Investor Presentation
August 2020
Science-Based Innovation-Focused ADC Company
Investor Presentation August 2020 Forward-Looking Statements This - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Science-Based Innovation-Focused ADC Company Investor Presentation August 2020 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation and various remarks we make during this presentation, may contain forward-looking statements made pursuant to the
August 2020
Science-Based Innovation-Focused ADC Company
2
This presentation and various remarks we make during this presentation, may contain forward-looking statements made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements, including statements regarding expectations for achieving full FDA approval based on our confirmatory data for TRODELVY and the Company’s development of TRODELVY for additional indications, clinical trials (including the funding therefor, anticipated patient enrollment, trial outcomes, timing or associated costs), regulatory applications and related timelines, including the filing and approval timelines for BLAs and BLA supplements, out-licensing arrangements, forecasts of future operating results, potential collaborations, capital raising activities, and the timing for bringing any product candidate to market, involve significant risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied herein. Factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to, the Company’s reliance on third-party relationships and outsourcing arrangements (for example in connection with manufacturing, logistics and distribution, and sales and marketing) over which it may not always have full control, including the failure of third parties on which the Company is dependent to meet the Company’s business and operational needs for investigational
ability to meet post-approval compliance obligations; imposition of significant post-approval regulatory requirements on our products, including a requirement for a post-approval confirmatory clinical study, or failure to maintain or obtain full regulatory approval for the Company’s products, if received, due to a failure to satisfy post-approval regulatory requirements, such as the submission of sufficient data from a confirmatory clinical study; the uncertainties inherent in research and development; safety and efficacy concerns related to the Company’s products and product candidates; uncertainties in the rate and degree of market acceptance of products and product candidates, if approved; inability to create an effective direct sales and marketing infrastructure or to partner with third parties that offer such an infrastructure for distribution of the Company’s products and product candidates, if approved; inaccuracies in the Company’s estimates of the size of the potential markets for the Company’s products and product candidates or limitations by regulators
matters that could affect the availability or commercial potential of the Company’s products and product candidates; the Company’s dependence on business collaborations or availability of required financing from capital markets, or other sources on acceptable terms, if at all, in order to further develop
U.S. and around the world; risks associated with litigation to which the Company is or may become a party, including the cost and potential reputational damage resulting from such litigation; loss of key personnel; competitive risks to marketed products; and the Company’s ability to repay its outstanding indebtedness, if and when required, as well as the risks discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company is not under any obligation, and the Company expressly disclaims any obligation, to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Brendan Delaney
CHIEF COMMERCIAL OFFICER
Bryan Ball
CHIEF QUALITY OFFICER
Usama Malik
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CHIEF BUSINESS OFFICER
Jared Freedberg
GENERAL COUNSEL SECRETARY
Kurt Andrews
CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER
EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
3
John Stubenrauch
SVP, GLOBAL HEAD OF MANUFACTURING
4
– Product in channel within one week of approval – NCCN guidelines updated within two weeks of approval
– $20.1M net sales in first two months of commercial launch
care for 3rd-line mTNBC
product education
educate on adverse event management
partnerships
5
❑ TRODELVY available in distribution channel within a week of FDA approval ❑ TRODELVY.com with SEO campaign within hours of approval ❑ First Peer-to-Peer speaker program executed in week one of launch ❑ Over 500 attendees for TRODELVY National Broadcasts ❑ First payer coverage policy in place within two weeks of approval
KOL National Broadcasts Trained Speaker Bureau Broad HCP NPP campaign Product Distribution Trodelvy.com Website Patient HUB
6
Robust adoption in both the community and academic settings (~67% community accounts)
7 *IntrinsiQ survey conducted on June 27th, 2020
NCCN Guidelines were updated to include Sacituzumab-Govitecan on May 8, 2020
>80% of top 150 accounts penetrated in first two months of commercial launch >80% HCPs intend to prescribe TRODELVY in third-line mTNBC* >500 accounts ordered TRODELVY in first two months of commercial launch
implemented TRODELVY coverage policies
restrictions
strong patient access to TRODELVY
8
