Impact of Periodic and Constant Proportion Harvesting Policies On - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

impact of periodic and constant proportion harvesting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Impact of Periodic and Constant Proportion Harvesting Policies On - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Impact of Periodic and Constant Proportion Harvesting Policies On TAC-Regulated Fisheries Systems Abdul-Aziz Yakubu Department of Mathematics Howard University Washington, D.C. 20059 (ayakubu@howard.edu) Collaborators Jon Conrad, Nianpeng Li


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Impact of Periodic and Constant Proportion Harvesting Policies On TAC-Regulated Fisheries Systems Abdul-Aziz Yakubu Department of Mathematics Howard University Washington, D.C. 20059 (ayakubu@howard.edu) Collaborators Jon Conrad, Nianpeng Li and Mary Lou Zeeman

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Emerging Ocean Diseases

Disease is increasing among most marine organisms (Ward and Lafferty, 2004). Examples: Recent epizootics (epidemics in animals) of Atlantic Ocean bottlenose dolphins and endangered Florida manatees. Contributing Factors include

  • global warming
  • habitat destruction
  • human overfishing
  • etc
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overfishing Implicated In Sea Urchin Epidemics

  • Sea urchin epidemics have risen
  • ver the last 30 years, and

diseases have decimated urchin populations in many parts of the world.

  • In the early 1980s, an epidemic

killed more than 95 percent of the long-spined sea urchins (Diadema antillarum) in the

  • Caribbean. After the urchins

died, prevalence of seaweeds increased dramatically; today, many coral reefs there are dead.

  • Biologists have suggested that
  • verfishing urchin predators

such as toadfish (Opsanus sp.) and queen triggerfish (Balistes vetula) may have played a role in this epidemic.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

World's Fish Supply Running Out, Researchers Warn (Journal of Science) By Juliet Eilperin

Washington Post Writer, November 3, 2006

  • Economists’ and ecologists’ warning: No more seafood as of 2048
  • Based on 4-year study of
  • Catch data
  • Effects of fisheries collapses
  • Causes
  • Overfishing
  • Pollution
  • Other Environmental Causes
  • Loss of Species affects oceans’ ability to
  • Produce seafood
  • Filter nutrients
  • Resist the spread of disease
  • Store CO2
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Total Allowable Catch (TAC)

  • Many fisheries are regulated using TAC.
  • A TAC within a system of individual transferable quotas (ITQs) is

currently used to manage the Alaskan halibut fishery.

  • The Alaskan halibut is one of the few success stories in the book on US

fisheries management. The TAC did a reasonable good job of preventing overfishing, but created another set of problems.

  • Regulated open access: If TAC is imposed on a fishery where access

to the resource is free or of minimal cost, fishers have an incentive to “race for the fish,” trying to capture as large a share of the TAC for themselves before the cumulative harvest reaches the TAC and the season is ended.

  • Regulated open access may result in a severely compressed fishing

season where vast amounts of “fishing effort” are expended in a few day (halibut derby…Prior to 1995…one or two day season).

  • fishers sit idle or re-gear and cause overfishing in other fisheries.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Periodic Proportion Policy (PPP)

a(t). p) a(t Therefore, F(t). p) F(t and periodic is mortality fishing Fishing, Pulse Under mortality natural m mortality fishing F(t) ) ( ) ) ( 1 )( ( a(t) (PPP) ) ( ) ( y(t) (TAC) catch allowable total y(t) (biomass) stock fish estimated ) ( year t,

  • f

start At = + = + = = + − − = = = = t F m t F me t F t x t a t x

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Constant Proportion Policy (CPP)

fishers. to acceptable and implement easy to nt, transpare is CPP . ) 1 ( a where (CPP) ), ( ) ( F m F m e F t ax t y + − − − = =

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Harvested Fish Stock Model

Escapement

Model

) ( )) ( 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( t x t a t y t x t S − = − =

))) ( )) ( 1 (( ) 1 )(( ( )) ( 1 ( ) 1 ( )) ( ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( )) ( ( ) 1 ( t x t a g m t x t a t x

  • r

t S g t S t S m t S f t x − + − − = + + − = = +

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Compensatory Dynamics and CPP Without Allee Effect

