Investor Presentation November 2015 Forward looking statements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Investor Presentation November 2015 Forward looking statements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Investor Presentation November 2015 Forward looking statements Matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements under U.S. federal securities laws, including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
1
Forward looking statements
Matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements under U.S. federal securities laws, including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance and may include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, the delivery of vessels, the outlook for tanker shipping rates, general industry conditions future operating results
- f the Company’s vessels, capital expenditures, expansion and growth opportunities, bank borrowings,
financing activities and other such matters, are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that its expectations stated in this presentation are based on reasonable assumptions, actual results may differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the failure of counterparties to fully perform their obligations to us, the strength of the world economies and currencies, general market conditions, including changes in tanker vessel charter hire rates and vessel values, changes in demand for tankers, changes in our vessel operating expenses, including dry-docking, crewing and insurance costs, or actions taken by regulatory authorities, ability of customers of our pools to perform their obligations under charter contracts on a timely basis, potential liability from future litigation, domestic and international political conditions, potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents and political events or acts by terrorists. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward- looking statement contained in this presentation, whether as a result of new information, future events or
- therwise, except as required by law. In light of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward
looking events discussed in this presentation might not occur, and our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
2
Euronav – Largest quoted tanker company in world
2 FSO Stripped water capacity 380k barrels 2.8 Million barrels Average age 12 years 1 V-PLUS Over 441,000 DWT Only 4 in world fleet 3 Million barrels Average age 12 years 23 SUEZMAX 125,000 – 180,000 DWT 1 Million barrels Average age 10 years 28 VLCC + 3 (TBD) Up to 320,000 DWT 2 Million barrels Average age 6 years
- New trading lanes established past 2 yrs
- USA shale reducing need for imports
pushing Atlantic to be “long” oil
- China and India diversifying suppliers
- China continues to fill SPR
- OPEC strategy for market share seeing
increasing output
- Potential for Iran to return to production
at pre-sanction levels = 1m bpd
- USA shale output largely intact since oil
price fall
- Russia, Kuwait, North Sea, West Africa
- all at record output
- Additional increase to order book over
summer driven by Tier III legislation
- Order book moderate at 17% VLCC &
18% Suezmax fleet
- natural
fleet rejuvenation = 15% order book or 3 years
- Financing of new builds much reduced
since 2009 – no private equity for 15 months
- Agencies consensus forecast 1.5m bpd
growth 2015 & 1.3m bpd 2016; base case of 1m bpd 2017-2020
- Lower oil price has stimulated demand
- Demand non-OECD > OECD
- Base demand 1m bpd = 30-40 VLCCs
Demand for Oil Vessel Supply Ton miles Supply
- f Oil
Current Fleet – Total 54 Vessels
Financing
- f ships
3
Demand for Oil has ALWAYS been robust
Oil @ $60
Refinery expansion in Asia & Middle East key driver
2017 +
Demand – robust outlook from refinery expansion & low oil price
Demand consistently upgraded during 2015 Refinery Throughputs and Tanker Earnings
Source: Citi
Only 2 negative growth years since 1990
Source: EIA
4
Demand – 1m bpd = demand for 30-40 VLCCs pa
1m bpd of additional exports x 365 days = 365m barrels 365m barrels / 2m barrel capacity per VLCC = 180 cargoes 180 cargoes / 4.5 average no of journeys pa for VLCC (Atlantic – Far East) = 40 VLCCs
Source: Morgan Stanley
648 VLCCs Global Fleet 30 = 4.6% 40 = 6.2%
5
Supply – VLCC Order book – growing but moderate
Source: Clarksons
6
Supply – Suezmax Order book – more of a 2017 story
Source: Clarksons
7
Vessel Supply – manageable: financing now a barrier to entry
IMPORTANT - New era of financing is restrictive
Order book as % of fleet – manageable
Source: Clarksons Hamburg Marine Money *up to Nov 2014
Order book is back end loaded
Age profile of VLCC fleet – scrapping rates to rise 2018+
4 9 9 8 19 12 4 4 20 1 1 4 10 15 16 10 4 10 5 10 15 20 25 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 VLCC Suezmax 84% 62% 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 2008 2014 Bank Debt as % of Total Shipping Finance
Source: Clarksons Source: Clarksons
26% down
Source: Clarksons
8
3 - Supply of Oil = more cargoes = more demand for shipping
Oil supply growth HUGE +6.6m bpd past two years Supply outlook – Robust: hard to see output cuts
Output m bpd 2013 2014 2015 2016 Comment North America 17.2 18.9 19.7 19.5 Shale growth likely negative but small % FSU 13.8 13.9 13.9 13.7 Rouble weakness & demand for $ driving output; Q3 15 record Saudi Arabia 9.6 9.7 10.2 10.4 continues to ramp up production China 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 static output Iraq 3.1 3.3 3.8 4 record production in Q3 2015 Iran 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 was producing 4m bpd pre sanctions Venezuela 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 output constant despite economic problems Nigeria 2 1.9 1.8 1.8 static output Libya 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.5 potential return to 1m bpd?
Source: ABG Sundal Collier
- Increase of global crude output not just a phenomenon of USA shale expansion
- Russia, Iraq, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia all hit record production at some point in 2015
- OPEC importance is arguably diluted given diversity of oil supply and difficult to see
where cuts of sufficient magnitude will come from….and Iran to re-enter the market in 2016
Source: Energy Intelligence
9 Russia, 14% Saudi Arabia, 14% Oman , 11% Angola, 10% Iraq, 9% Iran, 6% Venezuela, 6% Kuwait, 4% Brazil, 3% Kazakhstan, 1% Libya, 1% Others, 20%
Source: China General Administration
China – solid demand: structural support from SPR & reforms
Two drivers underpin growth – SPR & “teapot” reform* China Oil demand – always been steady not spectacular
China imports diversification continues
China 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Oil Demand (mbpd) 6.5 6.7 7.2 7.6 7.8 7.9 YoY growth (mbpd) 0.9 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 YoY growth % 16.1% 3.1% 7.5% 5.6% 2.3% 1.9% GDP growth % 8.8% 12.4% 12.5% 13.9% 7.1% 11.7% China 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015e Oil Demand (mbpd) 9.0 9.4 9.8 10.1 10.6 10.9 YoY growth (mbpd) 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 YoY growth % 13.6% 4.2% 4.3% 3.5% 4.3% 3.0% GDP growth % 10.0% 8.7% 8.0% 7.6% 7.2% 6.8%
*Teapot refinery licences = 984k bpd (source: Arctic 28.10.15)
Source: China Customs –ratio is 4m tons = 1m bpd Source: Bloomberg
Base effect: China imports 7m bpd
Source: Energy Intelligence
7m bpd = 30.1 metric ton
10
What does it all mean? Freight rates will remain volatile as they are set on a daily basis via an auction
Source: Clarksons
11
What does it all mean? Rates are seasonal as well
12 $264 $339 $493 $650 $1,092 +$5,000 per day +$15,000 per day +$25,000 per day +$55,000 per day
Potential for Powerful Cash Generation
Euronav is well positioned for strong cash flow generation Pro forma fleet earnings capability (EBITDA, $M) 1
1 Based on full year contribution of 57 ships on proportionate basis
VLCC TCE rates $25,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $80,000 Suezmax TCE rates $20,000 $25,000 $35,000 $45,000 $75,000
■ Breakeven (including debt service): ~$27,000 for VLCC
- opex $8,000
~$22,000 for Suezmax
- opex $7,400
■ FSOs generate a consistent, high quality income stream – $52mm of EBITDA ■ Dividend policy – to distribute at least 80% of net income (P&L definition)
Each $5,000 uplift in both VLCC and Suezmax rates improves net revenue and EBITDA by $72mm
Next 12 months spot days exposure = 14,341 days
Company overview
14
Fixed / Spot Exposure (Jan 2015) Fixed / Spot Exposure (Year end 2008)
18% 82%
- Chartering strategy seeks to maximize returns through optimal mix of spot and fixed charters
- Deliberately positioned itself toward more spot exposure at this stage of the cycle
- Look to maximize earnings through combining high-quality assets and directly employed
crews in storage opportunities for both short term and long-term (FSO) contracts
Chartering strategy – opportunistic rather than strategic
Chartering strategy allows Euronav to capitalize on increasing rate environment
17% 83%
Fixed Spot
Fixed / Spot Exposure (Year end 2004)
57% 43% 20% 80%
Fixed / Spot Exposure (September 2015)
15
Maximizing value through size – Tankers International Pool
- Tankers International = Only owner-led VLCC pool; a cost
center
- No value leakage; no commissions
- Leading spot market oriented VLCC pool in which ship owners
