Making Sense of the Mix: The Future of the Curbside Bin Dylan de - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

making sense of the mix
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Making Sense of the Mix: The Future of the Curbside Bin Dylan de - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Making Sense of the Mix: The Future of the Curbside Bin Dylan de Thomas Resource Recycling, Inc . Whats Going to Be in the Bin? Whats the mix today? Whats changing in materials use? What does it mean? How will it be


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Making Sense of the Mix: The Future of the Curbside Bin

Dylan de Thomas Resource Recycling, Inc.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What’s Going to Be in the Bin?

  • What’s the mix today?
  • What’s changing in materials

use?

  • What does it mean?
  • How will it be recovered?
  • The road forward
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Methodology/Sources

  • EPA 2012 MSW Characterization Report
  • Conducted Web-based research
  • Interviews with
  • Resin producers
  • Packaging manufacturers
  • Brand owners
  • MRF operators
  • Reclaimers
  • Municipalities
  • Industry experts
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Brief History of Curbside Recycling

1973: First program in California 1988: ~1,000 1992: Nearly 5,000

(a growth of more than 250% in 3 years!)

2002: 8,800 2011: 9,800+

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 2,000

4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2008 2010 2011 2012

Printed Paper Generation in MSW Stream 1960-2012

Newspaper/Mechanical Papers Books/Magazines Office-Type Papers Standard Mail Other Commercial Printing EPA MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE UNITED STATES: 2012 FACTS AND FIGURES

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2012 Total MSW Generation by Material Type

EPA MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE UNITED STATES: 2012 FACTS AND FIGURES

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2012 Total MSW Generation by Product Type

EPA MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE UNITED STATES: 2012 FACTS AND FIGURES

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Evolution of Packaging

Glass bottle, metal cap to PET bottle, PP cap Glass jars, metal cap to PET jar, PP cap

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Evolution of Packaging

Glass bottle, metal cap to HDPE bottle, PP cap HDPE Bottle, PP Cap to multi-layer, flexible film pouch

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Evolution of Packaging

From steel can, paper label adhesive to multi-layer, foil-lined flexible film pouch From glass jar, metal lid and paper label adhesive to multi- layer, multi-resin pouch with PP enclosure

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Evolution of Materials Use

slide-12
SLIDE 12

A Precipitous Decline

North American newsprint shipments in million metric tons: 2000: 15.8 2005: 12.7 2010: 7.8 2011: 7.3 2012: 6.7 2013: 6.4 This is a loss of 50 percent over eight years.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Evolution of Materials Use

Source: Chaz Miller, NW&RA

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The Evolution of Packaging

  • Light-weighting & increasing recycled content
  • Projected increase in film packaging

– “Containment format and packaging process of choice for the primary packaging of a broad range

  • f products”

– Americans to use nearly 33 BILLION more rigid plastic and flexible packages in 2017 than in 2012 – Flexible pack to rise 3.5% annually to more than 9 billion pounds in 2017.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What’s Flexible Film Packaging?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What’s Flexible Film Packaging?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What’s Flexible Film Packaging?

“Smart Packaging” with temperature indicators and freshness monitors

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What’s Flexible Film Packaging?

  • Technologically advanced
  • Multi-layer
  • Multi-resin
  • Sometimes with non-plastic materials such as

foil

  • Barrier layers
  • Tie Layers
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Environmental Drivers Fueling the Shift

Flexible Film Pouches & Packaging

Flexible Packaging Association www.flexpack.org

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Market Drivers Fueling the Shift

  • Brand differentiation in an increasingly competitive

environment

  • What do customers want?

– Convenience is king – “On-the-go” lifestyles among increasingly time poor consumers – Trend of smaller, single-serving sizes

  • Performance is key

– Highly technical – Logistical advantages – “Doesn’t matter if it’s sustainable if it doesn’t perform”

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Sustainable Material Management

Replacing all plastic packaging with non-plastic alternatives would require 4.5 times as much packaging material by weight, increasing the amount of packaging used in the U.S. by nearly 55 million tons

slide-22
SLIDE 22

MSW Recycling Rates, 1960 to 2012

EPA MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE UNITED STATES: 2012 FACTS AND FIGURES

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Growing Opportunities

EPA MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE UNITED STATES: 2012 FACTS AND FIGURES

