MM Roma 10 03 2015 Riunione 27 marzo, situazione ordini - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
mm roma 10 03 2015
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MM Roma 10 03 2015 Riunione 27 marzo, situazione ordini - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jun 29, 2023 339 likes •474 views

MM Roma 10 03 2015 Riunione 27 marzo, situazione ordini incollatrice, Situazione camera pulita, delivery dei componenti, tempi costruzione, workflow (P.Bagnaia) stato QAQC: leak test, limbo, controlli vari

slide-1
SLIDE 1

MM Roma 10 – 03 – 2015

 Riunione 27 marzo,  situazione ordini incollatrice,  Situazione camera pulita,  delivery dei componenti,  tempi costruzione,  workflow (P.Bagnaia)  stato QAQC: leak test, limbo, controlli vari clean room, ….

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fabien Janneau, NSW week 10 March 2015

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Part Quantity Company Responsible Cost Delay (w) Status #1 (external+gas) 27 x 1.3m (35.1m) 36 x 2.2m (79.2m) Extal (IL)

  • G. Ciapetti

Die: 3k€ Parts: 3.7 k€ 15/03/15 Shipped (1) #2 (external drift + R/O) 174 x 1.25m (217.5m) 72 x 1.5m (108m) Extal (IL)

  • G. Ciapetti

Die: 3 k€ Parts: 10.125 k€ 15/03/15 Shipped (1) #3 (mesh frame) 105 x 1m (105m) 148 x 1.25m (185m) 60 x 1.55m (93m) MIFA (NL)

  • R. Hertenberger

Die: 1.225 k€ Parts: 2 k€ ? In progress(2) #4 (R/O internal bars – 60x10x1.5) 69 x 1m (69m) 85 x 1.6m (136m) 50 x 2.1m (105m) MIFA (NL)

  • R. Hertenberger

Die: 2.525 k€ Parts: 3.9 k€ ? In progress(3) #5 (Drift internal bars – 30x10x1.5)

  • Include in #4

#6 (gas gap frame) 315 x (1000x13mm) 175 x (700x13mm) MIFA (NL)

  • R. Hertenberger

Die: 1 k€ Parts: 1.5 k€

25/02/15 Delivered(4) BB5 Mesh frame corners (SM1, SM2 and LM1) 160 (2 mod. +25%

spare)

Freiburg University

  • R. Hertenberger

Raw material

  • In progress

Gas gap frame corners 192 (3 modules) Construction sites Construction sites

  • Cooling tubes

100m (2 modules) Buntmetall

  • U. Landgraf

8 k€ + 8k€ (water-jet cut) Delivered Thermal insulator 108m ?

  • U. Landgraf

? ? Offer ? Copper plates 256 ?

  • U. Landgraf ?

? ? ?

(1) Material: Aluminum 6063-T66 ; Finish: mill finish / Alodine (2) Material: Aluminum 6060-T5 ; Finish: Surtec 650 ; Geometry: straightness 0.6/1000mm, torsion 0.4/1000mm, tolerance measurement 5.06 +/-0.025 (3) Material: Aluminum 6060-T5 ; Finish: Surtec 650 ; Tolerance measurement 10 +/-0.05 (middle) +/-0.03 (edges) Geometry:

  • straightness and torsion 0.4/1000mm for 1 and 1.6m lengths
  • straightness and torsion 0.6/2000mm for length 2100mm

(4) Material: Aluminum 6060-T5 ; Tolerance 13+/-0.1mm and 5.17 +/- 0.03 mm Geometry:

  • straightness 0.4/1000mm; torsion 0.2/1000mm

Frames – M0

  • #1 and #2 (Extal)

https://edh.cern.ch/Document/SupplyChain/DAI/5842339

  • #3 and #4 (Mifa)

https://edh.cern.ch/Document/SupplyChain/DAI/5861568

  • #6 (Mifa)

https://edh.cern.ch/Document/SupplyChain/DAI/5878986 3 modules

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Procurement schedule – production

Cost Delay (w) March April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. R/O PCB >200 k€ 8 Technical meeting Open tender, close tender, place the contract

Delivery

Drift PCB >200 k€ 4 Resistive foils 4-5 Frames 10<>200 k€ 4-5 Cooling 10<>200 k€ 8-9 HC 10<>200 k€ 3

  • Al. pin

10<>200 k€ 8 Mesh high cost >200 k€ 4 Mesh low cost 10<>200 k€ 4

Market survey Price inquiry or tendering process Delivery ? FDR Place orders

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Maccarrone, NSW week 10 March 2015

