managing longevity risk tontines vs annuities
play

Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities An Chen, Peter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Lyon, September 2015 | Jakob Klein University of Ulm Page 2 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Content


  1. Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Lyon, September 2015 | Jakob Klein University of Ulm

  2. Page 2 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Content Table of contents Introduction Model setup Contract specifications Contract value Optimization problem Mortality New product Numerical illustrations Conclusion

  3. Page 3 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Introduction Table of contents Introduction Model setup Contract specifications Contract value Optimization problem Mortality New product Numerical illustrations Conclusion

  4. Page 4 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Introduction Introduction Annuity providers face systematic mortality risk: ◮ Solvency regulations force insurers to set aside capital ◮ Possible consequences: High annuity/reinsurance premiums, solvency risk when capital requirements are not sufficient, . . . Measures taken: ◮ Risk transfer to other parties (e.g. Swaps) or policyholders

  5. Page 5 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Introduction Objectives ◮ Derive optimal payouts for expected-utility-maximizers ◮ Fairness restrictions ◮ Analyze risks borne by providers ◮ Calculation of risk-adequate loadings ( → Solvency II) ◮ Multiple perspectives

  6. Page 6 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Introduction Tontines: Past and present ◮ Early suggestion by Tonti (17 th century) ◮ Collection of money in the UK ◮ Popular product in the US - now forbidden ◮ Milevsky, Salisbury (2015): Optimal Retirement Tontines

  7. Page 7 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Table of contents Introduction Model setup Contract specifications Contract value Optimization problem Mortality New product Numerical illustrations Conclusion

  8. Page 8 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Relevant quantities ◮ Tontine contract: ◮ Provider pays a fixed amount to a group of policyholders ◮ alive policyholders share the payout ◮ Annuity contract: ◮ Provider pays a fixed amount to each alive individual

  9. Page 9 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Contract payoffs At time t > 0 ◮ an individual tontine-policyholder receives nd ( t ) b • ( t ) := 1 { ζ> t } N ( t ) , (1) ◮ an annuitant receives b ◦ ( t ) := 1 { ζ> t } c ( t ) . (2) where ζ is the residual lifetime of the individual and N ( t ) is the number of policyholders at time t .

  10. Page 10 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Value of a tontine  ∞  � P • � · p ∗ e − rt b • ( t ) d t � x , d ( · ) , n := E   0 ∞ n − 1 � � n − 1 � x ) n − 1 − k nd ( t ) e − rt t p ∗ � ( t p ∗ x ) k ( 1 − t p ∗ = k + 1 d t x k k = 0 0 ∞ � e − rt � 1 − ( 1 − t p ∗ x ) n � = d ( t ) d t . (3) 0

  11. Page 11 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Value of an annuity  ∞  ∞ � � P ◦ � · p ∗ e − rt b ◦ ( t ) d t  = e − rt t p ∗ � x , c ( · ) , n := E x c ( t ) d t . (4)  0 0

  12. Page 12 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Expected utility - Policyholder perspective Assume an investor with; Power utility with constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) u ( X ) = X 1 − γ 1 − γ Expected utility of a tontine policyholder:  ∞  � � nd ( t ) � U • � · p ∗ 1 { ζ> t } e − rt u � x , d ( · ) , n := E d t   N ( t ) 0 ∞ n − 1 � n − 1 � � nd ( t ) � � x ) k + 1 ( 1 − t p ∗ x ) n − 1 − k d t . � e − rt ( t p ∗ = u k k + 1 k = 0 0 (5)

  13. Page 13 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Optimal tontine payout d ∗ ( t ) := max d ( t ) U • � · p ∗ � x , d ( · ) , n , (6) ∞ � e − rt d ( t ) 1 − ( 1 − t p ∗ x ) n � � s . t . d t ≤ 1 . 0 Solution: 1  n − 1  � 1 − γ � � x ) k + 1 ( 1 − t p ∗ γ � n − 1 x ) n − 1 − k n ( t p ∗ � k k + 1   k = 0 d ∗ ( t ) = , (7)   1 − ( 1 − t p ∗ λ ∗ � x ) n �    