* * Time-to-Review: represents the elapsed time from FDA approval to a
commercial payer implementing a coverage policy for a new product
9
Robust Sales & Marketing Execution Speed & Quality of Payer Coverage TRODELVY Launch Excellence + =
Upcoming Market Catalysts
FTE doubled in size
Field Base, 67 Office, 317
384
FTE
Pivotal Global Trials Scientific publications & presentations Approved Investigator Initiated Trials Patients on TRODELVY Trials
Global Partnerships
Commercial
Manufacturing
Clinical
11
12
payload of choice
damaging DNA
Tolerated
release
(bystander effect) killing of tumor cells
indications
CEACAM5, IMMU-140 targets HLA-DR
13
Indication Designation Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Approval Partner
mTNBC (3L+) mTNBC (3L) ASCENT HR+/HER2‒ mBC TROPiCS-02 mTNBC (3L) (China) mTNBC (1L) / mUC / mNSCLC (+ Tecentriq) MORPHEUS mTNBC / mUC / Ovarian (+ Rubraca) SEASTAR Urothelial (3L) TROPHY U-01 Urothelial (3L) (Pending FDA Discussion) mNSCLC / H&N / Endometrial (Trop-2-enriched) TROPiCS-03
Cohort 1 Enrollment Completed
Met 1o and key 2o endpoints TRODELVYTM
14
Indication Designation Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Sponsor
HER2‒ BC (post-neoadjuvant) SASCIA German Breast Group mTNBC, PD-L1‒ (1L) (+ Keytruda) Dana Farber Cancer Institute HR+/HER2‒ mBC, PD-L1+ (+ Keytruda) Dana Farber Cancer Institute TNBC (neoadjuvant) NeoSTAR Massachusetts General Hospital mTNBC (2L) (+ Talzenna) Massachusetts General Hospital Endometrial Cancer (Persistent or Recurrent) Yale University Metastatic Prostate Cancer (2L) U of Wisconsin & PCCTC Breast Brain Metastasis and Glioblastoma UT Health at San Antonio
15
Neo/Adjuvant (24- 26k Pts) 1st Line (10-11k Pts)
2nd Line (9-10k Pts)
3rd Line+ (8-9k Pts)
Stage 3 locally advanced (unresectable), Stage 4 metastatic Stage 1, 2 and 3 (resectable)
Phase 3 ASCENT Phase 1b/2 MORPHEUS Phase 1/2 SEASTAR Phase 3 SASCIA
Treatment Line
metastatic setting The Unmet Need
side effects with currently available therapies
impairment may only have supportive care options Market Size
Status
16
National Institutes of Health. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02574455 17
Continue treatment until progression
N = 529
mTNBC
≥2 prior treatments OR 1 therapy for advanced disease who also progressed within 12 months of (neo)adjuvant therapy Primary Endpoint
Secondary Endpoint
Indication Endpoint
TRODELVY 10 mg/kg IV day 1 & 8, every 21 days Traditional chemotherapy treatment of physicians’ choice*
Twin Arm Study
* Eribulin, gemcitabine, capecitabine & vinorelbine
Study Met Primary and Key Secondary Endpoints
Brian mets+ capped at 15%
18
TPC2 TRODELVY 1.7 Months 5.6 Months
ASCENT P3 Topline
mPFS HR=0.41, p<0.00011
1: mPFS: median progression free survival; primary endpoint in brain met negative patients 2: Treatment of physician’s choice: eribulin, capecitabine, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine
label and no new safety signals
breaking abstract
in Q4’20, EU submission targeted for H1’21
Other Key Takeaways from ASCENT
3: OS: Overall Survival; ORR: Overall Response Rate by RECIST1.1
Drug Phase N Population ORR (%) Median PFS (months) Median OS (months)
Carboplatin1 3 188 1st line 31 3.1 12.4 Docetaxol1 3 188 1st line 36 4.5 12.3 Cisplatin or Carboplatin2 2 86 1st line (80.2%) 25.6 2.9 11.0 Atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel3 3 451 1st line (untreated) 56.0 7.2 21.3 Nab-paclitaxel3 3 451 1st line (untreated) 45.9 5.5 17.6
* Includes breast cancer drugs with data from Phase 2/3 studies with minimum mTNBC sample size > 60; ORR and PFS data. Source of data: 1) Tutt A, SABCS 2014; 2) Isakoff SJ, J Clin Oncol 2015; 3) Schmid P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2108-2121
19
The Unmet Need
and immune checkpoint inhibitors offer low response rate, short response duration and high toxicity Market Size
Status
TROPHY U-01 trial
20
21
31
(N=45)
14 8.6 8.9
Docetaxel in 2nd line Phase 33 Docetaxel in 2nd line Phase 22 Vinflunine in 2nd line1 TRODELVY in ≥3rd line4 Docetaxel in 2nd line Phase 33 Docetaxel in 2nd line Phase 22 Vinflunine in 2nd line1 TRODELVY in ≥3rd line4
ORR
(%)
PFS
(months) 3.0 7.3
(N=45)
2.8 2.8
* Information is based on comparative results from independent studies Source of data: 1) Bellmunt J, JCO 2009; 2) Petrylak D, JCO 2016; 3) Petrylak D, Lancet 2017; 4) Tagawa S, ASCO-GU 2019
National Institutes of Health. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03547973 22
pembrolizumab in CPI-naïve patients
Continue treatment until progression
mUC
Cohort 1: Post platinum- and CPI-based therapies (N = 100) Cohort 2: 2nd line post CPI for cisplatin-ineligible patients (N = 40) Cohort 3: 2nd line post pt- based therapy for CPI-naïve patients (N = ~60) Primary Endpoint
Secondary Endpoint
Indication Endpoint
Cohort 1 & 2: TRODELVY 10 mg/kg IV day 1 & 8, every 21 days Cohort 3: TRODELVY + pembrolizumab 200 mg day 1, every 21 days
Single-Arm Study
Endpoint Cohort 1 (N=35) Median follow-up, mon 4.1 Patients continuing treatment, n (%) 20 (57) ORR, n (%) [95% CI] 10 (29) [15, 46] CR, n (%) 2 (6) PR, n (%) 6 (17) uPR pending confirmation,a n (%) 2 (6) Median time to onset of response, mon (range) 1.5 (1.2, 2.8)
a Follow-up scan is pending.CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; ORR, objective response rate; PR, partial response; uPR, unconfirmed partial response.
