Impact of Geothermic Well Temperatures and Residence Time on the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

impact of geothermic well temperatures and residence time
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Impact of Geothermic Well Temperatures and Residence Time on the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Colorado School of Mines, Colorado Energy Research Institute, 30 th Oil Shale Symposium 7.1 In Situ Process Modeling Impact of Geothermic Well Temperatures and Residence Time on the In-situ Production of Hydrocarbon Gases from Green River


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Impact of Geothermic Well Temperatures and Residence Time on the In-situ Production of Hydrocarbon Gases from Green River Formation Oil Shale

1

Mark White*, Larry Chick, Gary McVay

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory mark.white@pnl.gov

Colorado School of Mines, Colorado Energy Research Institute, 30th Oil Shale Symposium 7.1 In Situ Process Modeling

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Environmental Stewardship

  • Radionuclide migration and remediation
  • Nuclear waste tank leakage
  • Vegetated surface barrier design
  • Freeze-wall technology

Environmental Remediation

  • Carbon tetrachloride in deep vadose zone environment
  • Trichloroethylene in arid climate
  • Petrol-processing waste in shallow water table environment

Geologic CO2 Sequestration

  • Deep sedimentary saline formations
  • Deep basaltic saline formations
  • Methane hydrate formations with co-production

Hydrocarbon Production

  • Alaska Northslope gas hydrate accumulations
  • Suboceanic gas hydrate accumulations
  • Piceance Basin oil shale
  • Enhanced oil recovery technologies

Subsurface Simulation PNNL

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases

Operational Modes

  • STOMP-W, -WA, WAE -- Water-Air-Energy Operational Modes
  • STOMP-WO, -WOA, WOAE -- Water-Oil-Air-Energy Operational Modes
  • STOMP-WS, -WSA, WSAE -- Water-Salt-Air-Energy Operational Modes
  • STOMP-WCS, -WCSE -- Water-CO2-Salt-Energy Operational Modes
  • STOMP-WCMSE -- Water-CO2-CH4-Salt-Energy Operational Modes

Implementations

  • Sequential (Fortran 90)
  • Scalable (Fortran 90/Global Arrays/PETSc)

Licensing and Quality Assurance

  • Academic, U.S. Gov., Foreign Gov., Industrial
  • Documentation (Guides, Website, Publications)
  • Short Courses (University Sponsored)
  • DOE Order 414.1C (System Safety Software)

Future

  • Geologic CO2 sequestration
  • Hydrocarbon production
  • Petascale computing and beyond

STOMP Overview

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 500-ft kerogen-rich interval

above the water table

  • Fischer-Assay of 19 gal/ton
  • Geothermic well temperatures of

450˚, 550˚, and 650˚ C

  • Geothermic well power density of

2 kW/m

  • Hexagonal pattern spacings of

45 ft, 10 m, and 5 m.

  • Intrinsic porosity 0.22
  • Intrinsic permeability 1 darcy
  • Induced fracture density 0.05
  • Matrix compressibility 1.e-9 Pa-1
  • Maximum induced fracture

porosity 0.10

Problem Description

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Conservation equations
  • Thermal energy (temperature)
  • Heavy oil (HO volu. molar density)
  • Light oil (LO volu. molar density)
  • Hydrocarbon gas (CHx volu. molar density)
  • Methane (CH4 volu. molar density)
  • Phases
  • Nonaqueous phase liquid (mobile-compositional)
  • Gas (mobile-compositional)
  • Kerogen (immobile-single component)
  • Coke (immobile-single component)
  • Char (immobile-single component)
  • Constitutive equations
  • Physical properties
  • Chemical reactions
  • Phase equilibrium
  • Transport properties
  • Fracture model

Newton-Raphson Iteration Molar Density Equilibrium to Eliminate Primary Variable Switching (system pressure)

Mathematical Model

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Heat transport by advection, gaseous diffusion/dispersion, phase

transformations, component appearance and disappearance, heat of kerogen dissociation, but ignoring oil cracking heat of reaction.

  • Darcian advection
  • Fickian advection

Algebraic form

Conservation of Energy

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Model #1
  • Thermal energy, Oil, H2, CO, CO2, CH4, C2Hx, C3Hx
  • Campbell et al. (1980a, 1980b) reaction network
  • Kerogen pyrolysis only, no oil cracking reactions
  • Simulations yielded high residual NAPL saturations
  • Model #2
  • Thermal energy, C50Hx, C30Hx, C18Hx, C12Hx, C8Hx, C3Hx, CH4, H2, CO2
  • Fan et al. (2009) reaction network
  • Simulations yielded oil production lower than consistent for Green

River Formation oil shales with Type 1 kerogens

  • Model #3
  • Thermal energy, Heavy Oil, Light Oil, Hydrocarbon Gas, Methane
  • Modified Braun and Burnham (1993) reaction network
  • Kerogen pyrolysis and oil cracking reactions
  • Producing coke and char
  • Oil production consistent with Type 1 kerogens

Model Development

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Peng-Robinson cubic equation of state
  • Modified version of Michelsen’s (1985) flash procedure
  • No binary interaction terms
  • Temperature dependent pure component parameters
  • Fugacity coefficients functions of phase composition, pressure

and temperature

  • Michelsen’s scheme requires solution of three independent

variables:

  • Modified scheme yielded increased stability and more rapid

convergence by adding two equations:

Phase Equilibria

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Matrix Permeability
  • Induced Fracture Permeability
  • Dual-Continuum Permeability

Rock Permeability

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Gas Relative Permeability
  • Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Relative Permeability

Phase Relative Permeability

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Linear combination of Arrhenius reaction rate equations

Chemical Reaction Model

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Chemical Reactions and Component Species
  • 7 chemical species, 4 reactions (13 species, 10 reactions)
  • No H2O, H2, CO2, CO
  • Water vaporization ignored
  • Geomechanics
  • Empirical model that allowed fracture aperture to increase with

pore pressure

  • Fracture permeability dependent on fracture aperture, absolute

fracture roughness, and fracture density

  • Hydrologic Properties
  • Empirical model of matrix permeability as a function of kerogen,

char, and coke saturations

  • Matrix and fracture moisture retention characteristics
  • Symmetry and Boundary Effects
  • Two-dimensional horizontal domain ignores end effects
  • Symmetry assumption requires active adjacent hexaagons

Approximations and Assumptions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

45-ft Hex 650˚C Geothermic Well

slide-14
SLIDE 14

45-ft Hex 650˚C Geothermic Well

slide-15
SLIDE 15

45-ft Hex 550˚C Geothermic Well

slide-16
SLIDE 16

45-ft Hex 450˚C Geothermic Well

slide-17
SLIDE 17

10-m Hex 650˚C Geothermic Well

slide-18
SLIDE 18

10-m Hex 650˚C Geothermic Well

slide-19
SLIDE 19

10-m Hex 550˚C Geothermic Well

slide-20
SLIDE 20

10-m Hex 450˚C Geothermic Well

slide-21
SLIDE 21

1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years

Temperature, color scaled from 40˚ to 440˚C

10-m Hex 450˚C Geothermic Well

slide-22
SLIDE 22

1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years

Kerogen saturation, colored scaled from 0.0 to 1.0

10-m Hex 450˚C Geothermic Well

slide-23
SLIDE 23

1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years

Liquid oil saturation, color scaled from 0.0 to 1.0

10-m Hex 450˚C Geothermic Well

slide-24
SLIDE 24

1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years

Coke saturation, color scaled from 0.0 to 1.0

10-m Hex 450˚C Geothermic Well

slide-25
SLIDE 25

5-m Hex 450˚C Geothermic Well

slide-26
SLIDE 26

5-m Hex 450˚C Geothermic Well

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Geothermic Well Power

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Reaction networks that only consider the primary

kerogen decomposition process will yield residual liquid

  • il in the formation, which is not consistent with

laboratory or field observations.

  • Char and coke formation are important pore filling

processes that are required for accurate calculation of pore pressure and fluid expulsion.

  • Oil and gas recovery predictions are strongly dependent
  • n the accuracy and appropriateness of the chemical

reaction network, stoichiometry, and kinetics.

Conclusions Reaction Networks

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Oil production in terms of percent of Fischer Assay is

strongly related to formation temperatures and residence time; where higher temperatures and longer residence times lower oil production, but favor gas production.

  • The production period is strongly related to geothermic

well spacing, where larger spacings yield longer production periods.

  • Temperature limits on the geothermic wells cause the

power required for these wells to decline during production.

Conclusions Numerical Simulations

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Maximum heater well temperature of 450˚C
  • 16 electric heaters in concentric patterns
  • Outer hexagon spacing of 19.5 ft
  • Intermediate hexagon spacing of 14.0 ft (rotated 90˚)
  • Inner diamond spacing of 8.5 ft
  • 113-ft heated interval between 280 to 393 ft bgs
  • 540-day experimental period
  • 1806 barrels of liquid oil recovered
  • 861 additional BOE of gas recovered
  • 2 simulations with STOMP-OS
  • 20 gal/ton Fischer Assay oil shale
  • 12 gal/ton Fischer Assay oil shale
  • Modified Braun and Burnham (1993) reaction network

Shell Oil Field Experiment MDP[s]

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Temperature, color scaled from 40˚ to 440˚C

MDP[s] Calibration Study (12 gal/ton FA)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Kerogen saturation, color scaled from 0.0 to 1.0

MDP[s] Calibration Study (12 gal/ton FA)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Liquid-oil saturation, color scaled from 0.0 to 1.0

MDP[s] Calibration Study (12 gal/ton FA)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Coke saturation, color scaled from 0.0 to 1.0

MDP[s] Calibration Study (12 gal/ton FA)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Shell Oil MDP[s] Calibration Study