Landlords in Europe A Comparative Analysis Launch Event 12 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Landlords in Europe A Comparative Analysis Launch Event 12 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Landlords in Europe A Comparative Analysis Launch Event 12 November 2013 European Parliament About UIPI: Union Internationale de le Proprit Immobilire (UIPI) Founded in Paris during 1923 Headquarters transferred to Brussels in
About UIPI:
- Union Internationale de le Propriété Immobilière (UIPI)
– Founded in Paris during 1923 – Headquarters transferred to Brussels in 2006
- The UIPI represents:
– 5 million property owners – Covering more than 20 million dwellings – Through 30 member associations – Across 28 countries
- Our members include:
– 3.5 million private landlords (both domestic and commercial) – 1.5 million home-owners and condominium co-owners
UIPI Member Associations:
- Albania
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech
Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Ireland
- Italy
- Monaco
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- UK
Objective of the Analysis:
- Increase knowledge of the Private Rented Sector (PRS)
– Academic and theoretical research already exists – Focus on PRS from a practitioners point of view – Highlighting the key issues which landlords face
- Improve understanding at all levels of Government:
– At Local, Regional, National and EU levels – All with different legislative frameworks
- Promotion of housing policies which create:
– Good quality, affordable private rented housing – And a stable and sustainable sector across the EU
Relevance for Policy Makers:
- The Private Rented Sector plays a crucial role in:
– Providing essential accommodation for European citizens – Supporting the European economy
- Increasing interest in the sector from Government:
– Credit crunch caused affordability issues for home-ownership – Resulting in a significant increase in the demand for rented housing – 18.1% of European households lived in the PRS in 2011
- European context:
– Although not within EU competence – Increased focus on housing market and property taxation – Through policies such as European Semester – And work undertaken by URBAN Intergroup
Scope of the Analysis:
- The analysis focuses on:
– The main characteristics – Strengths and weaknesses – In national regulation
- Looking in particular at:
– Legislative Frameworks – Property Taxation – Planning and Zoning
12 Case Study Countries:
- Austria
- Belgium
- Czech Republic
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Ireland
- Italy
- Norway
- Slovakia
- Spain
- UK
Legislative Frameworks: Creating a Tenancy
- Determining the rent:
– Only 5 countries have laws regulating the initial rent – Limited right to increase rents during the tenancy in 7 countries
- The form of tenancy agreements and negotiable clauses :
– More than 80% of countries require written tenancy agreements – Most countries allow parties to negotiate clauses in the tenancy – Additional requirements on the contents in some countries – Registration of the tenancy is necessary in 5 countries
- Security deposits:
– Security deposits are common across all countries – 10 countries have regulations governing the amount, use and repayment of deposits to tenants.
Legislative Frameworks: During a Tenancy
- Contractual duration:
– Regulations governing tenancy duration exist in all countries – Freedom to negotiate is stronger in 3 countries – Fixed term contracts exist in most countries – Minimum statutory period on tenancy exist in 8 countries – Unlawful to set a minimum duration in Germany
- Maintenance and repair obligations:
– Landlords are usually responsible for maintenance and major repairs – Tenants are required to inform landlords of defects
Legislative Frameworks: Ending a Tenancy
- Termination practices:
– It is much easier for tenants to end tenancies than landlords – Fixed-term tenancies end on expiration in some countries – Most countries require landlords to provide legitimate reasons – France and Italy do not allow termination by the landlord; only the refusal to renew the contract
- Regaining possession through the Courts:
– Landlords must usually follow a two-stage process – Process takes between 6 months and 3 years – This can be sometimes an extremely expensive process – Some countries have accelerated procedures for rent arrears
Legislative Frameworks: Residential Overview
Pro-landlord
Czech Republic United Kingdom
Neutral
Greece Slovakia Norway
Pro-tenant
Austria Belgium France Germany Ireland Italy Spain
Legislative Frameworks: Commercial Tenancies
- Significantly different to residential tenancies:
– No weaker party, so no need for protective provisions – Greater contractual freedoms to negotiate clauses – No regulation of initial rent levels – Rent increases only regulated in 4 countries – Less restrictive termination rights
- Exceptions and restrictions:
– Restrictions on minimum duration vary considerably – Greece has the longest minimum tenancy duration – Refusal to prolong tenancy requires compensation in 2 countries – Belgium and France have stricter provisions than residential tenancies
Legislative Frameworks: Commercial Overview
Pro-landlord
Czech Republic Germany Norway Slovakia Spain United Kingdom
Neutral
Austria Ireland
Pro-tenant
Belgium France Greece Italy
Taxation: Buying and Selling
- Purchasing property:
– All countries levy a tax on the purchaser except Slovakia – Either a Registration Fee, Stamp Duty or Transfer Tax – Most countries base tax on purchase price – Actual property value is used in some countries
- Selling property:
– Capital Gains Tax (CGT) exists in all countries – Most countries treat CGT as income tax at the same rates – However, a separate Capital Gains Tax is levied in 4 countries – Most countries have some exemptions or reductions to CGT
- KEY: Housing stock is most efficiently used in countries
with the lowest transaction taxes
Taxation: Using the Property
- Rental Income:
– Taxed at the same rates as other income in many countries – Rates depend on whether landlord is an individual or corporate entity – Spain and Norway use net income as tax base – Common expenses can be offset in these countries
- Recurrent Property Taxes
– No trends exists within case study countries – Tax is based on property value in most countries – Rates vary significantly (percentages or fixed fees) – Most are levied on landlord (except UK)
- Other indirect taxes have not been addressed
– Value Added Tax (VAT), Inheritance Tax (IHT), etc.
Planning and Zoning:
- Planning regulation:
– Planning policy is designed to create enjoyable environment – Regulation is overly complex and not effectively used – Stringent obligations placed on landlords at all stages – Property owners play limited role in policy formulation – Greece has an extremely complex planning system
- Obtaining consent:
– Implementation of planning regulation is decentralised – Planning permission required for new buildings in all countries – 4 countries have mandatory requirements to consult local residents on all applications
Expropriation:
- Strict rules exist on Expropriation:
– Universal Declaration on Human Rights – European Convention on Human Rights
- All countries have some powers of Expropriation:
– Governments must demonstrate public need outweighs human right – Fair compensation must be provided – Expropriation must take place in a timely manner
- Compensation for property owners:
– Determination of compensation is problematic in many countries – Expropriation is very rarely used in Germany or UK
Conclusion:
- Europe has a diverse rental market:
– “One size fits all” policies will be detrimental to most markets
- Stable and sustainable renting:
– Onerous legislative and tax burdens result in diminished supply of affordable housing – Complex legislative frameworks discourage investments in the private rented sector
- Future policy considerations:
– Simplify tenancy, planning and building norms – Avoid excessive taxation of property compared to other forms of capital – Balance the needs of all housing tenures and not to distort the market