monotone paths in dense edge ordered graphs
play

Monotone Paths in Dense Edge-Ordered Graphs Kevin G. Milans ( - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Monotone Paths in Dense Edge-Ordered Graphs Kevin G. Milans ( milans@math.wvu.edu ) West Virginia University AMS Spring Southeastern Sectional Meeting University of Georgia Athens, GA March 5, 2016 Monotone paths Let G be a graph whose


  1. Monotone Paths in Dense Edge-Ordered Graphs Kevin G. Milans ( milans@math.wvu.edu ) West Virginia University AMS Spring Southeastern Sectional Meeting University of Georgia Athens, GA March 5, 2016

  2. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ .

  3. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ . 1 2 4 3 5 6

  4. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ . 1 2 4 3 5 6 ◮ A monotone path traverses edges in increasing order.

  5. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ . 1 2 4 3 5 6 ◮ A monotone path traverses edges in increasing order.

  6. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ . 1 2 4 3 5 6 ◮ A monotone path traverses edges in increasing order. ◮ The altitude of G , denoted f ( G ), is the maximum integer k such that every edge-ordering of G has a monotone path of length k .

  7. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ . 1 2 4 3 5 6 ◮ A monotone path traverses edges in increasing order. ◮ The altitude of G , denoted f ( G ), is the maximum integer k such that every edge-ordering of G has a monotone path of length k . ◮ [Chv´ atal–Koml´ os (1971)] What is f ( K n )?

  8. Prior work Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 2 ≤ f ( K n ) ≤ 3 n 4

  9. Prior work Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 2 ≤ f ( K n ) ≤ 3 n 4 ◮ R¨ odl: Graham–Kleitman and design theory give f ( K n ) ≤ ( 2 3 + o (1)) n

  10. Prior work Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 2 ≤ f ( K n ) ≤ 3 n 4 ◮ R¨ odl: Graham–Kleitman and design theory give f ( K n ) ≤ ( 2 3 + o (1)) n ◮ Alspach–Heinrich–Graham (unpublished): f ( K n ) ≤ ( 7 12 + o (1)) n

  11. Prior work Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 2 ≤ f ( K n ) ≤ 3 n 4 ◮ R¨ odl: Graham–Kleitman and design theory give f ( K n ) ≤ ( 2 3 + o (1)) n ◮ Alspach–Heinrich–Graham (unpublished): f ( K n ) ≤ ( 7 12 + o (1)) n Theorem (Calderbank–Chung–Sturtevant (1984)) f ( K n ) ≤ ( 1 2 + o (1)) n

  12. Prior work II ◮ Roditty–Shoham–Yuster (2001): the max. altitude of a planar graph is in { 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } .

  13. Prior work II ◮ Roditty–Shoham–Yuster (2001): the max. altitude of a planar graph is in { 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } . ◮ Alon (2003): the max. altitude of a k -regular graph is in { k , k + 1 } .

  14. Prior work II ◮ Roditty–Shoham–Yuster (2001): the max. altitude of a planar graph is in { 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } . ◮ Alon (2003): the max. altitude of a k -regular graph is in { k , k + 1 } . ◮ Mynhardt–Burger–Clark–Falvai–Henderson (2005): the max. altitude of a 3-regular graph is 4, achieved by the flower snarks.

  15. Prior work II ◮ Roditty–Shoham–Yuster (2001): the max. altitude of a planar graph is in { 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } . ◮ Alon (2003): the max. altitude of a k -regular graph is in { k , k + 1 } . ◮ Mynhardt–Burger–Clark–Falvai–Henderson (2005): the max. altitude of a 3-regular graph is 4, achieved by the flower snarks. Theorem (De Silva–Molla–Pfender–Retter–Tait (2015+)) ◮ f ( Q n ) ≥ n / lg n

  16. Prior work II ◮ Roditty–Shoham–Yuster (2001): the max. altitude of a planar graph is in { 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } . ◮ Alon (2003): the max. altitude of a k -regular graph is in { k , k + 1 } . ◮ Mynhardt–Burger–Clark–Falvai–Henderson (2005): the max. altitude of a 3-regular graph is 4, achieved by the flower snarks. Theorem (De Silva–Molla–Pfender–Retter–Tait (2015+)) ◮ f ( Q n ) ≥ n / lg n ◮ If p ( n ) = ω (log n / √ n ) , then f ( G ( n , p )) ≥ (1 − o (1)) √ n with probability tending to 1 .

  17. Random edge-orderings Theorem (Lavrov–Loh (2015+)) ◮ With probability tending to 1 , a random edge-labeling of K n has a monotone path of length 0 . 85 n.

  18. Random edge-orderings Theorem (Lavrov–Loh (2015+)) ◮ With probability tending to 1 , a random edge-labeling of K n has a monotone path of length 0 . 85 n. ◮ With probability at least 1 / e − o (1) , a random edge-labeling of K n has a Hamiltonian monotone path.

  19. Random edge-orderings Theorem (Lavrov–Loh (2015+)) ◮ With probability tending to 1 , a random edge-labeling of K n has a monotone path of length 0 . 85 n. ◮ With probability at least 1 / e − o (1) , a random edge-labeling of K n has a Hamiltonian monotone path. Conjecture (Lavrov–Loh) With high probability, a random edge-labeling of K n has a Hamiltonian monotone path.

  20. Our result Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 f ( K n ) ≥ 2

  21. Our result Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 f ( K n ) ≥ 2 Theorem (R¨ odl (1973)) √ If G has average degree d, then f ( G ) ≥ (1 − o (1)) d.

  22. Our result Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 f ( K n ) ≥ 2 Theorem (R¨ odl (1973)) √ If G has average degree d, then f ( G ) ≥ (1 − o (1)) d. Theorem Let G be an n-vertex graph, and let s = Cn 1 / 3 (lg n ) 2 / 3 . If G has average degree d, then 4 s 2 � � � � � � f ( G ) ≥ d 1 − 2 1 − 1 1 − . 4 s d − 2 d s

  23. Our result Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 f ( K n ) ≥ 2 Theorem (R¨ odl (1973)) √ If G has average degree d, then f ( G ) ≥ (1 − o (1)) d. Theorem Let G be an n-vertex graph, and let s = Cn 1 / 3 (lg n ) 2 / 3 . If G has average degree d, then 4 s 2 � � � � � � f ( G ) ≥ d 1 − 2 1 − 1 1 − . 4 s d − 2 d s Corollary f ( K n ) ≥ ( 1 20 − o (1))( n / lg n ) 2 / 3

  24. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n .

  25. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 14 3 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1

  26. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 14 3 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G .

  27. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G .

  28. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top.

  29. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

  30. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 16 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

  31. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 13 7 12 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 16 24 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

  32. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 13 7 12 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 16 24 35 14 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

  33. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 13 7 12 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 16 24 35 46 14 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

  34. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 13 7 12 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 16 24 35 46 56 14 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 8 4 15 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend