IANA Stewardship Transition Number community component By: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

iana stewardship transition number community component
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

IANA Stewardship Transition Number community component By: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IANA Stewardship Transition Number community component By: Mwendwa Kivuva Ernest Byaruhanga Janvier Ngnoulaye Date: 4 December 2015 The community process CRISP Team AFRINIC APNIC RIPE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

IANA 
 Stewardship Transition
 Number 
 community component

By: Mwendwa Kivuva Ernest Byaruhanga Janvier Ngnoulaye

  • Date: 4 December 2015
slide-2
SLIDE 2

The community process – CRISP Team

  • APNIC ¡

RIPE ¡ ARIN ¡ AFRINIC ¡ LACNIC ¡

  • ­‑Janvier ¡

Ngnoulaye ¡

  • ­‑Mwendwa ¡

Kivuva ¡

  • ­‑Ernest ¡

Byaruhanga ¡

  • ­‑Esteban ¡

Lescano ¡

  • ­‑Nico ¡

Scheper ¡

  • ­‑Andres ¡

Piazza ¡

  • ­‑Bill ¡

Woodcock ¡

  • ­‑John ¡

Swee<ng ¡

  • ­‑Michael ¡

Abejuela ¡

  • ­‑Dr. ¡Govind ¡
  • ­‑Izumi ¡

Okutani ¡

  • ­‑Craig ¡Ng ¡
  • ­‑Andrei ¡

Robachevsky ¡

  • ­‑Nurani ¡

Nimpuno ¡

  • ­‑Paul ¡

Rendek ¡

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CRISP TEAM COMMITMENT

  • Committed to the success of this transition
  • Transparency throughout the discussion

process,

  • Respect principles in the CRISP proposal:

separation of policy dev and operational roles; description of services provided to RIRs; transparent and accountable reporting by IFO; security, performance & audit requirements; Review of IANA operations; failure to perform; term of contract; continuity of operations; IPR; dispute resolution; cost based fee

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Number function in the Combined proposal

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CRISP work post submission

  • Present, effectively communicate and vouch for

proposal, e.g. Improved CRISP website

  • Ensure proposal integrity: IPR, Termination

clause, SLA, Review committee

  • Actively participate in overall IANA stewardship

transition process, Representing the Numbers proposal, Coordination with other communities, Ensuring we meet transition timelines

slide-6
SLIDE 6

TIMELINE

  • Sep 2015: IANA Functions contract extended by
  • ne year
  • Oct 2015: ICG has completed combined

proposal

  • January 2016: CCWG Accountability expected to

completes its work

  • Submission of ICG and CCWG Accountability

reports to NTIA by ICANN board

  • September 2016: Expiry of IANA Functions

contract

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Where are we?

  • The Names portion of this proposal is

conditioned on ICANN-level accountability mechanisms currently under development in the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG). The Numbers and Protocol Parameters portions of the proposal are complete, ready for implementation, and have no dependencies on the work of the CCWG or other remaining processes.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Number Proposal components

  • IANA function stability & reliability: ICANN to

continue as the IANA Numbering Services Operator

  • SLA – last draft review: Replace role of NTIA

with the RIRs

  • Review Committee – formation of RC
  • IPR – cross community negotiations
slide-9
SLIDE 9

To-do

  • Intellectual Property Rights

– We want IPR framework finalized before submission to the NTIA – IANAPLAN has produced a high level description – CRISP has published its minimum requirements

The three communities are talking J J

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SLA

  • Termination clause: Either party can terminate

agreement

  • SLA development to take place in public
  • Final public call for comments
slide-11
SLIDE 11

REVIEW COMMITTEE CHARTER – DELIVERABLE At AFRINIC

  • Internet Number Community – IANA Numbering

Services Review Committee Charter in place

  • https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Review-

Committee-Charter_FINALclean.pdf

slide-12
SLIDE 12

REVIEW COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS

  • Advise and assist NRO EC in its periodic review
  • f the service level of the IANA Numbering

Services provided to the Internet Number Community.

  • Report to the NRO EC concerns regarding the

performance of the IANA Numbering Services Operator, including any observed failure or near failure by the IANA Numbering Services Operator to meet its obligations under the SLA

  • Submit report to the NRO EC once per year
slide-13
SLIDE 13

RC limitations

  • The Review Committee does not have any

power to commit the NRO EC to any recommendation or decision made by it, except where and to the extent that it has express delegated authority from the NRO EC

slide-14
SLIDE 14

RC Composition

  • 15 members total
  • two community appointees – Not staff
  • one RIR staff from each region – non voting
  • RIRs to appoint RC members by methods of

their own choosing.

  • RIRs shall determine the term of appointment for

its RC members.

  • Each RIR may, from time to time, remove and/or

replace any of its appointed RC members

slide-15
SLIDE 15

RC Proceedings

  • Meet entirely via teleconference
  • Meetings must be held at least twice each year,

and more often as required

  • RC final report and/or recommendation to the

NRO EC, it must first consult and seek the feedback and comment from the Internet Number Community

slide-16
SLIDE 16

RC members, which direction AFRINIC? Recommendations

  • Community input: AFRINIC ASO-AC members
  • Board decision: SGM

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

  • Term limits of RC members
  • RC’s mandate to start after transition
slide-17
SLIDE 17

References

  • CRISP Team: https://www.nro.net/crisp-team
  • Numbers Community IANA Proposal: http://

www.nro.net/crisp-final-proposal

  • FAQ: http://www.nro.net/crisp-proposal-faq
  • IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination

Group (ICG): http://www.ianacg.org

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Thank you for your Attention

  • Questions?

afrinic
 afrinic
 afrinic afrinic afrinic afrinic

  • media

.net twitter.com/
 flickr.com/ facebook.com/
 linkedin.com/company/
 youtube.com/
 www.