THE STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION OF FTI CONSULTING
Li Livin ing Well at t the he End o
- f Li
Life: Oregon
- n and Washingt
gton
- n S
Li Livin ing Well at t the he End o of Li Life: Oregon on and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
THE STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION OF FTI CONSULTING Li Livin ing Well at t the he End o of Li Life: Oregon on and Washingt gton on S Survey R y Results Methodology This is the second installment of the Regence/National Journal
THE STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION OF FTI CONSULTING
2
3
4
(FEB-11)
71% 85% 83% 23% 11% 14%
Enhance Extend Enhance Extend Enhance Extend Which statement comes closer to your point of view?
Weekly Churchgoers: 76% - 21% Weekly Churchgoers: 77% - 16% Weekly Churchgoers: 68% - 24%
5
Agree Disagree
Agree Disagree
When I approach the end of my life, I should be allowed to control my end-of-life treatment options, including choosing to decline life- extending treatment options and choosing when and where to die Seriously ill patients should be allowed to control their end-of-life treatment options, including choosing to decline life-extending treatment options and choosing when and where to die
95% 96%
5% 4%
Strongly Agree 85% Strongly Agree 87%
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree
94% 93%
4% 6%
Strongly Agree 85% Strongly Agree 81%
77% 70%
20% 27%
Fav Unfav Fav Unfav
The Death with Dignity Act was approved by Oregon voters in 1994 and reaffirmed in 1997 / approved by Washington voters in 2008. This act allows doctors to prescribe medicine for some of the most seriously ill patients to take in
The POLST Program is an initiative developed by doctors and policymakers in the state through which seriously ill patients have their wishes and preferences for life-sustaining treatments documented on a medical order and signed by a
medical order, meaning that a patient’s wish to receive or not receive life-sustaining treatment must be followed by other medical professionals.
Very Fav 52% Very Fav 44%
91% 85%
5% 12%
Fav Unfav Fav Unfav
Very Fav 56% Very Fav 49% REP: 60% - 39% IND: 74% - 19% DEM: 92% - 7% Weekly Church: 49% - 46% REP: 48% - 46% IND: 70% - 29% DEM: 85% - 12% Weekly Church: 38% - 58% REP: 86% - 9% IND: 92% - 5% DEM: 94% - 4% Weekly Church: 87% - 9% REP: 85% - 13% IND: 83% - 14% DEM: 87% - 9% Weekly Church: 85% - 12%
6
7
52% 17% 31% Unique Common Don't Know
32% 37% 31% Unique Common Don't Know
8
Though many voters admit some hesitation, the public in both states say they support these policies because they provide choices and options for patients at the end of life. .
I fully support these policies without hesitation because they are the right approach to give people the greatest choice when it comes to end-of-life care.
I have some hesitations about these policies, but I support them because I think they at least help create some more
I oppose these policies, but I think they bring up some good points about the need for more options on end-of-life care. I fully oppose these policies because they take the state in the wrong direction on these issues.
Which statement comes closest to your own point of view?
OREGON WASHINGTON 54% Age 18-29 44% Age 18-29 44% Rural Voters 59% Rural Voters 45% Independents 46% Republicans 58% Non-Whites 46% HS Ed or Less 50% Weekly Church 44% Weekly Church
Top Groups with HESITATIONS
9
65% 78% 77% 33% 21% 23%
National (Feb-11) Oregon Washington
Familiar / Not Familiar
86% 94% 87% 13% 6% 13%
National (Feb-11) Oregon Washington
Familiar / Not Familiar
10
24% 32% 26% 71% 61% 70%
Non-Coll: 22% - 69% College+: 46% - 50% 18-44: 28% - 69% 45+: 36% - 55% Non-Coll: 12% - 83% College+: 40% - 56% 18-44: 17% - 80% 45+: 34% - 61% Non-Coll: 16% - 80% College+: 35% - 59% 18-44: 21% - 77% 45+: 25% - 67%
11
12
Great Deal / Some Not Too Much / Not At All
Voters say they have spent considerable time thinking about these issues and they believe that palliative care treatment should be available for all patients.