Category Subgroup ORR, % (n/N) Overall N/A 29 (10/35) Age <75 29 (8/28) ≥75 29 (2/7) ECOG PS 33 (5/15) 1 25 (5/20)
regimens 2 18 (2/11) ≥3 33 (8/24) Visceral involvement at study entry Yes 23 (5/22) Liver 25 (2/8) No 39 (5/13) Bellmunt risk factors 0-1 35 (10/29) 2-3 0 (0/6)
ORR in Patient Subgroups Response Outcomes
23
The Unmet Need
fail and cancer relapses, requiring chemotherapy treatment
Market Size
Status
TROPiCS-02 study
24
25
31
(N=54)
13 11.0
Vinorelbine in 2nd line chemo mBC1 TRODELVY in ≥3rd line chemo3
ORR
(%)
PFS
(months) 3 6.8
(N=54)
3.1 2.5
* Information is based on comparative results from independent studies Source of data: 1) Jones S, JCO 1995; 2) Kaufman PA, JCO 2015; 3) Kazmi S, ESMO 2019 Abstract 366P; 4) Kalinsky K, SABCS 2018
11.5
TRODELVY in ≥3rd line chemo4 Eribulin in 3rd line chemo mBC2 Eribulin in 3rd line chemo mBC3 Capecitabine in 3rd line chemo mBC3 Capecitabine in 3rd line chemo mBC2 Vinorelbine in 2nd line chemo mBC1
26
Continue treatment until progression
N = 400
HR+/HER2‒ mBC
CDK4/6 treatments
Protocol Allows ORR Analysis for Potential Accelerated Approval Submission Based
Primary Endpoint
Secondary Endpoint
Indication Endpoint
TRODELVY 10 mg/kg IV day 1 & 8, every 21 days Traditional chemotherapy treatment of physicians’ choice
Twin Arm Study
National Institutes of Health. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCTNCT03901339
* Eribulin, gemcitabine, capecitabine & vinorelbine
Adverse Event mTNBC (N=108)1 mUC (N=35)2 HR+/HER2‒ mBC (N=50)3 Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%) Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%) Grade 3 or 4 (%) Blood and lymphatic system
Neutropenia 26 16 29 26 42 Anemia 11 17 6
General and administration-site
Fatigue and asthenia 8 6 2
Gastrointestinal
Diarrhea 8 6 3 4 Nausea 6 2 Vomiting 6 4
27 Source of data: 1) Bardia A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:741-51; 2) Tagawa, S, et al. ESMO 2019; 3) Bardia, A, et al. ASCO 2018
No >grade 2 neuropathy or rash and no treatment-related deaths or interstitial lung disease, low discontinuation rates due to AEs
Grades 3 and 4 Adverse Events Occurring in >5% of Patients
Cancer Type ORR (%) PFS (months) Other Agents TRODELVY Other Agents TRODELVY mTNBC
11 – 15 (single chemo) 33 1.7* (erib, gem, cap or vin) 5.6*
mUC
9 – 14 (single chemo) 31** 29*** ~2.8 – 3 (single chemo) 7.3** TBD***
HR+/HER2‒ mBC
11 – 13 (single chemo) 31 ~2.5 – 3.1 (cap, gem or erib) 6.8
* From ASCENT topline; ** From IMMU-132-01 (full mUC Cohort); ** From TROPHY-U-01 interim
28
29
The Unmet Need
chemotherapy, therapeutic 2nd line options for advanced disease are limited Market Size
Status
evaluate TRODELVY in NSCLC
* Initially targeting highest 25% Trop-2 expressors with potential increase of this percentage allowed under the study protocol
30
Continue treatment until progression
NSCLC & H&N
chemotherapy
Endometrial
based chemotherapy
Primary Endpoint
Secondary Endpoint
Indication Endpoint
TRODELVY 10 mg/kg IV day 1 & 8, every 21 days
Simon Two-Stage Design
Exploratory
Stage 1: 40 Patients per Indication Stage 2: 60 Additional Patients per Indication
National Institutes of Health. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03964727
31
mTNBC (8k-9k) mUC (8k-15k) HR+/HER2‒ mBC (25k/28k)
Cancer Indication (# U.S. Patients 3rd/2nd Line)
mNSCLC (40k/60k)
32
Balance Sheet June 30, 2020
Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities $975.5 million* Basic shares outstanding (fully diluted) 231million (242 million)
Projected financial resources adequate to support planned operations into 2021, including:
* Includes a $60 million milestone payment from Everest Medicines for TRODELVY approval in the U.S.
Strong Foundation
Significant Market Opportunity
At Inflection Point
commercial catalysts
33
Partner of Choice
Wisconsin, MSK, Yale, Fred Hutch …
Everest …