Music Informatics Alan Smaill March 22, 2018 Alan Smaill Music - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

music informatics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Music Informatics Alan Smaill March 22, 2018 Alan Smaill Music - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

N I V E U R S E I H T T Y O H F G R E U D I B N Music Informatics Alan Smaill March 22, 2018 Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 1/16 Today N I V E U R S E I H T T Y O H F G R E U D I B


slide-1
SLIDE 1

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Music Informatics

Alan Smaill March 22, 2018

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 1/16

slide-2
SLIDE 2

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Today

Paradigmatic analysis Analysing outside WTM

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 2/16

slide-3
SLIDE 3

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Admin

About to give feedback on unassessed assignment. Assessed coursework: ask questions at end of the lecture.

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 3/16

slide-4
SLIDE 4

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Automated music analysis enables in principle various forms of manipulation of musical structures: variation; coordination between performers; structuring machine improvisation; within algorithmic composition. Paradigmatic analysis is a method that lends itself to implementation.

For a quick overview of computational aspects: http://preview.tinyurl.com/j4uyqfo

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 4/16

slide-5
SLIDE 5

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Hint from anthropology

Levi-Strauss did a comparative analysis of various myths, and found it useful to give an analysis in the form of a table that indicated: succession of events in time – by a reading in normal top/bottom (left/right) order and similarity of events, by ordering them in columns This was a way to bring out internal structure and relationships between myths. (C. L´ evi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology, 1963)

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 5/16

slide-6
SLIDE 6

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Example

C seeks sister C kills dragon S kill each other Limping L O kills father left-handed L O swollen foot O marries mother E kills brother where O = Oedipus C = Cadmos E = Eteocles S = Spartans L = Laius

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 6/16

slide-7
SLIDE 7

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Music version

Ruwet used this as a model for analysis;

  • n-line discussion describing the background and a software tool is

at http://tinyurl.com/yzfqso5 Nicolas Donin and Jonathan Goldman, Charting the Score in a Multimedia Context: the Case of Paradigmatic Analysis, at Music Theory On-line. It is worth looking through the examples treated there to get an idea of the strenghths and weaknesses of the approach.

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 7/16

slide-8
SLIDE 8

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Ruwet example

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 8/16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

How to automate?

As before, there is a lot to do in order to make sense of this sort of analysis to the point where it can be carried out automatically. The two main questions are: what are the units that are being compared? what counts as musical similarity here? The questions are not independent; in looking for similarity, some bits of segmentation can be

  • suggested. (We already saw this role of similarity in GTTM.)

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 9/16

slide-10
SLIDE 10

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Possible routes to Ruwet’s analysis

The interaction between segmentation and similarity can be

  • rganised in different ways, eg
  • 1. note segments A, A′, B, B at large granularity;
  • 2. alternatively, use a, b, b′, c, d at medium granularity
  • 3. or finer grained, with d1 etc

This has an assumption that the segments are roughly similar size, in terms of duration. This is different from the case of myths, where time spent on a given episode is less relevant.

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 10/16

slide-11
SLIDE 11

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Size of units

Compare the toy analysis of the British national anthem in this way, depending on the size of the units compared. Handout is from Music as Discourse, Agawu, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp 168–173 (in restricted access from course web page).

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 11/16

slide-12
SLIDE 12

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Hierarchy?

We can also see a version of hierarchy in terms of patterns of bunches of the segments: immediate repetition from same class will bunch together; immediate repetition of this bunch will bunch together. This is fairly crude, but will work for popular music in recognise melodic echos and 8-bar structure, without minimal rhythmic or harmonic analysis. The algorithm depends on parameters N,M, suitable small integers.

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 12/16

slide-13
SLIDE 13

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

11

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 13/16

slide-14
SLIDE 14

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Algorithm sketch

Work by following the temporal structure of music in first instance: * Identity: repeat: * Look for repetition of N notes * If found, extend as far as possible * now look for other instances in the rest of the piece * tag as a class & remove from input * Similarity: repeat * Look for similar passages of M notes * If found, extend as far as possible * now look for other instances in the rest of the piece * tag as class & remove from input * Anything left will be isolated segments

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 13/16

slide-15
SLIDE 15

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Similarity

The procedure obviously depends on what notion of similarity is

  • used. Some metric is need, and this will make some use of the
  • rganisation involved in the style.

The claim is that similarity based on general cognitively salient aspects of musical sound can get us a long way, without eg notions

  • f key:

similarity in duration patterns similarity in melodic shape (rising, falling, stationary) On the other hand, the analysis is not a plausible cognitive model

  • f listening to the music in real time: segments far apart in time

are related to each other, and the analysis is not incremental through time.

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 14/16

slide-16
SLIDE 16

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Example

Listen to the first piece from Charles Ives’ “Three Quarter Tone Pieces”. On-line performance can be found on you-tube, with moving score. This is for two pianos, tuned a quarter tone apart. The harmonies used are not from WTM, yet some patterns are clear to listeners (I think). This sort of music can be successfully given paradigmatic analysis using a simple algorithm and notion of similarity as described above.

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 15/16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H

Summary

Paradigmatic analysis from myth Applied to music Relatively independent from stylistic assumptions

Alan Smaill Music Informatics March 22, 2018 16/16