Total Important Total Not Important Total Important Total Not Important
Regardless of whether or not you have been personally involved in planning for or making palliative care decisions, how much have you personally thought about these issues? How important do you believe it is that palliative care treatment options be available to all seriously ill patients who need them and want them? 74% 68%
26% 32%
Great Deal / Some Not Too Much / Not At All 96% 97%
4% 2%
Non-Coll: 66% - 33% College+: 83% - 17% 18-44: 69% - 31% 45+: 77% - 22% Non-Coll: 61% - 39% College+: 74% - 26% 18-44: 54% - 46% 45+: 78% - 22%
How confident are you that quality palliative care would be available to you or a family member if you needed it?
76% 72%
19% 25%
13
14
57% 52% 17% 13% 7% 7% 6% 5%
Family Members Family Doctor / Physician Hospice Group Hospital / Care Facility Church Members / Pastor Attorney Nurse Friend
56% 44% 15% 11% 6% 8% 6% 5%
Family Members Family Doctor / Physician Hospice Group Hospital / Care Facility Church Members / Pastor Attorney Nurse Friend
Who specifically have you consulted with or talked to regarding these palliative care decisions?
15
Yes No
46% 46%
34% 35% 19% 18%
Don’t Know Yes No Don’t Know
In your opinion, do you believe that doctors and other health care providers do a good enough job of talking with seriously ill patients about the full range of options available to them including palliative care alongside all other treatments? Among Full Sample: Among Those Involved In Planning
Getting DATA From Venture
Yes No
52% 47%
36% 44% 11% 8%
Don’t Know Yes No Don’t Know
16
Exc / Good Fair / Poor
Exc / Good Fair / Poor
Options to Extend Life as Long as Possible Options to Ease Pain and Suffering and Focus More on Quality of Life
66% 66%
22% 25%
66% 63%
23% 30%
Exc / Good Fair / Poor Exc / Good Fair / Poor I’d like to read you some different options available for seriously ill patients. For each one, please tell me if you believe the availability of that option in your state is…
Non-Coll: 60% - 29% College+: 74% - 15% Urban: 69% - 20% Suburb: 64% - 23% Rural: 64% - 27% Non-Coll: 64% - 28% College+: 68% - 23% Urban: 56% - 34% Suburb: 70% - 21% Rural: 72% - 20% Non-Coll: 62% - 29% College+: 71% - 15% Urban: 72% - 20% Suburb: 64% - 21% Rural: 61% - 31% Non-Coll: 59% - 34% College+: 66% - 26% Urban: 53% - 37% Suburb: 68% - 26% Rural: 63% - 29%
Exc / Good Fair / Poor
37% 32% 22% 31% 40% 37%
Don’t Know
How would you rate the quality of palliative care treatment options available to seriously ill patients in your state?
Exc / Good Fair / Poor Don’t Know Exc / Good Fair / Poor
46% 43% 22% 29% 32% 27%
Don’t Know
Exc / Good Fair / Poor Don’t Know
Among Full Sample:
No Involvement in Palliative Care Decisions
Exc / Good Fair / Poor
62% 59% 20% 28% 17% 12%
Don’t Know
Exc / Good Fair / Poor Don’t Know
Personal Involvement in Decisions
17
18
23% 43% 5% 6%
Widely available to almost all patients who need it and want it Available, but
patients with the right insurance or resources Available to
number of patients Mostly unavailable
Given the definition read to you earlier about what palliative care is, how available would you say that palliative care treatment
19% 47% 7% 8%
Widely available to almost all patients who need it and want it Available, but
patients with the right insurance or resources Available to
number of patients Mostly unavailable
19
17% 48% 13% 9%
Readily available and easy to come by Available, but
know where to look and who to ask Somewhat available, but hard to come by Hard to find or unavailable
12% 52% 18% 12%
Readily available and easy to come by Available, but
know where to look and who to ask Somewhat available, but hard to come by Hard to find or unavailable
20
21
74% 15% Agree Disagree
74% 16% Agree Disagree