Cases Deaths (Per 100,000 Pop.) 1 Acute diarrhoea 1020377 176 1643.3 2 Pyrexia of unknown origin 269740 54 434.4 3 Dengue haemorrhagic fever 139355 245 224.4 4 Food poisoning 138795 2 223.5 5 Pneumonia 135768 1057 218.6 6 Haemorrhagic conjunctivitis 107929 173.8 7 Influenza 42371 1 68.2 8 Dysentery 37601 2 60.6 9 Malaria 34925 81 56.2 10 Chickenpox 31707 1 51.1

Ref.: Annual Epidemiological Surveillance Report 2001, MOPH

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Top ten mortality rate of diseases under surveillance Thailand, 2002 (2545)

Mortality Rate Rank Diseases Cases Deaths (Per 100,000 Pop.) 1 Pneumonia 135768 1057 1.7 2 Tuberculosis 30033 287 0.46 3 Dengue haemorrhagic fever 139355 245 0.39 4 Suicide by liquid substance 5241 224 0.36 5 Acute diarrhoea 1020377 176 0.28 6 Leptospirosis 10217 171 0.28 7 Malaria 34925 81 0.13 8 Pyrexia of unknown origin 269740 54 0.09 9 Rabies 37 37 0.06 10 Encephalitis - total 430 30 0.05

Ref.: Annual Epidemiological Surveillance Report 2001, MOPH

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Causes of Death of Thai Physicians (1992-2001) No.=262 1= Cancers (35.1%)

1.1 Hepatoma (7.6%)

2= Heart Diseases (28.2%) 3=Accidents (12.6%) 4=Sepsis (3.4%) 5=Suicides (3.4%)

Source: Sithisarankul P et al. Intern Med J Thai 2004;20:188-191

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Causes of Death

Total deaths = 165 (100%)

  • 1. Vascular diseases

= 46 (28%) Coronary heart disease = 28 CVA = 16 Other vascular diseases = 2

  • 2. Cancers = 43 (26%)
  • 3. Injuries

= 37 (22%)

  • 4. Non-malignant GI & Liver disease= 22 (13%)
  • 5. Unknown causes.

= 9 (5%)

  • 6. Sudden deaths.

= 5 (3%)

slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

“ There are substantially more nosocomial infections each year than hospital admissions for either cancer or accidents and at least four times more than admissions for acute myocardial infarction.”

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Year 2006, Admission Diagnoses,PSU Hospital Rank Diseases Number of patients 1 Senile cataract 1,123 2 Malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung 734 3 Malignant neoplasm of breast 576 4 Malignant neoplasm of ovary 483 5 Intracranial injury 445 6 Malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile ducts 442 7 Malignant neoplasm of rectum 415 8 Malignant neoplasm of cervix uteri 415 9 Maternal care for known or suspected abnormality of pelvic organs 385 10 Lymphoid leukaemia 331

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Year 2006, Causes of Deaths, In-Patients, PSU Hospital Rank Causes of Deaths

  • No. of

Patients 1 Malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung 56 2 Acute myocardial infarction 51 3 Other septicaemia 38 4 Intracerebral haemorrhage 25 5 Malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile ducts 22 6 Diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 20 7 Aortic aneurysm and dissection 18 8 Chronic renal failure 18 9 Chronic ischaemic heart disease 17 10 Malignant neoplasm of cervix uteri 16 11 [HIV] disease resulting in 15 infectious and parasitic diseases

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Impacts of Nosocomial Infections on National Vital Statistics

slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38

229 patients were followed for 4.29+/-0.7 years

slide-39
SLIDE 39

2 UTIs 1 infected CAPD 1perianal abscess 1pneumonia 4 unknown site

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Nosocomial Infections

Economical Impacts-How much?

slide-41
SLIDE 41

J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88 (Suppl 10): S1-9

42 hospitals Point prevalence survey March 2001 18,456 patients. Patients on antibiotics = 48.5%

slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43

The number of admissions in Thailand is ~6.2

  • million. With a prevalence rate of 6.4%, the

annual hospital costs for management of N.I. was about 7 billion baht (175 million U.S. dollars).

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Health Expenditure 1980-2002 (Million baht)

Wibulpolprasert S et al. Thailand Health Profile 2001-2004 MOPH Bangkok, Thailand 2005 (ISBN: 974-465-889-4)

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Allocation of Government Health Budget by Service Category, 1993-2004

Wibulpolprasert S et al. Thailand Health Profile 2001-2004 MOPH Bangkok, Thailand 2005 (ISBN: 974-465-889-4)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Why rising cost of antibiotics???

