Mandated report: Effects of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Mandated report: Effects of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Mandated report: Effects of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Craig Lisk and Jeff Stensland March 1, 2018 The 21 st Century Cures Act mandated readmissions study Mandated study question: Are reduced readmissions related to
The 21st Century Cures Act mandated readmissions study
- Mandated study question: Are reduced
readmissions “related to changes in
- utpatient and emergency services”?
- This report examines relationships between
changes in readmissions and
- Observation stays
- Emergency department visits
- Mortality
2
Refinements to the draft report
In response to the January meeting’s discussion:
- Use non-HRRP conditions as the comparison group
in the graphics
- Examined change in rate of decline in hospital
readmissions before and after program enactment
- Readmission rates declined faster after program enactment
- Added discussion to the chapter
- Updated the literature review
- Findings unchanged
3
Raw readmission rates after passage of the HRRP
Results are preliminary and subject to change 4 0.167 0.168 0.167 0.168 0.164 0.159 0.156 0.158 0.150
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Unplanned readmission rate No HRRP PPACA passes HRRP penalties begin
Raw readmission rates declined for each condition covered by HRRP
Results are preliminary and subject to change 5
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Unplanned readmission rate AMI Heart failure Pneumonia COPD Hip and knee replacement Other conditions No HRRP PPACA passes HRRP penalties begin
Risk-adjusted readmission rates fell faster for conditions covered by the HRRP
Results are preliminary and subject to change 6
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Unplanned readmission rate
AMI Heart failure Pneumonia COPD Hip and knee replacement Other conditions No HRRP PPACA passes HRRP penalties begin
Growth in observation and ED use was not driven by the HRRP program
- Overall observation and ED visits increased from 2010 to
2016 (overall, meaning not just post-discharge visits)
- Observation stays overall increased by 1.9 per 100 beneficiaries
- ED visits overall increased by 5.4 visits per 100 beneficiaries
- Growth in use of observation and ED began before the
HRRP passed
- Similar growth for beneficiaries without an admission,
suggesting the HRRP program did not drive the increase
7 Results are preliminary and subject to change
Risk-adjusted use of observation and ED grew the same for conditions covered and not covered by the HRRP
Results are preliminary and subject to change 8
- 3.1
- 2.5
1.1 1.0 2.1 2.1 0.1 0.6
- 4.0
- 3.0
- 2.0
- 1.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
5 initial conditions Conditions not included in HRRP
Percentage point change, 2010 to 2016
Risk-adjusted unplanned readmission rate 8 hour plus observation (post-discharge) ED (post-discharge) Return to the hospital (sum of all three)
Raw mortality rates, 2008 to 2016
Results are preliminary and subject to change 9
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Raw mortality rate AMI Heart failure Pneumonia Non-HRRP conditions No HRRP PPACA passes HRRP penalties begin
Note: Raw mortality includes in-hospital and 30 days after discharge
Risk-adjusted mortality rates declined from 2008 to 2016
Results are preliminary and subject to change 10 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Risk-adjusted mortality rate AMI Heart failure Pneumonia Non-HRRP conditions
No HRRP PPACA passes HRRP penalties begin
Note: Risk-adjusted mortality includes in-hospital and 30 days after discharge
Readmission policy refinements
- Refine the penalty formula (eliminate the multiplier)
- Expand to all conditions to pay for fixing the penalty
formula
- Fixed target
- Adjust penalties to account for SES (implemented as part
- f the 21st Century Cures Act)
11
Readmission program has been largely successful
- The HRRP created an incentive to reduce readmissions
- Readmissions declined (at least partially due to the
HRRP)
- Observation and emergency visits increased, but may be
largely due to reasons other than the HRRP
- HRRP did not appear to negatively affect mortality rates
- While successful, the HRRP still could be refined
12