  • 1,000

2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 PET Bottles/Jars HDPE Natural Bottles Other Containers Bags, Sacks, Wraps Other Plastic Packaging PET Bottles/Jars HDPE Natural Bottles Other Containers Bags, Sacks, Wraps Other Plastic Packaging PET Bottles/Jars HDPE Natural Bottles Other Containers Bags, Sacks, Wraps Other Plastic Packaging PET Bottles/Jars HDPE Natural Bottles Other Containers Bags, Sacks, Wraps Other Plastic Packaging PET Bottles/Jars HDPE Natural Bottles Other Containers Bags, Sacks, Wraps Other Plastic Packaging PET Bottles/Jars HDPE Natural Bottles Other Containers Bags, Sacks, Wraps Other Plastic Packaging PET Bottles/Jars HDPE Natural Bottles Other Containers Bags, Sacks, Wraps Other Plastic Packaging PET Bottles/Jars HDPE Natural Bottles Other Containers Bags, Sacks, Wraps Other Plastic Packaging 1980 1990 2000 2005 2008 2010 2011 2012

Plastics Generated, Recovered, & Discarded in MSW - 1980-2012

(in thousands of tons)

Generated Recovered Discarded

slide-24
SLIDE 24

MSW Management in the U.S., 2012

Combustion with Energy Recovery 11.7% Discarded 53.8% Recovery 34.5%

slide-25
SLIDE 25

We are sending money to the landfill

Material Recycling Rate Value of Unrecovered Materials

Paper 61% $3.1 Billion Aluminum Cans 65% $1.3 Billion Plastic Bottles 31% HDPE, 30% PET $1.6 Billion Steel Cans 65% $0.4 Billion Glass Bottles 28% $0.1 Billion Total $6.5 Billion

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Recycling rates for selected products, 2011-2012

96.2 72.5 57.3 70.6 67 44.6 28.6 34.2 29.1 2.5

20 40 60 80 100 120

Auto Batt. Newsprint Y ard Scraps Steel Cans UBC Tires HDPE Glass PET Food Scraps

Recycling Rate (Percent)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

It’s Also About Collection

  • Growing collection innovation
  • Wet/Dry collection growing

– Taking the place of single-stream?

  • Sorting MSW

– Montgomery, AL; San Jose, CA; Houston (?)

  • The “other stuff”
  • Different collection ideologies
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Growth of Single-Stream

Source: Government Advisory Associates, Inc., 2013

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Single-Stream MRFs in the U.S.

  • Map
slide-30
SLIDE 30

What MRFs Have to Do With It

slide-31
SLIDE 31

What MRFs Have to Do With It

  • MRFs need to be flexible
  • Retrofitting and reconfiguring needs to be

built into the regular capital cycle

  • “Mega-MRFs” and “Hub & Spoke” sorting

taking hold in some areas

  • Plastics Recycling Facilities (PRFs) could be a

solution here or overseas

  • Flexible packaging “not an issue” at the MRF

level … yet

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Growing the MRF

  • Republic Services has 32 single-stream MRFs,

but, “Really only 18 that matter, meaning those 18 process 85% of the material we collect”

  • Waste Management has grown their single-

stream recycling capacity by 30% over the last three years

  • ReCommunity operates 22 single-stream

MRFs, no plans to build non-single-stream MRFs

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Sortation Technology

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Sorting It Out

  • There is no mechanical sortation

technology on the market for flex film

  • Vacuum technology exists as a

solution

  • PE film continues to be a challenge
  • Optical sortation is growing and will

continue

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Sorting It Out

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The Role of Exports

  • Impacts of the Green Fence

– Softened spot market – Changed bale composition

  • Material that is moving again, not necessarily

directly to China

– High-grading plastics before import to China reportedly happening – SE Asia the likely destination

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The Road Forward

  • Domestic reclamation

– Long term contracts needed to supply enough material to make investment cost-effective – Recycling is occurring – MRFs should move to capture material

  • Other recovery

– Developing technology and markets – “One cog in an inter-connected system”

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The Road Forward

  • Recovery is a priority

– Domestic reclamation is occurring – but more material is needed – Communities looking to expand collection programs – Increased consumer education is needed

  • “If you bale it, they will come”

– “As more of this material is produced, it becomes more an

  • pportunity than a problem”

– Lower-valued plastics can be viable feedstocks for entrepreneurial ventures

slide-39
SLIDE 39

The Road Forward… Will Have Many Paths

Other recovery Options

– Energy Recovery and Plastics- to-Oil

  • Maturing industries
  • Economics only support use of

waste plastics

  • Small-scale systems (<10K TPY)
  • Incubator markets for materials

collection

“One cog in an inter-connected system”

slide-40
SLIDE 40

The Road Forward…

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Thank You!

Dylan de Thomas Editorial Director Resource Recycling, Inc. dylan@resource-recycling.com 503-309-5142 www.resource-recycling.com Special thanks to research and reporting teammate -- Amy Roth, Green Spectrum Consulting