www.kcadeutag.com
KCA Deutag is a leading international drilling and engineering company working onshore and offshore with a focus on safety, quality and operational performance
First Quarter 2014
Investor Presentation First Quarter 2014 KCA Deutag is a leading - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Investor Presentation First Quarter 2014 KCA Deutag is a leading international drilling and engineering company working onshore and offshore with a focus on safety, quality and operational performance www.kcadeutag.com Disclaimer The
www.kcadeutag.com
KCA Deutag is a leading international drilling and engineering company working onshore and offshore with a focus on safety, quality and operational performance
First Quarter 2014
Disclaimer
1
The distribution of this presentation in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. Persons into whose possession this presentation comes are required to inform themselves about and to
This presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning KCA Deutag. These forward- looking statements are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and
uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results and developments to differ materially from any future results and developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking
forward-looking statements contained in this presentation to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation.
2
Agenda
1
Key Highlights
2
Commercial Developments
3
Business Overview
4
Group Results
5
Summary
3
Q1 Key highlights
KCA Deutag is a leading international drilling and engineering company working onshore and
1
Group revenue and EBITDA of $513.9m (Q1 2013: $474.7m) and $80.8m (Q1 2013: $56.2m) respectively
2
Improved operational and financial performance from Land Drilling, RDS, Platforms and MODUs
3
Successful refinancing has pushed our earliest significant maturities out to 2018
4
Contract backlog of $8.5bn (as at 1 May 2014) across a blue chip customer base
5
Net debt/LTM EBITDA leverage fell from 4.0x at Q4 2013 to 3.41x by Q1 2014
1Pro-forma Q1 2014. See slide 17 for full details.Integrated Land Drilling Offshore Drilling Services & Design
US$181m EBITDA (54% of total)¹ US$154m EBITDA (46% of total)¹
Land Drilling Bentec Platform Services Rig Design Services (RDS)
premium drilling rig owner and operator
high-end premium land rigs and components
concept to commission
Middle East, Europe and SE Asia
Oman
Norway, Azerbaijan, Russia, SE Asia and Africa
Bergen, Houston, London
Market-leading international drilling & engineering company
4 Design & Engineering Design & Manufacture Own & Operate Own & Operate Manage Manage
53 drilling rigs, 4 workover rigs
2007 have been built by Bentec
12-16 rigs and 50 top drives2 p.a.
drilling operations on 39 platforms
platforms designed or refurbished by RDS
and support staff
¹ LTM BITDA pre-exceptional items, excluding MODUs and prior to allocation of central overheads. EBITDA by segment for 2013 has been re-presented to reallocate support costs which were previously shown as central overheads (such as HR, Supply Chain and IT costs) to the operational business segments. 2014 figures are presented on the same basis.
2 High-specification mechanical equipment turning the drill string.Europe (inc North Sea) 23% Russia 20% Africa 14% Caspian 13% Middle East 11% SE Asia 10% Other 9% Houston
Ben Loyal jack-up rig
Baku London
Stavanger Bad Bentheim Tyumen Nizwa Ben Rinnes jack-up rig
St. Johns
Bergen Dubai
Land Drilling Platform Services RDS offices MODUs Bentec Regional offices
Continued strong market position and balanced portfolio of assets across highly attractive international markets
Aberdeen (HQ)
5
1EBITDA excludes results from the Ben Avon jack-up which was disposed of in March 2013 and is stated before normalisationadjustments and excluding central overheads of $53m. Map excludes work over land rigs, defined as being below 900HP.
PRESENCE IN KEY AREAS 2013 EBITDA split by region
North Sea /Norway 25 Plat. Europe & Caspian 8 Rigs Azerbaijan 7 Plat. Russia 15 Rigs Middle East 12 Rigs Angola 3 Plat. Africa 17 Rigs Sakhalin 3 Plat. Brunei 1 Rig Myanmar 1 Plat.
126 55 50 40 15 30 60 90 120 150 Europe North Africa Middle East North Sea Russia
Years
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 TRIR per 200,000 man hours
Total Recordable Incident Rate Improvement (TRIR)
TRIR (average) 6
Health, safety and environmental performance
Mar -14
KCAD TRIR at end Q1 2014 was 0.501 injuries per 200,000 man hours worked IADC industry average 0.812 for 2013
1 Total Recordable Incident Rate per 200,000 man hours. This is a rolling 12 month average. 2 KCAD Total Recordable Incident Rate is directly comparable with IADC’s Total Recordables (RCRD) statistic.IADC figures are annual and are not released until after year end, therefore no 2014 information is available. Note: IADC stands for International Association of Drilling Contractors.
Significant new contracts – Platforms, Canada
7
Contract nature Drilling operations and maintenances services on the Hebron platform in Canada Contract length & timeframes 12 years fixed (3 years pre-operations, 9 years operations and maintenance) with option to extend Customer ExxonMobil Contract value Multi-million dollar
“The award of our first contract in Canada by ExxonMobil Canada Properties is an excellent
this project together.” Rune Lorentzen, President of Offshore, KCA Deutag
8
Healthy backlog providing high level earnings visibility for the future
$1,258 $839 $1,595 $3,692 $51 $141 $4,015 $4,207 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 2014 2015 2016 and thereafter Total backlog $m Contract Option $980m $5,610m $7,899m $1,310m $1,726m $251m $5,737m $173m $12m Land Drilling Bentec Platforms RDS MODUs
Total contract backlog as at 1 March 20141 Contract backlog by BU as at 1 March 20141 Total contract backlog as at 1 May 2014 Contract backlog by BU as at 1 May 2014
$1,635 $273 $6,370 $144 $55 Land Drilling Bentec Platforms RDS MODUs $1,072 $895 $1,885 $3,852 $54 $127 $4,445 $4,626 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 May to Dec 2014 2015 2016 and thereafter Total backlog $m Contract Option $1,126m $1,022m $6,330m $8,478m
1As presented in Q4 2013 pack.Mar to Dec 2014
Q1 2014 Q1 2013 Variance 2014 YTD 2013 YTD Variance $m $m $m % $m $m $m %
Revenue 168.0 150.5 17.5 11.6 168.0 150.5 17.5 11.6 EBITDA
pre support costs allocation1
38.5 30.3 8.2 27.1 38.5 30.3 8.2 27.1 Support costs allocation (2.8) (2.4) (2.8) (2.4) EBITDA
post support costs allocation1
35.7 27.9 7.8 28.0 35.7 27.9 7.8 28.0 Margin % 21.3 18.5 21.3 18.5
9
Q1 2013)
programme have contributed to improving EBITDA in Europe versus Q1 2013 and Q4 2013
delivered in Algeria in mid 2013 contributing to the year on year uplift in EBITDA
activity and a rig moving between clients Financial Performance to 31 March 2014
Land Drilling
1 EBITDA by segment for 2013 has been re-presented to reallocate support costs which were previously shown as centralsame basis.
Q1 2014 Q1 2013 Variance 2014 YTD 2013 YTD Variance $m $m $m % $m $m $m %
Revenue 26.3 40.9 (14.6) (35.7) 26.3 40.9 (14.6) (35.7) EBITDA
pre support costs allocation1
0.8 3.3 (2.5) (75.8) 0.8 3.3 (2.5) (75.8) Support costs allocation (0.7) (0.8) (0.7) (0.8) EBITDA
post support costs allocation1
0.1 2.5 (2.4) (96.0) 0.1 2.5 (2.4) (96.0) Margin % 0.4 6.1 0.4 6.1
Bentec
10
same period in 2013 and Q4 2013
and timing of component sales
particularly in the second half
desert rigs for Enafor, Algeria
Financial Performance to 31 March 2014
1 EBITDA by segment for 2013 has been re-presented to reallocate support costs which were previously shown as centralsame basis.
Platform Services
11
Financial Performance to 31 March 2014
1 EBITDA by segment for 2013 has been re-presented to reallocate support costs which were previously shown as centralsame basis.
Q1 2014 Q1 2013 Variance 2014 YTD 2013 YTD Variance $m $m $m % $m $m $m %
Revenue 188.7 169.5 19.2 11.3 188.7 169.5 19.2 11.3 EBITDA
pre support costs allocation1
25.1 19.7 5.4 27.4 25.1 19.7 5.4 27.4 Support costs allocation (1.9) (1.6) (1.9) (1.6) EBITDA
post support costs allocation1
23.2 18.1 5.1 28.2 23.2 18.1 5.1 28.2 Margin % 12.3 10.7 12.3 10.7
strong EBITDA growth from the same quarter 2013 (28.2%)
while activity levels in Sakhalin remained stable
increase in lower margin reimbursables
lower activity in the pipe rental business, lower reimbursables and the stacking
RDS
12
Financial Performance to 31 March 2014
EBITDA growth of 66.7% on Q1 2013
and Statoil Mariner in the UK North Sea, has continued but will reduce in coming quarters as they reach completion
same basis.
Q1 2014 Q1 2013 Variance 2014 YTD 2013 YTD Variance $m $m $m % $m $m $m %
Revenue 96.0 81.4 14.6 17.9 96.0 81.4 14.6 17.9 EBITDA
pre support costs allocation1
17.7 10.8 6.9 63.9 17.7 10.8 6.9 63.9 Support costs allocation (0.7) (0.6) (0.7) (0.6) EBITDA
post support costs allocation1
17.0 10.2 6.8 66.7 17.0 10.2 6.8 66.7 Margin % 17.7 12.5 17.7 12.5
MODUs
13
quarter versus $4.5m in Q1 2013
$3.5m in Q1 2013
2014 at $6.5m EBITDA2 compared to $1.2m in Q1 20132 Financial Performance to 31 March 2014
1EBITDA by segment for 2013 has been re-presented to reallocate support costs which were previously shown as central overheads(such as HR, Supply Chain and IT costs) to the operational business segments. 2014 figures are presented on the same basis.