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Antibiotic Resistance: PSU

slide-48
SLIDE 48

MRSA

1986 1987 1988 1989 PSU 5% 15% 25% 30%

Siriraj 14% 14% 23%

slide-49
SLIDE 49

PSU Antibiotic Resistance : MRSA

Year Resistance 1990 38% 1991 20% 1992 25% 1993 27% 1994 26% 1995 31% 1996 29% 1997 35% 1998 35% 1999 34% 2000 33%

slide-50
SLIDE 50

PSU Antibiotic Resistance - E. coli

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Ciprofloxacin 7% 6% 8% 16% 18% 18% 25% 24% 25% 25%

Amikacin 9% 6% 6% 4% 6% 7% 5% 5% 4% 5%

slide-51
SLIDE 51

PSU Antibiotic Resistance : Ps. aeruginosa Imipenem Resistance

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 % resistance 4% 9% 12% 8% 8% 10% 7% 11% 16%

slide-52
SLIDE 52

PSU Antibiotic Resistance : Ps. aeruginosa

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Imipenem 16% 19% 20% 18% 13% 17% Sulperazone 22% 19% 14% 13% 14% 10% Cefipime 20% Tazobactam 19% Amikacin 28% 28% 25% 25% 18% 14%

slide-53
SLIDE 53

PSU Antibiotics: Cost/Day

Amikacin 15 mg./kg q d. 262 bht. Sulperazone 2 g. q 12 hr. 1578 bht Imipenem 500 mg. q 6 hr. 3213 bht. Meropenem 0.5 g. q 6 hr. 3780 bht. Meropenem 1 g. q 8 hr. 4200 bht. Ertapenem

  • 1g. q d. 1498 bht.

Cefipeme 2 g. q 12 hr. 2088 bht. Tazocin 4.5 q 8 hr. 1890 bht.

slide-54
SLIDE 54

J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88 (Suppl 10): S1-9

42 hospitals Point prevalence survey March 2001 18,456 patients. Patients on antibiotics = 48.5%

slide-55
SLIDE 55

The number of admissions in Thailand is ~6.2

  • million. With a prevalence rate of 6.4%, the

annual hospital costs for management of N.I. was about 7 billion baht (175 million U.S. dollars).

slide-56
SLIDE 56

PSU Antibiotic Resistance : Acinetobacter Imipenem Resistance

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 2% 9% 31% 39%

slide-57
SLIDE 57

http://narst.dmsc.moph.go.th/

Percentage of susceptible Acinetobacter baumanii , Jan - Dec 2005

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Source of infection and Source of infection and

  • rganisms:PSU (2003
  • rganisms:PSU (2003-
  • 2004)

2004)

  • Lower respiratory tract infection

1 S.aureus 41.7%(MRSA 50%), 2 Acinetobacter spp. 25%, 3 K.pneumoniae 12.5% 4 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 12.5%

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Hand contamination of personnel in NICU Knittle M A et.al. J Ped 1975, 88, 433

  • No. of nurses

13

  • No. of cultures

151 Positive cultures 130 86.1%

  • E. coli

25 18.6% Klebsiella 119 78.7% Pseudo aeruginosa 25 16.5%

slide-60
SLIDE 60
slide-61
SLIDE 61
slide-62
SLIDE 62

Is there any other national impact of nosocomial infections besides their impacts on mortality and economy???

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Central Chest hospital TB Division Drug resistance survieillance Central prison Chiang Rai hospital Drug-resistant Tuber- culosis research fund Year 1995-6 1998 1999 1997-8 1998-9 1999 2000 2001-2 MDR-TB % HIV + 5.2 HIV - 0.4 3.64 3.58 2.1 4.8 5.52 3.39 HIV + 4.1 HIV - 2.0

Prevalence of primary MDR-TB in Thailand

(Courtesy: Manoon Leechavengvongs MD)

slide-64
SLIDE 64

MDR-TB surveillance, Chiangrai (1995- 1997) 1oresistance 2oresistance INH 14.5% 40.8% Rifampicin 11.5% 36.9% EMB 7.0% 17.7% MDR-TB 7.2% 30.8%

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Bacteremia, Bamrasnaradura Hospital (CID 1999, 180:87; Lancet 1999, 354, 1159)

  • 246 febrile patients
  • 182(74%) = HIV
  • 119(48%) had positive blood culture
  • 114 = HIV, only 5 = non-HIV
slide-66
SLIDE 66

TB Bacteremia, Bamrasnaradura Hospital

(CID 1999, 180:87; Lancet 1999, 354, 1159)

(1) = Cryptococcus (31) (2) = M. tbc. (27) (3) = MACS (24) (4) = Salmonella (16)

  • 5 of 20 (25%) of TB isolates= MDR-TB
slide-67
SLIDE 67

HIV & OPD; T.B. OUTBREAK

ST Vincent Hospital , Sydney , Australia O.P.D : Air conditioned treatment room September 1993 - One T.B. index case 91 HIVs followed for 7.4 mo. ( 1-14 mo.) 3 developed T.B. with identical RFLP All within 15 wks. of follow - up.

Ref: Couldwell D.L. et al : AIDS 1996 , 10-521

slide-68
SLIDE 68
slide-69
SLIDE 69
slide-70
SLIDE 70

วารสารวัณโรค โรคทรวงอกและเวชบําบัดวิกฤต 2548;27:35-46

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Year = 2004-2005 5 ER personnels had TB 3=TB lung (one with MDR-TB) 2=TB lung& LN TB rate =1,701per100,000 person-year

slide-72
SLIDE 72

TB Prevalence/100,000 populations: Terms

>1,000 = TB epidemic >100 = High risk for TB =<10 = Low risk for TB <1 = Entering the elimination phase 0.1 = TB eliminated

slide-73
SLIDE 73

MDR –TB. OUTBREAKS- ? WHERE ?

“ Enviroments where inmunocompromised persons are likely to be found , including health care facilities , homeless shelters and prisons. Virtually all MDR - TB. outbreaks have occurred in settings such as these.”

Ref : Beck - sague C et al : JAMA 1992: 268 : 1280-1286

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Central Chest hospital TB Division Drug resistance survieillance Central prison Chiang Rai hospital Drug-resistant Tuber- culosis research fund Year 1995-6 1998 1999 1997-8 1998-9 1999 2000 2001-2 MDR-TB % HIV + 5.2 HIV - 0.4 3.64 3.58 2.1 4.8 5.52 3.39 HIV + 4.1 HIV - 2.0

Prevalence of primary MDR-TB in Thailand

(Courtesy: Manoon Leechavengvongs MD)

slide-75
SLIDE 75

The prevalence of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis was 568 per 100,000 inmates, which was eight times higher than that in the general population.

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Eight (38%) of 21 culture-positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates had DNA fingerprints matching those of another inmate who was housed in the same room or in the same dormitory unit;

slide-77
SLIDE 77

www.insidetime.org/.../bangkokhilton.htm

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Prisoners at the Bangkok jail are locked in 40x14 feet wide cells housing 67 people with a concrete floor to sleep on and a personal space the size of an average

  • coffin. They are ‘banged up’ for 15 hours a day with one

‘stinking hole’, which serves as a lavatory for 67 people. A total of ten holes are for some 700 prisoners.

slide-79
SLIDE 79

A hospital ward in Malaysia

slide-80
SLIDE 80

An OPD. in a Thai provincial hospital

slide-81
SLIDE 81

An OPD. in a Thai provincial hospital

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Rate per 100,000 Pop.

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

  • Fig. 1 Reported Cases of Tuberculosis (Total) per 100,000 Population.

by Year, Thailand, 1993 - 2005.

Rate per 100,000 Pop.

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

  • Fig. 1 Reported Cases of Tuberculosis (Total) per 100,000 Population.

by Year, Thailand, 1993 - 2005.

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

  • Fig. 1 Reported Cases of Tuberculosis (Total) per 100,000 Population.

by Year, Thailand, 1993 - 2005.

slide-83
SLIDE 83
slide-84
SLIDE 84

Is there any other example of the role of hospital as an amplification place for diseases???

slide-85
SLIDE 85

SARS

slide-86
SLIDE 86
slide-87
SLIDE 87

Second Wave of Epidemic: in the Hospitals

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Nosocomial transmission was the primary acceleration of SARS infections accounting for 72% of cases in Toronto and 55% of probable cases in Taiwan.

Ref.: Booth CM et al. JAMA 2003;289:2801-9

  • CDC. MMWR 2003;52:461-6
slide-89
SLIDE 89

SARS occurred in healthcare workers in >70 hospitals throughout Beijing, and clusters of >20 probable SARS cases among healthcare workers

  • ccurred in four Beijing hospitals.
slide-90
SLIDE 90

Where in the hospital did the outbreak

  • ccur?
slide-91
SLIDE 91

EID 2004;10:782-788

Thirty- one cases of SARS occurred after exposure in the emergency room of the National Taiwan University Hospital.

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Crit Care Med 2005;33:S53-S60

Four hospitals had major nosocomial

  • utbreaks of SARS. Three of these
  • utbreaks occurred in ICUs.
slide-93
SLIDE 93

“Within 18 hrs of presentation, the patient was admitted to the ICU and 3 hrs later was placed in an isolation room.This 21-hr period of unprotected contact led to128 cases of SARS resulted from transmission of the virus within this hospital. (42% HCWs, 28% patients or visitors, and 30% household contacts).”

slide-94
SLIDE 94

What Next??? Avian Flu????

slide-95
SLIDE 95

A chicken farm An OPD

slide-96
SLIDE 96

A chicken farm A hospital ward