Interplay between the Beale-Kato-Majda theorem and the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

interplay between the beale kato majda theorem and the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Interplay between the Beale-Kato-Majda theorem and the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interplay between the Beale-Kato-Majda theorem and the analyticity-strip method to investigate numerically the incompressible Euler singularity problem Miguel Bustamante and Marc Brachet " s w o fl d n a s e l c i t r a p


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Interplay between the Beale-Kato-Majda theorem and the analyticity-strip method to investigate numerically the incompressible Euler singularity problem

Miguel Bustamante and Marc Brachet

W

  • r

k s h

  • p

" M a t h e m a t i c s

  • f

p a r t i c l e s a n d fl

  • w

s " M a y 2 8

  • J

u n e 2 2 1 2 W

  • l

f g a n g

  • P

a u l i

  • I

n s t i t u t e V i e n n a

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

arXiv:1112.1571 (also submitted to PRE)

details can be found in: New version soon: end of june!

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Plan of Talk

  • Introduction
  • Results and classical analysis of energy

spectra using the Analyticity Strip method and of maximum vorticity using BKM

  • Bridging the Analyticity Strip method and

Beale-Kato-Majda Theorem

  • Analysis of analyticity-strip width in terms
  • f BKM theorem
  • Conclusion

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Millennium NS Problem

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Is 3D Euler singular? Are numerical results in favor of Yes or No?

  • Long history...
  • Next 4 slides from J. D. Gibbon’s talk (from

Euler 250: 5 years ago)

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-6
SLIDE 6

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-7
SLIDE 7

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-8
SLIDE 8

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-9
SLIDE 9

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Basic definitions: Analiticity-Strip

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Basic definitions: AS and BKM

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Uriel’s Book

Exponential behavior implies no singularity Taylor-Green simulations 1981: 2563 1991: 8643

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Taylor-Green flow: basic definition

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Taylor-Green vs. French Washing Machine

cylindrical box no-slip boundaries Cubic (impermeable) box free-slip boundaries

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TYG Symmetries

  • Flow is 2-Pi periodic
  • Impermeable box: x=0,Pi; y=0,Pi and

z=0,Pi are planes of mirror symmetry

  • Rotation by Pi around axis x=z=Pi/2

and y=z=Pi/2

  • Rotation by Pi/2 around the axis

x=y=Pi/2

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Numerical method

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results and classical analysis

  • Raw data from numerical simulations
  • Fitting method for energy spectra and

analiticity strip results

  • BKM analysis of max of vorticity

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Evolution of Energy Spectra

Results from runs at resolutions 5123 10243 20483 40963 are shown together

Lin-Log Log-Log E(k) E(k) k k

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-19
SLIDE 19

5123 10243 20483 40963

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 10 10

1

10

2

time ||||(t)

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 10

30

10

20

10

10

10

k E(k)

3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4 10

1

b) a)

Energy Spectra Max of vorticity

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-20
SLIDE 20

full impermeable box at t=3.75 t=3.75 t=3.5 t=4

40963

Renderings

  • f

Vorticity performed using VAPOR

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Analiticity-Strip Analysis

  • Based on Least Square Fits
  • Assumes that the Energy Spectrum can be

represented globally by a simple expression such as: E(k)=C k-n e -2 δ k

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Fitting Method

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Fits of Energy Spectra

Resolutions 40963

E(k) E(k) k k Lin-Log Log-Log Fin in red and data points in blue

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Fits: 5123 10243 20483 40963

1 2 3 4 10 10

1

10

2

10

3

time C(t)

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

time log((t))’

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 10

2

10

time (t)

3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 10

3

1 2 3 4 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6

time n(t)

3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 5

a) b) c) d)

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Exponential law and reliability time

5123 10243 20483 40963

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Effect of fit interval

10 10

1

10

2

10

3

10

30

10

25

10

20

10

15

10

10

10

5

10

k E(k)

t=1.3 2 93 t=1.9 2 250 t=2.5 2 691 t=2.9 2 1363 t=3.4 2 1364 t=3.8 2 1364

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-27
SLIDE 27

BKM analysis of vorticity maximum

  • BKM states that the integral of the

maximum of vorticity should blow up

  • Assume a power law behavior in time
  • See if the data can be fitted in this way, with

an exponent consistent with BKM

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Analysis method

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-29
SLIDE 29

BKM analysis of vorticity maximum

2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 0.5 1 1.5 2

1/log(||||(t))’

2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 2 4 6 8

T*

2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 3 2 1

time

  • 5123

10243 20483 40963

3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 0.2 0.4

c) b) a)

5123 10243 20483 40963

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Bridging Analyticity- Strip method and Beale-Kato-Majda Theorem

«How fast must the analyticity-strip width decrease to zero in order to sustain a finite-time singularity, consistent with the BKM theorem?» The well-resolved change of regime, leading to a faster decay of δ(t) motivates the following question:

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Motivation and simple estimates/1

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Motivation and simple estimates/2

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Motivation and simple estimates/3

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Formalization

  • Problem with previous bound (Cε is infinite at ε=0)
  • Need to bound the energy spectrum itself
  • A formal section of our work deals with these

problems

  • 2 main ingredients: 1) a «New bound» and 2) a

«Working hypothesis»

  • I will only show here these 2 aspects
  • Then I will show the main formal result + remarks
  • n Burgers and MHD

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-35
SLIDE 35

New bound

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Woking hypothesis/1

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Woking hypothesis/2

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Main result

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-39
SLIDE 39

1D Burger’s case

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-40
SLIDE 40

MHD’s case

  • There is an extension of BKM to MHD: see

Theorem 5.1 in R. E. Caflisch, I. Klapper, and

  • G. Steele, Commun. Math. Phys. 184, 443–

455 (1997)

  • The extension of our theoretical results to

MHD is straightforward

  • Work is underway with A. Pouquet, D.

Rosenberg, P . Mininni and G. Krstulovic to use it to analyze high-resolution MHD runs

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Analysis of analyticity- strip width in terms of BKM theorem

  • Quality of bounds
  • Analysis of δ(t)

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Bounds

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-43
SLIDE 43

analysis of δ(t)

2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 time 1/log((t))’ 5123 10243 20483 40963

3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4 0.6 0.4 0.2

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Conclusion/1

  • 40963 is well-resolved up to t≃3.85
  • At t≃3.7 a change of regime leads to a

faster decay of δ(t)

  • Standard BKM on vorticity max for

3.7<t<3.85 does not rule out a singularity around t≃4 (but no stable power-law)

  • Using a new bound, BKM was combined

with the analyticity-strip method

  • Analysis of δ(t) does not rule out a

singularity around t≃4 (but only on last «reliable point»)

dimanche 1 juillet 2012

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Conclusion/2

Thank you for your attention!

dimanche 1 juillet 2012