Monitoring Behavior at Scale Upneet Singh Water and Sanitation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

monitoring behavior at
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Monitoring Behavior at Scale Upneet Singh Water and Sanitation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan Monitoring Behavior at Scale Upneet Singh Water and Sanitation Program India The World Bank Overview Monitoring Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan Monitoring Behavior at Scale Upneet Singh, Water and Sanitation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan

Monitoring Behavior at Scale

Upneet Singh Water and Sanitation Program – India The World Bank

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Monitoring
  • Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan – Monitoring Behavior at Scale
  • Upneet Singh, Water and Sanitation Program-India, The World Bank
  • usingh@worldbank.org

Summary: Unlike infrastructure, tracking behavior requires frequent cross- checks over a period of time. This has a cost in terms of time and resources. Even when large scale pen and paper surveys undertake tracking of behavior, results may be challenged on methodological grounds. Mobile to web systems

  • ffer the potential to enable tracking of outcomes in a way that is affordable,

relatively quick and offers quality features such as photograph and geotag of respondents.

Overview

Knowledge Sharing Forum What works at scale? Distilling critical success factors for scaling-up rural sanitation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Identifying the Goal

Scaling up Behavior Change Scaling up Rural Sanitation

  • Sanitation = habit
  • Toilet construction is a means to an end
  • Even if few use a toilet, all are at risk, unless

a community is ODF

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Challenges of Monitoring Sanitation at Scale

Use in decision-making and feedback to implementers 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Current Monitoring System

  • Comprehensive, ICT

enabled

  • Technically sound, works

at scale

  • Decentralized reporting
  • Provides a range of

reports

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Potential for Strengthening

  • Limited indicators

– Focus on financial (budget spent) and physical (toilets constructed) progress – Usage and sustainability – this needs periodic update

  • Time Lag

– Survey/Census – significant time lag b/w data collection and results

  • Quality

– Self reported – Lack of incentive to report quality data

  • Lack of Coordination

– Physical and financial progress not linked – Outcomes are tracked separately from inputs/outputs

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Sustainability Gap… difference between construction and usage

9% 10% 14.6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Source: TSC online reports; Census 2001; DLHS 2004; DLHS 2008

State X Rural Sanitation Coverage

Routine data (toilets constructed) vs. Household survey data (usage)

TSC progress DLHS Forecast

55%

Need reliable and timely information on behavior change!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Potential to use ICT to Bridge the Sustainability Gap

  • Mobile usage has boomed
  • Mobile to web systems have

potential to improve service delivery

  • Examples: water point

mapping, motivating behavior change, complaint redressal

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tracking Behavior through Use of Mobiles

2010

Examples

  • f Liberia

and Indonesia

2011

Proof of Concept in 2 blocks

2012

Advocacy to scale up Work with MDWS and NIC on design Flexible modules 13 languages

2013

Testing at scale : 1) govt system 2) third party surveys

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Outcome Tracker Mobile app

  • # of questions – less is more!
  • Introduction: name, informed consent, ID #
  • Poverty Status
  • Toilet Coverage
  • Usage Behavior by hh member
  • Child feces disposal
  • Material for Hand-washing
  • Photograph & geo-tag
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Who Collects the Data

1) Govt Functionaries

– Any person who is designated to train

  • r provide handholding support to

NBA implementation at village level

  • NBA district/block coordinators
  • Swachata Doot
  • BRC members
  • relevant and qualified NGOs etc

– Willing participants from other departments such as Education, Health, ICDS etc.

2) Third party survey agency

slide-12
SLIDE 12

How it Works

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Testing at Scale

Coverage and Usage data

  • f 55,000 households in 4

months …. and counting

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Advantages of Mobile Surveys

  • Relatively low average unit

cost per record

  • QUICK! Real time data

transfer

  • Electronic data entry, reduces

error

  • Date/time stamp, helps with

quality assurance

  • Geo-tag and photograph

increases credibility

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Challenges

Field Supervision can reduce this

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Next Steps

  • Potential to use for ODF verification/Baseline/Routine/NGP assessment

etc

– Does not require high end phones – Works in multiple languages – Module and customizable questions for Household, School, Anganwadi sanitation

  • Works on NIC codes, possible to integrate mobiles as an input mode to

existing system

slide-17
SLIDE 17

<usingh@worldbank.org>

+91.11.41479.419

THANKS Open for Questions/Comments