. ) 1 ( and function, smooth decreasing a ) , [ ) , [ : missing, is the )). ) 1 (( ) 1 (( ) 1 ( ) ( F m F me F a strictly is g effect Allee When x a g m x a x f + − − = ∞ → ∞ − + − − =

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Compensatory Dynamics and CPP (Continued)

( )

( ) a

  • 1

1 ) ( point fixed the is biomass state steady then the ry, compensato is dynamics the and ) ( 1 ) ( If level. stock initial any for zero approaches size stock then the , ) ( 1 ) (

. m)

  • (1

a

  • 1

1 1

      = ∞ ∞ − + − < − + − >

− − = g

a x x m g m g a m g m g a If

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Example: Beverton-Holt Model and Constant Harvesting

( ) ( )

0.15 m Halibut Alaskan . 1 whenever ) 1 )( 1 ( 1 ) 1 ( 1 1 ) 1 ( at point fixed attracting globally a

  • n

persists stock The . 1 when depleted is stock The . 1 1 where , ) 1 ( 1 ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) ( = + − − < − − − − − − + − = ∞ + − − > > + −       − + + − − = α α β α α α α β α m m a m a a m a x m m a m x a m x a x f

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Allee Effect (Critical Depensation) in Real Populations

Stoner and Ray-Culp showed evidence of the Allee

effect in natural populations of the Caribbean queen conch Strombus gigas, a large motile gastropod that supports one of the most important marine fisheries in the Caribbean region.

There is experimental evidence of the Allee effect in

urchins.

In fisheries systems, the Allee mechanism is

relevant to issues of species extinction, conservation, fisheries management and stock rehabilitation.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Strong Allee Effect

). , (min

  • f

subset a

  • n

uniformly persists stock the and ), min , [ in all for ) ( lim such that , min level stock positive critical a exists there if effect Allee strong a has stock exploited The ∞ ∞ ∞ = ∞ → ∞ x x x x t f t x

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Compensatory Dynamics and CPP With Strong Allee Effect (critically depensatory net growth function)

. 1 lim that so decreases then and 1, n bigger tha is that value positive maximum a to zero from increases that map hump

  • ne

smooth a is ) , [ ) , [ : that assume we present, is effect Allee When the < ∞ → ∞ → ∞ g(x) x g

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Compensatory Dynamics and CPP With Strong Allee Effect (Continued)

Modified Beverton-Holt Model:

β β α α β β α α β α β α 2 2 ) 1 ( 4 2 ) 1 )( 1 ( 1 ) 1 )( 1 ( 1 2 2 ) 1 ( 4 2 ) 1 )( 1 ( 1 ) 1 )( 1 ( 1 min . 2 ) 1 )( 1 ( 1 ) 1 ( , 2 2 ) 1 ( 1 ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) ( a m a m a x and a m a m a x Then m a a where x a x a m x a x f − −       − − − + − − − = ∞ − −       − − − − − − − = ∞ > − − − −         − + − + − − =

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Modified Beverton-Holt Model and CPP

. 2 ) ) 1 (( 1 ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) , ( : n bifurcatio fold the exhibits x a x a m x a x a f Theorem         − + − + − − = β α

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Compensatory Dynamics and CPP (Continued)

Under compensatory dynamics and CPP, the stock size exhibits a discontinuity at a=acr when the strong Allee effect is present. The stock size suddenly jumps to zero as a exceeds acr.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Overcompensatory Dynamics and CPP

Ricker Model:

(salmon) 2 . , ) ( ) 1 ( 1 ) ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( =       − − + − − = + m t x a r e m t x a t x

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Ricker Model and CPP Without Allee Effect

Under overcompensatory dynamics via the Ricker model (no Allee effect) and CPP, the stock size decreases smoothly to zero with increasing levels

  • f harvesting.
  • Period-doubling reversals
  • L. Stone, Nature 1993.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Modified Ricker Model With Allee Effect and CPP

. ) 1 ( ) 1 ( 1 ) 1 ( ) , ( : n bifurcatio fold the exhibits x a r xe a m x a x a f Theorem       − − − + − − =

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Allee Effect and CPP

Under CPP, the Allee mechanism generates a sudden discontinuity at a=acr, with the stock size suddenly jumping to zero as a approaches the critical value (fold bifurcation), when the stock dynamics is either compensatory or overcompensatory.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Stock Dynamics and Periodic Proportion Policy(PPP)

( )

). ( ) ( , ) ) ( 1 (( ) 1 ( )) ( 1 ( ) , ( )), ( ) ( ( t a k t a where x t a g m x t a x t f that so t F k t F mortality fishing periodic k a assume We = + − + − − = = + −

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Compensatory Dynamics and PPP

( )

. 01 , 05 ker : Proof increasing 1 1 1 1 2 1 : )

  • n (JDEA'

shing-Hens sult of Cu

  • f the re

extension a period-k ) (JDEA' di-Sac lt of Elay neral resu Use the ge ivides k. where r d e r-cycle, ally stabl asymptotic bally bits a glo sting exhi

  • d-k harve

under peri n populatio the stock a(j). Then k) a(j ), where , s in ( ry dynamic compensato der

  • wn map un

concave d be an ) a(j))x g(( m) ( a(j))x ( (x) j f }, let ,...,k- , , { For each j Theorem = + ∞ − + − − = ∈

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Beverton-Holt Model (Without Allee effect) and PPP

. le k-cycle cally stab asymptoti a globally s ng exhibit k harvesti er period- lation und stock popu , the a(j). Then k) and a(j , β α m j a where , x a(j) β( α m) ( a(j))x ( (x) j f }, let ,...k , , { For each j Corollary = + > > + − −       − + + − − = − ∈ 1 ) 1 ))( ( 1 ( ) 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 :

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Compensatory Dynamics, Strong Allee Effect and PPP

( )

divides k. ),where r , x in cle itive r-cy stable pos totically ally asymp and a glob s; zero attractor two exhibits harvesting k riod k under pe , the stoc a(j). Then k) a(j ), and , x s in [ ry dynamic compensato der

  • wn map un

concave d is an j e f fect, wher e Allee ef exhibit th a(j))x) g(( m a(j))x ( (x) j f }, let ,...,k , { For each j Theorem: ∞ ∞ − = + ∞ ∞ − + − − = − ∈ (min coexisting min increasing 1 1 1 1 2 1

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Modified Beverton-Holt Model, Strong Allee Effect and PPP

( )

ct). Allee effe k-cycle ( e positive ally stabl asymptotic an zero and ttractors; existing a has two co ng k harvesti er period- lation und stock popu Then, the a(j). k) and a(j β

  • m)
  • a(j))(
  • (
  • a(j))

α( where , a(j))x ( β a(j))x α( m a(j))x ( (x) j f }, let ,...,k , , { For each j Corollary: 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 = + >         − + − + − − = − ∈

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Overcompensatory Dynamics and PPP

Ricker Model and PPP As in the case of CPP,

under PPP and no Allee effects the stock size exhibits the “bubble” bifurcation as it decreases smoothly to zero. *Attractors in periodic environments (S. M. Henson,

  • J. M. Cushing et al., Bull.
  • Math. Biol. 1999, and J.

Franke and J. Selgrade, JMAA 2003).

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Overcompensatory Dynamics, Allee Effect and PPP

Under PPP and overcompensatory dynamics, low population sizes lead to the extinction of the stock, whenever the strong Allee effect

  • ccurs during each pulse fishing

season.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Modified Ricker Model With Allee Effect and PPP

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Halibut Data

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Pacific Halibut

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Parameter Estimation

0.15. m and y(t)

  • x(t)

s(t) to )))} ( ( 1 )( ( ) 1 ( { 32 1 MSE

2 2007 1975

= = + − − + =

subject t s g m t s t x Minimize

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Parameter Estimation: Continued

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Pacific Halibut & Modified Ricker Model

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Future Of Pacific Halibut (a=0.1277)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Halibut Under Period-2 Harvest

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Halibut Under High Constant Fishing Pressure

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Question

What are the interactions between climate change, Allee effect and persistence of exploited species?

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Stochastic Model

(Random Environment and Fisheries)

( ) ( )

m t x t a Model d random distribute mean ) be a , (t)~U( ) 1 ) ( )) ( 1 ( ) 1 : var " 1 1 + − − = + + − ζ σ σ ζ t x t a g t t x Stochastic iable. uniformly spread preserving Let ) ( )) ( 1 (( ) ( ( " − −

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Unstructured Populations In Random Environments

( ) { }

term.

