MPact Physician Education John D. Owen, MD, FACEP, FAAFP Chief - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mpact physician education
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MPact Physician Education John D. Owen, MD, FACEP, FAAFP Chief - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MPact Physician Education John D. Owen, MD, FACEP, FAAFP Chief Medical Officer, MPact Health Medical Director-Mosaic Emergency Dept. Physician Dyad, Secondary Service Area-Mosaic Brig Gen, USAF, Retired Drivers of Change High cost of care


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MPact Physician Education

John D. Owen, MD, FACEP, FAAFP

Chief Medical Officer, MPact Health Medical Director-Mosaic Emergency Dept. Physician Dyad, Secondary Service Area-Mosaic Brig Gen, USAF, Retired

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • High cost of care
  • Insurance costs and lack of value added

services

  • Inconsistent quality of care
  • Employers looking for other options

Drivers of Change

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Physician expectations

  • Practice High Quality Medicine
  • Work with similarly minded high quality

individuals

  • Receive reasonable compensation
  • Minimize interruptions and hassles when doing a

good job

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Multi-state Clinically Integrated Network (CIN)
  • Meets the FTC and DOJ definitions of clinical

integration.

  • Single-signature value-based contracting
  • “Chapter-Centric” CIN
  • Hogan Marren Babbo & Rose-proven case law

What is MPact?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Physician Joint Ventures that do not involve the sharing of substantial financial risk may also involve sufficient integration to demonstrate that the venture is likely to produce significant efficiencies. Such integration can be evidenced by the network implementing an active and ongoing program to evaluate and modify practice patterns by the network's physician participants and create a high degree of interdependence and cooperation among the physicians to control costs and ensure quality. This program may include: (1) establishing mechanisms to monitor and control utilization of health care services that are designed to control costs and assure quality of care; (2) selectively choosing network physicians who are likely to further these efficiency objectives; and (3) the significant investment of capital, both monetary and human, in the necessary infrastructure and ability to realize the claimed efficiencies.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Our experience indicates that in order to qualify as legitimately clinically integrated pursuant to this definition, the following conditions must exist: 1. a network of physicians willing to demonstrate “a high degree of interdependence and cooperation,” through 2. a program of initiatives designed to “control costs and ensure quality,” which 3. is supported by an infrastructure that allows the physicians to “evaluate and modify practice patterns.”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The 3-part legal analysis for Clinical Integration

An analysis of any physician network’s clinical integration program is essentially a three-part test which asks: 1. Whether the network’s clinical integration program is “real” containing authentic initiatives, actually undertaken by the network, which involve all physicians in the network, and apply to the physicians’ practice patterns relative to patients who obtain health benefits under fee-for- service health plans; 2. Whether the initiatives of the program are designed to achieve likely improvements in health care quality and efficiency; and 3. Whether joint contracting with fee-for-service health plans is “reasonably necessary” to achieve the efficiencies of the clinical integration program.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

MPact: More than a Legal Entity

Facilitates….

  • Clinical Integration
  • Quality Improvement
  • Contracting
  • Care management
  • Data analytics
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Composition of Network

  • 4000+ physicians
  • 50+ hospitals
  • 250+ clinic locations
slide-11
SLIDE 11

As of 1.13.17

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Clinical Integration Network Board, LLC

Quality Improvement Committee - IT Committee Insurance Strategy Committee - Care Management Committee

Payers Employers Government

Organizational Structure

Alliance Chapters

slide-13
SLIDE 13

As of 1.13.17

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • How does our Chapter’s Quality metrics

compare to MPact overall and to the national benchmarks?

  • Which metrics are weakest to target the QI

work?

  • Do we have providers not meeting the

Quality threshold?

Work of the Chapters

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Physician-led quality improvement

committee

  • Measure 5-7 metrics per specialty
  • “Evaluate and modify” physician,

chapter, and MPact level performance

  • Leverage shared reporting platform

Quality Improvement CIN Requirements

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Quality Improvement Reporting

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Today’s Database

  • 3 million patient lives in our database
  • 3,600 active physicians sharing data
  • Measuring 44 unique clinical metrics

across specialties

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Result: The reasons we went into medicine

  • Work with likeminded quality collegues
  • Take great care of our patients
  • Help others deliver great care, as well
  • Do so with fewer time and process interruptions
  • Remain competitive
  • Be recognized for the good job that we do
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Thank you for your time!

For questions or comments, please contact Nate Blackford, Vice President of MPact nate.blackford@mpact-health.com or 660.541.1750