How to get regulation right? Balancing growth, risk, and equity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how to get regulation right
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How to get regulation right? Balancing growth, risk, and equity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CEPR 10 Years After the Crisis How to get regulation right? Balancing growth, risk, and equity Catherine L. Mann OECD Chief Economist 22 September 2017 London OECD resilience framework: Potential trade-offs between growth and risk


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Catherine L. Mann

OECD Chief Economist 22 September 2017 London CEPR “10 Years After the Crisis”

How to get regulation right?

Balancing growth, risk, and equity

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

OECD resilience framework:

Potential trade-offs between growth and risk and, how do growth and risk interact with equity? Tail risk = the risk of an extreme negative growth shock

GDP-at-Risk = quantile of the GDP growth distribution

Extreme negative growth i.e. max GDP loss with 95% prob.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Financial regulation typically presents a trade-off between growth and risk

3

Note: The X axis plots the effect on fragility; Fragility is defined as higher likelihood of financial crises (polices with red outline) or a higher GDP (negative) tail risk. Three types of financial crises are considered: Currency, banking and twin crises. Tail risk is defined as the effect on the bottom 10% of the distribution for quarterly GDP growth. For each policy, the Y axis plots the average (overall) growth effect. Source: Authors’ calculation based on Caldera Sánchez and Gori and by Caldera Sánchez and Röhn.

Macro-prudential policies can reduce fragility, but may also lower growth Growth benefits from financial market liberalisation offset by higher crisis risk

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Too much, or the wrong kind of finance:

Negatively associated with growth and inequality

Increase in Gini coefficients due to higher credit

For 10% of GDP increase , Gini impact in percentage points

4

Note: The error bars show 90% confidence intervals. Source: Cournède and Denk (2015), “Finance and Economic Growth in OECD and G20 countries”.

  • 0.05

0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35

  • 0.05

0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 Bank credit Stockmarket capitalisation

Growth impact of higher credit

For 10% of GDP increase in credit or stock market capitalization, in percentage points

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 All bank credit to the non- financial private sector Household credit Deposit money bank credit Bond (and

  • ther non-

bank) credit Stockmarket capitalisation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Bank credit:

A suspect in raising economic insecurity

Change in labour earnings growth at different percentiles of the earnings growth distribution

In percentage points

5

Source: OECD estimations using harmonised household survey data from 29 countries

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 P1 P10 P20 P30 P40 P50 P60 P70 P80 P90 P99 Bank credit Bonds and other non-bank credit

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

How is finance and regulation failing to support strong, inclusive, resilient growth?

Implicit subsidies to TBTF institutions Wage premium in finance Lack of credit for dynamic firms Bank forbearance and zombies

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Too-Big-to-Fail Implicit Subsidies:

More negatively associated with growth

7

Implicit bank debt guarantees influence the relationship between bank credit and GDP growth

Percentage point change in real GDP per capita growth associated with an increase in bank credit by 10% of GDP Note: The figure shows econometric estimates of the association of an increase in bank credit with GDP growth, controlling for a wide range of factors. The point estimates are surrounded by 90% confidence intervals. Source: Schich, Cournède and Denk (2015), “Finance and Economic Growth in OECD and G20 countries”.

  • 0.4
  • 0.3
  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.1

  • 0.4
  • 0.3
  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.1 Countries where bank creditors have been shielded from losses Other countries

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Estimated financial-sector wage premium across the income distribution, European countries, %, 2010

8

Large wage premium in finance:

Adds to inequality

Note: Dotted lines show 90% confidence intervals. Source: Denk (2015), “Financial Sector Pay and Labour Income Inequality: Evidence from Europe

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Smaller growth company listings (IPOs) in advanced economies

9

Declining small growing company listings:

Part of decline in business dynamism

Source: OECD Business and Finance Scoreboard 2017

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 United States Advanced Europe Japan Number of issues

USD, billion

  • No. issues
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Zombie firms:

Associated with weak banks

10

Note: Panel A shows the average level of bank health across 11 European countries (Austria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Latvia,

Portugal, Slovenia Spain and the United Kingdom), weighted by the number of firms for which a bank is considered to be their main bank. Bank health is given by the first principal component (i.e. the one associated with the largest eigenvalue) from a principal component analysis of seven core balance sheet and financial statement variables of banks. Panel B shows the average zombie firm share for each bin of bank health, purged of country-industry- fixed effects. The relationship is statistically significant at the 1% level and is based on over 1.5 million firm-bank observations for 11 European countries

  • ver the period 2001-2014.

Source: Andrews, D. and F. Petroulakis (2017), “Breaking the Shackles: Zombie Firms, Weak Banks and Depressed Restructuring in Europe”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, forthcoming.

Average zombie firm share for each category of bank health

The

Bank health composite index

Less healthy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Zombies capture capital, reduce dynamism:

Turnaround positively associated with productivity

11

Capital sunk in zombie firms

Share of total capital stock, 2013

Note: Firms aged 10 years or more and with profits not covering interest payments over three consecutive years. The sample excludes firms that are larger than 100 times the 99th percentile of the size distribution in terms of capital stock or number of employees. RHS: Counterfactual gains to aggregate MFP from reducing zombie capital shares to industry best practice level. Source: LHS: Adalet McGowan, Andrews and Millot (2017), “The Walking Dead? Zombie Firms and Productivity Performance in OECD Countries”, OECD Economics Department working paper; and OECD calculations.

Productivity gains from reducing zombie capital

Gains to aggregate multi-factor productivity

slide-12
SLIDE 12

How to Get Regulation Right

12

Need to balance growth, risk and minimise trade-offs

  • Post-crisis overhaul of regulation has focussed mostly on risk
  • Other policies matter too

A well-developed and healthy financial system is needed

  • Reduce debt subsidies
  • Clean up remaining banking problems
  • Europe needs to achieve overhaul of bank business model

Challenge: how to make finance more inclusive

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Resources: blogs, ppt, video, research

13

The

Economic Resilience Finance and Inclusive Growth Global Forum on Productivity

Research teams: Boris Cournède, Alain de Serres, Guiseppe Nicoletti, Peter Hoeller, Oliver Denk, Aida Caldera Sanchez, Priscilla Fialho, Filippo Gori, Dan Andrews, Chiara Criscuolo, Valentine Millot, Muge Adalet McGown, Serdar Celik