Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics Carole Bernard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

insurance market effects of risk management metrics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics Carole Bernard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics Carole Bernard (University of Waterloo) Weidong Tian (U. Waterloo U. North Carolina) August 2008, Portland, ARIA meeting. Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Insurance Market Effects

  • f Risk Management Metrics

Carole Bernard (University of Waterloo) Weidong Tian (U. Waterloo → U. North Carolina) August 2008, Portland, ARIA meeting.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 1/26

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Outline

◮ I Optimal Risk Sharing in the Insurance Market (standard theory of optimal insurance design) ◮ II Optimal Risk Sharing in the Presence of Regulators ◮ III Methodology & Results: Model & Economic Implications ◮ IV Research Directions

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 2/26

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Part I Optimal Risk Sharing in the Insurance Market

(Standard theory of optimal insurance design)

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 3/26

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Insurance Market Participants

✬ ✫ ✩ ✪ ✛ ✚ ✘ ✙

Policyholders

✬ ✫ ✩ ✪

Insurer Insurance Market The policyholder pays a premium P to the insurer. He has a loss

  • X. And receives I(X) from the insurance company.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 4/26

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Optimal Risk Sharing

✬ ✫ ✩ ✪ ✛ ✚ ✘ ✙

Policyholders

✬ ✫ ✩ ✪ ✬ ✫ ✩ ✪

Optimal Insurance Contract

Insurer Insurance Market The policyholder pays a premium P to the insurer. He has a loss

  • X. And receives I(X) from the insurance company.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 5/26

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Insurance Contract Design

Let I(X) be an insurance indemnity.            0 I(X) X P = φ (E [I(X)]) I(X) non − decreasing with φ′ > 0 and φ(X) X.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 6/26

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Framework

  • A one-period Model.
  • At the beginning of the period:

W p : Initial wealth of policyholders W0 : Initial wealth of the insurer

  • At the end of the period:

W p

T

= W p

0 − P − X + I(X)

WT = W0 + P − I(X) − c(I(X)) where X = Loss of policyholders, c 0 and c is increasing.

  • U : utility of policyholders, V : utility of the insurer.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 7/26

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Optimal Insurance Design

From the policyholders’ perspective: max

I

E

  • U(W p

0 − P − X + I(X))

  • s.t.

           0 I(X) X P = φ (E [I(X)]) I(X) non − decreasing From the insurer’s perspective: max

I

E [V (W0 + P − I(X) − c(I(X)))] s.t.            0 I(X) X P = φ (E [I(X)]) I(X) non − decreasing

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 8/26

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Optimal Insurance Design from Policyholders’ Perspective

From the policyholders’ perspective: max

I

E

  • U(W p

0 − P − X + I(X))

  • s.t.

           0 I(X) X P = φ (E [I(X)]) I(X) non − decreasing Stop loss insurance / Deductible are optimal (Arrow (1963)). I ∗(X) = max(X − d, 0) Uniqueness of the optimum a.s.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 9/26

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Optimal Insurance Design from the Insurer’s Perspective

From the insurer’s perspective: max

I

E [V (W0 + P − I(X) − c(I(X)))] s.t.            0 I(X) X P = φ (E [I(X)]) I(X) non − decreasing Upper-limit policies are optimal: (Raviv 1979) I ∗(X) = min(X, c) Uniqueness of the optimum a.s.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 10/26

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Part II Optimal risk sharing in the Presence of Regulators

(Value-at-Risk requirements)

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 11/26

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Insurance Market Participants

✬ ✫ ✩ ✪ ✛ ✚ ✘ ✙

Policyholders

✬ ✫ ✩ ✪

Insurer Insurance Market

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 12/26

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Insurance Market Participants

✬ ✫ ✩ ✪ ✛ ✚ ✘ ✙

Policyholders

✬ ✫ ✩ ✪ ✬ ✫ ✩ ✪

Regulatory Constraints Insurer

Insurance Market

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 13/26

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Objective of our Study: the Insurance Market

In Europe, the “Solvency II” project will likely introduce Value-at-Risk requirements in the insurance marketplace. What is the impact of such a change on the market? We look at the economic effects of Value-at-Risk regulation imposed to insurers on optimal risk sharing in the insurance market.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 14/26

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Market without Regulators

Let I(X) be an insurance indemnity.            0 I(X) X P = φ (E [I(X)]) I(X) non − decreasing with φ′ > 0 and φ(X) X. ⇒ Insurers can sell any indemnity I to customers (no constraints from regulators.)