  • long

in the abundances low reaching

  • f

y probabilit low a has population the If 1. y probabilit th extinct wi goes population the . (1),0) G( ln xpected etc (1988) Hardin (1984), Ellner (1982), Chesson * Theorem Ergodic Birkhoff * (1969) Cohen and Lewinton * ))) ( )) ( 1 (( ) 1 ))( ( 1 ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ) ( ) 1 ( > < Ε = − + − − = = + γ γ ζ γ ζ ζ ζ If Let et al t x t a g t m t a t x t G where t x t G t x t x

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Uncertainty and Allee Effect

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Uncertainty and Allee Effect

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Stochastic Model Predictions

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Stochastic Model Extinctions

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Cod Data From Georges Bank

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Modified Ricker Cod Model

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Cod’s Future & Fishing Pressure

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Optimal CPP and PPP

At time t, industry revenue is where p>0 is the dockside (or ex-vessel) price per unit for y(t), c>0 is the unit cost for fishing effort, q= “catchability coefficient”, and b, d >0 are the elasticities of harvest.

d b t x q t a c By effort fishing

  • f

amount t E t x t pa t py t R 1 1 )) ( ( ) ( cE(t) C(t) is equation cost function, production Douglas

  • Cobb

) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (         − = = = = =

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Optimal PPP and CPP

( )

  • unt term.

is a disc δ and unt factor is a disco is given x and t a where t x t a g m t x t a t x to subject d b t x q t a c t x t pa t t Maximize t a ll and CPP wi PPP

  • ptimal

The d b t x q t a c t x t pa t x is function revenue Net 1 1 . ) ( 1 ) ( )) ( )) ( 1 (( ) 1 ( ) ( )) ( 1 ( ) 1 ( 1 1 )) ( ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )} ( { 1 1 )) ( ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )) ( ( > + = > < ≤ − + − − = +                     − − ∑ ∞ = = Π         − − = Π δ ρ ρ

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Data

Table 1. Important species landed or raised in the Northeast, their landings, L ( thousand mt), ex-vessel revenue, R ( $, millions), and prices,P ( $ per lb), 1995-1999 Year L R P L R P L R P L R P L R P American lobster Sea scallops Blue crab Atlantic salmon2 Goosefish 1995 31.8 215 3.06 8 91.1 5.16 56.7 101 0.81 10 56.7 2.56 25.1 36.1 0.65 1996 32.5 243 3.39 7.9 98.2 5.64 37.7 64.3 0.77 10 46.2 2.1 25.3 32.3 0.58 1997 37.5 272 3.29 6.3 90.5 6.56 45.3 82.7 0.83 12.2 49.5 1.84 28.3 35.2 0.56 1998 36.3 255 3.19 5.6 76 6.19 39.1 90.1 1.05 13.1 60.4 2.09 26.7 33.9 0.58 1999 39.7 323 3.69 10.1 123 5.5 39 80.6 0.94 12.2 58.2 2.16 25.2 47 0.85 Hard Clam Surf clam Menhadin Squid Loligo Cod 1995 4.2 42.1 4.5 30.1 47.1 0.71 345 45.7 0.06 18.5 23.8 0.58 13.7 28.6 0.95 1996 3.2 35.1 4.94 28.8 42.6 0.67 283 37.9 0.06 12.5 18.6 0.68 14.3 26.7 0.85 1997 4.4 44.5 4.62 26.3 38.9 0.67 247 33.8 0.06 16.2 26.5 0.74 13 24.6 0.86 1998 3.6 41.2 5.2 24.5 33 0.61 249 44.4 0.08 19.2 32.7 0.77 11.1 25.5 1.04 1999 3.5 40.7 5.25 26.7 34.1 0.58 189 33.2 0.08 18.8 32.2 0.78 9.7 23.9 1.11

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Conclusion

  • Constant exploitations diminish stocks while preserving compensatory

dynamics.

  • Periodic and constant exploitations simplify complex overcompensatory

stock dynamics with or without the Allee effect.

  • In the absence of the Allee effect, stock size decreases smoothly to zero

with increasing levels of constant or periodic fishing pressure.

  • Constant and periodic exploitations force sudden decline in fisheries

systems that show evidence of the Allee mechanism.

  • The probability of extinction increases with large enough variance in the

climate variable.

  • Optimal control techniques for discrete-time models with exploitation.
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Thank You.