Investor presentation Q3 2016 Nordea Bank Finland plc a snapshot Q3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investor presentation q3 2016 nordea bank finland plc a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Investor presentation Q3 2016 Nordea Bank Finland plc a snapshot Q3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nordea Bank Finland Covered Bonds Investor presentation Q3 2016 Nordea Bank Finland plc a snapshot Q3 2016 100% owned by Nordea Bank AB Loans to the public was EUR 30.6bn per Q3 2016 Licensed by Finnish FSA to issue covered bonds


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nordea Bank Finland Covered Bonds Investor presentation Q3 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Nordea Bank Finland plc – a snapshot

Q3 2016

2

  • 100% owned by Nordea Bank AB
  • Loans to the public was EUR 30.6bn per Q3 2016
  • Licensed by Finnish FSA to issue covered bonds according to the Finnish covered

bond legislation (Covered Bond Act (688/2010) or CBA)

  • Issuer rated Aa3/AA-*/AA-
  • Covered bonds rated Aaa by Moody’s

*Negative outlook S&P as of the 20th November 2012

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cover pool key characteristics

Q3 2016

3

Pool notional EUR 22.7bn Cover pool content Mortgage loans secured by residential or commercial property. Loans guaranteed by public sector. Geographic distribution Throughout Finland with concentration in urban areas Asset distribution 99.0% residential, 1.0% public sector Weighted average LTV 49.8% (indexed, calculated per property) Average loan size EUR 68,685 (weighted average, covered amount 65.0k) Rate type Fixed rate 2%, Floating rate 98% Substitute assets None Pool type Dynamic Loans originated by Nordea Bank Finland

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Cover pool key characteristics – 93.3% single family housing with low LTVs

Q3 2016

4

West Finland 23,8% South Finland 21,5% North/Middle Finland 12,3% Greater Helsinki area 42,4%

Cover pool balance by geographical area

Single family houses 10 015 44,0% Tenant owner units 10 645 46,8% Multi-family housing 1 296 5,7% Summer houses 573 2,5% Public sector 218 1,0%

Cover pool balance by loan category

  • Pool mainly includes single family houses and tenant owner units.
  • The main part of real estates are located in greater Helsinki but are
  • therwise evenly distributed between western, northern and

southern part of Finland.

  • Low WALTVs in the pool

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Single family houses Tenant owner units Multi-family houses

Weighted average LTV - Indexed

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Performance of housing loan portfolio – Nordea Bank Finland

Q3 2016

5

  • Low level of loan losses supported by strong household sector
  • Impaired non-performing loans are at low levels
  • 0,02%

0,00% 0,02% 0,04% 0,06% 0,08% 0,10%

Net loan losses % for Nordea Bank Finland’s housing loan portfolio

0,00% 0,50% 1,00% 1,50% 2,00% 2,50% 3,00% 3,50% 4,00% 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000 25 000 30 000 35 000 EURm

Nordea Bank Finland’s housing loan stock and level of impaired non-performing loans*

Lending (EURm) (LHS) Non-performing loans (RHS) *The majority of the increase in Q4-2015 is model driven and is related to an improved way

  • f calculating collectively assessed provisions on contract level, implemented in Q4-2015
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Underwriting criteria – common Nordea policy

Q3 2016

6

  • Residential mortgage loans
  • Nordea’s credit decision is based on the borrower’s payment capacity and collateral is always

taken.

  • Collateral must be in the form of mortgages in real estate or in shares in housing companies.
  • Repayment ability of borrowers is calculated using stressed scenarios.
  • Credit bureau check is always conducted (Suomen Asiakastieto).
  • Individual valuation of property based on market value.
  • Commercial mortgage loans
  • Borrowers with strong EBITDA/debt and cash flow based on e.g. long-term high quality lease

contracts and adequate interest rate hedging.

  • Individual credit decision based on credit policy and rating.
  • An evaluation of all property-related commitments is performed in the ordinary annual review

against a background of quality issues/risk factors regarding the property itself, the lease, the management, the long-term cash flow and -strength of balance sheet/gearing. The analysis focuses on the repayment capacity.

  • Individual valuation of property based on market value.