  14. Page 14 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Optimal annuity payout ∞ � c ∗ ( t ) := max c ( t ) U ◦ � · p ∗ e − rt t p ∗ � x , c ( · ) , n = max x u ( c ( t )) d t , (8) c ( t ) 0 ∞ � e − rt c ( t ) t p ∗ s . t . x d t ≤ 1 . 0 Solution: − 1  ∞  � e − rt t p ∗ c ( t ) = x d t (9) .   0

  15. Page 15 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Mortality assumptions ◮ Gompertz law ◮ Binomial distribution for number of survivors up to time t = ( t p x ) 1 − ǫ , where ǫ is ◮ life tables with mortality shock: t p new x the (random) magnitude of a longevity shock

  16. Page 16 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Risk Margin Calculation of the risk margin (see e.g. Börger (2010)) ◮ Solvency II: Technical Provisions = Best Estimate Liabilities + Risk Margin ◮ In numerical illustrations: Fair Premium = Technical Provision SCR t ◮ Risk Margin = CoC � ( 1 + r ) t t ≥ 0 ◮ Simplifications allowed, e.g. SCR ( t ) = BEL t BEL 0 SCR 0 ◮ CoC = 6% � � � � BEL 1 − CF 1 ◮ SCR = argmin x P − BEL 0 > x ≤ 0 . 005 1 + r

  17. Page 17 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Future losses At time t > 0 the losses generated by a longevity shock can be calculated as � ∞ e − rs � � x ) 1 − ǫ − s p ∗ L ◦ t , · p ∗ x , d ∗ ( · ) ( s p ∗ c ∗ ( s ) d s , � � := (10) x ǫ t � ∞ x ) 1 − ǫ � n − e − rs �� � n � L • t , · p ∗ x , c ∗ ( · ) 1 − ( s p ∗ 1 − ( s p ∗ d ∗ ( s ) d s , � � � := x ) ǫ t (11)

  18. Page 18 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Model setup Switching from tontine to annuity Fix a switching time t ∗ , at time t a policyholder receives: nd ( t ) N ( t ) + 1 { ζ ≥ t ∗ } c , (12) 1 { 0 ≤ ζ< t ∗ } Fair value: t ∗ ∞ � � x ) n ) d ( t ) d t + e − rt ∗ e − r ( t − t ∗ ) t − t ∗ p ∗ e − rt ( 1 − ( 1 − t p ∗ t ∗ p ∗ x + t ∗ c d t = 1 x t ∗ 0 (13)

  19. Page 19 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Numerical illustrations Table of contents Introduction Model setup Contract specifications Contract value Optimization problem Mortality New product Numerical illustrations Conclusion

  20. Page 20 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Numerical illustrations Tontine vs Annuity: Loss distribution Figure: loss distribution: age 65, r=4%

  21. Page 21 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Numerical illustrations Tontine vs Annuity:Risk margin Figure: Risk margins: age 65, different longevity shock magnitudes

  22. Page 22 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Numerical illustrations Annuity: Risk margin Figure: Risk margin: age 65, various portfolio sizes at inception

  23. Page 23 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Numerical illustrations Tontine: risk margin Figure: Risk margin: age 65, various portfolio sizes at inception

  24. Page 24 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Numerical illustrations Expected utility - risk loading Figure: Expected utility with risk-based loading: varying interest and shock magnitude

  25. Page 25 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Numerical illustrations Switching times - Solvency Capital Requirement Figure: SCR for deferred payout: age 65

  26. Page 26 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Conclusion Table of contents Introduction Model setup Contract specifications Contract value Optimization problem Mortality New product Numerical illustrations Conclusion

  27. Page 27 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Conclusion Conclusions ◮ Fairness restrictions ◮ Products with different risk structures: take into account compensation for risk transfer ◮ New products: multiple perspectives have to be analyzed

  28. Page 28 Managing Longevity Risk: Tontines vs. Annuities | An Chen, Peter Hieber, Jakob Klein | Conclusion Outlook/Paper ◮ Mortality models ◮ Detailed proofs ◮ Sensitivity analyses ◮ ...

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend