International Workshop on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships and IMO - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
international workshop on maritime autonomous surface
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

International Workshop on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships and IMO - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 27, 2023 1.11k likes •1.45k views

International Workshop on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships and IMO regulations Monday, 14 May 2018 Main Hall, IMO Headquarters, London Organized by National Maritime Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Japan Ship Technology Research Institute

slide-1
SLIDE 1

International Workshop on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships and IMO regulations

Monday, 14 May 2018 Main Hall, IMO Headquarters, London

Organized by

National Maritime Research Institute (NMRI) Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan (MLIT) Japan Ship Technology Research Association (JSTRA)

Supported by the Nippon Foundation

18 May 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Opening address by Mr. Kitack Lim

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Programme

Opening address by Mr. Kitack Lim, the Secretary General of IMO Keynote speech by Ms. Heike Deggim, Director, Maritime Safety Division, IMO Session 1 - R&D on autonomous ships

  • Dr. Akihito Hirayama, Director, Strategic Marketing Division, Akishima Laboratories (Mitsui Zosen) Inc.
  • Mr. Bernard Twomey, Regulatory Development Lead (Marine), Rolls-Royce Plc
  • Dr. Hideyuki Ando, Senior General Manager, Maritime Technology Division, MTI Co., Ltd. (NYK Group)
  • Mr. Carl Magne Rustand, Business Developer Aftermarket, Kongsberg Maritime AS

Session 2 – Regulatory study Session 3 - Panel discussion

  • Mr. James Fanshawe CBE, Chairman, UK Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory WG
  • Mr. Per Sønderstrup (SFS), Director, Maritime Regulation and Legal Affairs, Danish Maritime Authority
  • Mr. Tomotsugu Noma, Maritime Bureau, MLIT

Moderator: Dr. Koichi Yoshida, Ship Equipment Inspection Society of Japan and Yokohama National Univ.

  • Mr. Akira Fukaishi, 1st Secretary, Embassy of Japan in London UK
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Autonomous ships - View of the IMO Secretariat by Ms. Heike Deggim Keynote speech

  • Definitions and concepts
  • Type and size of ships
  • Instruments
  • Methodology
  • Deliverables
  • Plan of work
  • Intersessional arrangements
  • Coordination mechanism

Framework of the regulatory scoping exercise

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Session 1 - R&D on autonomous ships Activities for Realization of Autonomous vessels, by Dr. Akihito Hirayama

Identification of Required Functions for Autonomization Function Classification

  • f Onboard Works

Analysis for Onboard Work

List of Required Technologies

R&D Road-Map for Autonomous Vessel Concept of Autonomous Vessel Verification Test of Core Technology Assessment Technology

y Grasp of Core Technology Output

Investigation into Required Technologies

R&D Flow

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Session 1 - R&D on autonomous ships

O n b

  • a

r d Wo r k O c e a n N a v i g a t i

  • n

H a r b

  • r

N a v i g a t i

  • n

C a r g

  • H

a n d l i n g Wa t c h Wa t c h I n f

  • .

a c q u i s i t i

  • n

I n f

  • .

a c q u i s i t i

  • n

Ma n e u v e r Ma n e u v e r R e c

  • r

d / R e p

  • r

t R e c

  • r

d / R e p

  • r

t R e s p

  • n

s e R e s p

  • n

s e E n g i n e wa t c h Wa t c h Wa t c h I n f

  • .

a c q u i s i t i

  • n

I n f

  • .