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 15/26

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Market with Regulators

Regulators aim at protecting the insurance market and

  • customers. Thus, they want to induce companies to control their
  • risks. Assume that regulators require companies to satisfy:

Pr (WT < K) α. where WT= insurer’s final wealth. WT = W0 + P − I(X) − c(I(X)) where c is non-negative and non-decreasing. The constraint writes also as: Pr (I(X) > a) α, Obviously this condition can’t always be satisfied. ◮ Ignoring the reinsurance market, the company is not fully free: some indemnities are TOO RISKY to be issued. The presence of regulators influences the insurance market.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 16/26

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Part III Methodology & Results

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 17/26

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Methodology

We compare two situations: ◮ Optimal Insurance Contracts without Regulation ◮ Optimal Insurance Contracts under VaR Constraints We analyse optimal contracts: ◮ For risk-averse policyholders to buy, ◮ For risk-averse insurers to issue.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 18/26

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Market without Regulators

From the policyholders’ perspective: max

I

E

  • U(W p

0 − P − X + I(X))

  • s.t.

           0 I(X) X P = φ (E [I(X)]) I(X) non − decreasing From the insurer’s perspective: max

I

E [V (W0 + P − I(X) − c(I(X)))] s.t.            0 I(X) X P = φ (E [I(X)]) I(X) non − decreasing

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 19/26

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Market with Regulators

From the policyholders’ perspective: max

I

E

  • U(W p

0 − P − X + I(X))

  • s.t.

       0 I(X) X P = φ (E [I(X)]) I(X) non − decreasing Pr (WT < K) α From the insurer’s perspective: max

I

E [V (W0 + P − I(X) − c(I(X)))] s.t.        0 I(X) X P = φ (E [I(X)]) I(X) non − decreasing Pr (WT < K) α

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 20/26

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Comparison of Optimal Insurance Designs for policyholders

In blue —–, with regulation. In red - - - , without regulation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 q=6 Indemnity I(x) d*=2 Loss x dArrow=3 Insured’s optimum Arrow’s optimum

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 21/26

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Comparison of Optimal Insurance Designs for Insurers

In blue —–, with regulation. In red - - - , without regulation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 q=4 Indemnity I(x) Loss x r=3 a=1 Insurer’s optimum Raviv’s optimum 2 4 6 8 1 2 3 4 q=4 Indemnity I(x) Loss x r=2 a=1 Insurer’s optimum Raviv’s optimum Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 22/26

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Contributions

◮ Positive effects of VaR Regulation on the insurance market:

  • Policyholders are better protected irrespective of the fact

that the contract is designed from the insurer’s perspective or policyholders’ perspective.

  • Insurers’ insolvency risk is reduced.

◮ Extend the work by Arrow (1963), Raviv (1979), Golubin (2006), Cummins and Mahul (2004). ◮ Technical contribution: Derive the optimal design under Value-at-Risk Constraints (non convex optimization with several interdependent constraints).

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 23/26

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Negative Effects of VaR Regulation

Basak and Shapiro (RFS 2001) study the impact of Value-at-Risk risk management on the financial market. They derive the following economic effects: ◮ VaR risk managers incur larger losses when losses occur. (Consistent with our results for the insurance market: it is optimal for VaR risk managers to incur losses in the worse states.) ◮ Negative effects on the financial market:

  • Adverse effect of VaR regulation. Regulators should be

concerned to reduce losses in any of the most adverse states

  • f the world (and not to increase them).
  • VaR risk managers amplify stock market volatility at times
  • f down market and attenuates the volatility in up market.

(Optimal contracts are discontinuous under Value-at-Risk, creates moral hazard.)

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 24/26

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

Research Directions

  • Towards the equilibrium: combine reinsurance market and

insurance market ; design in a Pareto optimal framework.

  • A one-period framework: how about multiperiod optimal

contracts?

  • Release assumptions:
  • Premium is based on the actuarial value
  • Regulation is based on Value-at-Risk
  • Expected Utility Framework.

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 25/26

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Insurance Market VaR regulation Methodology & Results Research Directions

◮ Optimal Insurance Design: Arrow (AER1963, book1971), Borch (Astin1962), Raviv (AER1979), Cummins and Mahul (JRI2004), Golubin (JRI2006), Doherty and Eeckhoudt (JRU 1995), Gollier and Schlesinger (ET1996), Eeckhoudt, Gollier and Schlesinger (Book2005), Gollier (2007 JPubEco), Doherty and Schlesinger (JPE2003), Huberman, Mayers and Smith (BellJoE1983). ◮ Risk Management for Financial Intermediation: Froot and Stein (JFE1998), Cummins, Phillips and Smith (2001); Cummins, Dionne, Gagn´ e and Nouira (WP2007); Doherty and Dionne (JRU 1993); Froot, Scharfstein and Stein (JOF1993). ◮ Actuarial Approach: Gajek Zagrodny (IME2000, IME2004, JRI2004), Promislow and Young (IME 2005), Cai, Tan (Astin2007), Kaluszka (IME2001), Zhou Wu (IME2008). ◮ Finance literature: Basak and Shapiro (RFS2001), Shefrin and Statman (FM1993, JFQA), Kahneman and Tversky (E1979, JRU1992), Boyle and Tian (MF2007), Follmer and Leukert (F&S1999), Bernard, Boyle and Tian (WP2008). ◮ Mathematical Economics: Carlier and Dana (ET2003, JME2005), Picard (IER2000).

Bernard Carole Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics 26/26