2Post reallocation of support costs. 3Excluding the results of the barges and the Ben Avon, Q1 2014 EBITDA would be $5.6m and Q1 2013 would be $4.5m.Q1 2014 Q1 2013 Variance 2014 YTD 2013 YTD Variance $m $m $m % $m $m $m %
Revenue 40.7 39.3 1.4 3.6 40.7 39.3 1.4 3.6 EBITDA
pre support costs allocation1
12.6 2.6 10.0 382.4 12.6 2.6 10.0 382.4 Support costs allocation (0.5) (0.4) (0.5) (0.4) EBITDA3
post support costs allocation1
12.1 2.2 9.9 447.0 12.1 2.2 9.9 447.0 Margin % 29.7 5.6 29.7 5.6
Group Results
Financial Performance to 31 March 2014
14
Revenue and EBITDA ($m)
Q1 2014 Q1 2013 2014 YTD 2013 YTD Revenue from business units 520 483 520 483 Consolidation adjustments (6) (8) (6) (8) Total revenue 514 475 514 475 EBITDA from business units 88 61 88 61 Corporate costs/other (7) (5) (7) (5) Total EBITDA 81 56 81 56
Cash Flow and Working Capital
Financial Performance to 31 March 2014
15
Working Capital
9 (60)
*Deltas denote working capital movements from Q4 2013 and Q4 2012 respectively.
Free Cash Flow
9
working capital (see right) and higher EBITDA
interest payments:
in Q1 2013
$22m early collection in Q1 2014 for the 4th rig for a customer in Algeria
rigs to be manufactured by Bentec and then operated by the Land business unit
new build rig orders received at the end of 2013 15 (92) (60.0) (50.0) (40.0) (30.0) (20.0) (10.0)
Q1 2014 Delta* Q1 2013 Delta* Cash Impact of Delta ($m)
Working Capital Delta
Working Capital Delta
Q1 2014 Q1 2013 2014 YTD 2013 YTD Cash flow from operating activities 82 (46) 82 (46) Cash flow from investing activities (21) 2 (21) 2 Equity injection 40 40 Foreign exchange (1) 4 (1) 4 Net Cash flow before debt repayment 60 60 Drawdown/(repayment) of debt (net issuance costs) (2) (12) (2) (12) Net cash flow 58 (12) 58 (12)
61
649
32 155 50
500
50 2014 Mar-15 Mar-16 Jun-16 Mar-17 2018 2019 2020 2021
Off B/S Guarantee Facility Senior Secured Notes $50m Additional RCF approved in A&E Liquidity Facilities Term Loans 255 93 16
Capital Structure
Pre and post refinancing
New maturity profile ($m)
250 500 375 375
2014 Mar-15 Mar-16 Jun-16 Mar-17 2018 2019 2020 2021
New Senior Secured Notes TLB Existing Senior Secured Notes Liquidity facilities
Previous maturity profile ($m)
38
17
Pro-forma EBITDA and Net Debt
Pro-forma net debt Pro-forma EBITDA
$m Q1 2014 LTM EBITDA 325.4 Exclusion of loss on the Barges1 1.2 Exclusion of Ben Avon2 (0.2) Pro-forma new land rigs3 2.8 Algerian rigs lease charge added back4 3.8 Pro-forma Q1 2014 LTM EBITDA 333.0 Facility Q1 2014 Actual Sale of SET rigs1 Refinancing Pro-forma Cash (65) (50) (20) (135) Capex facility 29 (29)
151 (151)
530 (530)
750 Existing SSN 500 500 Other 24 24 Total debt 1,169 (50) 20 1,139
calculated on a pro-forma basis for use in leverage calculations on the following slide
results
1Barges sale assumed in Q2 2014. 2Ben Avon jackup disposed of in March 2013, therefore results have been excluded. 3New land rigs in 2013 annualised. 4Exclusion of lease charge payable on 2 Algerian rigs which were moved into KCA Deutag financial group in January 2014.5x 4.8x 4x 3.4x
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 Pro-forma Net debt and EBITDA ($m) Net Debt LTM EBITDA Net debt/LTM EBITDA
500 500 2 2 24 24 180 530 375 375
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Cash Senior secured notes 2018 Liquidity facilities Other TLB & Capex facility TLC New TLB Senior secured notes 2021
Net Debt Pre and Post Refinancing
As at 31 March 2014
18 Net Debt 31 March 2014 – Pre refinancing Net Debt 31 March 2014 – Pro-forma2 post refinancing
Working Capital facilities repaid
2021 Senior Notes drawn
Net debt / LTM EBITDA
1Net debt portrayed as a positive figure to simplify illustration. 2See preceding slide for full reconciliation to group results.Net debt1
$1,169m $1,139m
2Closing remarks
19
increased cash generation based upon long term contracts
delivery of results
20
investor.relations@kcadeutag.com