internal languages of higher categories
play

Internal Languages of Higher Categories Karol Szumi lo University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Internal Languages of Higher Categories Karol Szumi lo University of Leeds HoTT 2019 1/18 Theorem (LambekScott) The category of -calculi is equivalent to the category of cartesian closed categories. 2/18 Theorem (LambekScott)


  1. Internal Languages of Higher Categories Karol Szumi� lo University of Leeds HoTT 2019 1/18

  2. Theorem (Lambek–Scott) The category of λ -calculi is equivalent to the category of cartesian closed categories. 2/18

  3. Theorem (Lambek–Scott) The category of λ -calculi is equivalent to the category of cartesian closed categories. Theorem (Lambek–Scott) The category of higher order intuitionistic type theories is (almost) equivalent to the category of elementary toposes with NNO. 2/18

  4. Theorem (Lambek–Scott) The category of λ -calculi is equivalent to the category of cartesian closed categories. Theorem (Lambek–Scott) The category of higher order intuitionistic type theories is (almost) equivalent to the category of elementary toposes with NNO. What is a counterpart for HoTT? 2/18

  5. Joint work with Chris Kapulkin: Theorem (2017) The homotopy theory of comprehension categories with Id and Σ is equivalent to the homotopy theory of quasicategories with finite limits. 3/18

  6. Joint work with Chris Kapulkin: Theorem (2017) The homotopy theory of comprehension categories with Id and Σ is equivalent to the homotopy theory of quasicategories with finite limits. Theorem (in progress) The homotopy theory of comprehension categories with Id , Π and Σ satisfying functional extensionality is equivalent to the homotopy theory of locally cartesian closed quasicategories. 3/18

  7. A homotopy theory is modeled by a homotopical category, i.e., a category C with a subcategory of weak equivalences. 4/18

  8. A homotopy theory is modeled by a homotopical category, i.e., a category C with a subcategory of weak equivalences. C has an associated (∞ , 1 ) -category obtained by universally inverting the weak equivalences. 4/18

  9. A homotopy theory is modeled by a homotopical category, i.e., a category C with a subcategory of weak equivalences. C has an associated (∞ , 1 ) -category obtained by universally inverting the weak equivalences. A functor F ∶C → D is homotopical if it preserves weak equivalences. 4/18

  10. A homotopy theory is modeled by a homotopical category, i.e., a category C with a subcategory of weak equivalences. C has an associated (∞ , 1 ) -category obtained by universally inverting the weak equivalences. A functor F ∶C → D is homotopical if it preserves weak equivalences. It is a DK-equivalence if Ho C → Ho D is essentially surjective and L H C( X , Y ) → L H D( FX , FY ) are weak homotopy equivalences, i.e., it induces an equivalences of (∞ , 1 ) -categories. 4/18

  11. CompCat Id , Π , Σ LCCQ comprehension categories locally cartesian closed quasicategories 5/18

  12. CompCat Id , Π , Σ LCCQ Π-Trb comprehension categories Π-tribes locally cartesian closed quasicategories 5/18

  13. semisimplicial Π-tribes Π-sTrb CompCat Id , Π , Σ LCCQ Π-Trb comprehension categories Π-tribes locally cartesian closed quasicategories 5/18

  14. semisimplicial Π-tribes Π-sTrb CompCat Id , Π , Σ LCCQ Π-Trb comprehension categories Π-tribes locally cartesian closed quasicategories 5/18

  15. A tribe is a category C with a subcategory of fibrations. T1 There is a terminal object and all objects are fibrant. T2 There are pullbacks along fibrations and fibrations are stable under pullback. T3 Every morphism factors as an anodyne morphism followed by a fibration. T4 Anodyne morphisms are stable under pullbacks along fibrations. 6/18

  16. A tribe is a category C with a subcategory of fibrations. T1 There is a terminal object and all objects are fibrant. T2 There are pullbacks along fibrations and fibrations are stable under pullback. T3 Every morphism factors as an anodyne morphism followed by a fibration. T4 Anodyne morphisms are stable under pullbacks along fibrations. anodyne = LLP with respect to fibrations 6/18

  17. A tribe is a category C with a subcategory of fibrations. T1 There is a terminal object and all objects are fibrant. T2 There are pullbacks along fibrations and fibrations are stable under pullback. T3 Every morphism factors as an anodyne morphism followed by a fibration. T4 Anodyne morphisms are stable under pullbacks along fibrations. anodyne = LLP with respect to fibrations a b 6/18

  18. A tribe is a category C with a subcategory of fibrations. T1 There is a terminal object and all objects are fibrant. T2 There are pullbacks along fibrations and fibrations are stable under pullback. T3 Every morphism factors as an anodyne morphism followed by a fibration. T4 Anodyne morphisms are stable under pullbacks along fibrations. anodyne = LLP with respect to fibrations a Pa ∼ a × b a b a 6/18

  19. A tribe is a category C with a subcategory of fibrations. T1 There is a terminal object and all objects are fibrant. T2 There are pullbacks along fibrations and fibrations are stable under pullback. T3 Every morphism factors as an anodyne morphism followed by a fibration. T4 Anodyne morphisms are stable under pullbacks along fibrations. anodyne = LLP with respect to fibrations a c a Pa ∼ ∼ a × b a b a Pa Pa 6/18

  20. ∼ Pa ↠ a × a . A path object on a is given by a factorization a ↣ 7/18

  21. ∼ Pa ↠ a × a . A path object on a is given by a factorization a ↣ A homotopy between morphisms a → b is a morphism a → Pb . 7/18

  22. ∼ Pa ↠ a × a . A path object on a is given by a factorization a ↣ A homotopy between morphisms a → b is a morphism a → Pb . A homotopy equivalence is a morphism with an inverse up to homotopy. 7/18

  23. ∼ Pa ↠ a × a . A path object on a is given by a factorization a ↣ A homotopy between morphisms a → b is a morphism a → Pb . A homotopy equivalence is a morphism with an inverse up to homotopy. A homomorphism of tribes is a functor that preserves fibrations, anodyne morphisms, terminal object and pullbacks along fibrations. 7/18

  24. ∼ Pa ↠ a × a . A path object on a is given by a factorization a ↣ A homotopy between morphisms a → b is a morphism a → Pb . A homotopy equivalence is a morphism with an inverse up to homotopy. A homomorphism of tribes is a functor that preserves fibrations, anodyne morphisms, terminal object and pullbacks along fibrations. A Π-tribe is a tribe T such that for all fibrations p ∶ a ↠ b , the pullback functor p ∗ ∶ T ↡ b → T ↡ a has a right adjoint Π p that is a homomorphism. 7/18

  25. ∼ Pa ↠ a × a . A path object on a is given by a factorization a ↣ A homotopy between morphisms a → b is a morphism a → Pb . A homotopy equivalence is a morphism with an inverse up to homotopy. A homomorphism of tribes is a functor that preserves fibrations, anodyne morphisms, terminal object and pullbacks along fibrations. A Π-tribe is a tribe T such that for all fibrations p ∶ a ↠ b , the pullback functor p ∗ ∶ T ↡ b → T ↡ a has a right adjoint Π p that is a homomorphism. A Π-homomorphism is a homomorphism that preserves Π. 7/18

  26. ∼ Pa ↠ a × a . A path object on a is given by a factorization a ↣ A homotopy between morphisms a → b is a morphism a → Pb . A homotopy equivalence is a morphism with an inverse up to homotopy. A homomorphism of tribes is a functor that preserves fibrations, anodyne morphisms, terminal object and pullbacks along fibrations. A Π-tribe is a tribe T such that for all fibrations p ∶ a ↠ b , the pullback functor p ∗ ∶ T ↡ b → T ↡ a has a right adjoint Π p that is a homomorphism. A Π-homomorphism is a homomorphism that preserves Π. It is a weak equivalence if it induces an equivalence on homotopy categories. 7/18

  27. A semisimplicial set is a “simplicial set without degeneracies”. 8/18

  28. A semisimplicial set is a “simplicial set without degeneracies”. Semisimplicial sets carry a symmetric monoidal geometric product. 8/18

  29. A semisimplicial set is a “simplicial set without degeneracies”. Semisimplicial sets carry a symmetric monoidal geometric product. A semisimplicial Π-tribe is a Π-tribe that is enriched in semisimplicial sets such that ▸ cotensors by finite semisimplicial sets exist and the “pullback cotensor property” is satisfied; ▸ cotensors preserve anodyne morphisms; ▸ adjunctions p ∗ ⊢ Π p are semisimplicial. 8/18

  30. A frame in a Π-tribe T is a Reedy fibrant homotopically constant semisimplicial object in T . 9/18

  31. A frame in a Π-tribe T is a Reedy fibrant homotopically constant semisimplicial object in T . The category of frames Fr T is a semisimplicial Π-tribe. 9/18

  32. A frame in a Π-tribe T is a Reedy fibrant homotopically constant semisimplicial object in T . The category of frames Fr T is a semisimplicial Π-tribe. Fr Π-sTrb Π-Trb U 9/18

  33. A frame in a Π-tribe T is a Reedy fibrant homotopically constant semisimplicial object in T . The category of frames Fr T is a semisimplicial Π-tribe. Fr Π-sTrb Π-Trb U ∼ U Fr T T 9/18

  34. A frame in a Π-tribe T is a Reedy fibrant homotopically constant semisimplicial object in T . The category of frames Fr T is a semisimplicial Π-tribe. Fr Π-sTrb Π-Trb ̂ Fr U ∼ ∼ ∼ ̂ Fr U T ′ T ′ U Fr T T Fr T ′ 9/18

  35. A quasicategory is a simplicial set C with the RLP with respect to the inner horn inclusions. Quasicategories model (∞ , 1 ) -categories. 10/18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend