[PPT] - Neural Networks Hugo Larochelle ( @hugo_larochelle ) Google Brain PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

Neural Networks

Hugo Larochelle ( @hugo_larochelle ) Google Brain

SLIDE 2

NEURAL NETWORK ONLINE COURSE

2

Topics: online videos

for a more detailed

description of  neural networks…

… and much more!

http://info.usherbrooke.ca/hlarochelle/neural_networks

SLIDE 3

NEURAL NETWORK ONLINE COURSE

2

Topics: online videos

for a more detailed

description of  neural networks…

… and much more!

http://info.usherbrooke.ca/hlarochelle/neural_networks

SLIDE 4

NEURAL NETWORKS

3

What we’ll cover
how neural networks take input x and make predict f(x)
forward propagation
types of units
how to train neural nets (classifiers) on data
loss function
backpropagation
gradient descent algorithms
tricks of the trade
deep learning
unsupervised pre-training
dropout
batch normalization

...

x1

xd

...

xj

1 1

... ...

1

... ... ...

f(x)

x

SLIDE 5

Neural Networks

Making predictions with feedforward neural networks

SLIDE 6

ARTIFICIAL NEURON

5

Topics: connection weights, bias, activation function

Neuron pre-activation (or input activation):
Neuron (output) activation

    are the connection weights  is the neuron bias   is called the activation function

...

1

x1

xd

b w1

wd

d b w

a(x) = b + P

i wixi = b + w>x

P

P
h(x) = g(a(x)) = g(b + P

i wixi)

{
g(·)

b

+ w>

SLIDE 7

ARTIFICIAL NEURON

6

Topics: connection weights, bias, activation function

1

1

1

1

1

1

y1 x1 x2

biais

(from Pascal Vincent’s slides)

w
{

range determined   by bias only changes the position of the riff

·) b

{
g(·)

SLIDE 8

CAPACITY OF NEURAL NETWORK

7

Topics: single hidden layer neural network

R´ eseaux de neurones

1 1 1 1 .5

1.5

.7

.4
1

x1 x2 x

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

y1 y2 z zk

wkj wji

x1 x2 x1 x2 x1 x2 y1 y2

sortie k entr´ ee i cach´ ee j biais

(from Pascal Vincent’s slides)

SLIDE 9

CAPACITY OF NEURAL NETWORK

8

Topics: single hidden layer neural network

y1 y2 y4 y3 y3 y4 y2 y1 x1 x2 z1 z1 x1 x2

(from Pascal Vincent’s slides)

SLIDE 10

CAPACITY OF NEURAL NETWORK

9

Topics: single hidden layer neural network

(from Pascal Vincent’s slides)

x1 ... x1 x2 R1 R2 R2 R1 x2

trois couches

SLIDE 11

CAPACITY OF NEURAL NETWORK

10

Topics: universal approximation

Universal approximation theorem (Hornik, 1991):
‘‘a single hidden layer neural network with a linear output unit can approximate

any continuous function arbitrarily well, given enough hidden units’’

The result applies for sigmoid, tanh and many other hidden

layer activation functions

This is a good result, but it doesn’t mean there is a learning

algorithm that can find the necessary parameter values!

SLIDE 12

NEURAL NETWORK

11

Topics: multilayer neural network

Could have L hidden layers:
layer pre-activation for k>0
hidden layer activation (k from 1 to L):
output layer activation (k=L+1):

...

x1

xd

...

xj

1 1

... ...

1

... ... ...

h(k)(x) = g(a(k)(x))
h(L+1)(x) = o(a(L+1)(x)) = f(x)

(h(0)(x) = x)

h(1)(x)

h(2)(x)

) W(1)

W(2)

W(3)

b(1)

b(2)

b(3)

a(k)(x) = b(k) + W(k)h(k1)(x) (

SLIDE 13

ACTIVATION FUNCTION

12

Topics: sigmoid activation function

Squashes the neuron’s

pre-activation between   0 and 1

Always positive
Bounded
Strictly increasing
g(a) = sigm(a) =

1 1+exp(a)

SLIDE 14

ACTIVATION FUNCTION

13

Topics: hyperbolic tangent (‘‘tanh’’) activation function

Squashes the neuron’s

pre-activation between  

1 and 1
Can be positive or

negative

Bounded
Strictly increasing
g(a) = tanh(a) = exp(a)exp(a)

exp(a)+exp(a) = exp(2a)1 exp(2a)+1

SLIDE 15

ACTIVATION FUNCTION

14

Topics: rectified linear activation function

Bounded below by 0

(always non-negative)

Not upper bounded
Strictly increasing
Tends to give neurons

with sparse activities

g(a) = reclin(a) = max(0, a)

SLIDE 16

ACTIVATION FUNCTION

15

Topics: softmax activation function

For multi-class classification:
we need multiple outputs (1 output per class)
we would like to estimate the conditional probability
We use the softmax activation function at the output:

strictly positive
sums to one
Predicted class is the one with highest estimated probability

⇣

p(y = c|x)
|
o(a) = softmax(a) =

h

exp(a1) P

c exp(ac) . . .

exp(aC) P

c exp(ac)

i>

SLIDE 17

FLOW GRAPH

16

Topics: flow graph

Forward propagation can be

represented as an acyclic   flow graph

It’s a nice way of implementing

forward propagation in a modular  way

each box could be an object with an fprop method,

that computes the value of the box given its  parents

calling the fprop method of each box in the

right order yield forward propagation

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 18

Neural Networks

Training feedforward neural networks

SLIDE 19

MACHINE LEARNING

18

Topics: empirical risk minimization, regularization

Empirical (structural) risk minimization
framework to design learning algorithms
is a loss function
is a regularizer (penalizes certain values of )
Learning is cast as optimization
ideally, we’d optimize classification error, but it’s not smooth
loss function is a surrogate for what we truly should optimize (e.g. upper bound)

arg min

θ

1 T X

t

l(f(x(t); θ), y(t)) + λΩ(θ)

l(f(x(t); θ), y(t))
Ω(θ)
θ

SLIDE 20

MACHINE LEARNING

19

Topics: stochastic gradient descent (SGD)

Algorithm that performs updates after each example
initialize ( )
for N epochs
for each training example

✓ ✓

To apply this algorithm to neural network training, we need
the loss function
a procedure to compute the parameter gradients
the regularizer (and the gradient )
initialization method for
r

8

∆ = rθl(f(x(t); θ), y(t)) λrθΩ(θ)
r
(x(t), y(t))
θ
P r
θ θ + α ∆

)}

training epoch = iteration over all examples

l(f(x(t); θ), y(t))
rθl(f(x(t); θ), y(t))
r
Ω(θ)
rθΩ(θ)
θ ⌘ {W(1), b(1), . . . , W(L+1), b(L+1)}
θ

SLIDE 21

LOSS FUNCTION

20

Topics: loss function for classification

Neural network estimates
we could maximize the probabilities of given in the training set
To frame as minimization, we minimize the

negative log-likelihood

we take the log to simplify for numerical stability and math simplicity
sometimes referred to as cross-entropy

natural log (ln)

f(x)c = p(y = c|x)
x(t)

y(t)

l(f(x), y) = P

c 1(y=c) log f(x)c = log f(x)y

SLIDE 22

BACKPROPAGATION

21

Topics: backpropagation algorithm

Use the chain rule to efficiently compute gradients, top to bottom
compute output gradient (before activation) 
for k from L+1 to 1
compute gradients of hidden layer parameter
compute gradient of hidden layer below
compute gradient of hidden layer below (before activation)
ra(L+1)(x) log f(x)y

( = (e(y) f(x))

r
(
r
rb(k) log f(x)y

( = ra(k)(x) log f(x)y

rh(k−1)(x) log f(x)y

( = W(k)> ra(k)(x) log f(x)y

ra(k−1)(x) log f(x)y

( =

rh(k−1)(x) log f(x)y
[. . . , g0(a(k1)(x)j), . . . ]
rW(k) log f(x)y

( =

ra(k)(x) log f(x)y
h(k1)(x)>

SLIDE 23

ACTIVATION FUNCTION

22

Topics: sigmoid activation function gradient

Partial derivative:
g(a) = sigm(a) =

1 1+exp(a)

g0(a) = g(a)(1 g(a))

SLIDE 24

ACTIVATION FUNCTION

23

Topics: tanh activation function gradient

Partial derivative:
g(a) = tanh(a) = exp(a)exp(a)

exp(a)+exp(a) = exp(2a)1 exp(2a)+1

g0(a) = 1 g(a)2

SLIDE 25

ACTIVATION FUNCTION

24

Topics: rectified linear activation function gradient

Partial derivative:
g(a) = reclin(a) = max(0, a)

g0(a) = 1a>0

SLIDE 26

FLOW GRAPH

25

Topics: automatic differentiation

Each object also has a bprop method
it computes the gradient of the loss with

respect to each parent

fprop depends on the fprop of a box’s parents,

while bprop depends the bprop of a box’s children

By calling bprop in the reverse order,

we get backpropagation

only need to reach the parameters

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 27

FLOW GRAPH

25

Topics: automatic differentiation

Each object also has a bprop method
it computes the gradient of the loss with

respect to each parent

fprop depends on the fprop of a box’s parents,

while bprop depends the bprop of a box’s children

By calling bprop in the reverse order,

we get backpropagation

only need to reach the parameters
l(f(x), y) =

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 28

FLOW GRAPH

25

Topics: automatic differentiation

Each object also has a bprop method
it computes the gradient of the loss with

respect to each parent

fprop depends on the fprop of a box’s parents,

while bprop depends the bprop of a box’s children

By calling bprop in the reverse order,

we get backpropagation

only need to reach the parameters
l(f(x), y) =

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 29

FLOW GRAPH

25

Topics: automatic differentiation

Each object also has a bprop method
it computes the gradient of the loss with

respect to each parent

fprop depends on the fprop of a box’s parents,

while bprop depends the bprop of a box’s children

By calling bprop in the reverse order,

we get backpropagation

only need to reach the parameters
l(f(x), y) =

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 30

FLOW GRAPH

25

Topics: automatic differentiation

Each object also has a bprop method
it computes the gradient of the loss with

respect to each parent

fprop depends on the fprop of a box’s parents,

while bprop depends the bprop of a box’s children

By calling bprop in the reverse order,

we get backpropagation

only need to reach the parameters
l(f(x), y) =

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 31

FLOW GRAPH

25

Topics: automatic differentiation

Each object also has a bprop method
it computes the gradient of the loss with

respect to each parent

fprop depends on the fprop of a box’s parents,

while bprop depends the bprop of a box’s children

By calling bprop in the reverse order,

we get backpropagation

only need to reach the parameters
l(f(x), y) =

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 32

FLOW GRAPH

25

Topics: automatic differentiation

Each object also has a bprop method
it computes the gradient of the loss with

respect to each parent

fprop depends on the fprop of a box’s parents,

while bprop depends the bprop of a box’s children

By calling bprop in the reverse order,

we get backpropagation

only need to reach the parameters
l(f(x), y) =

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 33

FLOW GRAPH

25

Topics: automatic differentiation

Each object also has a bprop method
it computes the gradient of the loss with

respect to each parent

fprop depends on the fprop of a box’s parents,

while bprop depends the bprop of a box’s children

By calling bprop in the reverse order,

we get backpropagation

only need to reach the parameters
l(f(x), y) =

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 34

FLOW GRAPH

25

Topics: automatic differentiation

Each object also has a bprop method
it computes the gradient of the loss with

respect to each parent

fprop depends on the fprop of a box’s parents,

while bprop depends the bprop of a box’s children

By calling bprop in the reverse order,

we get backpropagation

only need to reach the parameters
l(f(x), y) =

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 35

FLOW GRAPH

25

Topics: automatic differentiation

Each object also has a bprop method
it computes the gradient of the loss with

respect to each parent

fprop depends on the fprop of a box’s parents,

while bprop depends the bprop of a box’s children

By calling bprop in the reverse order,

we get backpropagation

only need to reach the parameters
l(f(x), y) =

(1) x

(2) W(1)

(3) W(2)

(2) b(1)

(3) b(2)

x f(x)

a(1)(x) =
a(2)(x) =
h(1)(x) =

SLIDE 36

REGULARIZATION

26

Topics: L2 regularization

Gradient:
Only applied on weights, not on biases (weight decay)
Can be interpreted as having a Gaussian prior over the

weights

Ω(θ) = P

k

P

i

P

j

⇣ W (k)

i,j

⌘2 = P

k ||W(k)||2 F

P P P ⇣

rW(k)Ω(θ) = 2W(k)

SLIDE 37

INITIALIZATION

27

Topics: initialization

For biases
initialize all to 0
For weights
Can’t initialize weights to 0 with tanh activation
we can show that all gradients would then be 0 (saddle point)
Can’t initialize all weights to the same value
we can show that all hidden units in a layer will always behave the same
need to break symmetry
Recipe: sample from where
the idea is to sample around 0 but break symmetry
other values of b could work well (not an exact science)
W(k)

i,j

) U [b, b]

] b =

p 6

p

Hk+Hk−1

( see Glorot & Bengio, 2010) size of h(k)(x)

SLIDE 38

MODEL SELECTION

28

Topics: grid search, random search

To search for the best configuration of the hyper-parameters:
you can perform a grid search
specify a set of values you want to test for each hyper-parameter
try all possible configurations of these values
you can perform a random search (Bergstra and Bengio, 2012)
specify a distribution over the values of each hyper-parameters (e.g. uniform in some range)
sample independently each hyper-parameter to get configurations
bayesian optimization or sequential model-based optimization …
Use a validation set (not the test set) performance to

select the best configuration

You can go back and refine the grid/distributions if needed

SLIDE 39

KNOWING WHEN TO STOP

29

Topics: early stopping

To select the number of epochs, stop training when validation

set error increases (with some look ahead)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Training Validation

underfitting

verfitting

number of epochs

SLIDE 40

OTHER TRICKS OF THE TRADE

30

Topics: normalization of data, decaying learning rate

Normalizing your (real-valued) data
for dimension xi subtract its training set mean
divide by dimension xi by its training set standard deviation
this can speed up training (in number of epochs)
Decaying the learning rate
as we get closer to the optimum, makes sense to take smaller update steps

(i) start with large learning rate (e.g. 0.1) (ii) maintain until validation error stops improving (iii) divide learning rate by 2 and go back to (ii)

SLIDE 41

OTHER TRICKS OF THE TRADE

31

Topics: mini-batch, momentum

Can update based on a mini-batch of example (instead of 1 example):
the gradient is the average regularized loss for that mini-batch
can give a more accurate estimate of the risk gradient
can leverage matrix/matrix operations, which are more efficient
Can use an exponential average of previous gradients:
can get through plateaus more quickly, by ‘‘gaining momentum’’

r

(t) θ

= rθl(f(x(t)), y(t)) + r

(t1) θ

SLIDE 42

OTHER TRICKS OF THE TRADE

32

Topics: Adagrad, RMSProp, Adam

Updates with adaptive learning rates (“one learning rate per parameter”)
Adagrad: learning rates are scaled by the square root of the cumulative sum of squared

gradients

RMSProp: instead of cumulative sum, use exponential moving average
Adam: essentially combines RMSProp with momentum

r

(t) θ

= rθl(f(x(t)), y(t)) p (t) + ✏ γ(t) = βγ(t−1) + (1 β) ⇣ rθl(f(x(t)), y(t)) ⌘2 γ(t) = γ(t−1) + ⇣ rθl(f(x(t)), y(t)) ⌘2 r

(t) θ

= rθl(f(x(t)), y(t)) p (t) + ✏

SLIDE 43

GRADIENT CHECKING

33

Topics: finite difference approximation

To debug your implementation of fprop/bprop, you can

compare with a finite-difference approximation of the gradient

would be the loss
would be a parameter
would be the loss if you add to the parameter
would be the loss if you subtract to the parameter
@f(x)

@x

⇡ f(x+✏)f(x✏)

2✏

f(x)

⇡ ) x ⇡ x ✏

f(x + ✏)

) f(x ✏)

⇡ x ✏

SLIDE 44

DEBUGGING ON SMALL DATASET

34

Topics: debugging on small dataset

Next, make sure your model is able to (over)fit on a very

small dataset (~50 examples) 

If not, investigate the following situations:
Are some of the units saturated, even before the first update?
scale down the initialization of your parameters for these units
properly normalize the inputs
Is the training error bouncing up and down?
decrease the learning rate
Note that this isn’t a replacement for gradient checking
could still overfit with some of the gradients being wrong

SLIDE 45

Neural Networks

Training deep feed-forward neural networks

SLIDE 46

Topics: inspiration from visual cortex

DEEP LEARNING

36

SLIDE 47

Topics: inspiration from visual cortex

DEEP LEARNING

36

SLIDE 48

Topics: inspiration from visual cortex

DEEP LEARNING

36

SLIDE 49

Topics: inspiration from visual cortex

DEEP LEARNING

36

SLIDE 50

Topics: inspiration from visual cortex

DEEP LEARNING

36

edges  ...

SLIDE 51

Topics: inspiration from visual cortex

DEEP LEARNING

36

edges  ... nose mouth eyes

SLIDE 52

Topics: inspiration from visual cortex

DEEP LEARNING

36

edges  ... nose mouth eyes face

SLIDE 53

DEEP LEARNING

37

Topics: theoretical justification

A deep architecture can represent certain functions

(exponentially) more compactly

Example: Boolean functions
a Boolean circuit is a sort of feed-forward network where hidden units are logic

gates (i.e. AND, OR or NOT functions of their arguments)

any Boolean function can be represented by a ‘‘single hidden layer’’ Boolean circuit
however, it might require an exponential number of hidden units
it can be shown that there are Boolean functions which
require an exponential number of hidden units in the single layer case
require a polynomial number of hidden units if we can adapt the number of layers
See ‘‘Exploring Strategies for Training Deep Neural Networks’’ for a discussion

SLIDE 54

DEEP LEARNING

38

Topics: success story: speech recognition

SLIDE 55

DEEP LEARNING

39

Topics: success story: computer vision

SLIDE 56

DEEP LEARNING

40

Topics: why training is hard

First hypothesis: optimization is harder

(underfitting)

vanishing gradient problem
saturated units block gradient

propagation

This is a well known problem in

recurrent neural networks

...

x1

xd

...

xj

1 1

... ...

1

... ... ...

SLIDE 57

DEEP LEARNING

41

Topics: why training is hard

Second hypothesis: overfitting
we are exploring a space of complex functions
deep nets usually have lots of parameters
Might be in a high variance / low bias situation

low variance/ high bias good trade-off high variance/ low bias

f ⇤
f ⇤
f ⇤

f

possible

f

possible

f

possible

SLIDE 58

DEEP LEARNING

41

Topics: why training is hard

Second hypothesis: overfitting
we are exploring a space of complex functions
deep nets usually have lots of parameters
Might be in a high variance / low bias situation

low variance/ high bias good trade-off high variance/ low bias

f ⇤
f ⇤
f ⇤

f

possible

f

possible

f

possible

SLIDE 59

DEEP LEARNING

42

Topics: why training is hard

Depending on the problem, one or the other situation will

tend to dominate

If first hypothesis (underfitting): better optimize
use better optimization methods
use GPUs
If second hypothesis (overfitting): use better regularization
unsupervised pre-training
stochastic «dropout» training

SLIDE 60

DEEP LEARNING

43

Topics: why training is hard

Depending on the problem, one or the other situation will

tend to dominate

If first hypothesis (underfitting): better optimize
use better optimization methods
use GPUs
If second hypothesis (overfitting): use better regularization
unsupervised pre-training
stochastic «dropout» training

SLIDE 61

UNSUPERVISED PRE-TRAINING

44

Topics: unsupervised pre-training

Solution: initialize hidden layers using unsupervised learning
force network to represent latent structure of input distribution
encourage hidden layers to encode that structure

character image random image

SLIDE 62

UNSUPERVISED PRE-TRAINING

44

Topics: unsupervised pre-training

Solution: initialize hidden layers using unsupervised learning
force network to represent latent structure of input distribution
encourage hidden layers to encode that structure

character image random image Why is one a character and the other is not ?

SLIDE 63

UNSUPERVISED PRE-TRAINING

45

Topics: unsupervised pre-training

Solution: initialize hidden layers using unsupervised learning
this is a harder task than supervised learning (classification)
hence we expect less overfitting

character image random image Why is one a character and the other is not ?

SLIDE 64

AUTOENCODER

46

Topics: autoencoder, encoder, decoder, tied weights

Feed-forward neural network trained to reproduce its input at

the output layer

Decoder
Encoder

bj

ck

x

x

W

W∗

h(x) = g(a(x)) = sigm(b + Wx) b x =

(b

a(x)) = sigm(c + W∗h(x))

for binary inputs

= W

(tied weights)

h(x) =

SLIDE 65

UNSUPERVISED PRE-TRAINING

47

Topics: unsupervised pre-training

We will use a greedy, layer-wise procedure
train one layer at a time, from first to last, with unsupervised criterion
fix the parameters of previous hidden layers
previous layers viewed as feature extraction

...

x1

xd

...

xj

1

... ... ...

x1

xd

...

xj

1

... ...

1

... ... ... ... ...

x1

xd

...

xj

1

... ...

1 1

... ...

SLIDE 66

FINE-TUNING

48

Topics: fine-tuning

Once all layers are pre-trained
add output layer
train the whole network using supervised learning
Supervised learning is performed as in

a regular feed-forward network

forward propagation, backpropagation and update
We call this last phase fine-tuning
all parameters are ‘‘tuned’’ for the supervised task

at hand

representation is adjusted to be more discriminative

... ... ...

x1

xd

...

xj

1

... ...

1 1

... ... ...

1

SLIDE 67

DEEP LEARNING

49

Topics: impact of initialization

Why Does Unsupervised Pre-training Help Deep Learning? Erhan, Bengio, Courville, Manzagol, Vincent and Bengio, 2011

SLIDE 68

DEEP LEARNING

49

Topics: impact of initialization

Acts as a regularizer:

overfits less with large capacity
underfits with small capacity

Why Does Unsupervised Pre-training Help Deep Learning? Erhan, Bengio, Courville, Manzagol, Vincent and Bengio, 2011

SLIDE 69

DEEP LEARNING

50

Topics: why training is hard

Depending on the problem, one or the other situation will

tend to dominate

If first hypothesis (underfitting): better optimize
use better optimization methods
use GPUs
If second hypothesis (overfitting): use better regularization
unsupervised pre-training
stochastic «dropout» training

SLIDE 70

DROPOUT

51

Topics: dropout

Idea: «cripple» neural network by

removing hidden units stochastically

each hidden unit is set to 0 with

probability 0.5

hidden units cannot co-adapt to other

units

hidden units must be more generally

useful

Could use a different dropout

probability, but 0.5 usually  works well

...

x1

xd

...

xj

1 1

... ...

1

... ... ...

h(1)(x)

h(2)(x)

) W(1)

W(2)

W(3)

b(1)

b(2)

b(3)

SLIDE 71

DROPOUT

51

Topics: dropout

Idea: «cripple» neural network by

removing hidden units stochastically

each hidden unit is set to 0 with

probability 0.5

hidden units cannot co-adapt to other

units

hidden units must be more generally

useful

Could use a different dropout

probability, but 0.5 usually  works well

...

x1

xd

...

xj

1 1

... ...

1

... ... ...

h(1)(x)

h(2)(x)

) W(1)

W(2)

W(3)

b(1)

b(2)

b(3)

SLIDE 72

DROPOUT

51

Topics: dropout

Idea: «cripple» neural network by

removing hidden units stochastically

each hidden unit is set to 0 with

probability 0.5

hidden units cannot co-adapt to other

units

hidden units must be more generally

useful

Could use a different dropout

probability, but 0.5 usually  works well

...

x1

xd

...

xj

1 1

... ...

1

... ... ...

h(1)(x)

h(2)(x)

) W(1)

W(2)

W(3)

b(1)

b(2)

b(3)

SLIDE 73

DROPOUT

52

Topics: dropout

Use random binary masks m(k)
layer pre-activation for k>0

hidden layer activation (k from 1 to L):
output layer activation (k=L+1):

...

x1

xd

...

xj

1 1

... ...

1

... ... ...

h(1)(x)

h(2)(x)

) W(1)

W(2)

W(3)

b(1)

b(2)

b(3)

h(k)(x) = g(a(k)(x))
h(L+1)(x) = o(a(L+1)(x)) = f(x)
a(k)(x) = b(k) + W(k)h(k1)(x) (

(h(0)(x) = x)

SLIDE 74

DROPOUT

52

Topics: dropout

Use random binary masks m(k)
layer pre-activation for k>0

hidden layer activation (k from 1 to L):
output layer activation (k=L+1):

...

x1

xd

...

xj

1 1

... ...

1

... ... ...

h(1)(x)

h(2)(x)

) W(1)

W(2)

W(3)

b(1)

b(2)

b(3)

h(k)(x) = g(a(k)(x))
h(L+1)(x) = o(a(L+1)(x)) = f(x)
a(k)(x) = b(k) + W(k)h(k1)(x) (

m(k)

x)

(h(0)(x) = x)

SLIDE 75

DROPOUT

53

Topics: dropout backpropagation

This assumes a forward propagation has been made before
compute output gradient (before activation) 
for k from L+1 to 1
compute gradients of hidden layer parameter
compute gradient of hidden layer below
compute gradient of hidden layer below (before activation)
ra(L+1)(x) log f(x)y

