Modelling Bio-electrochemical CO 2 Reduction to Methane Gamunu - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

β–Ά
modelling bio electrochemical co 2 reduction to methane
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Modelling Bio-electrochemical CO 2 Reduction to Methane Gamunu - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Modelling Bio-electrochemical CO 2 Reduction to Methane Gamunu Samarakoon, Anirudh B. T. Nelabhotla*, Carlos Dinamarca, Dietmar Winkler, Rune Bakke 6/18/2019 1 Introduction Anaerobic Digestion: Conversion of organic matter to methane and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Modelling Bio-electrochemical CO2 Reduction to Methane

Gamunu Samarakoon, Anirudh B. T. Nelabhotla*, Carlos Dinamarca, Dietmar Winkler, Rune Bakke

6/18/2019 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • Anaerobic Digestion: Conversion of organic matter

to methane and carbon dioxide with help of micro-

  • rganisms in the absence of oxygen.
  • A typical waste treatment plant in Norway

produces biogas with about 60-70% methane and 30-40% CO2 .

  • Biogas needs to be upgraded (separation or

utilization of CO2) to be used as a transport fuel.

6/18/2019 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Microbial Electrosynthesis System

  • Convert electrical energy to chemical energy with help of microorganisms as

catalysts.

  • Carbon dioxide is reduced to methane at the cathode with an applied potential.

6/18/2019 (Nelabhotla et. al., 2018).

slide-4
SLIDE 4

MES Integration with AD

6/18/2019 4

(Nelabhotla et. al., 2019)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Model Development and Method

The reaction system in an anaerobic digester is complex with a number of sequential and parallel steps.

  • Biochemical reactions mediated by bacteria
  • Physico-chemical reactions (e.g., pH), and

gas-liquid transfer.

6/18/2019 5

Qin Qout qgas

slide-6
SLIDE 6

MES Model Development and Method

𝐷𝑃2 + 8𝐼+ + 8π‘“βˆ’

πœπ‘‘1 𝐷𝐼4 + 2𝐼2𝑃

6/18/2019

πœπ‘‘1 = 𝑙m

0 π‘Œ

𝑇𝑏 𝐿𝑏 + 𝑇𝑏 𝑇𝑒 𝐿𝑒 + 𝑇𝑒

The electron-donor and the electron-acceptor substrates together limit the overall reaction

  • km

0 - maximum growth rate

  • X – micro org. con.
  • Sa , Sd - two "limiting-substrate'' con.
  • Ka , Kd - half-maximum rate con. for substrates S1 and S2.

a – electron acceptor d – electron donor

𝑇𝑏 𝐿𝑏 + 𝑇𝑏 = 𝑇𝐷𝑃2 𝐿𝐷𝑃2 + 𝑇𝐷𝑃2

𝑇𝑒 𝐿𝑒+𝑇𝑒 = 1 1+π‘“π‘¦π‘ž βˆ’ 𝐺

π‘†π‘ˆπœƒ

Electrochemical substrate limitation

slide-7
SLIDE 7

MES Model Parameters

  • local potential(Ξ·) is defined = EKA - Ecathode
  • EKA is the potential in which the substrate consumption rate will reach half of the maximum

substrate consumption (analogous to Kd).

  • Ξ· accounts the electro active part of the rate expression
  • The current study, EKA is taken as the reference potential (i.e., EKA =0)
  • R = ideal gas law constant
  • T = absolute temperature
  • F = faraday constant

6/18/2019 7

𝑇𝑒 𝐿𝑒+𝑇𝑒 = 1 1+π‘“π‘¦π‘ž βˆ’ 𝐺

π‘†π‘ˆπœƒ

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Model Assumptions

  • Hydrogenotrophic methanogens (X_H2) catalyse methane production from CO2 via

direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET).

  • Complete mixed cathode compartment.
  • Non- limiting flow of proton, and electron current supplies with separate anode

compartment.

  • The heterotrophic biogas production follows the ADM1 model.

Overall redox reactions Oxidation reaction :

1 2 𝐼2𝑃 β†’ 𝐼+ + π‘“βˆ’ + 1 4 𝑃2

Reduction reaction :

1 8 𝐷𝑃2 + 𝐼+ + π‘“βˆ’ β†’ 1 8 𝐷𝐼4 + 1 4 𝐼2𝑃

6/18/2019 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Simulation Result – Anaerobic Digestion

Conventional AD for baseline data – Batstone Model

  • CSTR reactor
  • 50 days
  • Feed step increases at day 16 and 37
  • Feed composition

6/18/2019 9

Batstone, et al. (2002). The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). Water Science and Technology, 45(10), 65-73.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 30 40 50

feed flow (m3d-1 ) time (day)

Feed flow to AD

feed flow

Components in the feed Concentrations kg COD Amino acids 4.2 Fatty acids 6.3 Monosaccharides 2.8 Complex particulates 10 Total 23.3

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Conventional AD for baseline data

6/18/2019 10

10 20 30 40 50 10 20 30 40 50

biogas flow( m3/d) time (d)

Biogas production rate

20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40 50

gas % day

Gas composition

CH4 % CO2 %

~ 60%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Saturated Potential and Substrate Limitation

6/18/2019 11

𝑠 = 𝑙m

0 π‘Œ

1 1 + π‘“π‘¦π‘ž βˆ’ 𝐺 π‘†π‘ˆ πœƒ 𝑇𝑑𝑝2 𝐿𝑑_𝑑𝑝2 + 𝑇𝑑𝑝2 Electrode Soluble substrate

0.00E+00 2.00E-01 4.00E-01 6.00E-01 8.00E-01 1.00E+00 1.20E+00

  • 0.300
  • 0.200
  • 0.100

0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300

NM(Nernst-monod)

nue (Ξ·) local potential 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.13 40 140 240 340 440 540

S_co2/(Ks_co2+S_co2) time (d)

Local potential (Ξ·) is increased from -0.2 to +0.2 v stepwise.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Biogas Composition

6/18/2019 12

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 40 90 140 190 240 290 340 390

% Time (d)

  • Biogas methane content rise up

to 85 % from 65 %.

  • Further increase of Ξ· does not

result in rise of methane content.

  • Substrate limitation (S_CO2)

CH4 CO2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

pH

6/18/2019 13

  • pH of the digester rises due to depletion of headspace CO2 and depletion of protons.
  • The rise of pH inhibits heterotrophic biogas production.
  • However, the methane yield (MY) increases, due to electrochemical contribution.

7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 40 90 140 190 240 290 340 390

pH time (d)

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 40 90 140 190 240 290 340 390

CH4 yield Time (d)

SMP (m3 / kg COD org) SMP (kg COD ch4/ kg COD org)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

External CO2 Source

  • Overcome the substrate limitation (S_CO2)
  • Reduce the pH inhibition
  • It will increase the specific CH4 yield
  • Utilisation of CO2 as opposed to capture for storage

6/18/2019 14

Duration (d) CO2 loading (M. d-1 ) 400-450 450-500

0.01

500-550

0.015

550-600

0.02

CO2 loading conditions

slide-15
SLIDE 15

6/18/2019 15

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 400 450 500 550 600

m3/d d

Biogas Flow

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 400 450 500 550 600

% d

Biogas composition

ch4 co2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 400 450 500 550 600

Yield d

Methane yield

MY (m3 / kg COD org) MY (kg COD ch4/ kg COD org)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

6/18/2019 16

7.15 7.2 7.25 7.3 7.35 7.4 7.45 7.5 7.55 7.6 400 450 500 550 600

pH d

pH

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 400 450 500 550 600

S_co2/(Ks_co2+S_co2) d

S_co2/(Ks_co2+S_co2)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 400 450 500 550 600

Percentage conversion d

CO2 to CH4

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Restrictions on the Model

  • Electron flow or current (internal and external resistance, overpotential of anodic
  • xidation reactions, conductivity)
  • Electrode area (geometry, which depends on space available in the reactor)
  • Morphology of the biofilm on the cathode (availability of the specific micro-organism
  • n the cathode biofilm)
  • Electron transfer coefficient (all electrons which flow to the cathode are not available

for this specific reaction, e.g., parallel reduction reactions, cell synthesis )

  • Mass transfer in the biofilm on the cathode.

6/18/2019 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Conclusion

  • AD with MES can increase the biogas methane content from 65 % to 80-90 %

(v/v).

  • The rate of reaction can be controlled by the substrate concentration and local

potential.

  • It is necessary to maintain a buffer system to prevent pH inhibition.
  • Addition of external CO2 to an ADMES, operated under limited organic loading

could achieve simultaneous bio-methanation of CO2 20%.

  • Industrial CO2 emissions can also be reduced to methane which increases the

methane yield without decreasing methane concentration to less than 80%.

6/18/2019 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

References

  • Nelabhotla ABT, Dinamarca C (2019) Bioelectrochemical CO2 Reduction to Methane: MES Integration in Biogas

Production Processes. Appl Sci 9:1–13. doi: 10.3390/app9061056

  • Nelabhotla ABT, Dinamarca C (2018) Electrochemically mediated CO2 reduction for bio-methane production: a
  • review. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technology 17:531–551. doi: 10.1007/s11157-018-9470-5
  • Batstone, D. J., Keller, J., Angelidaki, I., Kalyuzhnyi, S. V., Pavlostathis, S. G., Rozzi, A., . . . Vavilin, V. A. (2002).

The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). Water Science and Technology, 45(10), 65-73.

  • Marcus, A. K., Torres, C. I., & Rittmann, B. E. (2007). Conduction‐based modelling of the biofilm anode of a

microbial fuel cell. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 98(6), 1171-1182.

  • Logan, B. E.; Hamelers, B.; Rozendal, R.; SchrΓΆder, U.; Keller, J.; Freguia, S.; Aelterman, P.; Verstraete, W.;

Rabaey, K., Environmental Science & Technology 2006, 40 (17), 5181-92.

  • Cheng, S.; Xing, D.; Call, D. F.; Logan, B. E., Environmental Science & Technology 2009, 43 (10), 3953-8.

6/18/2019 19