it service investment board
play

IT Service Investment Board November 12, 2013 Agenda Welcome and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IT Service Investment Board November 12, 2013 Agenda Welcome and Introductions Strategy Board Update Technology Recharge Fee Annual Review FY 2015 Investment Opportunities Portfolio Prioritization Process Follow Up Wrap Up


  1. IT Service Investment Board November 12, 2013

  2. Agenda  Welcome and Introductions  Strategy Board Update  Technology Recharge Fee Annual Review  FY 2015 Investment Opportunities  Portfolio Prioritization Process Follow Up  Wrap Up 2

  3. Strategy Board Update 3

  4. UW-I T Stra te g ic Ove rvie w DRAF T  Co nve nie nt a nd sa fe a c c e ss to info rma tio n a nd se rvic e s a c ro ss time , pla c e , d e vic e a nd Vision o rg a niza tio na l b o und a rie s  E na b le stud e nts, fa c ulty a nd sta ff to b e mo re e ffe c tive  He lp UW ma na g e risks a nd re so urc e s Mission  E nc o ura g e inno va tio n a nd c o mpe titive ne ss  Be a truste d , so ug ht-a fte r pa rtne r, pa ssio na te a b o ut using IT to impro ve the UW  Ope ra te a n e xe mpla ry o rg a niza tio n, kno wn fo r e xc e lle nc e , e ffic ie nc y, a nd inte g rity  De ve lo p stro ng stra te g ic pa rtne rships F oundation  F o ste r a c ulture o f e xplo ra tio n, sha ring , a nd d a ta -d rive n re sults  L iste n, a ntic ipa te , c o mmunic a te , e xe c ute  Clo ud , Co lla b o ra tio n, Co nsume riza tio n, Mo b ility, Pe rso na liza tio n, Big Da ta Dr ive r s Str ate gic Pro mo te De live r Goals Pro vid e Suppo rt Mo d e rnize Se c urity E ffe c tive Supe rio r Wo rld E na b le Info rma tio n a nd Se rvic e s Infra struc ture Cla ss Inno va tive & Busine ss Busine ss With Co st & T o o ls Re se a rc h T e a c hing Syste ms Co ntinuity T ra nspa re nc y Asse ssme nts & Outc ome s T e c hno lo g y Busine ss Custo me r Go ve rna nc e & Ma na g e me nt Sa tisfa c tio n De c isio n Ma king E ng a g e me nt

  5. T ime line fo r Administra tive Applic a tio n Assumptio ns - DRAF T  One ma jo r syste m a t a time  I nc re me nta l inno va tio n a re a prio rity, e spe c ia lly in stude nt fa c ing syste ms  I nve stme nts in b usine ss pro c e ss re de sig n will le a d to b e tte r o utc o me s  Mo me ntum a nd e xpe rtise fro m syste m re pla c e me nts sho uld b e le ve ra g e d  Be tte r info rma tio n no w fo r de c isio n ma king is c ritic a l 5

  6. Administrative Systems Replacement - DRAFT FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 HR/Payroll  Business process redesign  Replace legacy systems  Additional functionality Finance  Procure to Pay  HR/P - finance intersections  Options analysis  Business process redesign  Replace legacy systems  Additional functionality Student  MyPlan / Student self svc  Curriculum Management  Scoping & tech feasibility  Business process redesign  Student - finance intersections  Replace legacy systems Enterprise Info Mgmt  EDMS proof of concept  Enterprise integration  EDW / BI build-out Nov 2013 Significant implementation effort (Ongoing maintenance and production support not represented) Incremental modernization

  7. I T Se rvic e I nve stme nt Bo a rd T ime line SIB Po rtfo lio SIB Po rtfo lio SIB Po rtfo lio Pro vo st Pro vo st Pro vo st Prio ritiza tio n Prio ritiza tio n Prio ritiza tio n Bud g e t Bud g e t Bud g e t Imple me nt Imple me nt Pro po sa l Pro po sa l T RF Pro po sa l T RF T RF Imple me nt Pro vo st Pro vo st T RF Appro ve d Appro ve d T RF Due Appro ve d T RF F und ing Due F und ing Due Aut Wtr Spr Sum Aut Wtr Spr Sum Aut Wtr Spr 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015 2015 2016 2016 ST F ST F ST F ST F ST F ST F Pro po sa l F und ing Pro po sa l F und ing Pro po sa l F und ing Due Due Due  Po rtfo lio Re vie w Bo a rd (b i-we e kly) – Ma na g e d re so urc e s, a ssure pro je c ts a re o n tra c k  IT Se rvic e Ma na g e me nt Bo a rd (mo nthly) – Ma ke re c o mme nda tio ns fo r se rvic e impro ve me nts a nd disc o ntinua tio n o f se rvic e  IT Se rvic e Inve stme nt Bo a rd (SIB) (mo nthly) – Pro je c t prio ritie s, b udg e t re q ue sts, T RF  IT Stra te g y Bo a rd (3 time s pe r ye a r)– Po lic y, stra te g y, ma jo r IT inve stme nt, re vie w 7

