Nanocrafter Xylem vs. r pl r lv r pl r lv r pl r lv + d - d - d - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
nanocrafter xylem
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nanocrafter Xylem vs. r pl r lv r pl r lv r pl r lv + d - d - d - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feb 13, 2023 144 likes •673 views

Nanocrafter Xylem vs. r pl r lv r pl r lv r pl r lv + d - d - d + d BLIND BLIND RATINGS BLIND RATINGS CHOICE Compute desired win rate using players rating BLIND RATINGS Compute desired win rate using players rating Compute

slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Xylem Nanocrafter

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

rpl rlv

vs.

rlv

  • d

rpl + d rlv + d rpl

  • d
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

BLIND

slide-23
SLIDE 23

BLIND RATINGS

slide-24
SLIDE 24

BLIND RATINGS CHOICE

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Compute desired win rate using player’s rating

BLIND RATINGS

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Compute desired win rate using player’s rating Compute player’s win expectancy versus each remaining level

BLIND RATINGS

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Compute desired win rate using player’s rating Compute player’s win expectancy versus each remaining level Serve level with win expectancy closest to desired win rate

vs.

BLIND RATINGS

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Compute desired win rate using (player’s rating – 400) Compute desired win rate using player’s rating Compute desired win rate using (player’s rating + 400)

CHOICE

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Compute desired win rate using (player’s rating – 400) Compute desired win rate using player’s rating Compute desired win rate using (player’s rating + 400) Compute player’s win expectancy versus each remaining level Compute player’s win expectancy versus each remaining level Compute player’s win expectancy versus each remaining level

CHOICE

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Compute desired win rate using (player’s rating – 400) Compute player’s win expectancy versus each remaining level

vs.

Compute desired win rate using player’s rating Compute desired win rate using (player’s rating + 400)

EASY RECOMMENDED HARD

Compute player’s win expectancy versus each remaining level Compute player’s win expectancy versus each remaining level

CHOICE

slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Variable BLIND RATINGS CHOICE Challenge Time 515 791 897 Levels Attempted 7 10 12 Levels Completed 5 7 8

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Variable BLIND RATINGS CHOICE Interest/Enjoyment 63% 65% 63% Perceived Competence 57% 52% 57% Perceived Choice 78% 80% 82% Effort/Importance 83% 86% 83%

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38

RATINGS

slide-39
SLIDE 39

RATINGS

slide-40
SLIDE 40

RATINGS

slide-41
SLIDE 41

CHOICE

slide-42
SLIDE 42

CHOICE

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Previous Result Easy Recommen ded Hard

Complete (Win) 40% 49% 11% Forfeit (Loss) 41% 36% 23% Skip 57% 32% 11%

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Previous Result Easy Recommen ded Hard

Complete (Win) 40%

49%

11% Forfeit (Loss) 41% 36% 23% Skip 57% 32% 11%

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Previous Result Easy Recommen ded Hard

Complete (Win) 40% 49% 11% Forfeit (Loss) 41% 36% 23% Skip

57%

32% 11%

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Previous Result Easy Recommen ded Hard

Complete (Win) 40% 49% 11% Forfeit (Loss) 41% 36% 23% Skip 57% 32% 11%

slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51

Anurag Sarkar Northeastern University sarkar.an@husky.neu.edu

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant

  • no. 1652537. We would like to thank the University of Washington's Center for Game

Science for initial Paradox development.