HSE Interventions Priority Risks & HSE Strategy ....influence - PDF document

‘HSE Interventions Priority Risks’ &

HSE Strategy ‘………..…..influence organisations to embrace high standards of health and safety……………….’; ‘……………work with business to prevent catastrophic failures’ Bill Callaghan – Former Chairman HSC

E e s So What are HSE’s Priorities S a H c h – c Case Studies: e a r e e • …………2 men were killed in a plant bread oven on cup final day 2002…………overcome h n by heat exhaustion the men were essentially cooked because appropriate safeguards t i associated with confined space work including the use of a permit to work were not s n e followed o u i t l c c • …………a contractor received serious head injuries and has ongoing brain damage as a a o result of an explosion in a sugar refining plant………another contractor was carrying out k w unauthorised and uncontrolled hot work on another part of the plant…… o t o r t • …………………an engineer died trying to realign the belt of a spiral cooler while the belt o d while it was in motion………..the crow bar he was using to leverage the belt slipped causing e n n him to fall backwards striking his head on the ground causing fatal head injuries……… a O d • ………………..a hygiene operative received serious pelvic injuries when he was crushed e v between the body of a dough mixer and its fixed support frame when cleaning a blockage in l a drain within the mixer enclosure……………….the mixer man initiated rotation of the o mixer not realising the other party was in the enclosure. v n i

‘This is best practice – send us a copy of your next HSE Visits to Allied Bakeries audit so that I can share with XYZ Company’ • Specific review of Isolation/Lock Off, Permits to Work, Statutory Inspections & Contractor Control • 4 of the 6 core topics covered by Priority Risk Audits in AB • Audit is against AB standards which include guidance/training/competency tests & records/ appointment of duty holders/monitoring arrangements for each topic

Audits Results ( Compliance Critical Issues ) Permit to Work CDF GTS GLA LIV ORP STV STP STK WAL W.BR 2 Risk Assessments available 24 24 24 18 15 24 18 9 15 24 30 30 30 27 27 30 21 18 24 30 3 Permits used on every occasion where required 5 Training Records are in place and current 15 30 30 27 21 27 24 27 21 9 24 30 30 27 21 30 21 18 27 30 6 Permits issued as per standard 14 Permits kept for 2 years (30 30 30 30 27 24 30 30 30 24 30 8 Permits fully completed (20 20 16 20 20 10 20 20 18 16 20 Isolation & Lock-off CDF GTS GLA LIV ORP STV STP STK WAL W.BR 2 Current Risk Assessments available 30 21 30 24 15 27 18 9 18 15 5 Isolation used in conjunction with PTW 30 30 30 30 30 27 30 30 24 30 3 Trained Person's Register 18 16 20 20 14 20 20 18 18 0 4 Training Records 10 20 20 20 14 18 20 18 14 0 16 20 20 20 20 20 14 20 18 20 9 Suitable means of isolation on all equipment Statutory Inspections CDF GTS GLA LIV ORP STV STP STK WAL W.BR 2 Written schemes are in place for all Pressure System 30 30 30 24 30 27 30 30 27 27 3 Schedule in place for all Lifting Systems 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 16 20 18 4 Schedule in place for all LEV 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 18 18 30 30 30 30 24 30 30 30 27 27 5 All Items inspected to the required frequency 7 All appropriate records maintained 30 24 30 30 24 24 27 30 21 30

Audit results collated centrally

Audit results collated centrally Priority Risk Audits (Quarterly) As at 8/08 90% or above 80 to 89% 79% or below Total % - Compliance Cdf Gts Gla Liv Orp Stv Stp Stk Wal W.Br ABGB Critical Questions 86.1% P er mit to Wor k 89% 93% 98% 86% 88% 96% 88% 78% 83% 62% 87.8% Isolation & Lock-off 88% 88% 100% 95% 89% 95% 90% 84% 86% 63% Statutory Inspections 95% 95% 100% 95% 93% 100% 100% 92% 84% 100% 95.5% 95.7% P owered Trucks 99% 93% 100% 94% 98% 96% 89% 100% 88% 100% 89.9% Contr actor Management 90% 88% 100% 94% 88% 99% 96% 87% 88% 70% F lour Deliver ies. 100% 93% 100% 95% 84% 88% 91% 89% 87% 98% 92.4% 89.0% Logistics Activities 83% 89% 95% 84% 91% 88% 84% 93% 86% 98% 90.9% Compliance Index Number 92.1 91.4 98.9 91.7 90.1 94.7 91.0 89.0 86.0 84.3

Site benchmarking - Compliance Index Number (Average Score) - the KPI Priority Issues Audits Compliance Index Number 94.8 100 91.4 90.4 88.6 87.0 86.5 86.5 86.3 84.8 90 78.0 77.1 80 70 60 50 . w s e v m e h l t n f o r e g f k t o A o o t o i l o a d o a t g a p r n p B t g s r B G W r S k a a e n e G c v C l t i v B o s G p e i t e t r L A S S W O

Priority Risk Audit Ratings Priority Risk Audit Ratings - Compliance Rating Priority Risk Audit Ratings - Compliance Rating Compliance Index - Critical Risks - June 09 Priority Risk Audit Ratings - Compliance Rating December 2007 March 2008 94.8 98.9 98.5 95.6 95.2 95.1 94.1 93.8 93.4 92.7 92.1 100 Priority Risk Audit Ratings - Compliance Rating J une 2008 91.4 97.2 90.4 90.8 100 88.6 99.2 89 94 87.0 100 86.5 86.5 86.3 92.3 92.1 September 2008 84.8 90.9 100 90 94.4 89.2 89.1 88.7 90 92.3 92 86.5 90 110 90.8 90.7 90.6 78.0 90.1 77.1 84.6 80 87.6 86.9 80 98.9 90 70 100 94.7 76.2 80 92.1 91.7 91.4 91 90.9 60 90.1 70 89 76.5 80 86 50 90 84.3 70 60 40 70 80 30 60 50 20 70 60 10 50 Glasgow ABGB Av. Gates Stevenage Walth Liverpool kport West Brom Stoke Orpington Cardiff 0 60 50 Stoc Glasgow ABGB Av. Stevenage Gates Liverpool Stoke Walth West Brom Cardiff kport Orpington e f l w t e n o e m t s h f s g i r k g e o d o o t 50 a o a l o w o a t t a r p g e s n e e l h m f t p f g a o r r e Stoc k n a t g l f r g W t r s o o e o B t k i n o l S a e G a e C o e d t o a g a a n p c r e p r B g s t i n h s f r l v t v B e v w e G e r W m k f a o S p r g l a e t o n e o k t i A e G c g s o v e i l v o C o a l d i t r t L o t v t o a o a p a A s G e g e O p t r g r S p W r t i e t t n a B r G S e s k L n S B S W r B S O W e C e v a c i G v v G A p t l o s G e i B r B t L e S B O t S A W A G B A

Result • Traffic lights highlight non-compliances and drive priorities for actions • GM Accountability – 91% Compliance as an objective – red results in visit to head office – amber requires written explanation • Track continuous improvement • 18001 compatible • In house competition via league table • Positive response from HSE

Priority Risk Audits As at June 09

Scoring for Critical Questions – June 09 Green - 91% or above Amber - 85 to 90% Red - 84% or below Total % - Compliance Critical ABGB Questions Av. Card Gates Glas Lpool Orp Stev Stock Stoke Walth W.B. Belfast Permit to Work 93.0% 89.4% 94.1% 97.6% 90.0% 90.6% 86.5% 98.2% 98.2% 88.8% 89.4% 100.0% Isolation & Lock-off 91.9% 80.0% 92.5% 97.5% 90.0% 94.2% 91.7% 90.8% 100.0% 88.3% 92.5% 93.3% Statutory Inspections 97.7% 100.0% 97.7% 100.0% 100.0% 95.4% 100.0% 100.0% 96.9% 100.0% 92.3% 92.3% Fork Trucks / Pallet Trucks 95.8% 97.6% 96.5% 100.0% 86.5% 92.9% 100.0% 98.2% 100.0% 88.8% 95.9% 97.6% Contractor Management 92.0% 78.0% 92.5% 100.0% 85.5% 91.5% 91.5% 93.0% 99.0% 91.5% 96.5% 93.0% Flour Deliveries. 95.2% 100.0% 91.8% 100.0% 85.9% 96.5% 88.8% 94.7% 97.6% 91.8% 100.0% 100.0% Logistics Activities 93.1% 90.5% 91.8% 96.8% 85.3% 92.7% 90.5% 90.5% 97.4% 95.8% 100.0% 93.2% Compliance Index Number 94.1% 90.8% 93.8% 98.9% 89.0% 93.4% 92.7% 95.1% 98.5% 92.1% 95.2% 95.6%

Compliance Index Number Compliance Index - Critical Risks - June 09 98.9 98.5 95.6 95.2 95.1 94.1 93.8 93.4 92.7 92.1 90.8 89 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 e e l e t t s n h f w m o s r f g g k o e o t i o o a l d a o a t o p t a p g f a r g r r n t l k W a e r s e B S G n e e c v C a B i v v o p t A l s G e i t r L S e O B t S W G B A

ABGB Average - June 08 to June 09 94.3 94.1 91.8 90.9 90.6 100 90 80 70 Improving & Sustaining Performance 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Jun '08 Sept '08 Dec '08 Mar '09 Jun-09