Implications on Future Local Money Issues Implications on Future - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

implications on future local money issues implications on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Implications on Future Local Money Issues Implications on Future - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Implications on Future Local Money Issues Implications on Future Local Money Issues To provide Board members and those in attendance at this public meeting with a general overview of the generation of local revenue under Ohio law 2/21/2013 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Implications on Future Local Money Issues Implications on Future Local Money Issues

slide-2
SLIDE 2

To provide Board members and those in attendance at this public meeting with a general overview of the generation of local revenue under Ohio law

2/21/2013 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 Current combined property valuation for the

Triad Local School District

  • Includes Champaign, Logan, and Union Counties

$102,034,800 $102,034,800

2/21/2013 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 A mill is 1/1000 or .001 of a dollar

.001 x $1.00 = .001 x $1.00 = $.001 $.001 Or Or 1/100 of a 1/100 of a Penny Penny

2/21/2013 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Since a mill is 1/1000 or .001 of a dollar  And the total property valuation of the Triad

Local School District is $102,034,800

.001 x $102,034,800 = .001 x $102,034,800 = $102,034 $102,034 Each mill in our district currently Each mill in our district currently generates generates $102,034 in local revenue. $102,034 in local revenue.

2/21/2013 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 The current effective millage in the Triad

Local School District is:

 15.01 mills  Originally the voters approved 20.60 mills but

as property values rise, the auditor is required to reduce the amount of voted mills collected so that only the revenue originally voted comes in

2/21/2013 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

 Factors that affect your tax bill:  Property tax is collected based on all issues

approved by the voters. This includes other governmental entities besides our schools.

 There are voted mills, called outside mills, and

non-voted mills, called inside mills

 Inside mills are to be levied at 1% or 10 mills per

taxing district based upon the constitution

  • 5 mills to schools and 5 to other governmental functions

2/21/2013 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 Between 1968 and 1974 Triad voters approved

20.6 general operating mills not requiring renewal.

 At the time, the Triad Board of Education

authorized going to voters to approve operating levies that generated enough revenue to meet the revenue shortfall.

 The County Auditor had to figure the amount of

millage needed based upon property values at the time of the levy requests.

2/21/2013 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2/21/2013 9

20.6 mils voted

  • riginally for

schools Now 15.01 effective

The County Auditor must adjust voted mills over time so that the amount of money collected under the original voter approval remains the same.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2/21/2013 10

20.6 mils 20.6 mils voted voted

  • riginally for
  • riginally for

schools schools Now Now 15.01 15.01 effective effective

5 5 mills mills 5 5 mills mills

The inside mills authorized under the State Constitution are not adjusted so revenue does does increase as property values rise.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Ask voters to approv

Ask voters to approve additional operating levy e additional operating levy

  • Board determines how much revenue is needed

based upon budgetary needs

  • Local operating revenue can be used for any

purpose approved by the Board in the annual appropriations

  • Could be for a set number of years
  • Could be for an indefinite period of time

 How many mills would Triad’s Board need to ask

How many mills would Triad’s Board need to ask for? for?

  • The Board would have to determine the amount of

revenue needed and then the millage rate to generate needed revenue would be set by auditor.

2/21/2013 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 Ask voters to approve a Permanent

Improvement (PI) levy.

  • Triad does not currently have a PI levy being

collected

  • PI levy revenue would be restricted to use for

district improvements that are expected to last for more than 5 years

  • Could be for a set number of years
  • Could be for an indefinite period of time

2/21/2013 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

 Ask voters to approve a replacement levy.

  • Voters could be asked to replace

replace the total approved mills back to the original 20. 6 mills that were voted in from the current effective mills of 15.01.

  • This would generate an additional 5.58 mills for the

district.

  • If approved this would continue for an indefinite

period of time.

.00558 x $102,034,800 = $569,354 .00558 x $102,034,800 = $569,354

2/21/2013 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2/21/2013 14

20.6 mils voted

  • riginally for

schools Now 15.01 effective

Now Now

20.6 mils voted

  • riginally for

schools 20.6 mils effective mills if replacement levy approved

slide-15
SLIDE 15

 Last option is not a levy

not a levy.

  • The Board could authorize the auditor to move a

portion or all of the 5 (un-voted) inside mills from

  • perating to permanent improvement.
  • PI funds are not calculated in the setting of the

minimum of 20 voted mills.

  • This does not require a public vote.
  • The auditor would be required to increase voted
  • utside mills up to an effective rate of 20 mills

instead of the15 mills we are currently collecting.

.005 x $102,034,800 = $510,174 .005 x $102,034,800 = $510,174

2/21/2013 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2/21/2013 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2/21/2013 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2/21/2013 18

Triad Taxing Districts: H26 – Rush/Triad H28 - N Lewisburg/Rush/ Triad H29 - Woodstock/Rush Triad J37 – Union/Triad L43 – Wayne/Triad

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2/21/2013 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

 This presentation will be posted on the Triad

Local School District website for download or further review.

 www.triad.k12.oh.us

2/21/2013 20