a c q u i s i t i

  • n

Ma n e u v e r Ma n e u v e r P r e p a r e P r e p a r e Mo

  • r

i n g Mo

  • r

i n g A n c h

  • r

i n g A n c h

  • r

i n g R e c

  • r

d / R e p

  • r

t R e c

  • r

d / R e p

  • r

t P i l

  • t

, e t c . ： 1 3 wo r k s P i l

  • t

, e t c . ： 1 3 wo r k s T a g b

  • a

t , e t c . ： 1 4 wo r k s T a g b

  • a

t , e t c . ： 1 4 wo r k s T h r u s t e r , e t c . ： 1 1 wo r k s T h r u s t e r , e t c . ： 1 1 wo r k s T r i a l , e t c . ：1 5 wo r k s T r i a l , e t c . ：1 5 wo r k s Wi n c h , e t c . ： 6 wo r k s Wi n c h , e t c . ： 6 wo r k s C a s t i n g , e t c . ：2 wo r k s C a s t i n g , e t c . ：2 wo r k s R A D A R , A I S , e t c . ：8 wo r k s R A D A R , A I S , e t c . ：8 wo r k s E C D I S , e t c . ： 7 wo r k s E C D I S , e t c . ： 7 wo r k s S t e e r i n g , e t c . ： 6 wo r k s S t e e r i n g , e t c . ： 6 wo r k s R e s c u e , e t c . ： 4 wo r k s R e s c u e , e t c . ： 4 wo r k s 26 works 62 works 4 categories

  • ver 200works

Analysis for Onboard Work

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Session 1 - R&D on autonomous ships Yara Birkeland－ a global game changer, by Mr. Carl Magne Rustand

  • Captain role
  • Chief Engineer role

Shore Control Center

  • Monitor operational information
  • Monitor equipment condition
  • Approve voyage plan
  • Approve loading condition
  • Initiate voyage
  • Voice communication
  • Safe state
  • Remote Control

Main roles and tasks:

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Session 1 - R&D on autonomous ships ISM Code STCW Carriage requirements Performance standards

  • Radar
  • ECDIS
  • Steering control
  • Autopilot
  • …….
  • Officer on watch
  • Lookout
  • Helmsman
  • Standing orders
  • …….
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Session 1 - R&D on autonomous ships Ship Intelligence and the Autonomous Infrastructure, by Mr. Bernard Twomey

Land Based Remote Operating Centre (ROC)

  • For consideration:
  • Will the ROC need to comply with national HSE

law?

  • Educational qualifications of the operators and

maintainers of the autonomous infrastructure.

  • The land based requirements for the ROC, e.g,

access, physical security, lighting, evacuation etc.

  • PSC, Vetting, Classification Surveyors, Pilots etc –

what skills are required?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

R e mo t e & A u t

  • n
  • mo

u s t i me l i n e

2 1 8 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 x

‘ X ’ i s s u b j e c t t

  • r

e g u l a t i

  • n

Session 1 - R&D on autonomous ships

REMOTE SUPPORT, OPERATION OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS REMOTE AND AUTONOMOUS LOCAL VESSEL REMOTE AND AUTONOMOUS SHORT SEA VESSEL REMOTE AND AUTONOMOUS OCEAN GOING VESSEL

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Session 1 - R&D on autonomous ships Digitalization in Shipping - Approach of NYK -, by Dr. Hideyuki Ando

Internet of Ships (IoS) Open Platform

Roles are defined and each player provides their expertise on the Internet of Ship(IoS)

  • platform. Data governance and business rules have been built by IoS OP Consortium

under ShipDC. Platform

User (PU)

PP

Platform Provider

PP

Platform Provider

Provider of

  • nboard data

collection equipment and services Provider of

  • nboard data

collection equipment and services

Ship data center Ship data center

Data collection, storage, standardization and provision Data integration from other sources Data collection, storage, standardization and provision Data integration from other sources

SP

Solution Provider

SP

Solution Provider

Application service provider based on IoT data of ShipDC Application service provider based on IoT data of ShipDC

IoS Open Platform

Ship owner Operator Ship management Operator Ship owner Operator Ship management Crew Data Buyer Shipyard, manufacturer, etc. Solution

User (SU)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Session 1 - R&D on autonomous ships Data and Technology are more available In the era of digitalization, accessibility of data and technology becomes more available. Identify right issues to solve is mostly important Shipping is a rich semantics domain so it is very difficult for external consultants or data scientists to identify right issues to solve. People internally in shipping themselves have to lead innovations. Pursuing optimization of fleet operation and ship design Best combination of PPTO (people, process, technology & organization) and solving issues with right partners are indispensable. Step-by-step implementations of automation should be a part of this improving process.

Summary by Dr. Ando

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Session 2 – Regulatory study

  • Responsible Ownership
  • Safe Operation
  • Recognised Accreditation, Training

and Standards

  • Effective Integration into the existing

Maritime structure

MASS Safety

Regulatory Study at IMO, by Mr. James Fanshawe CBE

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Session 2 – Regulatory study

Summary by Mr. Fanshawe

  • IMO is about to embark on a very important body of work as it starts the scoping

exercise for MASS.

  • The pace of change is dramatic.
  • Technological advances are likely to outpace regulatory development.
  • The development of MASS should not be held up by the work IMO is undertaking.
  • Patience will be critical and expectations shall be sensitively managed.
  • While this work continues at IMO, ships will continue to ply their trade safely and

efficiently across the globe; and

  • MASS will begin to find their place in the natural order.
  • There will be change but this is important, necessary and not a threat.
  • The human element is as critical today as it has always been.
  • The skills of the seafarer may change and develop but are as important as ever.
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Session 2 – Regulatory study

Analysis of regulatory barriers

Analysis of Regulatory Barriers to Autonomous Ships, by Mr. Per Sønderstrup

slide-16
SLIDE 16

N e e d f

  • r

a s y s t e m a t i c a n d w e l l d e f i n e d a p p r

  • a

c h

Where is the decision made?

Who decides?

On board Elsewhere

System Human

A L A L 1 A L 2 A L 3 A L 4 A L 5 A L 6

Conceptual

A L

M a n u a l l y c

  • n

t r

  • l

l e d . T h e

  • p

e r a t

  • r

i s

  • n

b

  • a

r d

  • r

c

  • n

t r

  • l

s t h e v e s s e l r e mo t e l y t h r

  • u

g h r a d i

  • l

i n k .

A L 1

D e c i s i

  • n
  • s

u p p

  • r

t

  • n

b

  • a

r d . T h e

  • p

e r a t

  • r

mo n i t

  • r

s a n d c h a n g e s c

  • u

r s e a n d s p e e d i f n e c e s s a r y .

A L 2

D e c i s i

  • n
  • s

u p p

  • r

t

  • n

b

  • a

r d

  • r

f r

  • m

s h

  • r

e . S u g g e s t i

  • n

s f

  • r

i n t e r v e n t i

  • n

s ma y b e p r

  • v

i d e d b y a l g

  • r

i t h ms .

A L 3

E x e c u t i

  • n

b y

  • p

e r a t

  • r

w h

  • mo

n i t

  • r

s a n d a u t h

  • r

i s e s a c t i

  • n

s .

A L 4

E x e c u t i

  • n

b y

  • p

e r a t

  • r

w h

  • mo

n i t

  • r

s a n d i s a b l e t

  • i

n t e r v e n e . M

  • n

i t

  • r

i n g ma y t a k e p l a c e f r

  • m

s h

  • r

e .

A L 5

G e n e r a l g

  • a

l s a r e d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e

  • p

e r a t

  • r

. M

  • n

i t

  • r

i n g ma y t a k e p l a c e f r

  • m

s h

  • r

e .

A L 6

F u l l y a u t

  • n
  • mo

u s . G e n e r a l g

  • a

l s ma y b e d e t e r mi n e d b y t h e s y s t e m. M

  • n

i t

  • r

i n g f r

  • m

s h

  • r

e .

9 / 1 1 / 2 1 7

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Session 2 – Regulatory study Issues to address for fully autonomous and unmanned ships is numerous － Safety of Navigation － Liability and insurance － Manning － Merchant shipping act Short term goal － The Conventions has some room for technology driven innovations but we need to have a common understanding of how far can we go under the existing regulatory framework It should be carefully considered how to get things right － technology is already far ahead of the existing regulations － Is the right approach a new regulatory framework rather a very labour intensive and time consuming walkthrough of the existing instruments

Some conclusions by r. Per Sønderstrup

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Session 2 – Regulatory study Introduction of a phased approach to build future regulatory frameworks for MASS, by Mr. Tomotsugu Noma

  • 2020 2020-

Way forward to MASS

Scoping Exercise Develop interim Guidelines Experience Building Phase (EBP) Verify the experience from EBP New technologies introduced Identify and implement further actions

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Session 2 – Regulatory study

Conclusion by Mr. Tomotsugu Noma

 MASS covers manned ships with decision support tools/equipment and unmanned ship and new technologies will be gradually introduced to MASS  Regulatory frameworks can be divided into two phases ① Early phase →Current regulatory frameworks + Interim Guidelines ② Developed phase →Development of specific regulatory frameworks  Experience Building Phase can be introduced to gain experience and knowledge from new technologies which will contribute to assess further action including the unmanned operation

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Session 3 - Panel discussion

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Session 3 - Panel discussion

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Session 1

  • What sort of safety measures do you think would need to be considered in your research and

development projects?

  • With regard to the presentation made by Mr. Ando on Digitalization in Shipping, slide 20 showed

the necessity of a new mechanism to share onboard data of each ship with other ships via Ship Data Centre, which would be an unprecedented concept. How do you think about such a new concept?

  • In general, what kind of roles and action are you expecting the IMO to take in the field of Research

and Development on autonomous ships? Session 2

  • It is expected that the regulatory scope for MASS will extend according to the level of development,

such as in light of its autonomy. How should we address such extension in order to realize MASS as early as possible?

  • Do you have any ideas on what sort of approach we should follow to consider the revision of

existing conventions and codes as well as the establishment of new ones, taking into account the relevant safety measures?

  • What kind of safety measures do you expect to be necessary for MASS at the moment?

Discussions at the Panel

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Conclusions of the panel discussion

  • I

t w

  • u

l d b e n e c e s s a r y f

  • r

t h e I M O t

  • e

s t a b l i s h r e g u l a t

  • r

y f r a m e w

  • r

k s f

  • r

t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i

  • n
  • f

n e c e s s a r y m e a s u r e s t

  • e

n s u r e s a f e t y

  • f

M A S S w i t h

  • u

t d i s c

  • u

r a g i n g t h e r e l e v a n t i n n

  • v

a t i

  • n

.

  • T
  • t

h i s e n d ,

  • n

e

  • f

t h e b e s t a p p r

  • a

c h e s c

  • u

l d b e t h e d e v e l

  • p

m e n t a n d i m p l e m e n t a t i

  • n
  • f

i n t e r i m g u i d e l i n e s a t t h e e a r l y p h a s e , a n d t h e e s t a b l i s h m e n t

  • f

s p e c i f i c r e g u l a t

  • r

y .

  • A

s r e s e a r c h a n d d e v e l

  • p

m e n t i n t h i s a r e a a r e r a p i d l y p r

  • g

r e s s e d r e c e n t l y , i t w

  • u

l d b e n e c e s s a r y t

  • d

i s c u s s r e g u l a t

  • r

y f r a m e w

  • r

k s t a k i n g i n t

  • c
  • n

s i d e r a t i

  • n

t h e l a t e s t t e c h n

  • l
  • g

i e s . I n t h i s r e g a r d , i t w

  • u

l d b e b e n e f i c i a l f

  • r

t h e I M O t

  • p

r

  • v

i d e f u r t h e r

  • p

p

  • r

t u n i t i e s l i k e t h i s W

  • r

k s h

  • p

t

  • s

h a r e s u c h l a t e s t i n f

  • r

m a t i

  • n

a m

  • n

g M e m b e r S t a t e s a n d t h e r e l e v a n t s t a k e h

  • l

d e r s .

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Thank you for your attention!

Presentations at the workshop are available:

http://www.nmri.go.jp/mass.html