Molecular determinants of factor VIII immunogenicity Moderator - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Molecular determinants of factor VIII immunogenicity Moderator - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Molecular determinants of factor VIII immunogenicity Moderator Prof. dr. H.C.J. Eikenboom Prof. dr. H.C.J. Eikenboom 1st author / speaker Jan Voorberg PhD Co-authors Not applicable Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form In accordance with
Molecular determinants of factor VIII immunogenicity
Moderator
- Prof. dr. H.C.J. Eikenboom
- Prof. dr. H.C.J. Eikenboom
1st author / speaker
Jan Voorberg PhD
Co-authors
Not applicable
Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form
In accordance with the rules of the Health Care Inspectorate (IGZ)
Name: Jan Voorberg PhD Affiliation: Sanquin Research / University of Amsterdam
☐
- I have no potential conflict of interest to report
I have the following potential conflict(s) of interest to report
- Type of affiliation / financial interest
Name of commercial company Receipt of grants/research supports: NOVO Nordisk Research grant. Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Participation in a company sponsored speaker’s bureau: Stock shareholder: Other support (please specify): Scientific advisory board
I have the following potential conflict(s) of interest to report
Molecular determinants of factor VIII immunogenicity
A major side effect of current treatment of hemophilia A comprises the development of inhibitory antibodies that preclude further treatment with factor VIII
A2
treatment with factor VIII Factor VIII inhibitors occur in about 10- 40% of the patients with severe hemophilia A
A1 C2 C1 A3
100 1.00
FVIII rFVIIa
BU/ml)
Inhibitor development in a patient with mild hemophilia A
Time (days)
50 100 150 200 250 300 1 10 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80
Inhibitor titre (BU/
Van den Brink et al., 1999
FVIII inhibitors are diagnosed using a classical “mixing” assay (Nijmegen Bethesda assay)
“Nijmegen modification” of the Bethesda assay can specifically detect low levels of FVIII inhibitors in plasma (<1.0 BU/ml). Verbruggen et al., 1995
Subclass analysis of factor VIII inhibitors reveals a prominent contribution of IgG1 and IgG4
IgG1 IgG4 Fulcher et al., 1987 92 kDa
Major B cell epitopes reside in the A2, A3 and C2 domain of factor VIII
A2 A1 A3
Heavy chain
A1 A2 A3 FIXa FX FXa FVIIIa
A1 C1 C2
Light chain
C1
FIXa
C2
phospholipids
FVIIIa
Voorberg and Meems, 2014
- Anti-factor VIII antibodies are primarily composed of subclasses IgG1
and IgG4
- The majority of anti-factor VIII antibodies bind to the A2, A3 or C2
Summary factor VIII inhibitors (I)
- The majority of anti-factor VIII antibodies bind to the A2, A3 or C2
domain
- Anti-A2 and A3 domain antibodies prohibit the binding of factor VIII
to factor IXa. Anti-C2 domain antibodies interfere with binding of factor VIII to phospholipids.
FVIII is endocytosed by antigen- presenting cells and loaded on MHC class II for efficient presentation to CD4+ T cells:
- 1. Endocytosis FVIII
- 2. Proteolytic degradation
FVIII-derived peptides presented on MHC class II
- 2. Proteolytic degradation
- 3. Loading small peptides on MHC class II
- 4. Recognition by FVIII-specific CD4+ T
cells Studies using either patient-derived material of mouse models of hemophilia A gave us insights into repertoire of FVIII-derived peptides presented to the T cells: mass spectrometry, humanized mouse models and bioinformatic tools
Peptide presentation on MHC class II employing factor VIII pulsed dendritic cells
FVIII PBS MHCII MHCII
Van Haren et al., 2011
Broad repertoire of FVIII-specific peptides can be presented on MHC class II
Van Haren et al., 2011; 2013
Immune recognition of FVIII by antigen-presenting cells
A2 A1 C2 C1 A3
Van Haren et al., 2012
Various pathways of endocytosis
Parton, R. G. & Simons, K. The multiple faces of caveolae. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 8, 185–194 (2007) doi:10.1038/nrm2122
75 100
trol
- FVIII endocytosis is mediated via the C1 domain
Effect of antibodies on FVIII endocytosis
10 40 160 25 50 75
KM33 (C1) VK34 (A2)
nM antibody added % control
- Van Haren et al., 2012
C1 domain A2 A1
Modification of an exposed loop in the C1 domain reduces endocytosis of factor VIII
80 100
WT 2092/93 2090/92/93
R2090 F2093 K2092
A3 A1 C1 C2
10 20 30 40
20 40 60
FVIII (nM)
% MFI
Wroblewska et al., 2012
750
*
(AU/ml) Cag 9
C1 domain A2 A3 A1 C1 C2
Modification of an exposed loop in the C1 domain reduces inhibitor titers in mouse model of hemophilia A
WT 2090/92/93
150 300 450 600
anti-FVIII IgG (AU/ 1 AU=1 ng Cag
7 14 21 28 Days: FVIII
FVIII-/-
R2090 F2093 K2092
C1 C2
Wroblewska et al., 2012
6 8
Wild-type n (SI)
60
(SI)
Con A
Modification of an exposed loop in the C1 domain reduces CD4+ T cell responses in mouse model of hemophilia A
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 2 4 6
** ** ***
2090/92/93 FVIII (ug/ml) Proliferation (S
WT 2090/92/93 20 40
Proliferation (SI)
Blood 2012
Wroblewska et al., 2012
Summary factor VIII inhibitors (II)
- A broad repertoire of factor VIII derived peptides is presented on
MHC class II
- Endocytosis of factor VIII by antigen presenting cells is mediated by
- Endocytosis of factor VIII by antigen presenting cells is mediated by
an exposed loop in the C1 domain of factor VIII
Risk factors for inhibitor development in hemophilia A
A2 A1
Immune system IgG1,4 patient
A1 C2 C1 A3
Immune system B cells T cells antigen presentation
Intron 22; approximately 20% of patients develop inhibitors
Specific missense mutations in patients with mild hemophilia A are linked to inhibitor development
Eckhardt et al., 2013
Risk factors for inhibitor development in hemophilia A
A2 A1
Immune system IgG1,4 patient
A1 C2 C1 A3
Immune system B cells T cells antigen presentation
FVIII genotype IL-10, TNFα, CTLA4 polymorphism, GWAS- study Intensity of treatment
Treatment-related factors; FVIII products
Gouw et al., 2013
Novel generation of factor VIII products; extended half-life (1.5-1.8)
Bay-9027
Studies performed in previously treated patients; no inhibitors
PEG
Blood 2014; JTH 2014
FVIII-Fc
patients; no inhibitors
Genetic and treatment-related parameters in a threshold model for inhibitor formation in hemophilia A
Gouw and Fijnvandraat et al., 2013; modified from Van Helden et al., 2010.