( = (e(y) f(x))

r
(
r
rb(k) log f(x)y

( = ra(k)(x) log f(x)y

rh(k−1)(x) log f(x)y

( = W(k)> ra(k)(x) log f(x)y

ra(k−1)(x) log f(x)y

( =

rh(k−1)(x) log f(x)y
[. . . , g0(a(k1)(x)j), . . . ]
rW(k) log f(x)y

( =

ra(k)(x) log f(x)y
h(k1)(x)>

SLIDE 76

DROPOUT

53

Topics: dropout backpropagation

This assumes a forward propagation has been made before
compute output gradient (before activation) 
for k from L+1 to 1
compute gradients of hidden layer parameter
compute gradient of hidden layer below
compute gradient of hidden layer below (before activation)
ra(L+1)(x) log f(x)y

( = (e(y) f(x))

r
(
r
rb(k) log f(x)y

( = ra(k)(x) log f(x)y

rh(k−1)(x) log f(x)y

( = W(k)> ra(k)(x) log f(x)y

ra(k−1)(x) log f(x)y

( =

rh(k−1)(x) log f(x)y
[. . . , g0(a(k1)(x)j), . . . ]
rW(k) log f(x)y

( =

ra(k)(x) log f(x)y
h(k1)(x)>

m(k−1)

x)

includes the   mask m(k−1)

SLIDE 77

DROPOUT

54

Topics: test time classification

At test time, we replace the masks by their expectation
this is simply the constant vector 0.5 if dropout probability is 0.5
for single hidden layer, can show this is equivalent to taking the geometric average of all

neural networks, with all possible binary masks

Beats regular backpropagation on many datasets, but is slower (~2x)
Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors.

Hinton, Srivastava, Krizhevsky, Sutskever and Salakhutdinov, 2012.

SLIDE 78

DEEP LEARNING

55

Topics: why training is hard

Depending on the problem, one or the other situation will

tend to dominate

If first hypothesis (underfitting): better optimize
use better optimization methods
use GPUs
If second hypothesis (overfitting): use better regularization
unsupervised pre-training
stochastic «dropout» training

SLIDE 79

DEEP LEARNING

55

Topics: why training is hard

Depending on the problem, one or the other situation will

tend to dominate

If first hypothesis (underfitting): better optimize
use better optimization methods
use GPUs
If second hypothesis (overfitting): use better regularization
unsupervised pre-training
stochastic «dropout» training

Batch normalization

SLIDE 80

BATCH NORMALIZATION

56

Topics: batch normalization

Normalizing the inputs will speed up training

(Lecun et al. 1998)

could normalization also be useful at the level of the hidden layers?
Batch normalization is an attempt to do that

(Ioffe and Szegedy, 2014)

each unit’s pre-activation is normalized (mean subtraction, stddev division)
during training, mean and stddev is computed for each minibatch
backpropagation takes into account the normalization
at test time, the global mean / stddev is used

SLIDE 81

BATCH NORMALIZATION

57

Topics: batch normalization

Batch normalization

g ill it yer r- e h a- y Input: Values of x over a mini-batch: B = {x1...m}; Parameters to be learned: γ, β Output: {yi = BNγ,β(xi)} µB ← 1 m

m

i=1

xi // mini-batch mean σ2

B ← 1

m

i=1

(xi − µB)2 // mini-batch variance

xi ← xi − µB
σ2

B +

// normalize yi ← γ xi + β ≡ BNγ,β(xi) // scale and shift

SLIDE 82

BATCH NORMALIZATION

57

Topics: batch normalization

Batch normalization

g ill it yer r- e h a- y Input: Values of x over a mini-batch: B = {x1...m}; Parameters to be learned: γ, β Output: {yi = BNγ,β(xi)} µB ← 1 m

m

i=1

xi // mini-batch mean σ2

B ← 1

m

i=1

(xi − µB)2 // mini-batch variance

xi ← xi − µB
σ2

B +

// normalize yi ← γ xi + β ≡ BNγ,β(xi) // scale and shift

Learned linear transformation to adapt to non-linear activation function   (𝛿 and β are trained)

SLIDE 83

NEURAL NETWORK ONLINE COURSE

58

Topics: online videos

for a more detailed

description of  neural networks…

… and much more!

http://info.usherbrooke.ca/hlarochelle/neural_networks

SLIDE 84

NEURAL NETWORK ONLINE COURSE

58

Topics: online videos

for a more detailed

description of  neural networks…

… and much more!

http://info.usherbrooke.ca/hlarochelle/neural_networks

SLIDE 85

MERCI!

59