with vessels of similar sizes and quality participate
- Innovation platform (VL Database, TI Pool App)
OTHER VLCC TANKER POOLS (ships on the water)
Overview of the Tankers International Pool Fragmented Global VLCC Fleet
VLCC Chartering undertaking leadership role
56 16 40
Source: Clarkson’s - Total 648 VLCC ships @ October 21 2015 Red indicates Captive or Sovereign fleet Blue indicates fleet in stock listed companies
1 ship owner, 37 vessels 2 ship owner, 52 3 ship owner, 24 4-10 ship owner, 154 10-15 ship owner, 103 COSCO Group, 17 SK Holdings, 18 NYK; 21 Fredriksen Group; 25 Euronav NV; 28 Angelicoussis Group, 29 Bahri, 31 MOL; 32 China Merchants Grp, 32 NIOC, 37
Top 10 Owners control 42% of global VLCC fleet
- Heidmar – VLCC Seawolf
7
- Navig8 – VL8 25
- China – Chinese VLCC
32
Source: Company reports
16
Euronav – substantial increase in TOTAL liquidity – shares fully fungible
* Does not include day 1 trading on NYSE 23 January 2015 = $104m value traded
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
$Million value traded per day
Total value traded in Dollars in Euronav shares since January 2014*
EURN US EURN BB
Average $21.4m
Source: Bloomberg based on Exchange volumes
17
Potential disruptive factors
China - slowdown
- Slowdown is relative – base effect on absolute numbers is key
- Strategic crude stockpile to grow 2015/2016
- Refinery plans in China well advanced & teapot reforms started
Yard Capacity Oil price increase
- Limited amount of yards building VLCC (11) /Suezmax (15-20)
- Financing landscape has changed post financial crisis
- Visibility until early 2018 only
- OPEC production cut could drive oil price higher
- Shale production stable above $40 per barrel
- Instability in specific oil producing states cuts output
Other
- Worldwide shale development – unlikely outside of USA
- OPEC output cut / Middle East reduce exports
- USA Export ban repeal – likelihood raised = positive for
tankers
Storage/Stockpiling
- Storage increasing across due to oversupply or strategic
reasons
- Function of oil oversupply and oil prices
- Ultimately stored crude needs to be shipped to final
destination
18
Summary – Euronav – the largest crude tanker equity platform
Financing
- f ships
VLCC TCE rates $25,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $80,000 Suezmax TCE rates $20,000 $25,000 $35,000 $45,000 $75,000
Each $5,000 uplift in both VLCC and Suezmax rates improves net revenue and EBITDA by $72mm
$264 $339 $493 $650 $1,092 +$5,000 per day +$15,000 per day +$25,000 per day +$55,000 per day
- New trading lanes established past 2 yrs
- USA shale reducing need for imports
pushing Atlantic to be “long” oil
- China and India diversifying suppliers
- China continues to fill SPR
- OPEC strategy for market share seeing
increasing output
- Potential for Iran to return to production
at pre-sanction levels = 1m bpd
- USA shale output largely intact since oil
price fall
- Russia, Kuwait, North Sea, West Africa
- all at record output
- Additional increase to order book over
summer driven by Tier III legislation
- Order book moderate at 17% VLCC &
18% Suezmax fleet
- natural
fleet rejuvenation = 15% order book or 3 years
- Financing of new builds much reduced
since 2009 – no private equity for 15 months
- Agencies consensus forecast 1.5m bpd
growth 2015 & 1.3m bpd 2016; base case of 1m bpd 2017-2020
- Lower oil price has stimulated demand
- Demand non-OECD > OECD
- Base demand 1m bpd = 30-40 VLCCs
Demand for Oil Vessel Supply Ton miles Supply
- f Oil
Financing
- f ships