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Timeline

10 Mar 2015

  • S. Zimmermann

2

July 2014 June 2015 Jan 2015 Sept 2015 Jan 2016 Design Review: Green light for module-0 Module-0 Material orders

sTGC Mod.0 construct IL, CA, CL, CN

Mod-0 Materials reception

MM Mod.0 construct IT,DE, CERN MM Mod.0 construct Saclay MM Mod.1 construct GR + JINR Module-0 Test (Cosmics, GIF++, Testbeam), Integration sTGC + MM series production FDR (*)

milestones

sTGC Mod.0 construct

  • St. Petersburg

(*) so far assumed without panning for review scope

S.Zimmermann, NSW week 10 March 2015

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Required Reviews and Review Types

10 Mar 2015

  • S. Zimmermann

3

Preliminary Design (PDR), Final Design (FDR) and Production Readiness Review (PRR) are part

  • f the regular progress reporting to ATLAS, under control of TC and the Review office

During intial ATLAS construction: additionally had production site visits/reviews which proved extremely useful

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Case of NSW MM/sTGC chamber construction

Slightly different situation for MicroMegas and sTGC chamber construction – Design Review end of July 2014 somewhat between in a Preliminary Design and Final Design Review

  • FDR: Green light for module-0
  • FDR: Green light to start procurement/tender process for mass prod. Materials
  • PDR: No full-size prototype had been built before
  • PDR: MM p

r esented assembly procedure defined only “on paper”, not executed in a prototype – prove that it works pending

  • PDR: Several decision remained to be taken

– MM: Mesh specification (pitch) – MM: Arrange resistive strips with an angle w.r.t. readout strips or not – MM: Resistive Foil technique – sputtering versus screen printing – Detailed Grounding scheme including mechanical elements – Details of mounting chambers to spacer frame – Details of electronics + service integration

10 Mar 2015

  • S. Zimmermann

4

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Post module-0

Next Review after module-0 completion must

  • Demonstrate that requirements in terms of mechanical precision have been achieved

(measurement results)

  • Demonstrate that requirements in terms of operational behavior (HV current, noise,

dead channels, …) h a ve been met

  • Demonstrate all choices left open at the July 2014 Design Review have been settled (NB:

this does not rule out having different sites use different well defined methods, eg MM vacuum bad versus stiffback method)

  • Present and justify any changes to the construction procedure and manual since the July

2014 Design Review, and p r ove no further “will be developed during construction” points are left

  • Demonstrate material qualifications have been completed
  • Demonstrate QA/QC protocol including detailed (possible site specific) methods
  • Prove sufficient resources exist to complete production according to schedule, present

detailed work flow and resource loaded schedule (hours per step, FTEs incl. names, work hours per week)

  • Provide information/show source of all materisls, provide delivery schedule,

demonstrate logistics flow

10 Mar 2015

  • S. Zimmermann

5

Somewhat made more complicated by module-0s not all completed at the same time …

slide-11
SLIDE 11

MM Proposal (NSW management)

2. Review (1 day meeting, presentation + prior documentation based, ATLAS Review panel)

  • Report on module-0 construction experience
  • Present module-0 results, prove requirements are

met

  • Present/justify changes to (global) construction

procedure

  • Report final material choices, present material

qualification results

  • Present details on orders, chosen manufacturers,

material delivery schedule

  • Logisitics work flow from CERN to institutes
  • QA/QC database infrastructure

10 Mar 2015

  • S. Zimmermann

6

  • 3. Site visits
  • Review site specific construction

procedure

  • Review site specific QA/QC

implementation

  • Review resources (manpower),

resource loaded schedule

  • INFN/DE: September
  • Saclay: November/December
  • Dubna/Thessaloniki: December,

including review of module-1 results

  • Review committee consisting of MM

experts (other sites) + 1-2 external members

  • 1. MM Mechanical Workshop after module-0 completion --- discuss construction experience,

possible problems, agree (potential) changes to construction procedure w.r.t. PDR one, define definite and final procedures.

End July/Early September – before final material order MM construction groups. (end) June

  • 4. Schedule Review (overall MM construct.) – 0.5 day meeting, ATLAS Review panel

Dec/Jan)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MM Proposal -- Alternative

2. Review (1 day meeting, presentation + prior documentation based, ATLAS Review panel)

  • Report on module-0 construction experience
  • Present module-0 results, prove requirements are

met

  • Present/justify changes to (global) construction

procedure

  • Report final material choices, present material

qualification results

  • Present details on orders, chosen manufacturers,

material delivery schedule

  • Logisitics work flow from CERN to institutes
  • QA/QC database infrastructure

10 Mar 2015

  • S. Zimmermann

7

  • 4. Site visits
  • Review site specific construction

procedure

  • Review site specific QA/QC

implementation

  • October 2015 to January 2016
  • For Dubna/Thess including review
  • f module-1 results
  • Review committee consisting of MM

experts (other sites) + 1-2 external members

  • 1. MM Mechanical Workshop after module-0 completion --- discuss construction experience,

possible problems, agree (potential) changes to construction procedure w.r.t. PDR one, define definite and final procedures.

End July/Early September – before final material order MM construction groups. (end) June

  • 5. PRR (review manpower, resources, resource loaded schedule)

Nov/Dec