Mercury in New York State Fish Howard Simonin and Jeff Loukmas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mercury in new york state fish
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Mercury in New York State Fish Howard Simonin and Jeff Loukmas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mercury in New York State Fish Howard Simonin and Jeff Loukmas Bureau of Habitat NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation DEC Monitoring Efforts Began monitoring Hg in fish before 1970 Statewide Toxic Substances Monitoring Program


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mercury in New York State Fish

Howard Simonin and Jeff Loukmas Bureau of Habitat NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

DEC Monitoring Efforts

  • Began monitoring Hg in fish

before 1970

  • Statewide Toxic Substances

Monitoring Program (1976 – 1993)

  • Specific projects
  • higher Hg in acidic waters
  • Continuing targeted

monitoring across NYS

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Impacts on Fish and Wildlife

  • Fish
  • not able to excrete

mercury; accumulates in muscle & fat

  • highest mercury in older

piscivorous fish

  • possible reproductive

impacts

  • Loons
  • Mink & Otter
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methylmercury

  • Bioaccumulates up food chains
  • Concentrations less than 1 ppt in the water

can lead to concentrations greater than 1 ppm in fish and loons

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Factors Affecting Bioaccumulation

Water Quality Variables

  • Methylation depends on presence of sulfur

reducing bacteria, anaerobic conditions, acidic conditions, dissolved organic carbon Hydrologic Variables

  • Reservoir, percent wetlands, watershed size

Biological Variables

  • Fish species and age
  • Length of food chain affects fish Hg conc
  • Productivity of lake affects fish Hg conc
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Statewide Strategic Monitoring Statewide Strategic Monitoring

  • f Mercury in Fish
  • f Mercury in Fish
  • 4

4-

  • year project: 2003

year project: 2003-

  • 2006

2006

  • 131 lakes surveyed

131 lakes surveyed

  • 4 target species

4 target species

– – YP, LMB, SMB, WEYE YP, LMB, SMB, WEYE

  • Primarily new lakes,

Primarily new lakes, temporal and spatial temporal and spatial trends, test model trends, test model

  • Summarize historical

Summarize historical database database

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2001-2005 study lakes (N=148)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

Black Crappie (53) Common Carp (88) Yellow Perch (994) Brown Trout (69) White Perch (107) Largemouth Bass (499) Northern Pike (15) Chain Pickerel (69) Smallmouth Bass (553) Walleye (271)

Total Mercury (ppm)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Standard size determinations

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 Length (mm) Mercury (ppm)

0.70 Chodikee Lake Largemouth Bass

Hg conc. = Hg conc. = -

  • 1.6213+ (0.00604 x Length)

1.6213+ (0.00604 x Length)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9 inch Yellow Perch Mean = 0.35 ppm # Lakes = 95

<0.30 ppm: 0.30 – 0.99 ppm: >1.00 ppm:

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Standard Size Smallmouth Bass Hg Conc. vs. pH

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Have mercury levels changed? Have mercury levels changed?

  • Selected 20 lakes with data

Selected 20 lakes with data from 10 from 10 – – 20 years ago 20 years ago

  • Mostly YP from Adirondack

Mostly YP from Adirondack Lakes Lakes

  • Repeated the historical

Repeated the historical sampling effort to determine sampling effort to determine trends trends

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Trend analysis Trend analysis – – Cranberry Lake Cranberry Lake Smallmouth Smallmouth Bass Bass

P P-

  • values

values Slopes Slopes -

  • 0.2484

0.2484 Elevations Elevations -

  • 0.0014

0.0014 ANCOVA: P = 0.02

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Change in Mercury Concentration Lake Lake Size/Species Size/Species Change Change

  • Lake Adirondack

Lake Adirondack 9 inch YP 9 inch YP + 0.08 + 0.08 ppm ppm

  • Cranberry Lake

Cranberry Lake 15 in. SMB 15 in. SMB

  • 0.48

0.48 ppm ppm

  • Ferris Lake

Ferris Lake 9 in.YP 9 in.YP

  • 0.67

0.67 ppm ppm

  • Big Moose

Big Moose 9 in.YP 9 in.YP

  • 0.20

0.20 ppm ppm

  • Kings Flow

Kings Flow 9 in. YP 9 in. YP

  • 0.22

0.22 ppm ppm

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Policy Implications Policy Implications

Health Advisories Health Advisories

  • Prior to these studies

Prior to these studies there were 24 lakes with there were 24 lakes with mercury advisories mercury advisories

  • Based on review of data

Based on review of data from 17 NYC reservoirs from 17 NYC reservoirs and 96 statewide lakes and 96 statewide lakes (2001 (2001 – – 2004), DOH 2004), DOH issued 49 additional issued 49 additional advisories advisories

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Adirondacks and Catskills Adirondacks and Catskills

  • High rates of deposition
  • Acid conditions are likely contributing to

higher Hg concentrations

  • In 2005 DOH issued region-based

advisory for Parks

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Yellow Perch 9 inch YP Out of Parks: 0.18 ppm Inside Parks: 0.54 ppm Smallmouth Bass 15 inch SMB Out of Parks: 0.51 ppm Inside Parks: 1.05 ppm

slide-18
SLIDE 18

All inland lakes tested 1970 – 2004 73 Lakes with Health Advisories:

slide-19
SLIDE 19

What’s next?

  • Analyze ~600 additional

fish from 25 lakes

  • Test simple predictive

model

  • Examine landscape

characteristics that may influence mercury accumulation

  • Examine mercury in other

biota (e.g., macroinvertebrates, songbirds, loons, etc.)