Seattle Regional Training September 24, 25, 2009
Identifying and Developing Charities Cases
National State Attorneys General Program Charities Oversight and Regulation Project
Identifying and Developing Charities Cases Identify sources of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
National State Attorneys General Program Charities Oversight and Regulation Project Seattle Regional Training September 24, 25, 2009 Identifying and Developing Charities Cases Identify sources of charity cases Case
Seattle Regional Training September 24, 25, 2009
National State Attorneys General Program Charities Oversight and Regulation Project
Identify sources of charity cases Case Selection—Criteria Anatomy of an Investigation Subpoena/Civil Investigative Demands
What to Request
Investigators Role What if I Have No Investigator? Using an Organizations Own Filings
Registrations, Forms 990, Financial Statements, Management Letters, etc.
Identifying Violations of the Law
Using the IRS Form 990 to Find Violations of State
Multi-State Enforcement Actions
“Insiders” often refer or report matters:
anonymous complaints
consumer complaints about solicitation
Government Agency Referrals Referrals from law enforcement agencies
Mail drops Obtain a P.O. Box and donate through the P.O.
Old lady mail collectors Dummy phone lines, telemarketing calls
Ask your colleagues to collect their direct mail
Local BBB Offices can make referrals Reach out and establish a relationship with your
Leverage technology
Monitoring of the FTC’s charity2 listserve for
Those charities or solicitors are likely active in
The listserve also generates “multistate”
Paul Luehr presented “Beyond Google: Internet
Copies of his Powerpoint and Favorite
The charity’s own documents can often be used
The charity’s own documents can often be used
Auditors have traditionally provided their clients
This “letter” is written to management and the board
In the past, the letter was largely voluntarily and
Beginning with 2006 (applicable to years on or
internal control related matters identified in an audit SAS N0. 112 issued in 2006. Turned out to be overly complex in its
SAS No. 115 issued in 2008 (applicable to years ending on or after December 15, 2009). It keeps much of SAS No. 112, but simplifies the
Must be provided within 60 days after issuance of the auditor’s opinion
Auditors must disclose deficiencies in internal controls that they encounter during the audit which are either
Material weaknesses Significant deficiencies
Critical point:
to look for or find control deficiencies as an end in and of itself But in the course of performing the audit, the auditor is required to examine, test, and document internal controls as necessary in the auditor’s professional judgment to permit the auditor to identify and address audit risk and satisfy the auditing standards. So the auditor inevitably will find internal control issues; perhaps minor, or conceivably major
The auditor must provide a letter identifying significant weaknesses and material deficiencies detected during the audit process
Can provide a letter indicating that no material weaknesses
came to the auditor’s attention if there were no material weaknesses identified
Cannot provide a letter indicating that no significant
deficiencies were uncovered even if none were uncovered. As the audit process is not designed to look for this, it is possible that significant deficiencies do exist
Minutes should:
Minutes As a Tool:
Prepare:
A table of the attendance record of each director A table of employees who attended each meeting A List who attended, the date and time of the meeting A chronological list of financial decisions considered A list of new programs and services Describe the actions taken at each meeting and votes for and against them and major thread of discussion Describe committee reports to the board. Describe other business List all conflicts discussed.
No or poorly maintained minutes have
No body is related.
Not married but same names??
1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 2 STATE OF HAWAII 3 IN RE INVESTIGATION OF: ) AG Subpoena No. ) 2009-028 4 Animal CARE Foundation ) ) 5 ) ) 6 ___________________________ ) 7 8 9 10 11 12 EXAMINATION UNDER OATH OF SABINA DE GIACOMO 13 Taken on behalf of the Attorney General's Office at 14 the offices of Department of the Attorney General, 425 15 Queen Street, Honolulu, Hawaii, commencing at 9:57 16 a.m. on May 29, 2009, pursuant to Notice. 17 18 19
19 Q. Do you reside with Frank De Giacomo? 20 A. He lives in the house. 21 Q. Are you married to him? 22 A. It's somebody's definition. Legally the 23 paperwork has not been changed to a divorce. 24 Q. So you obtained a wedding license? 25 A. Yes.
13 Q. Did either of you petition the court for a 14 legal separation? 15 A. Not on paper. 16 Q. Okay. So then you're not legally separated. 17 A. Okay. 18 Q. You are currently married. If neither of you 19 has petitioned or received a separation from the 20 court, you remain legally married. 21 A. Okay.
No Management expenses?
It turns out that the Animal Care Foundation did
The Foundation failed to list its officers and
The Foundation failed to report the sale of
Private Foundation returns are filed with the
Treasury Reg. Sec. 1.6033-3(c)
Note the zeros and the handwriting. Suspicious? Nothing entered
Red Flag
But so underpaid.
I’m Sure the Supporting Schedules Explain Everything!
In this case, the $35,000 in “occupancy” expenses were for a luxury condominium in the Ilikai Hotel for the President of the organization. Note the travel expenses too. Who lived here and traveled?
Pick a good “poster child” case.
Good publicity generates new referrals and