  8. Technology Recharge Fee Annual Review 8

  9. TRF Review: Progress to Date Technology Recharge Fee  Successful audit of the TRF rate Advisory Committee Bill Ferris process by UW Internal Audit in UW Information Technology Co-Chair Spring 2013 Tom Sparks College of Engineering Co-Chair  Annual review and analysis by Cristi Chapman Management Accounting & Analysis David Green the Technology Recharge Fee School of Medicine Amy Floit Advisory Committee in October Office of Planning & Budgeting Jonathan Franklin School of Law  Recommendation to the Service Paul Ishizuka UW Medicine Investment Board today Linda Rose Nelson College of Arts & Sciences Paul Henderson, Ex-officio UW Medicine IT Services 9

  10. TRF Rate for FY 2015 Cost Model Assumptions  Maintain methodology approved by Service Investment Board for FY14 & FY15  Use UW-IT FY 2014 budget as base  Maintain FY 2014 TRF funding level ‒ Use UW-IT Fund Balance to cover increase in expenditures - $2.9M  New investments from Provost are not included in calculations 10

  11. UW-IT FY14 Budget $109M $50M Total UW-IT Budget Basic Services Self Sustaining $25.2M Basic Services - University Basic Central Supported Services, $31.2M Basic Services - TRF $3.9M $50.1M $18.9M Information Management $22.1M Classroom, Student Tech Fee Technology, & $2.2M Events, $6M 11

  12. TRF Rate for FY 2015  TRF Committee recommendation is to maintain current TRF Rates (no change)*: FY 14 FY 15 Campus Rate $54.50 mo $54.50 mo Medical Center Rate $50.00 mo $50.00 mo *TRF rate calculation resulted in an immaterial rate change. Committee recommended maintaining existing rates. 12

  13. Looking Ahead  Explore major changes to TRF for FY16: – Move to more transparent and simpler allocation methodology – Align with current UW-IT organization and services – Review treatment of Information Management and Classroom Technology & Events (new to UW- IT) – Review treatment of students – Review allocation of GOF/DOF  Begin in Winter/Spring 2014 13

  14. FY 2015 Investment Opportunities 14

  15. Should we include in the TRF?  40G Campus Network Upgrade – Increase the campus backbone network capacity to support big data research  Undergraduate Admissions Modernization – Transition the paper-intensive admissions review to an online process 15

  16. Impact of New Investments on TRF FY 15 40 GB UGA Both Campus $54.50 $56.68 $56.98 $59.26 Med Ctrs* $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 *Medical Centers are covered by separate networking agreement, and not impacted by 40 GB network. Medical Centers do not contribute to Information Management efforts. 16

  17. Information Item: Included in UW-IT Provost Request FY 2015  40G Campus Network Upgrade  Undergraduate Admissions Modernization  MY Husky Experience – A technology ecosystem that promotes student engagement in co-curricular learning experiences across campus  UW Academic Explorer – Following MyPlan, additional academic planning tools 17

  18. UW-IT Portfolio Ranking Process Follow Up 18

  19. UW-IT Portfolio Ranking Process Outcomes  Use ranking process priorities to guide UW-IT project resource allocations when conflicts arise  Hold next phase of eFECS project* ‒ Scope a more limited project to deliver functionality not provided by future replacement systems  Hold next phase of MyFD project*  Seek funding for top two SIB priorities: 40G Network and Undergraduate Modernization *Projects have maintenance-level funding 19

  20. Ranking Process Feedback  What worked well  Suggestions for improvement ‒ Process ‒ Project Proposals ‒ Ranking Criteria ‒ Other 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend